These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Gankers

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#41 - 2015-07-18 14:08:54 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:

Black Pedro wrote:

Yet here we all are. Playing a game full of illogical things, like criminals going un-hunted in highsec stations all because it makes for a better game.


I see this as a bug or a glitch. Betta map is broken too.

Code exists to deny docking permission. It isn't implemented. Has not been implemented, despite REPEATED dousings of the forums with tears, from the quick cry and run to high ceremonial tear-rantuals that threaten to overflow the collectors. Maybe this is in fact intended.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp
Valkin Mordirc
#42 - 2015-07-18 14:37:28 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:
Valkin Mordirc wrote:



Logically EVE spaceships could only fly in one trajectory, instead of like a plane

Logically the sun would burn a ship up, instead of bouncing off.

Logically the amount of 'near earth' planets in EVE would be far fewer

Logically going into a WH with a blackhole would mean death

Logically you shouldn't be able to zip between solar systems.

WHO WANT TO BE LOGICAL AND TRAVEL AT LIGHT SPEED TO JITA AND AMARR


NOT FUCKIN ME


you are mistaking reality for plausibility. With the given set of rules or laws all that you have nemtioned above is completetely plausible and for that logical. Criminals hunted everywhere but not on stations in high sec by police is completely implausible and for that illogical.



Oh I'm sorry I guess you know Physics better then you know. People who study physics.
#DeleteTheWeak
Nyalnara
Marauder Initiative
#43 - 2015-07-18 14:49:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Nyalnara
Rah McGee wrote:
Kenrailae wrote:
Mega corps with a monopoly on everything probably don't care whether criminals dock there, as long as they have Isk to spend


So concord cares if someone is getting shot but they don't care when criminals dock at teheir station?


Is the guy shooting at the station? No, so they don't care. As simple as that.

French half-noob.

Non, je ne suis pas gentil.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#44 - 2015-07-18 16:03:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Rah McGee wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:


Criminals are in the game by design. Suicide ganking is an intended mechanic; this has been confirmed by CCP many times. They are there to provide player-driven risk in highsec.


Them not being able to dock doesn't restrict them from ganking, so this is not even an argument.
And you restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't an argument for change either.

You folks make me laugh. You join a game known for ganking since it's birth, then do nothing but complain about it.
Games night at yours, would be an absolute blast I'm sure.

"What do you mean the Queen can move in all directions?????? What the hell? That sir is illogical and it should be changed henceforth!!!"

Roll

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2015-07-18 16:17:27 UTC
Wow, stop responding to these stupid children already and rather slap them like they deserve it.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE
Rah McGee
State War Academy
Caldari State
#46 - 2015-07-18 16:31:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Rah McGee
Mag's wrote:
And you restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it..bla bla bla..some tears



Again wrong. Since you have problems to understand this, I will gladly repeat it for you: If we take away the ability for criminals to dock in stations in high sec this does not make people less gankable.


Mag's wrote:


You join a game known for ganking since it's birth, then do nothing but complain about it.


The only tears and complainsI see in this thread are from people who fear about their 'gamestyle'.
Iain Cariaba
#47 - 2015-07-18 16:37:19 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:


You join a game known for ganking since it's birth, then do nothing but complain about it.


The only tears and complainsI see in this thread are from people who fear about their 'gamestyle'.

Nope, your "ganking is bad, gankers need to be punished" line definitely count as tears, and you're full of complaints about how gankers shouldn't be allowed to dock because you don't like it.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#48 - 2015-07-18 16:39:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:
And you restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it..bla bla bla..some tears



Again wrong. Since you have problems to understand this, I will gladly repeat it for you: If we take away the ability for criminals to dock in stations in high sec this does not make people less gankable.
And I shall repeat, as reading and or comprehension doesn't seem to be your forte.

Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:


You join a game known for ganking since it's birth, then do nothing but complain about it.


The only tears and complainsI see in this thread are from people who fear about their 'gamestyle'.
Irony. Now you just need to mention bullying, for ganker whine bingo.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Rah McGee
State War Academy
Caldari State
#49 - 2015-07-18 16:40:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Rah McGee
Iain Cariaba wrote:

Nope, your "ganking is bad, gankers need to be punished" line definitely count as tears, and you're full of complaints about how gankers shouldn't be allowed to dock because you don't like it.


Here we have the perfect example why we need this to be fixed asap. All the times I am talking about criminals, not only gankers, and those people with their 'gamestyle' only refere to themselves. You get -10 not only by ganking in high sec, you know?

