These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Merge Archeology and Hacking

First post
Author
Vlad Draculesti
M4gnum P.I.
#41 - 2015-07-28 03:10:03 UTC
Banana1x wrote:
I agree that the meta games are identical and thus could be merged. But I'd rather a better mini game be designed. Something that will take more time and leave explorers completely vulnerable so i am able to warp in and kill them - or if they warp out immediately they are punished for not staying and getting killed by allowing me to steal the data probe that contains the loot from the can they just hacked.

It frustrates me greatly that they can cloak, can get all the money from doing a heap of those sites and probing and they keep warping away especially if they are aligned to something rather than orbiting / loop approaching the can.

It's not fair that people are able to make decent amounts of money and be almost immune to death due to being cloakey's when im spending an entire 30 seconds figuring out what site they are at and warping to them only for them to escape like every time because im TERRIbad. But if you implement the above idea chances are i'll get some kills!



Fixed that for you.
Ransu Asanari
Perkone
Caldari State
#42 - 2015-07-28 03:17:17 UTC
Hah seriously. I kill explorers in these sites all the time. I actually made a video about how I hunt them a while back (turn up the audio):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UdQF1Mu4vY
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#43 - 2015-07-28 03:48:33 UTC
Ransu Asanari wrote:
Hah seriously. I kill explorers in these sites all the time. I actually made a video about how I hunt them a while back (turn up the audio):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UdQF1Mu4vY


Good video. I've always been a huge fan of sitting within 5km of the tastiest can with a cloaked Eris.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

Scuzzy Logic
Space Spuds
#44 - 2015-07-28 03:52:06 UTC
I agree 100%.

Alternatively, give us a different minigame/experience for archeology.


...I miss mag signatures.
Banana1x
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2015-07-28 03:55:58 UTC
Vlad Draculesti wrote:
Banana1x wrote:
I agree that the meta games are identical and thus could be merged. But I'd rather a better mini game be designed. Something that will take more time and leave explorers completely vulnerable so i am able to warp in and kill them - or if they warp out immediately they are punished for not staying and getting killed by allowing me to steal the data probe that contains the loot from the can they just hacked.

It frustrates me greatly that they can cloak, can get all the money from doing a heap of those sites and probing and they keep warping away especially if they are aligned to something rather than orbiting / loop approaching the can.

It's not fair that people are able to make decent amounts of money and be almost immune to death due to being cloakey's when im spending an entire 30 seconds figuring out what site they are at and warping to them only for them to escape like every time because im TERRIbad. But if you implement the above idea chances are i'll get some kills!



Fixed that for you.

lol

I enjoy exploring too. As I stated before, the intent wasn't to add more steps or expose explorers to any more risk. The current mechanic requires you to go to each can and remain vulnerable while you hack it. This is just a slightly different mechanic with no more or less exposure for the sole purpose of varying the game play to make it interesting.
Not that Forumguy
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2015-07-28 04:36:17 UTC
What about people like myself who trained up both skills to five ? P.S... love all the +1 kissing up to a csm post
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#47 - 2015-07-28 04:44:24 UTC
Ransu Asanari wrote:


I'd suggest removing the NPC seeded skillbooks for T3 Strategic Cruisers, Subsystems, and T3 Destroyers. Have all of these skillbooks completely seeded from Sleeper Data Sites. This would give Sleeper Data Sites something unique to provide to market, and the scarcity would manage the price and CCP can easily tune the drop rates to make sure the skillbook prices don't go out of control. For a good example of how this works, take a look at the Neurotoxin Control and Neurotoxin Recovery skillbooks. They are both completely seeded from Nullsec Booster Gas Sites.



So the empire designed ships and sub-systems for those ship but somehow can't write a user manual for them? They design them but don't know how they work?
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#48 - 2015-07-28 04:46:20 UTC
Not that Forumguy wrote:
What about people like myself who trained up both skills to five ? P.S... love all the +1 kissing up to a csm post


Reading the last part of the OP where your "issue" was described was too hard for you.
Herr Esiq
Viziam
#49 - 2015-07-28 06:34:22 UTC
Great idea Chance, even though I have both skills at V, I fully agree. It makes no sense.
SpaceSaft
Almost Dangerous
Wolves Amongst Strangers
#50 - 2015-07-28 06:43:42 UTC  |  Edited by: SpaceSaft
You know what? No.

