These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

A solution for Fozziesov

Author
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#1 - 2015-08-01 10:55:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Zloco Crendraven
Just make Battlecruiser hulls (Command ships also) the only viable for entosising and most of the problems would be solved. Leave frigates-cruisers to be a support force for taking sov and not the main one.

I know CCP doesnt want to limit number of tactics but like it is now there is only one tactic and it is the trollceptors. Playing with the battlecruiser fits ppl can still get a pretty fast ship to roam around and entosis stuff but it surely wont be this insane. There will still be lots of frigates-cruisers around supporting the BCS if there is no significant oposition.

But the situation that is now is just too easy for attackers to troll. If you want to defend your sov from trolling a simple gate camp can do it or a fast reaction to catch a BC which is a much slower ship than a ceptor.

We would suddenly see much more small gangs escorting the BCs to entosis stuff which is really good.

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

Xe'Cara'eos
A Big Enough Lever
#2 - 2015-08-01 11:41:13 UTC
a better solution to solve the BC woes would be to give them a range bonus like destroyers have (excluding attack BC's) so they play the same meta to cruisers that destroyers currently do to frigates. The above would also solve the current underuse of BS's that I see an awful lot of people complaining about.....

regarding fixing the sov........ trollceptors are easily solved by a rook sat by your vulnerable structures, with (if you really need it) a couple of logi cruisers

the other problem with interceptors is that the fastest ship in the game also has immunity to bubbles - not right (if logical).

For posting an idea into F&I: come up with idea, try and think how people could abuse this, try to fix your idea - loop the process until you can't see how it could be abused, then post to the forums to let us figure out how to abuse it..... If your idea can be abused, it [u]WILL[/u] be.

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#3 - 2015-08-02 12:40:04 UTC
Xe'Cara'eos wrote:
a better solution to solve the BC woes would be to give them a range bonus like destroyers have (excluding attack BC's) so they play the same meta to cruisers that destroyers currently do to frigates. The above would also solve the current underuse of BS's that I see an awful lot of people complaining about.....

regarding fixing the sov........ trollceptors are easily solved by a rook sat by your vulnerable structures, with (if you really need it) a couple of logi cruisers

the other problem with interceptors is that the fastest ship in the game also has immunity to bubbles - not right (if logical).


That's is not a bad idea either.

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2015-08-02 12:57:05 UTC
Having people in the space you own also helps, so I hear.
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#5 - 2015-08-02 13:34:33 UTC
afkalt wrote:
Having people in the space you own also helps, so I hear.



stop making sense.


Op yes the troll captor is immune to bubble. So it burns through your bubble and does entosis. Its escort is stuck in the bubble. Kill them in the bubble, e-war the inty, have a nice day.

Even a plain ole eaf is shutting down the troll captor. I am sure a 1000+ man crew can find a few pilots of these.

Also not seeing how BC's help here. Weaker sensors...easier to jam. easier to hit too. Troll ceptor seems to be working only because people cba to run counters against them. If you can't scare up just one ship with strong e-war to shut down the entosis....is this gong to change with a BC? Not really.


Long ago I messed up a titan bridge back home in a bc. Did not right click jump in time....titan jumped everyone else then jumped himself. What followed was a rather long 30 system hike back home, in a drake (not even nano fit), that I lived to make back home. Clear skies all the way home. Starting from hostile space. Apparently not one resident in say 25 systems not controlled by us could be assed to run even a basic camp or patrol to catch a very easy drake kill.
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#6 - 2015-08-02 17:34:00 UTC
Zan Shiro wrote:
afkalt wrote:
Having people in the space you own also helps, so I hear.



stop making sense.


Op yes the troll captor is immune to bubble. So it burns through your bubble and does entosis. Its escort is stuck in the bubble. Kill them in the bubble, e-war the inty, have a nice day.

Even a plain ole eaf is shutting down the troll captor. I am sure a 1000+ man crew can find a few pilots of these.

Also not seeing how BC's help here. Weaker sensors...easier to jam. easier to hit too. Troll ceptor seems to be working only because people cba to run counters against them. If you can't scare up just one ship with strong e-war to shut down the entosis....is this gong to change with a BC? Not really.


