EVE Information Portal

I do occasionally make mistakes at work.
And the QA department catches them and tells me to fix them.

That said, it's a minor issue, and certainly not worth the level of bitching it's receiving.

Hello CCP

Did you change the API server?

I cannot find any API apps that work at the moment.
EVEMon, EFT etc

Cheers

Happy Gas!

Not sure if I would go the fired route but would agree that if a system has a downtime for an update, bringing it up for customers before confirming everything is correct would result in people getting in trouble. Especially when its something as simple as viewing the market or checking the information pane. Especially when its such a small update. Imagine if they had accidentally buffed drone damage amps by 1000% due to lack of checking their changes?

#devfleet has the details, they are working on it

New icon for the Ballistic Control System?

Well, I've tried restarting my client and still no Gallente Tactical Destroyer Skillbooks available.

I don't really care about that destroyer; if it was for me, they would have scraped them. But calling this mishap that makes a sizable and hyped part of the patch unaccessible a "simple mistake" is downplaying CCP's incapabilities quite a lot. I remember times when Seagull and Hilmar touted that the new release cadence would lead to a better, more relaxed time for the devs and their toys/projects and a time full of functional features. So far, this has not really happened. Features are still rushed into the game, "simple mistakes" still happen a lot.

Only one thing works more or less flawlessly: the NES money grab that people hated to extreme extends a couple of years ago. *clapclap*

Dear developers,

it takes five minutes to verify that:
- Gallente T3 Destroyer skillbooks are absent
- only Missile tracking enhancer BPOs are in the Market, no computer, no scripts
- 3rd party API-oriented software like EVEMON, ISKperHOUR stopped functioning, so API is broken
- new iteration icons are still unusable

may I, please, wonder why it was impossible to check that before the actual patch deployment?

Can you, please, fix this and revert overview icons to convinient crosses and squares.

Thanks

By the way, as there are no release note, patch notes or threads available for it and CCP just dumps stuff on users:

When is the launcher going to be fixed?

This recently introduced whobbling (dynamic size jumps depending on the mouse positon) of the username/password field is immensely irritating. It makes it actually harder to hit the arrow button to roll down the username list, it makes it harder to hit the right box and it virtually serves no purpose beyond being a nuisance. This needs to be removed again.

When is the launcher going to work flawlessly? A couple of days ago, I needed to reopen the launcher 7 times to make it load the progressbar and tell me that the client is ready. Today I had a milder occurrence of that and only needed to to it twice.

When is CCP going to implement that the launcher window remembers it's location on my desktop? Every other software has this feature, but the EVE launcher always starts centered on the screen.

When will we be able to trigger the download and installation of a patch with a press of a button in the launcher instead of having to close and reopen it?

When is CCP going to stop wasting time on useless things like whobbling input fields and switching around buttons for no reason and actually start developing usable tech? When is CCP actually going to make this piece of software an enjoyable program to start the game? These are, by the way, all things that have been suggested, remarked, complained about multiple times

Please double check the Invention requirements and build materials for the Missile Guidance Enhancer and Computer:

- Both have Minmatar Encryption Methods as a prerequisite. Shouldn't this be Caldari, or are you just acknowledging Caldari Missile Supremacy will never be a thing? The Ballistic Control System BPC runs off the Caldari Encryption Methods invention process.

-Mineral input on the Missile Guidance Computer incomplete - only has Tritanium and Megacyte for build components?

-Missile Guidance Enhancer/Computer should use Rocket Engineering datacores, not Electronic/Mechanical.

-Supposed build components for the Missile Guidance Enhancer II uses an Omnidirectional Tracking Link not the T1 version of itself. Missile Guidance Computer II requires a Tracking Computer, not the T1 version of itself.

-T2 build components reflect incorrect moon products - Nanoelectrical Microprocessor instead of Nanomechanical Microprocessor.