These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

We want your SOV little things!

First post First post
Author
Ransu Asanari
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#21 - 2015-07-16 17:31:31 UTC

  • Ability to purposefully Transfer sovereignty structures between Alliances. Please make the new sovereignty transfer system EASY - like Executor corp able to right click an IHUB/TCU/Outpost, Right click -> Transfer to Alliance. The old way of having to to use a transfer corporation to own all of the sov structures, then transfer that corp into another Alliance was very cludgy.

  • Ability to purposefully drop sov - unanchor IHUB/TCU rather than just not paying the bills until the structures explode. Doing this should revert the sovereignty of a system to "Unclaimed" as it did before. This is important for the metagame as well as mechanically.

Hendrink Collie
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2015-07-16 17:36:12 UTC
Ransu Asanari wrote:

  • Ability to purposefully Transfer sovereignty structures between Alliances. Please make the new sovereignty transfer system EASY - like Executor corp able to right click an IHUB/TCU/Outpost, Right click -> Transfer to Alliance. The old way of having to to use a transfer corporation to own all of the sov structures, then transfer that corp into another Alliance was very cludgy.

  • Ability to purposefully drop sov - unanchor IHUB/TCU rather than just not paying the bills until the structures explode. Doing this should revert the sovereignty of a system to "Unclaimed" as it did before. This is important for the metagame as well as mechanically.



I'm ok with these changes as long as you can't do them while they are in either a vulnerable state (can be gamed) or are reinforced. +1
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#23 - 2015-07-16 17:36:40 UTC
Ransu Asanari wrote:

  • Ability to purposefully Transfer sovereignty structures between Alliances. Please make the new sovereignty transfer system EASY - like Executor corp able to right click an IHUB/TCU/Outpost, Right click -> Transfer to Alliance. The old way of having to to use a transfer corporation to own all of the sov structures, then transfer that corp into another Alliance was very cludgy.

  • Ability to purposefully drop sov - unanchor IHUB/TCU rather than just not paying the bills until the structures explode. Doing this should revert the sovereignty of a system to "Unclaimed" as it did before. This is important for the metagame as well as mechanically.




I assume based on this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5870299#post5870299

They are working on it, but IMHO, it should be near the top of the pile.....
USS YORKTOWN
Tritanium Industries and Technology
Goonswarm Federation
#24 - 2015-07-16 18:04:54 UTC
Is there any chance we could get up to date information on whats required for each index level?
Seven Koskanaiken
Sons Of Saints
Sanctus Cor
#25 - 2015-07-16 18:12:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
The notification for ihub nodes decloaking says "command nodes the ihub" rather than "for the ihub".
Ddolik
Bohemian Veterans
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#26 - 2015-07-16 18:19:11 UTC
make the sov icons just little bit smaller, maybe 10-15% less
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#27 - 2015-07-16 18:36:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
A lot more people than Holding Corp members need to be able to see the progress of Development Indices. I am currently flying completely blind when I want to rat in a system to get it to a level and do not know how far I've come, what's missing or when I come back the next day, how much the indices have decayed already.

I also demand the old Sovereignty window back. The new implementation is horrible to use. Before I just needed to press a tab to see system, constellation, region, world view. Now I need to search for that stuff.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Tridgit
Iron.Guard
Goonswarm Federation
#28 - 2015-07-16 18:51:52 UTC
Please add a confirmation/notification/somethingication for when you change time/settings in the sov window.

Also add the ability to change to the sov vulnerability window directly here: http://puu.sh/j1Cn0/0c9d369173.jpg

Having to go to another screen to affect these settings, and then getting zero notification that you 'pressed the button' is not optimal UI design.

Cheers,
-Trid
Dr Sandvich
Corrosive Synergy
#29 - 2015-07-16 20:10:30 UTC
Hello

This is a sov little thing but not related to the new changes.

When providing orbitals to Dust 514 players at Molden Heath districts, the district you are on appears on everyone's overview. Is there any chance this could be changed so districts don't appear on everyone's overview when a pilot is doing OB's? It would be awesome if enemy players need to have Intel, spies, or scanning probes to find a ship at a district.