Long ago I messed up a titan bridge back home in a bc. Did not right click jump in time....titan jumped everyone else then jumped himself. What followed was a rather long 30 system hike back home, in a drake (not even nano fit), that I lived to make back home. Clear skies all the way home. Starting from hostile space. Apparently not one resident in say 25 systems not controlled by us could be assed to run even a basic camp or patrol to catch a very easy drake kill.


Still BC is a better option than it is now.

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

M1k3y Koontz
House of Musashi
Stay Feral
#7 - 2015-08-02 17:56:27 UTC
This was suggested in the original thread about fozziesov. CCP shot it down because they don't want to artificially require the use of certain ships.

/thread

How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.

elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#8 - 2015-08-02 19:15:28 UTC
M1k3y Koontz wrote:
This was suggested in the original thread about fozziesov. CCP shot it down because they don't want to artificially require the use of certain ships.

/thread


Does that mean you cannot defend your space with 38382874756563 titans and soobers anymore and are required to fly a real boat?

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#9 - 2015-08-02 22:19:22 UTC
Zloco Crendraven wrote:

Still BC is a better option than it is now.



Thing is I will admit BC's need a role. Just not this one.


Moving target stuck in entosis not a role I want for this boat. It be a crap job. It give me flashbacks to the days I flew drakes in apoc. Where upon the fc would see the couple of us (it was harb and cane heavy those days) and go umm yeah, I linked a fit, run it now please. And before even opening it up you knew what the fit was. Bait drake....shall I fake surprise? Yay... another night of playing punching bag to sucker targets in.

The role I'd like to see is more in tune with what they were long ago. Feared combat ships. The dreaded dual neut o cane for example. this was a role, making frigates and cruisers hate life if they wandered into range to be double tapped by neuts. granted unbalanced...but something along these line is the role I'd like see returned. Not right click, press orbit and spin till cycles done or ship shot out of the sky.
Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort
#10 - 2015-08-02 23:00:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Nasar Vyron
The whole idea of claiming sov with the entosis was that they controlled the grid. In which case requiring the attacker to field a BC or larger shouldn't make a difference in these "dead" systems. The problem is people don't want to risk assets and they feel requiring larger ships than a frigate is somehow a "barrier to entry." I ask, to who? Who would be barred from entering the sov game if they were required to field something worth more than a frigate to launch their attack? If that's the best they can bring to bear then they really don't deserve the sov anymore than the person refusing to defend it. Their sov bills alone to hold that system are likely costing them more than your little trollceptor.

And if we're going to call fitting an entosis to a BC or larger an "artificial barrier" then I want to fit a covert cyno to my Ibis, or put DCUs on my Domi, or a Warp Disruption Field Gen to my Snake. Those ship role bonuses are are artificial barriers put to to disallow other ship types which could fit a module from doing so for the sake of balance. Making such a requirement on the entosis would be no different and would fit in just fine for the sake of game balance.

Players who can only fly a frigate should be protecting the players who are doing the heavy lifting to take the sov, not playing the main role. As if expecting them to fly a BC before they enter null space sov games is asking too much anyway. The player base needs to break out of this Frigates/Cruisers Online mentality so it can actually grow and regain it's depth again.
Rayzilla Zaraki
Yin Jian Enterprises
#11 - 2015-08-02 23:25:26 UTC
It seems weird to me that a ship made to have pretty much all engine (Interceptor) also has the computing power to use an Entosis Link to take over an enemy structure.

I think CCP is trying to please too many people with this and, by doing so, will likely fail to please anyone.

Let's face it, SOV is for the big Alliances, not the small band of corporations who don't live online. There is no real reason to make Entosis Links useable by everyone in every ship with the fitting stats to use them. Or, to be more exact, there is no real reason that EVERY Entosis Link should be able to be used to capture SOV.

I understand players have used the Entosis Links on the Jove Observatories and possibly other structures to gather data. As an explorer, I would like that to remain. However, as an explorer in a small corporation, I have absolutely zero use for the SOV aspects of the Entosis Link.

I also reject the idea that it is bad to pigeon-hole certain activities or abilities to certain ships. CovOps Cloak and Cyno, Warfare/Mining Links, Interdiction Probes are all restricted to certain ships and the game isn't coming apart at the seams because of it.

I think that in order to use an Entosis Link for the hostile takeover of structures a bigger ship with powerful computers is necessary. So, the Command Ships fit that pretty well, I think. Each empire has one, plus, give one to each pirate faction, too. They will probably need tweaking in order to fit the role as needed, but I agree that they are a good fit.

