These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AF Bonus output from Chaos: Please don't do MWD!

First post
Author
Carl Krypp
Juiced.
#21 - 2011-12-25 17:52:22 UTC
I agree with this thread. Assault frigates should have their own more unique role, as opposed to being just a heavier tackle. The best way to do this would be to give them an AB bonus instead of a MWD bonus.
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2011-12-26 19:51:27 UTC
interceptors have MWD bonus ": 15% reduction in MicroWarpdrive signature radius penalty "

EAS have a bonus to MWD cap use. so they can keep up their EW

Assault ships should get a bonus to something having to do with afterburners. Personally I want one ship *the wolf* to have an anti web bonus, and the other *jag* to have a speed bonus. I think this would make things more interesting than all AS having the same afterburner bonus.

would it be possible to give them a 50% reduction to all EW? in coming and outgoing?

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

St Mio
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2011-12-27 11:12:09 UTC
Not that I like the MWD sig rad bonus, but 200% velocity bonus + AFs with oversized 10MN AB sounds like a terrible idea
To mare
Advanced Technology
#24 - 2011-12-27 21:59:37 UTC
no with the boost they recived (more fitting more slots 1 more bonus) they dont need a role bonus at all
a AB bonus would really make them OP making them untouchable by anything that dont use small guns and of course with the tank/gank they have they are no match for any ship that's supposed to use small guns
Solinuas
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2011-12-28 22:52:49 UTC
To mare wrote:
no with the boost they recived (more fitting more slots 1 more bonus) they dont need a role bonus at all
a AB bonus would really make them OP making them untouchable by anything that dont use small guns and of course with the tank/gank they have they are no match for any ship that's supposed to use small guns

Or i could, you know grab my vindicator dual 90% webs comes to a 99% velocity loss, so going 2km/s thats now, what 20m/s? or grab a curse and neut the AB off, or grab my loki and blap it at 30km after webbing it twice, there is still larger solutions, many of them, some even BS sized.
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2011-12-30 11:31:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Grimpak
Solinuas wrote:
To mare wrote:
no with the boost they recived (more fitting more slots 1 more bonus) they dont need a role bonus at all
a AB bonus would really make them OP making them untouchable by anything that dont use small guns and of course with the tank/gank they have they are no match for any ship that's supposed to use small guns

Or i could, you know grab my vindicator dual 90% webs comes to a 99% velocity loss, so going 2km/s thats now, what 20m/s? or grab a curse and neut the AB off, or grab my loki and blap it at 30km after webbing it twice, there is still larger solutions, many of them, some even BS sized.



with an AB boost bonus, why use an interceptor at all? AF's have bigger EHP, can project damage farther and in some cases, outdamage the attacker inties, even with the lower speed and agility, since your sig is much smaller than a mwd'ing interceptor.


that was one of the reasons why the AB bonus was shot down. the other reason was that it would make good AF's too good and the bad AF's not good enough.


repeat after me: blanket bonuses are not good.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
#27 - 2011-12-30 12:05:39 UTC
CCP tried an AB speed bonus on Sisi. It was an unsuccessful experiment. We just ended up with 4 km/s untackle-able Jaguars easymoding around, it just made the good AFs better without helping the bad ones - or the ones designed to operate at range.

A blanket AB bonus could conceivably work, but it would require very careful balancing of AF speed - meaning taking the nerfhammer to the Jaguar and Ishkur, basically.

Also, whatever happens to the AFs, afterwards lol Worm?
Lucas Quaan
DEMONS OF THE HIDDEN MIST
TRUTH. HONOUR. LIGHT.
#28 - 2011-12-30 15:57:30 UTC
St Mio wrote:
AFs with oversized 10MN AB sounds like a terrible idea

That was the problem last time and unless the bonus is restricted to 1MN ABs then it's a bad idea this time too. Although I would very much like to see one at maybe 50%, not 200% that is way over the top.
Zagdul
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2011-12-30 16:59:30 UTC
Lucas Quaan wrote:
St Mio wrote:
AFs with oversized 10MN AB sounds like a terrible idea

That was the problem last time and unless the bonus is restricted to 1MN ABs then it's a bad idea this time too. Although I would very much like to see one at maybe 50%, not 200% that is way over the top.


So make it 100%.

Or even 50%, just something to make it unique.

Dual Pane idea: Click!

CCP Please Implement

CobaltSixty
Fawkes' Loyal Professionals
#30 - 2011-12-30 22:25:36 UTC
Role Bonus: -80% to powergrid requirements of 10MN afterburners.
Everything else falls into place - gives a strong inertia and cap-usage penalty for 1700-2200m/s speeds.
Ninevite
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-01-01 20:45:34 UTC
As someone who flys Ishkurs exclusively, I agree an AB boost would be better than an MWD boost. AFs are already difficult to fit with an AB a MWD would make it even worse. Additionally, I find AFs to be too slow for an MWD to matter anyway; a lot can outrun you even though you're in a frigate. An AB would help more to give assault frigates some extra advantage when engaging at close range, which makes sense as they are supposed to be the kings of close range frigate fights.

CCP just listen to us on this one PLEASE
Ninevite
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2012-01-01 20:50:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Ninevite
Gypsio III wrote:
CCP tried an AB speed bonus on Sisi. It was an unsuccessful experiment. We just ended up with 4 km/s untackle-able Jag

A blanket AB bonus could conceivably work, but it would require very careful balancing of AF speed - meaning taking the nerfhammer to the Jaguar and Ishkur, basically.


