These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

HighSec Ganking and Appropriate Punishment

Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#341 - 2015-07-23 11:30:06 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jethro Amar wrote:
it forces the gankers to play the game and interact with others instead of just "undock, warp, f1".
Don't be silly. That would mean they need skilled players and not just F1 monkeys following orders.

quoted for the irony of a space monkey making this statement Blink

CoolCool
:D
Don't worry, I see the irony. I'm no fan of F1 monkey activity which is why I supported changes like the drone assist changes and sov changes. Ideally I'd like to see every activity require every participant to think for themselves, but we're a long way off of that.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#342 - 2015-07-23 11:31:06 UTC
Xeno Szenn wrote:
What's wrong with having a lot of accounts? And how does it make it bot asspirant. Multiple accounts are useful for many things.

The only guy I know with more alt's then me Blink

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#343 - 2015-07-23 12:22:56 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Xeno Szenn wrote:
What's wrong with having a lot of accounts? And how does it make it bot asspirant. Multiple accounts are useful for many things.

The only guy I know with more alt's then me Blink
How many accounts is too many? I have 16 active at the mo.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#344 - 2015-07-23 12:50:58 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Xeno Szenn wrote:
What's wrong with having a lot of accounts? And how does it make it bot asspirant. Multiple accounts are useful for many things.

The only guy I know with more alt's then me Blink
How many accounts is too many? I have 16 active at the mo.

I'm confused by your comment here. Why was it made and why does it assume that i think any number is too many?

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#345 - 2015-07-23 13:09:57 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Xeno Szenn wrote:
What's wrong with having a lot of accounts? And how does it make it bot asspirant. Multiple accounts are useful for many things.
The only guy I know with more alt's then me Blink
How many accounts is too many? I have 16 active at the mo.
I'm confused by your comment here. Why was it made and why does it assume that i think any number is too many?
Lol? Same could be said for the original comment and response. Why did he say "what's wrong with having a lot of accounts", then why did you make a point of him having more than you? That prompted me to wonder, "what's 'too many'". You need to calm down fella.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#346 - 2015-07-23 13:34:57 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Xeno Szenn wrote:
What's wrong with having a lot of accounts? And how does it make it bot asspirant. Multiple accounts are useful for many things.
The only guy I know with more alt's then me Blink
How many accounts is too many? I have 16 active at the mo.
I'm confused by your comment here. Why was it made and why does it assume that i think any number is too many?
Lol? Same could be said for the original comment and response. Why did he say "what's wrong with having a lot of accounts", then why did you make a point of him having more than you? That prompted me to wonder, "what's 'too many'". You need to calm down fella.

He is a friend in game who never posts here I was saying hi pretty much Lol

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#347 - 2015-07-23 13:45:58 UTC
I see, still no need to get so hostile :p
My humblest apologies for responding to posts in a public thread. /bow

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#348 - 2015-07-23 13:46:13 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:
as most of the time there is not a significant and/or competent force to oppose suicide gankers.
See!

Why is there no real opposition? Because Antiganking is a lot of effort for no reward in ships that actually cost an amount people don't want to lose. Meanwhile, ganking is pretty easy, done in cheap ships and in general is pretty rewarding. There should be more opportunities for counters and counter-counters and counter-counter-counters, and ganking should have to field enough to make it worthwhile for antigankers to put some effort and skill into doing it.


Whilst this is true, it's also demonstrates the paradox. The highsec ruleset DEMANDS they use worthless ships.

Throwaway ships are required because of guaranteed loss. If you make them NEED better ships, ships worth shooting, you also then need to leash concord.

Or you find a way to make the bounty system simultaneously pay more, but not be exploitable via alts. Good luck there.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#349 - 2015-07-23 13:49:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Lucas Kell wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:
as most of the time there is not a significant and/or competent force to oppose suicide gankers.
See!

Why is there no real opposition? Because Antiganking is a lot of effort for no reward in ships that actually cost an amount people don't want to lose. Meanwhile, ganking is pretty easy, done in cheap ships and in general is pretty rewarding. There should be more opportunities for counters and counter-counters and counter-counter-counters, and ganking should have to field enough to make it worthwhile for antigankers to put some effort and skill into doing it.


because carebears dont want to pay for protection because it affects the amount of isk they earn, i dont make any isk when doing pvp so whats your point?

if im moving a capital or a marauder around lowsec/null, i always have a cyno with support on standby, nothing stopping carebears from having support

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#350 - 2015-07-23 13:54:26 UTC
Escorts are a) worse than mining for boredom and b) utterly garbage in high sec because you can't shoot first (i.e. you can't kill the warp in alt, or the scanners).

There is no amount of isk going that would make me escort in high sec. Don't need to escort in low/null because we use JFs.