Then, split the Entosis Links into militarized and civilian versions. The militarized ones have longer range and are powerful enough to take enemy structures, while the civilian ones are good for setting up your own structures and possibly some exploration. Give each a T1 and T2 variant.

Going down this route should accomplish all that CCP wanted to do with the Entosis Links while limiting the crazy tactic of tollcepting. It is a nonsensical form of gameplay, anyway.

Gate campers are just Carebears with anger issues.

Justin Cody
War Firm
#12 - 2015-08-03 03:36:00 UTC
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
Just make Battlecruiser hulls (Command ships also) the only viable for entosising and most of the problems would be solved. Leave frigates-cruisers to be a support force for taking sov and not the main one.

I know CCP doesnt want to limit number of tactics but like it is now there is only one tactic and it is the trollceptors. Playing with the battlecruiser fits ppl can still get a pretty fast ship to roam around and entosis stuff but it surely wont be this insane. There will still be lots of frigates-cruisers around supporting the BCS if there is no significant oposition.

But the situation that is now is just too easy for attackers to troll. If you want to defend your sov from trolling a simple gate camp can do it or a fast reaction to catch a BC which is a much slower ship than a ceptor.

We would suddenly see much more small gangs escorting the BCs to entosis stuff which is really good.


It isn't a bad idea to give an entosis role to some sort of ship. Perhaps a new class eventually will specialize in it like say a Tech 3 BC. But adding another layer to command ships and bc's in general will just make only the most tank-heavy useful. Yes I realize a T3 BC would probably feature more tank, but there could be other factors to it such as a beneficial entosis multiplier (- 10% / level entosis link cycle time - level) as an example.

Doesn't have to be a t3 bc either...perhaps a new T2 Battleship class or a role for the battleships as they are now...which are also underused as ship classes go (not counting the navpoc). I mean whats the last time you saw a Scorpion fleet?
Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#13 - 2015-08-03 06:45:47 UTC
Rayzilla Zaraki wrote:

Let's face it, SOV is for the big Alliances, not the small band of corporations who don't live online. There is no real reason to make Entosis Links useable by everyone in every ship with the fitting stats to use them. Or, to be more exact, there is no real reason that EVERY Entosis Link should be able to be used to capture SOV.



There is also no real reason to blow up people mining if you have no intent of using the space or even bothering to loot the ship but is a cherished form of game play that miners could easily claim is trolling but is it, no and neither is your so called problem with frigates. That you are either lazy or incompetent is no reason for changes to game mechanics.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2015-08-03 07:05:26 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
Nasar Vyron wrote:
The whole idea of claiming sov with the entosis was that they controlled the grid. In which case requiring the attacker to field a BC or larger shouldn't make a difference in these "dead" systems. The problem is people don't want to risk assets and they feel requiring larger ships than a frigate is somehow a "barrier to entry." I ask, to who? Who would be barred from entering the sov game if they were required to field something worth more than a frigate to launch their attack? If that's the best they can bring to bear then they really don't deserve the sov anymore than the person refusing to defend it. Their sov bills alone to hold that system are likely costing them more than your little trollceptor.

And if we're going to call fitting an entosis to a BC or larger an "artificial barrier" then I want to fit a covert cyno to my Ibis, or put DCUs on my Domi, or a Warp Disruption Field Gen to my Snake. Those ship role bonuses are are artificial barriers put to to disallow other ship types which could fit a module from doing so for the sake of balance. Making such a requirement on the entosis would be no different and would fit in just fine for the sake of game balance.

Players who can only fly a frigate should be protecting the players who are doing the heavy lifting to take the sov, not playing the main role. As if expecting them to fly a BC before they enter null space sov games is asking too much anyway. The player base needs to break out of this Frigates/Cruisers Online mentality so it can actually grow and regain it's depth again.


If they're actually taking sov in small ships, without a fight, that should tell you something.

If you actually LIVE in your space, it's not a problem.

Again I shall point to the (much maligned on here) CFC and their lack of space loss or timers. Because they LIVE there.



I think the question you OUGHT to be asking is if one guy in his interceptor is taking space from you, what the hell are you doing with it in the first place?
Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort
#15 - 2015-08-03 07:09:05 UTC
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
There is also no real reason to blow up people mining if you have no intent of using the space or even bothering to loot the ship but is a cherished form of game play that miners could easily claim is trolling but is it, no and neither is your so called problem with frigates. That you are either lazy or incompetent is no reason for changes to game mechanics.


