These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Taiwanistan
#1981 - 2012-01-02 02:51:23 UTC
Beaches wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:
it's 2012 and you are still butt hurt about those pranks?


It's 2012 and this game company can't manage to put two avatars in a room.

so?

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Beaches
#1982 - 2012-01-02 02:51:59 UTC
I set that snipe up and that's the best you could do?

"so?" Roll
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#1983 - 2012-01-02 02:53:57 UTC
Beaches wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:
it's 2012 and you are still butt hurt about those pranks?


It's 2012 and this game company can't manage to put two avatars in a room.


I humbly suggest that you check out Planet Calypso (which is F2P) so you can see what the limitations of multi-avatar gaming involves using the very latest in available licensable technology

What CCP had in mind was very ambitious, but cannot be achieved using present tech.

☼

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.
Beaches
#1984 - 2012-01-02 02:58:16 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:


I humbly suggest that you check out Planet Calypso (which is F2P) so you can see what the limitations of multi-avatar gaming involves using the very latest in available licensable technology

What CCP had in mind was very ambitious, but cannot be achieved using present tech.




That game actually is somewhat intriguing from the 20 seconds I've looked at it.

Thanks
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#1985 - 2012-01-02 03:03:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
Beaches wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:


I humbly suggest that you check out Planet Calypso (which is F2P) so you can see what the limitations of multi-avatar gaming involves using the very latest in available licensable technology

What CCP had in mind was very ambitious, but cannot be achieved using present tech.




That game actually is somewhat intriguing from the 20 seconds I've looked at it.

Thanks


It's fun for about a week, then you have to get out your wallet. Then you (probably) figure out no matter how much you spend, there you are.

That, and the WIS (full body avatar) part of the game revolves mostly around emoting when you are not "playing".

The avatar graphics also suck, but you can purchase sunglasses and vanity items to offset that .

☼

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.
Beaches
#1986 - 2012-01-02 03:12:53 UTC
Yeah in this thread they talk about how much RM they spend, damn.
Taiwanistan
#1987 - 2012-01-02 03:31:18 UTC
but if you are up for it you can make serious RL cash, and all legally within game mechanics

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Kuronaga
The Dead Parrot Shoppe Inc.
The Chicken Coop
#1988 - 2012-01-02 03:52:12 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
it's 2012 and you are still butt hurt about those pranks?


On the contrary I thought they were awesome.

I am bound by strict code of e-honour to call bullshit when I see it, though.
Mistrala DeLegra
Novus Alba FerrumSus
#1989 - 2012-01-02 04:19:38 UTC
Yes plase CCP finish what you started and set us free from this prison cell you call CQ, open the door and give us public space's!!!!!
Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
#1990 - 2012-01-02 04:28:31 UTC
Mistrala DeLegra wrote:
Yes plase CCP finish what you started and set us free from this prison cell you call CQ, open the door and give us public space's!!!!!


AMEN!! They don't even have to be terribly elaborate either. Just give us something where our avatars can all frolic together!

On a scale of "Aww, how sad." to "Wtf", how weird is it that I sit in my CQ doing nothing constantly wishing there were other people around?
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#1991 - 2012-01-02 04:34:24 UTC
Baby ChuChu wrote:
Mistrala DeLegra wrote:
Yes plase CCP finish what you started and set us free from this prison cell you call CQ, open the door and give us public space's!!!!!


AMEN!! They don't even have to be terribly elaborate either. Just give us something where our avatars can all frolic together!

On a scale of "Aww, how sad." to "Wtf", how weird is it that I sit in my CQ doing nothing constantly wishing there were other people around?


Try the undock button (bottom left) .. USE IT!

☼

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.
Taiwanistan
#1992 - 2012-01-02 04:40:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Taiwanistan
Baby ChuChu wrote:
Mistrala DeLegra wrote:
Yes plase CCP finish what you started and set us free from this prison cell you call CQ, open the door and give us public space's!!!!!


AMEN!! They don't even have to be terribly elaborate either. Just give us something where our avatars can all frolic together!