/shrug
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#351 - 2015-07-23 13:59:19 UTC
you cant fit fitted battleships and carriers in jf's and not everyone has a jf so scouting for others in null is a thing.

you cant shoot first? gankers are -10 they are shoot on site everywhere

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#352 - 2015-07-23 14:01:48 UTC
What is it with the assumption of ganking being easier than say, a null engagement? Both sides are effectively just F1-ing on broadcasts. If you get shot you broadcast. No fleet combat is hard or 'engaging' like you say ganking should be, so why should ganking be singled out by your posts by a large margin when it's less than 1% of fleet combat out there? Sounds like an excuse for personal reasons to me imo.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#353 - 2015-07-23 14:04:04 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:
as most of the time there is not a significant and/or competent force to oppose suicide gankers.
See!

Why is there no real opposition? Because Antiganking is a lot of effort for no reward in ships that actually cost an amount people don't want to lose. Meanwhile, ganking is pretty easy, done in cheap ships and in general is pretty rewarding. There should be more opportunities for counters and counter-counters and counter-counter-counters, and ganking should have to field enough to make it worthwhile for antigankers to put some effort and skill into doing it.


because carebears dont want to pay for protection because it affects the amount of isk they earn, i dont make any isk when doing pvp so whats your point?

if im moving a capital or a marauder around lowsec/null, i always have a cyno with support on standby, nothing stopping carebears from having support

Yup. Escorts are boring, but a necessary cost if you want to move your stuff safely. If you don't want to bring escorts or can't convince someone to do it (i.e. you have no friends) then use a hauling ship that doesn't need them or outsource your hauling to someone who will spend the effort to defend your stuff.

That is the game for haulers. Trade-offs and all that. If you don't like the choices on offer, choose another profession.

Let's take the time (again) to reflect on the words of a CCP developer who made it quite clear what haulers are expected to do by the designers of this game:

CCP Falcon wrote:
Why should CCP provide protection for your haulage in high sec?

CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and punitive rather than proactive.

If you want your haulage to be safer, bring the guns. If you don't have any guns, sacrifice some of your profit margin and hire someone who has them to escort you.

Welcome to New Eden, you just learned a very valuable lesson in being prepared and covering your back.

:)
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#354 - 2015-07-23 14:06:47 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
Did you miss the pertinent part? You cant shoot the neutral guys assisting.

So right this second I flew past a code neutral warp in alt ("Hi Perry Rodent!!!") in his venture, could I shoot him if I felt threatened as an escorter? Or shoot him as I KNOW he presents a threat? No, I cannot. Because high sec rules hilariously prevent it as he is lurking in an NPC corp (ironic, for a code alt).

Escorting is a joke in high sec beyond a webbing EAF, maybe logi for the armor freighters but even that's a bit of a nonsense. That's it. Nothing else is worth a damn. I would never do it, no-one I know would do it. It's far easier and simler to just not expose yourself in the first place.

The limit to "escorting" in highsec is someone webbing you.


Scouting is a thing in a fleet, I think you know that is different though.



Edit: I should probably be clear, there is nothing can be done about this, it is simply the reality.


Edit2: And whilst I'm on the topic, lets not pretend that all gankers are -10.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#355 - 2015-07-23 14:19:29 UTC
afkalt wrote:
Did you miss the pertinent part? You cant shoot the neutral guys assisting.


You absolutely can, you just don't want to deal with the consequences the gankers deal with.

That should tell you something, but I'd bet cash money that it won't.


Quote:

So right this second I flew past a code neutral warp in alt ("Hi Perry Rodent!!!") in his venture, could I shoot him if I felt threatened as an escorter? Or shoot him as I KNOW he presents a threat? No, I cannot.


Once again, yes, you can. You just don't want to accept the consequences of doing so.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#356 - 2015-07-23 14:20:08 UTC
scouting is a thing in a fleet? i move around alot solo and have my own scout so im not bothering anyone else to scout my vargur to a 10/10 8 jumps away, that scout will also light me a covert cyno if i need it.

that char will also move around and provide cynos for my carrier, thats nothing to do with fleets its my personal scout

having your own scout in nullsec is pretty essential if you plan living there

yeah escorting is a joke but so is structure grinding and cloaky camping, if i was moving 10bil worth of cargo i sure as hell aint moving that without some sort of support but hey thats just me.

i remember having to log off in a hostile system after losing a battle and only a couple of us survived, corp wouldnt let me log in till they had secured an escort fleet to get it back home safely, might be boring but you do what you gotta do to protect the assets of you and your friends.

as for the neutral in a venture, no you cant shoot him but you can shoot the gankers that warp to him or you could bring a ceptor or cheap frig to shoot the venture, and this will also bring concord to the gate.

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Black Pedro
Mine.
#357 - 2015-07-23 14:24:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
afkalt wrote:
Did you miss the pertinent part? You cant shoot the neutral guys assisting.

