Wormholes

I have lived in Wormholes since the beginning.

I now see it to be a normal thing to drop small towers on every moon that your not using so intruders can't
Come in and set a staging tower up un noticed.

These towers are a dead stick and I think there should be changes to this tactic.
I believe there should be a time period the towers either disapeer if not fueld and used or they automatically
Un anchore and becomes free game for whoever decides to scoop them up.

I think the same should for the defences and hardeners as well.

Maybe look at a 72 hr time period ?

If it's a tower with ship maintenance arrays or corporate hanger arrays with items still in them
Then they will need to be destroyed. Guns with ammo will be able to be accessed to loot
Then unachored if the tower is dead for the 72 hr time period.

Another option could allow these towers to be hacked and become your tower to do as you please.
One hacked the original owner won't know they lost the tower unless they physically check it.

I don't mine anymore but I still believe ore sites should be signatures needed to be scanned down. Why does gas sites need to
Be scanned but not ore?

so take oracle and shoot these towers i have 6 dead gallente larges in my wh and im confused much more if ccp deploy citadels and give time to players to sitch from pos to citadels poses will be deleted so best is to shoot them now untill you can

only thing that needed to happen was shields should go offline as well once pos goes offline.

its stupid how much hp a offline pos has

Just been having this debate with Nullarbor on slack, seems they are pretty sold on safe items for all.

So you will never lose a ship or module in a siege if you can just wait a while until the attackers leave and don't warp to your personal wreck as was the first design they thought of.

So it will be structures with no automated weapons but you won't lose anything when your structure is destroyed.

But well, think we will have to just wait and hope it isn't the case when the devblog comes out.

Hmm that sounds interesting.

I'm sure lazer hawks and others who rage roll and evict people won't like that mechanic at all

No loot from destroying them. Only issues I see is if those corps have a backup in a corporate hanger assuming they will allow them to be stored in them. If so then you get attacked lose your tower then wait for them to leave.

Warp to your loot and get your tower and drop a new one and already have all your loot,ships ect

I guess disincentivizing evictions is one way to get more people into WH space~

In my opinion, by making it to where things don't blow up and you lose items/ships from the pos being destroyed.

I think it will hurt the market for profits because if less things are destroyed then obviously less need for those items. It could lower some market items but then again how many poses are destroyed? And currently are there enough being destroyed to really have much of an affect at all?

No local in nullsec has also been brought up.

Could be interesting if they made no local in null unless you have some type of structure that scans ships entering systems that shows them in local. But in npc space local will always excest.

it's a perfectly cromulent word mate