These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Citadel Question - W-Space rules

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Justin Cody
War Firm
#1 - 2015-08-02 21:49:19 UTC
Regarding XL sized Citadels...will W-space people be able to have DD's and/or Fighter bomber bays for them?
Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2015-08-02 22:01:36 UTC
XL will require sov
Ripblade Falconpunch
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2015-08-02 22:11:27 UTC
Bronya Boga wrote:
XL will require sov


What Bronya said. The last official word was that Large will be the biggest one you can build in a WH.
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
xX SERENITY Xx
#4 - 2015-08-02 23:53:29 UTC
well large citadel will be only largest for wspace use the XL one will need sovergnity . wondering only if the wormhole citadels will be entosis-able . if so how we will deal with trollceptors .
Justin Cody
War Firm
#5 - 2015-08-03 03:28:29 UTC
Bronya Boga wrote:
XL will require sov


well screw sort dragon
Winthorp
#6 - 2015-08-03 04:48:00 UTC
Devblog will be out in a few days at most. But the impression i got from the structures slack channel and CCP's responses in there, if i recall Nullarbors words were "If you can get it in a WH you can use it in a WH".
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#7 - 2015-08-03 06:24:32 UTC
That's called the Girlfriend Principle

~~ Localectomy Blog ~~
calaretu
Honestly We didnt know
#8 - 2015-08-03 06:47:34 UTC
Can confirm that Nullarbor stated that as long as you can get the citadel somewhere, you can deploy it. No sov required.
Also no citadels in shattered wormholes unless Fozzie change his mind about them

~Bringer of happiness

http://collapsedbehind.blogspot.no/
Winthorp
#9 - 2015-08-03 06:57:08 UTC
But the devil is in the detail. And i expect us to be gobsmacked by a lot of other **** when devblog is out.
Bleedingthrough
#10 - 2015-08-03 10:23:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Bleedingthrough
They keep the Blog somewhat up to date.
Bleedingthrough
#11 - 2015-08-03 10:39:57 UTC
Winthorp wrote:
But the devil is in the detail.


I got the feeling that they realy want to get this right.
These new POSes are specifically designed to live in ... ergo: for us!
Let's hope they don't listen too much to these null lobbyists and more to people that have a clue like corbex.
Winthorp
#12 - 2015-08-03 10:45:30 UTC
Bleedingthrough wrote:
Winthorp wrote:
But the devil is in the detail.


I got the feeling that they realy want to get this right.
These new POSes are specifically designed to live in ... ergo: for us!
Let's hope they don't listen too much to these null lobbyists and more to people that have a clue like corbex.


I really hope i am wrong but the general feel i got from things was i wasn't going to like it at all.
corbexx
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2015-08-03 19:50:12 UTC
any size can go anywhere at the moment.

I've also pointed this in the way of CCP Nullarbor (well he actually asked for a link).

Corbexx for CSM X - Wormholes still deserve better
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#14 - 2015-08-03 19:57:33 UTC
XL in WH the dream. I can REALLY have a fortress now.

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
O'nira
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#15 - 2015-08-04 02:17:58 UTC
i'm really worried i won't like anything about the new structures.
Borg Stoneson
SWARTA
#16 - 2015-08-04 05:56:24 UTC
It does seem like the structures are going to be either great or terrible for us WH dwellers. No middle ground.

I don't mean good/bad in terms of finding targets/hiding from targets. I mean for basic functionality and actually living in. The fact that they'll either be so OP that even the largest groups will struggle to take them from even a 1guy and his alt corp or they'll be undefendable and impossible to remove assets from when there's even a modest attempt to camp it and will just be a pinyata to larger groups.
Sarah Jaxson
30plus
#17 - 2015-08-04 11:07:03 UTC
Im more interested to see the fuel requirements. From what i have read, they are not supposed to be tied to race, but will that change the fuel mechanic and should i start selling off all my fuel blocks now?
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#18 - 2015-08-04 12:36:52 UTC
Borg Stoneson wrote:
It does seem like the structures are going to be either great or terrible for us WH dwellers. No middle ground.

I don't mean good/bad in terms of finding targets/hiding from targets. I mean for basic functionality and actually living in. The fact that they'll either be so OP that even the largest groups will struggle to take them from even a 1guy and his alt corp or they'll be undefendable and impossible to remove assets from when there's even a modest attempt to camp it and will just be a pinyata to larger groups.


Doubt it won't be comparable to a POS. Replace FF with mooring area most likely and defenses are fitted, not anchored. Could easily imagine this to behave a bit like *traffic control* on a wormhole, when you jump and the client goes unresponsive, you got the jump animation but your ship remains in space until you relog. Just taht it's moored, so people can watch you while you do citadel-things without worrying.
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#19 - 2015-08-04 12:58:43 UTC
O'nira wrote:
i'm really worried i won't like anything about the new structures.

oh no let's tell CCP, then they can cater directly to your desiresRoll

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
unimatrix0030
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2015-08-04 14:54:18 UTC  |  Edited by: unimatrix0030
Sarah Jaxson wrote:
Im more interested to see the fuel requirements. From what i have read, they are not supposed to be tied to race, but will that change the fuel mechanic and should i start selling off all my fuel blocks now?

The stuctures themselfs will not need fuel but the services on them will.
Well that was what i last read about it anyway.
XL in wh's? Not sure if that will be good. There is to little info yet .
I hope we will get more info soon.

No local in null sec would fix everything!
123Next pageLast page