These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Alliance PVP statistics and rankings for H1 2015
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Danmal
TYR.
Exodus.
#1 - 2015-07-23 05:38:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Danmal
Hi all,

I have assembled and aggregated PVP statistics for the 204 most killing alliances and provided rankings for the most fun and best PVP alliances in EVE for the first six months of 2015. Of course what constitutes the most fun and best will remain debatable. :)

The report is available for download under: https://www.scribd.com/doc/272345350/EVE-Online-PVP-Ranking

Edit: If you don't want to install the app, don't click the link but copy the link in your browser and download the document.

Edit: I hear people still hate scribd. Straight download at: http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=06219486363556449029 [please work]

Enjoy,
Danmal
Aladar Dangerface
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2015-07-23 10:13:48 UTC
6th most fun alliance in game. Suck it all you un-fun allainces P

I don't need twitter. I'm already following you.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2015-07-23 10:18:28 UTC
i have fun :(

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2015-07-23 10:21:08 UTC
Uhh sincere thanks.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2015-07-23 11:12:57 UTC
Hengle Teron
Red Sky Morning
The Amarr Militia.
#6 - 2015-07-23 14:20:26 UTC
Would help if you'd explain how you got the points for the last few tables.
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#7 - 2015-07-23 14:27:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Eli Apol
Suggestion: Divide all the total kills/losses and isk values by the average number of members in each alliance over the period.

If 10 000+ members are only getting 95000 kills and 1.34t, that's only 9 kills and 100 million (edit:fixed my math) per player over half a year - not that great a sign of pvp imho...

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
flakeys
Doomheim
#8 - 2015-07-23 18:14:10 UTC
A bit in a double split here.On one side i think you can not make a ''fun'' ranking at all.But on the other side looking at those that hit your highest spots on that list in regards to fun they would be the alliances i would join ''for fun'' as i have good experiences with most of them on the ''battlefield'' as people who seemed to be sports and play for fun.



Really surprised me there to be honest ...

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2015-07-23 18:17:36 UTC
Eli Apol wrote:
Suggestion: Divide all the total kills/losses and isk values by the average number of members in each alliance over the period.

If 10 000+ members are only getting 95000 kills and 1.34t, that's only 9 kills and 1 billion per player over half a year - not that great a sign of pvp imho...


this.

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#10 - 2015-07-23 18:23:27 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Eli Apol wrote:
Suggestion: Divide all the total kills/losses and isk values by the average number of members in each alliance over the period.

If 10 000+ members are only getting 95000 kills and 1.34t, that's only 9 kills and 1 billion per player over half a year - not that great a sign of pvp imho...


this.

*cough* i made an error with my math...100m each lol

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
Danmal
TYR.
Exodus.
#11 - 2015-07-23 18:33:06 UTC
Hengle Teron wrote:
Would help if you'd explain how you got the points for the last few tables.


That is explained on the four pages right after the tables.
Danmal
TYR.
Exodus.
#12 - 2015-07-23 18:49:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Danmal
Eli Apol wrote:
Suggestion: Divide all the total kills/losses and isk values by the average number of members in each alliance over the period.

If 10 000+ members are only getting 95000 kills and 1.34t, that's only 9 kills and 100 million (edit:fixed my math) per player over half a year - not that great a sign of pvp imho...


This is a great idea, but a little bit more complicated as I would have to tap a different data source (probably Dotlan). The number of members on zkillboard is current. Dividing past kills by current members would be problematic for the obvious reason that the number of current members could be very different from the number of past members that achieved the kills. To get that statistic really right, I would need to divide the kills per month by the average members per month and then take the average over the months.

As far as I can tell, Dotlan only provides this information in graphical form, and there is no mention of the data source, so they may be running their own database.
Danmal
TYR.
Exodus.
#13 - 2015-07-23 19:27:34 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
i have fun :(


According to killboard information, your alliance was inactive during H1 2015 and hence was not ranked.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#14 - 2015-07-23 19:39:04 UTC
Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
#15 - 2015-07-23 19:45:48 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
For **** sake.




Haha.




I like Bacon.

Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!!
Danmal
TYR.
Exodus.
#16 - 2015-07-23 19:52:40 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
For **** sake.


Don't click the link, but copy it in your browser and then download the document. Should work.

<3
Dan
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#17 - 2015-07-23 20:38:02 UTC
Danmal wrote:
Eli Apol wrote:
Suggestion: Divide all the total kills/losses and isk values by the average number of members in each alliance over the period.

If 10 000+ members are only getting 95000 kills and 1.34t, that's only 9 kills and 100 million (edit:fixed my math) per player over half a year - not that great a sign of pvp imho...


This is a great idea, but a little bit more complicated as I would have to tap a different data source (probably Dotlan). The number of members on zkillboard is current. Dividing past kills by current members would be problematic for the obvious reason that the number of current members could be very different from the number of past members that achieved the kills. To get that statistic really right, I would need to divide the kills per month by the average members per month and then take the average over the months.

As far as I can tell, Dotlan only provides this information in graphical form, and there is no mention of the data source, so they may be running their own database.

Yeah, I kinda wish the killboards actually did this for us - divided up the isk value of each kill amongst all the people whoring on the mails - perhaps by percentage of damage done.

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#18 - 2015-07-23 20:45:29 UTC
Eli Apol wrote:
Suggestion: Divide all the total kills/losses and isk values by the average number of members in each alliance over the period.

If 10 000+ members are only getting 95000 kills and 1.34t, that's only 9 kills and 100 million (edit:fixed my math) per player over half a year - not that great a sign of pvp imho...

Yeah, kills and losses per member was my first thought.

Edit: but good job anyway and thanks.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
Tavisturus
Screaming Hayabusa
#19 - 2015-07-23 20:51:05 UTC
Um... I support this post and everything in it. Pirate
Patrick Ramdon
Doomheim
#20 - 2015-07-23 21:17:48 UTC
Danmal wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
For **** sake.


Don't click the link, but copy it in your browser and then download the document. Should work.

No, it does not work on mobile.
There is no way to download the document when opening it in mobile browser.
12Next page