Mag's wrote:


Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


No one is restricting the gememechanic. You still will be able to gang.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#50 - 2015-07-18 16:46:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:


Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


No one is restricting the gememechanic. You still will be able to gang.
Oh my bad. I thought not being able to dock was a restriction. Roll

I didn't mention gangs btw.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Rah McGee
State War Academy
Caldari State
#51 - 2015-07-18 16:50:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Rah McGee
Mag's wrote:
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:


Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


No one is restricting the gememechanic. You still will be able to gang.
Oh my bad. I thought not being able to dock was a restriction. Roll


I am glad that you see where you are wrong. This is not a restriction but a gamefix. Criminals will still be able to dock in null sec for instance.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#52 - 2015-07-18 16:53:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Mag's wrote:
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:


Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


No one is restricting the gememechanic. You still will be able to gang.
Oh my bad. I thought not being able to dock was a restriction. Roll

I didn't mention gangs btw.

It not a restriction, it's just logical. Anything else just doesn't make sense.

Why are you so resistant to these ideas? You will still technically be able to gank. It's not like he asking for all offensive modules to be locked out in highsec or anything.

The 8 Golden Rules of Eve

Why Do They Gank?
Iain Cariaba
#53 - 2015-07-18 16:54:02 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:

Nope, your "ganking is bad, gankers need to be punished" line definitely count as tears, and you're full of complaints about how gankers shouldn't be allowed to dock because you don't like it.


Here we have the perfect example why we need this to be fixed asap. All the times I am talking about criminals, not only gankers, and those people with their 'gamestyle' only refere to themselves. You get -10 not only by ganking in high sec, you know?

Mag's wrote:


Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


No one is restricting the gememechanic. You still will be able to gang.

LolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLol

Yep, knew this post was coming. People like you are so predictable. Didn't bother to even look up who you're talking to before you shitposted, did you? How could I possibly be "crying" that you're trying to ruin my "gamestyle" when I'm not even a ganker?
Mag's
Azn Empire
#54 - 2015-07-18 16:54:24 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:


Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


No one is restricting the gememechanic. You still will be able to gang.
Oh my bad. I thought not being able to dock was a restriction. Roll


I am glad that you see where you are wrong. This is not a restriction but a gamefix. Criminals will still be able to dock in null sec for instance.
Cute.

So your restriction to a game style, fixes what exactly?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#55 - 2015-07-18 16:55:57 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:


Restricting a perfectly legitimate game style because you do not like it, isn't a reason for change.


No one is restricting the gememechanic. You still will be able to gang.
Oh my bad. I thought not being able to dock was a restriction. Roll

I didn't mention gangs btw.

It not a restriction, it's just logical. Anything else just doesn't make sense.

Why are your so resistant to these ideas? You will still technically be able to gank. It's not like he asking for all offensive modules to be locked out in highsec or anything.
That's coming in the next, "Just one more nerf and it will be balanced." thread. Lol

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Rah McGee
State War Academy
Caldari State
#56 - 2015-07-18 16:58:45 UTC
Mag's wrote:

So your restriction to a game style, fixes what exactly?


As we agreed before: It is not a restriction but a fix to the logical glitch.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#57 - 2015-07-18 17:02:29 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:

So your restriction to a game style, fixes what exactly?


As we agreed before: It is not a restriction but a fix to the logical glitch.
Your forum foo is as poor, as your reading and comprehension it seems.

What logical glitch and why should a game style be restricted?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Valkin Mordirc
#58 - 2015-07-18 17:02:40 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:

So your restriction to a game style, fixes what exactly?


As we agreed before: It is not a restriction but a fix to the logical glitch.




Oh you are THE fuckin idiot of the day aren't you?
#DeleteTheWeak
Iain Cariaba
#59 - 2015-07-18 17:03:38 UTC
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:

So your restriction to a game style, fixes what exactly?


As we agreed before: It is not a restriction but a fix to the logical glitch.

Except your fix is not logical. Concord is not a policing agency with any direct authority over the Empires of EvE, so your suggestion that the mega-corporations of those Empires should care about what Concord says makes zero sense.
Rah McGee
State War Academy
Caldari State
#60 - 2015-07-18 17:07:04 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Rah McGee wrote:
Mag's wrote:

So your restriction to a game style, fixes what exactly?


As we agreed before: It is not a restriction but a fix to the logical glitch.

Except your fix is not logical. Concord is not a policing agency with any direct authority over the Empires of EvE, so your suggestion that the mega-corporations of those Empires should care about what Concord says makes zero sense.


So then you must see the hostility of emperial police as illogical. Why else would it chase and kill you if you are -10?