On a scale of "Aww, how sad." to "Wtf", how weird is it that I sit in my CQ doing nothing constantly wishing there were other people around?

why do you even play this game
*edit you also sound like the typical dumb barbie lover

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Mistrala DeLegra
Novus Alba FerrumSus
#1993 - 2012-01-02 04:51:32 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
Baby ChuChu wrote:
Mistrala DeLegra wrote:
Yes plase CCP finish what you started and set us free from this prison cell you call CQ, open the door and give us public space's!!!!!


AMEN!! They don't even have to be terribly elaborate either. Just give us something where our avatars can all frolic together!

On a scale of "Aww, how sad." to "Wtf", how weird is it that I sit in my CQ doing nothing constantly wishing there were other people around?


Try the undock button (bottom left) .. USE IT!




Try the "Log off" button...... ESC> LOG OFF!....use it :)
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1994 - 2012-01-02 04:53:35 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Why another thread? This one is approaching 100 pages of asking for clarification.

Not even close to the 440+ page thread I linked a few pages ago of people who wanted CCP to focus on real EvE content and all that was posted in two or three days. This thread has been limping along for weeks and you look silly for 'demanding' an answer even though CCP has already answered you.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#1995 - 2012-01-02 05:04:11 UTC
Mistrala DeLegra wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
Baby ChuChu wrote:
Mistrala DeLegra wrote:
Yes plase CCP finish what you started and set us free from this prison cell you call CQ, open the door and give us public space's!!!!!


AMEN!! They don't even have to be terribly elaborate either. Just give us something where our avatars can all frolic together!

On a scale of "Aww, how sad." to "Wtf", how weird is it that I sit in my CQ doing nothing constantly wishing there were other people around?


Try the undock button (bottom left) .. USE IT!




Try the "Log off" button...... ESC> LOG OFF!....use it :)


I''m not the one whining for attention, so you go first.

☼

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1996 - 2012-01-02 05:06:02 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Why another thread? This one is approaching 100 pages of asking for clarification.

Not even close to the 440+ page thread I linked a few pages ago of people who wanted CCP to focus on real EvE content and all that was posted in two or three days. This thread has been limping along for weeks and you look silly for 'demanding' an answer even though CCP has already answered you.


Not even close to several thousand of pages of Bible..
yet totally unrelated.
Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
#1997 - 2012-01-02 05:12:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Baby ChuChu
Taiwanistan wrote:
Baby ChuChu wrote:
Mistrala DeLegra wrote:
Yes plase CCP finish what you started and set us free from this prison cell you call CQ, open the door and give us public space's!!!!!


AMEN!! They don't even have to be terribly elaborate either. Just give us something where our avatars can all frolic together!

On a scale of "Aww, how sad." to "Wtf", how weird is it that I sit in my CQ doing nothing constantly wishing there were other people around?

why do you even play this game
*edit you also sound like the typical dumb barbie lover


And you just sound plain dumb. Obviously I don't pay for the game just to sit in CQ all day. I play the game to fly some damn spaceships. That said, I do like idea/promise of what the CQ could be so when I do decide to just chill, I sit in my CQ chatting wishing other people around.

But hey, if that makes me a dumb barbie lover than so be it. I'll gladly be the biggest, dumb barbie lover in the game. Sorry that, even though I have no contact with you and could really give a s*** who you are, I'm somehow ruining you game experience, but this ain't burger king son. You can't have everything you way.
Taiwanistan
#1998 - 2012-01-02 05:18:38 UTC
one hour of dev time spent on your barbie crap is one less hour spent on FW, industry, etc etc etc
so when you frolic in your cq you frolic with hitler

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1999 - 2012-01-02 06:22:11 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
one hour of dev time spent on your barbie crap is one less hour spent on FW, industry, etc etc etc
so when you frolic in your cq you frolic with ******



at least we are not demanding to stop development on other aspects of this game ,we are just asking for a little bit of dev time
and of course we want to know if that is possible.
Crubicle was made in 6 weeks according to CCP so those little tweaks you want in FIS can easily be done in 6 months

R.S.I2014
Taiwanistan
#2000 - 2012-01-02 06:36:55 UTC
get it into your plastic barbie heads that wis is frivolous, useless, and needs to be put down like a lamed horse

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."