Ishkurs are the slowest AF...and the others aren't that quick either

Maybe 4 km/s jaguars suggests that Jaguars are broken, not the other AFs. Just a thought

It doesn't make sense to give AFs a MWD bonus that no one wants and no one will really be able to use considering fitting requirements
EI Digin
irc.zulusquad.org
#33 - 2012-01-02 04:56:30 UTC
As much as I think assault frigs should be for straight up brawls, you shouldn't make MWDs on assault frigates completely obsolete. I think that the current MWD bonus unfairly boosts a style of fitting that isn't widely accepted, or useful for that matter. If you were to boost speed, how about a straight speed bonus to make both AB *AND* MWD assault frigates viable? The more options you give to people, the better.

However, I think that speed should not be boosted too much, because then you encroach on the job that interceptors do. EHP and general battle survivability are things that should be addressed, not speed.
Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy
#34 - 2012-01-02 10:19:35 UTC
MWD's on assault frigates (and everything else) should be a choice - Using afterburners should not feel like like a downgrade on anything... I totally agree with an AB bonus on assault frigates as long they will not be able to fit 10mn afterburners without at least sacrificing everything else and have the acceleration of a turtle.
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#35 - 2012-01-02 13:34:24 UTC
The fail is positively bubbling to the surface in this one.

Recap for the failures:
- 3 years ago or there about, CCP added a blanket AB speed bonus to AFs and had the concept tested on SiSi.
- Prior to SiSi testing the players cursed with common sense argued that it would make them so hilariously OP that not only would nothing else be used except in blobs but pilots would never be able to stop laughing maniacally when flying them.
- We (yes, I am burdened with common sense) further argued that it would widen the performance gaps within the AF class to an untenable degree.
- Testing proved both points to be bang on in all respects .. common sense: 2, Idiocy: 0.

Now you suggest a bonus that is even higher than the one tested in addition to added slots and tanks?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha,
/me takes in extra air
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha.....
thoth rothschild
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-01-02 16:32:44 UTC
i like the idea of the -80 % pg/cpu bonus to 10mn afterburner.
Not to massive boost. Has some ncie drawbacks and doesn't make the ship to fast.

+1 from me.
Zagdul
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2012-01-02 16:38:36 UTC
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
The fail is positively bubbling to the surface in this one.

Recap for the failures:
- 3 years ago or there about, CCP added a blanket AB speed bonus to AFs and had the concept tested on SiSi.
- Prior to SiSi testing the players cursed with common sense argued that it would make them so hilariously OP that not only would nothing else be used except in blobs but pilots would never be able to stop laughing maniacally when flying them.
- We (yes, I am burdened with common sense) further argued that it would widen the performance gaps within the AF class to an untenable degree.
- Testing proved both points to be bang on in all respects .. common sense: 2, Idiocy: 0.

Now you suggest a bonus that is even higher than the one tested in addition to added slots and tanks?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha,
/me takes in extra air
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha.....

So balance the AB bonus so it's not OP?

You can still give the ship an AB bonus that's balanced, just suggest how to balance it instead of being a douche.

Dual Pane idea: Click!

CCP Please Implement

Mors Sanctitatis
Death of Virtue
#38 - 2012-01-02 23:06:34 UTC
Zagdul wrote:
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
The fail is positively bubbling to the surface in this one.

Recap for the failures:
- 3 years ago or there about, CCP added a blanket AB speed bonus to AFs and had the concept tested on SiSi.
- Prior to SiSi testing the players cursed with common sense argued that it would make them so hilariously OP that not only would nothing else be used except in blobs but pilots would never be able to stop laughing maniacally when flying them.
- We (yes, I am burdened with common sense) further argued that it would widen the performance gaps within the AF class to an untenable degree.
- Testing proved both points to be bang on in all respects .. common sense: 2, Idiocy: 0.

Now you suggest a bonus that is even higher than the one tested in addition to added slots and tanks?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha,
/me takes in extra air
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha.....

So balance the AB bonus so it's not OP?

You can still give the ship an AB bonus that's balanced, just suggest how to balance it instead of being a douche.



#1, What Hirana says is true.

#2, I think that a 5% increase to AB speed per level of AF skill (25% total at level 5) would be sufficient.

The point of AFs is to tackle large ships at ultra-short range. Sure, they can be used for other roles, but this is what they should be tailored to. Of course they're not going to be able to run down other frigs, and they shouldn't. Get an interceptor for that.

But, get an AF under a big ships guns (Cruiser or larger) and they should be able to shred them apart bit by bit. I soloed a Tempest with an Ishkur once about (literally) 4+ years ago, maybe even 5; I still remember the kill. It was quite an accomplishment at the time and I want to see those days return again, but at the same time we can't create another Dramiel situation...
Lucas Quaan
DEMONS OF THE HIDDEN MIST
TRUTH. HONOUR. LIGHT.
#39 - 2012-01-02 23:40:48 UTC
Mors Sanctitatis wrote:
#2, I think that a 5% increase to AB speed per level of AF skill (25% total at level 5) would be sufficient.

This is a lot more reasonable.

The problem with the AB bonus last time was always the amount (75%) and the 10MN setups on certain ships; for the record, this was the discussion back then http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1179512/page/1. Conceptually there's nothing wrong with it, because it does help with the role as sturdier tackle. It also doesn't step on the toes of Interceptors, who get to keep their bonus exclusive.
Burseg Sardaukar
Free State Project
#40 - 2012-01-03 02:09:31 UTC
The best pieces I've read in here:

The 50% MWD sig radius bonus should be an EAF thing, absolutely.

The AF bonus should be AB speed based, or Web immunity.

These are amazing ideas.

Can't wait to dual box my Dust toon and EVE toon on the same machine!