Another small quality of life thing is if EVE players in the same alliance or corp as Dust players, got an EVE mail notifying them that their Dust district was under attack, and at what time the attack happens. This would be great if the same mail system also notified EVE players when an attack on a rival Dust district was to happen.

This isn't really anything to do with the new sov system, but for corps that hold sov in Dust districts it would be a great change.
USS YORKTOWN
Tritanium Industries and Technology
Goonswarm Federation
#30 - 2015-07-16 20:30:09 UTC
Read what the nice lady said.

Sov stuff only.
Zappity
Exit-Strategy
Unchained Alliance
#31 - 2015-07-16 20:52:11 UTC
If you are going to do heat maps for vulnerability etc (good idea) please use blue to red instead of green to red. It is quite effective and easier to distinguish for colour blind people.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Tallardar
PC Culture
#32 - 2015-07-16 21:03:44 UTC
I want more pink in my UI. Not like a setting I can turn on. I just want it to be there unchangeable.
Capri Sun KraftFoods
Adversity.
Psychotic Tendencies.
#33 - 2015-07-16 23:20:14 UTC
When I transfer a station between corps, the "use alliance standings" option gets toggled off. This is a pain.
Malakai Asamov
Van Diemen's Demise
Northern Coalition.
#34 - 2015-07-16 23:56:17 UTC
The defence multiplier icon (the shield one) needs a slight revision, when the multiplier is 0 it looks like it is max
SiKong Ma
Perkone
Caldari State
#35 - 2015-07-17 00:44:26 UTC
I would suggest the following improvements to command nodes animation:

1) When an attacker successfully entosis a command node, it should explode (which is what happened currently)
2) When a defender successfully entosis a command node, it should cloak up! (why would a defender blow up their own command nodes)
3) When a structure is contested, please show % completion beside the progress bar, it's not like we couldn't get the information from timerboard, so why make it necessary to obtain UI information from out of game tools?
Lycus Emyr
Doomheim
#36 - 2015-07-17 01:50:52 UTC
Better pve in Null that could be tied to Sov upgrades.

Can we remove moon goo information from the API to make it easier to harass moon mining.

Can the ship using the entosis link have a better visual effect.

Evelyn Atkinson
Ziggurat Forge
#37 - 2015-07-17 03:45:00 UTC
Some way to see current capture event progress in the whole constellation would be cool. Currently you have to have someone in the target system looking at the sov icons, it'd be cool if you could see this maybe from the command nodes themselves?
Raw Messiah Starchaser
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#38 - 2015-07-17 03:50:28 UTC
Why does gas mining not count for system index? It's the same as ice/ore mining I think.
Lycus Emyr
Doomheim
#39 - 2015-07-17 08:28:47 UTC
Can the jump range nerf be applied to Jump Freighters now to encourage Null industry?

and at the same time have a system where Ice anoms for off types of ice can form maybe 70% is the normal ice and the 10% chance for each of the other 3 to drop?

Can we get more variety to the anoms in Null, more interesting npc behavior, random waves, and maybe more varied npc responses (sometimes they kite, more variety of ewar, ect)

Aeon Veritas
Black OP - Mining and Research
UNITATO SQUAD
#40 - 2015-07-17 09:45:16 UTC
Raw Messiah Starchaser wrote:
Why does gas mining not count for system index? It's the same as ice/ore mining I think.
PI and relic/data sites should contibute too.



What makes me a little unhappy is that atm not small scale groups are encuraged, what iirc was the intention of this sov change.
But solo gameplay with entosis-interceptors is encuraged, no matter if for attacking the sov or for deffending it...
Except maybe for the case that someone actually shows up to claim the thing after the RF-period...

I'm not sure if I realy want this, but my proposal is to increase the capture time by 500% but allow up to 5 people of the same alliance to use their entosis links simultaneously. That way 5 people should be as fast as one is now...
As soon as one link of another alliance is used on the structure the capturing proces is paused, like is is now.