We all agree that the entire skill and attribute system needs change. The #1 thing people ask before getting into eve is "can I catch up" and the answer is "no but it doesn't matter that much." Great. We all know that's wrong to some degree. Hell, my character was born more than two years ago and I just now got into T2 cruisers because I did other stuff first. I sure would have liked to create content with more different ships in those two years.

The skillsystem is boring, it doesn't make much sense in many many cases, requires skill least of all and to single this problem with hacking and archeology out and remove it is a cop-out.

Here is a list of skills that don't make sense right now:

The market order skills. You train 4 different skills and lvl 4 and 5 bring next to nothing compared to the next 3 levels of the next skill.

It goes Trade 2 gives 4 per level -> Retail 5 gives 8 per level -> Wholesale 5 gives 16 per level -> Tycoon. gives 32 per level.

It's so crazy that it makes more sense to make an alt train these skills that complete tycoon 4 and 5.

The same problem exists with corporation membership skills.

It also exists, although not as extreme with industry and science job skills.

And Pi.

Anything that locks you out of using something that's essentially the same is the same has the issue with hacking and archeology: Racial shiphull skills, subsystems, guns to some degree. Like, once you have learned flying a ship or shooting a gun it's not like other races guns operate entirely differently.

Also it's worth mentioning the reddit post about those 10 mil skillpoints "core skills" that are literally 6 months filler that earn CCP cash. Or so they think, because they never see the cash of the people who just go away at the notion of "training" stupid stuff for 6 months before being able to do something interesting.

So advocate for a rework of the entire skillsystem please, not just the parts that inconvenience you personally.
Anthar Thebess
#51 - 2015-07-28 06:58:39 UTC
Something is wrong here.
Not a 'Shart' idea and CSM symbol ....
Stop talking this way or you will be re elected.
Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#52 - 2015-07-28 07:26:25 UTC
I don't explore
Thank it's the fact I dislike scanning.
But I could get behind this -

+1

On the skill side - merge the skills - add the SP from the merged skill to the primary skill. Any left over SP goes to the next highest skill in that skill group.
In the case the player has all skills in said great maxed out - allow them to spend as desired.

"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2015-07-28 07:35:41 UTC
Chance Ravinne wrote:
Rossi Tenmar wrote:
No.

It gives you so much easy ISK, it should take some time to train the skills.


Yes, "data sites make too much ISK" is the complaint of many an explorer.


Have you run the sleeper caches? They give a very nice return thank you very much :) The reason for the two modules is as I stated previously: enforced fitting choices. It also means you need to pick the correct analyzer on the correct can in a situation where even a few wasted seconds can blow the site (and your ship). I would also rather the hacks be differentiated but the separate skills and modules are fine.

Just a point on the calls to make explo easier for easy income for newbies. If we have a suddenly much simpler process and more people easily running sites the value of the goods from the sites will plummet. There has to be a balance and the sleeper cache system should be expanded to provide such. Use the same processes and layout to create escalations. Have the hack at such a level that hisec escalations can be followed by tech I analyzer skilled pilots, losec by more experienced hackers, null by tech II capable hackers.

Exploration should be made more involving not quicker and easier.
Matt Faithbringer
YOLO so no taxes please
#54 - 2015-07-28 07:52:37 UTC
Ransu Asanari wrote:
Short Answer

No, we don't need to merge these skills, or remove one branch. In fact, it wouldn't be worth the effort to do this.

Long Answer

There is a lot of complexity in the current system which is good. As others have pointed out, we have hard fitting choices when needing to fit both modules onto ships, we have T1 and T2 module and rig manufacturing, and different implants. For example, if you want to fit a T2 Data and Relic Analyzer on a decent Astero build, you either need to use a fitting module/rig, or a Sisters Core Probe Launcher.

The skill progression for Hacking and Archaeology is fairly shallow as well. I don't think it's beneficial to remove one of the skills and make the skill progression even more shallow. There is only the one skill for each Hacking and Archaeology to train to 5, and then you're done. There's no "Advanced" skill tree, or additional supplementary skills needed. We could even add in a skill, such as one that gives you more range to your hacking module. There is no need to give newbies a break, as a lot of the exploration sites can be done with a T1 hacking module and low skills.