Gankers manage to shoot neutrals. I think what you meant to say is that you do not want to shoot the neutrals (the bumpers/scouts) because you do not want to suffer the consequences of that action. I guess criminals do suffer consequences for their actions after all.

afkalt wrote:

So right this second I flew past a code neutral warp in alt ("Hi Perry Rodent!!!") in his venture, could I shoot him if I felt threatened as an escorter? Or shoot him as I KNOW he presents a threat? No, I cannot. Because high sec rules hilariously prevent it as he is lurking in an NPC corp (ironic, for a code alt).

Escorting is a joke in high sec beyond a webbing EAF, maybe logi for the armor freighters but even that's a bit of a nonsense. That's it. Nothing else is worth a damn. I would never do it, no-one I know would do it. It's far easier and simler to just not expose yourself in the first place.

The limit to "escorting" in highsec is someone webbing you.


Scouting is a thing in a fleet, I think you know that is different though.



Edit: I should probably be clear, there is nothing can be done about this, it is simply the reality.

There is plenty you can do. You just choose not to pay the cost. A small fleet of logi and quick-locking DPS/ECM can save any freighter and a single webber eliminates 99%+ of the risk of getting bumped in the first place. This has been hashed and rehashed so many times it isn't necessary again, but the main point is that haulers are suppose to be at risk. There are plenty of actions and behaviours you can take to mitigate those risks but CCP has chosen not to give you an I-get-out-of-PvP card to guarantee your safety. That is by design to keep players feeling uncertain and follows the nowhere-is-safe design of the game.

Almost every freighter makes it safely to its destination in highsec. A few unlucky/foolish ones are going to explode, but statistically, it is an insignificant fraction. A good hauler uses the tools available to increase the chance of being in that first group, but also plans for the chance they end up in the second, more exploded group - don't fly what you can't afford to lose and all.
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#358 - 2015-07-23 14:37:43 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
Black Pedro wrote:
afkalt wrote:
Did you miss the pertinent part? You cant shoot the neutral guys assisting.

Gankers manage to shoot neutrals. I think what you meant to say is that you do not want to shoot the neutrals (the bumpers/scouts) because you do not want to suffer the consequences of that action. I guess criminals do suffer consequences for their actions after all.


You know perfectly well that an actual escort isn't some half arsed throwaway gank catalyst. Yes, taking a fleet of suicide ships is completely how people escort Roll

Look, I never said there were not things you can do to not die, I said that escorting is a joke beyond webbing and we all know that, this is the reality.

I don't know how you all missed it, probably too busy frothing at the mouth about freighter ganking and leaping to defend it when a) I never attacked it here and b) the argument was that escorting, beyond webs is POINTLESS.

Because it is. You know it, I know it and the haulers know it.


Once again, since you all seemed to miss it the first time:

It's far easier and simpler to just not expose yourself in the first place.
Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#359 - 2015-07-23 14:48:26 UTC
Let's just say a lot of people (95%) don't take the basic precautions that could prevent 99% of losses.

The hauling profession is filled with arrogant entitlement, such as having five freighter alts and not a single webber, then complaining about losing three of them to ganks in the same day.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#360 - 2015-07-23 14:55:30 UTC
afkalt wrote:
You know perfectly well that an actual escort isn't some half arsed throwaway gank catalyst. Yes, taking a fleet of suicide ships is completely how people escort Roll

I do. But they really should if they want to significantly improve the chance of a valuable shipment arriving. There is nothing stopping them.

Eve has rules like any game and if you want to win, you should use them all to your advantage. Choosing not to use some strategies or techniques for whatever reason may make you feel good, but you are still at a disadvantage to the players who use them. And if you tie one hand behind your back you really can't then complain when you lose to them.

afkalt wrote:
Look, I never said there were not things you can do to not die, I said that escorting is a joke beyond webbing and we all know that, this is the reality.

I don't know how you all missed it, probably too busy frothing at the mouth about freighter ganking and leaping to defend it when a) I never attacked it here and b) the argument was that escorting, beyond webs is POINTLESS.

Because it is. You know it, I know it and the haulers know it.
Well then just web then. But CCP Falcon is not wrong though. If something is that important to you, you should bring a big enough fleet to counter all the risks. If it isn't important enough, well then you are balancing the odds that someone will catch you and destroy you vs the costs of such a escort. Most of the time you will win. Occasionally you will explode. That is the game for haulers.

afkalt wrote:
Once again, since you all seemed to miss it the first time:

It's far easier and simpler to just not expose yourself in the first place.

That is a perfectly viable strategy to avoid the predators. Too bad more haulers don't use that strategy but rather prefer the lose-my-10B-ISK-Freighter-while-AFK-and-then-whine-about-it-on-the-forums stratagem.