You cannot compare blowing up a solo miner with disrupting alliance level sovereignty... They are in no way the same thing.

....
..........
....
..........
....

Was going to write more, but then I realized if you can't grasp that much there's no point.
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#16 - 2015-08-03 07:16:41 UTC
Nasar Vyron wrote:
...........some blurrbbhh..............

Was going to write more, but then I realized if you can't grasp that much there's no point.


Suitonia did show on youtube how to solo sov he didn't want on youtube for mankind to watch and you are complaining that you should be safe from a frigate attack?

I could be wrong but I think you don't comprehend what we are saying. You want your ratting space in null, cool, no go defend it. There might be a solo-wtf-bbq-totally-overpowered-pimp-pwn-death machine out there to take it from you.

Or in other words, if you cannot solo a frigate you don't belong there in the first place. Highsec might be just right for you.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort
#17 - 2015-08-03 07:23:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Nasar Vyron
afkalt wrote:

If they're actually taking sov in small ships, without a fight, that should tell you something.

If you actually LIVE in your space, it's not a problem.

Again I shall point to the (much maligned on here) CFC and their lack of space loss or timers. Because they LIVE there.



I think the question you OUGHT to be asking is if one guy in his interceptor is taking space from you, what the hell are you doing with it in the first place?



They aren't, they're merely causing timers. They are being allowed to disrupt with no intention to follow through. It's not a case of blue balling, it's simply trolling alliance level play because they can now.

Playing chase the ceptor isn't fun content and the number of people willing to do such a thing are few and far between no matter the alliance you're a part of. It's much easier to let them do it and take back the timer you know they wont show up for. Maybe then you can actually see a fight or catch the ceptors since you know exactly where they'll be going. At least then it's not 4+ hours of standby duty EVERY DAY, it's just however long it takes to recapture nodes when something does get hit just like when a POS gets hit. You typically go to fight the RF, not try to flash form for the initial attack.

Same exact logic, similar game play, just now being kicked off by an individual who can zip around and through your defenses rather than an entire fleet.
Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#18 - 2015-08-03 08:35:37 UTC
Stop complaining about Fozziesov. Been working great down in Provi.
Only issue we have is an infestation of bees. Need to hire or get some volunteer pest control to go spray their hive.

"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2015-08-03 08:55:39 UTC
Nasar Vyron wrote:
afkalt wrote:

If they're actually taking sov in small ships, without a fight, that should tell you something.

If you actually LIVE in your space, it's not a problem.

Again I shall point to the (much maligned on here) CFC and their lack of space loss or timers. Because they LIVE there.



I think the question you OUGHT to be asking is if one guy in his interceptor is taking space from you, what the hell are you doing with it in the first place?



They aren't, they're merely causing timers. They are being allowed to disrupt with no intention to follow through. It's not a case of blue balling, it's simply trolling alliance level play because they can now.

Playing chase the ceptor isn't fun content and the number of people willing to do such a thing are few and far between no matter the alliance you're a part of. It's much easier to let them do it and take back the timer you know they wont show up for. Maybe then you can actually see a fight or catch the ceptors since you know exactly where they'll be going. At least then it's not 4+ hours of standby duty EVERY DAY, it's just however long it takes to recapture nodes when something does get hit just like when a POS gets hit. You typically go to fight the RF, not try to flash form for the initial attack.

Same exact logic, similar game play, just now being kicked off by an individual who can zip around and through your defenses rather than an entire fleet.



I don't understand.

Why do you need to flash form to a ping if you're already active in the system?

It's a simple case of warp to structure and see what is there kill/remove threat.

It takes like...a minute or two.

If you need to flash form, surely you are not present in the system at the time and one of the huge angles of attack of this Sov version is to make people physically live in the owned space.



I would say I would not be adverse to a ping going out at spool up time so a quick response needs no counter entosis work. I might make a separate thread for this
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#20 - 2015-08-03 09:19:39 UTC
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Stop complaining about Fozziesov. Been working great down in Provi.
Only issue we have is an infestation of bees. Need to hire or get some volunteer pest control to go spray their hive.

I heard Tenal and Branch are wide open at the moment. INIT and RAZOR apparently like to look for content in Curse and enjoy alt/JCing for if someone timered their space.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

12Next page