Yes, the basic frigate skill is needed, cloaking, and scanning skills. But when you compare this to the depth of SP investment for mining (for example) to get to an Exhumer with T2 Strip Mining and Ice Lasers, you can see where the investment for Hacking/Archaeology really isn't that much. On top of that, the Astero/Stratios have made it easier to get into decently bonused ships much faster than having to train Frigate 5 and then Covert Ops.

CCP have cleverly created a new tier of exploration with the Sleeper Cache sites where it requires Hacking and Archaology 5 to leverage the SP investment , as well as very good scanning skills to access them. This puts a higher SP bar to access and complete these sites, as well as the more difficult ones requiring very good tanking skills, as well as Cruiser level ships such as a Stratios or T3 Cruiser.

The new Covert and Besieged Covert sites added also require one of the modules, as well as a good tank and DPS (in the case of defeating the Mordu's Legion ships).

On top of this we have the new Drifter Complexes which require two teams equipped with Data Analyzers to access the central Hive. This is probably more to CCP's intent in Odyssey with the "loot spew" (now removed) where they wanted Exploration activities that encouraged teamwork.

When you look at the effort involved in removing one of the modules, industry components, the skills, and modifying all of the sites - I just don't see the benefit to us as a result of this effort on the part of CCP.

More details on what actual changes we could use in next post.


I agree that there should be progression. So let's merge the skills. And add new skills, analyzer range (+1km per level?, I could even see +2km per level), virus strength (+2 / level), virus coherency (+3 / level). That would add more progression. Only thing needed would be probably making some higher end sites harded on the hacking part
Sarah Bonaparte
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#55 - 2015-07-28 09:14:28 UTC
if u want remove some skill in this ******* nightmare game is ok.

drop useless skill is the first step..
Slim Maken
Jerz Meymez Industry
#56 - 2015-07-28 10:09:31 UTC
This change would be a buff to the Nestor. So I'm all for it.
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2015-07-28 10:37:33 UTC
Slim Maken wrote:
This change would be a buff to the Nestor. So I'm all for it.


Nestor doesn't need a buff for this, it already has the slots to fit both analyzers and still have a good armour tank. Most people would use a tech III cruiser over the nestor for explo anyway when such a tank i required.
Mynxee
Signal Cartel
EvE-Scout Enclave
#58 - 2015-07-28 10:44:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Mynxee
The OP's core complaint is that there's not enough differentiation between data and relic hacking. No argument there but I am not fond of seeing opportunities for more interesting and varied gameplay eliminated by combining/homogenizing content. I'd much rather see data and relic sites have completely different hacking mini-games--one using the current interface, and the other using some different new one. There's a lot of potential to make the hacking mini-game super fun with interesting and challenging variants for each mini-game type. As addicting as it is, the hacking mini-game in its current form is overly repetitive and predictable after doing a few dozen sites. It was a good start to this kind of gameplay but could be so much better.

I would also like the cans to be unscannable. You should have to complete the hack to find out what's in a can.

Lost in space, looking for sigs...

Blog: Cloaky Wanderer

rofflesausage
State War Academy
Caldari State
#59 - 2015-07-28 10:49:29 UTC
Merge the modules, but make the new one scriptable. Different scripts for each type of site.

This allows for the sites to be differentiated if CCP get around to it, but also allows for newer types of sites by simply adding a new script to the game.

There is a lot you could do with this approach.
For example: Each of the pirate factions in nullsec drop scripts with a very low chance. These unlock acceleration gates of other pirate faction sites in other regions of nullsec. The scripts get consumed on use. These sites are valuable in terms of their rewards.

Scripts are really easy for current and new players to understand, and they offer lots of expandability.
Mynxee
Signal Cartel
EvE-Scout Enclave
#60 - 2015-07-28 10:52:07 UTC
rofflesausage wrote:
Merge the modules, but make the new one scriptable. Different scripts for each type of site.

This allows for the sites to be differentiated if CCP get around to it, but also allows for newer types of sites by simply adding a new script to the game.

There is a lot you could do with this approach.
For example: Each of the pirate factions in nullsec drop scripts with a very low chance. These unlock acceleration gates of other pirate faction sites in other regions of nullsec. The scripts get consumed on use. These sites are valuable in terms of their rewards.

Scripts are really easy for current and new players to understand, and they offer lots of expandability.


Great suggestion!

Lost in space, looking for sigs...

Blog: Cloaky Wanderer