These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Weapon Defense System - Cluster Mines (THIS IS NOT AN AFK CLOAK THREAD

Author
Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#1 - 2015-07-02 09:29:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Amarisen Gream
Hi-slot defense mod.

Basic idea is that this would be a counter to cloaked ships from being able to sneak up on you and catch you off guard (active player)

The Cluster mine would dispense small mines that react to ships (even cloaked) not in your fleet or have neutral and lower standing.
It could ether A) be an active mod that launches more mines as it cycles - it deploys the mines up to 5km from your ship or B) be a player active single cycle mod that would deploy a number of mines that have a short life -10 to 20 minutes-
Possibly limited to BS as they tend to be slower less agile hulking beast.

Pros - adds a level of possible defense/early warning to active players
Pros - adds a small ISK/mineral sink due to cost of mines

Cons - makes it a little harder for gankers against active players.


Edit - for those who can't image

If balanced right - it would deploy little mines - things that would react to ships (cloaked or not) that are not in your fleet/corp/alliance/blue to you. They would last at max 20 minutes (would probably settle for like 5 minutes) The Launchers reload/cycle would be nearly the same as the items in space.

This is no form or type a counter vs AFK cloakie campers - - - This is for active defense for players who might be ratting or doing missions or mining or WTF they are do to help them not get ganked raped by that one guy in a SB with his 99 BLOP buddies waiting to jazz all over their keyboard when they get to kill someone.

***This is not to prevent hot-drops.
***Only a means to give (if the player is active) a fighting chance to make the hot-drop a major fell.
***The mines do very little damage - mostly just their to break cloaks.

i.e. Player A is enjoy a good day of ratting when a unknown neut shows up. Player A sees him and local does a quick D-Scan and doesn't see anything. He cycles his Cluster Mines - while he aligns/continues killing those poor rats. The cluster mines flash as they come in contact with the soon to be PITA.

(an alternative option would be that the deployed mines scatter out from the players ship and continue in their projected path for say 25-50km!)

"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs

Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2 - 2015-07-02 09:42:00 UTC
We have a thread to keep awful 'nerf cloaks' ideas in you know.
Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#3 - 2015-07-02 09:50:36 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
We have a thread to keep awful 'nerf cloaks' ideas in you know.



Yes. There is a thread for AFK cloaking. When looking at that, thread I didn't feel my idea fit in - due to it requiring active play.

"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs

Madd Adda
#4 - 2015-07-02 10:14:53 UTC
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
We have a thread to keep awful 'nerf cloaks' ideas in you know.



Yes. There is a thread for AFK cloaking. When looking at that, thread I didn't feel my idea fit in - due to it requiring active play.


Quote:
Basic idea is that this would be a counter to cloaked ships from being able to sneak up on you and catch you off guard (active player)


cloaked is cloaked whether afk or not.

besides i'm sure there is a thread on mines somewhere

Carebear extraordinaire

Maria Dragoon
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2015-07-02 10:18:49 UTC
We use to have mines, they were removed due to the amount of lag they generated when you have 100 people dropping 10 mines a person.

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. Confucius

"A man who talks to people who aren't real is crazy. A man who talks to people who aren't real and writes down what they say is an author."

FireFrenzy
Cynosural Samurai
#6 - 2015-07-02 11:58:10 UTC
and if this doesnt render actual gizmos on grid (and thus cause lag) how do you envision this working?

Ie. Convince me why this isnt a terrible idea likes all mines ever and wont cauise the hamsters to go on strike
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2015-07-02 12:07:24 UTC
FireFrenzy wrote:
and if this doesnt render actual gizmos on grid (and thus cause lag) how do you envision this working?

Ie. Convince me why this isnt a terrible idea likes all mines ever and wont cauise the hamsters to go on strike


Looks like he wants the equivalent of a defender smartbomb but that doesn't hit friendlies.

-1
Maria Dragoon
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2015-07-02 12:44:57 UTC
FireFrenzy wrote:
and if this doesnt render actual gizmos on grid (and thus cause lag) how do you envision this working?

Ie. Convince me why this isnt a terrible idea likes all mines ever and wont cauise the hamsters to go on strike



Even if they arn't render they will still create lag, because they are objects that the server has to keep track of. The reason why original mines were removed, was because A: they didn't expire, and B, when you have people deploying them, specially if they are a part of a big fleet, these little objects that the server has to keep track of, exponentially grows. lets say you limited the amount of mines that a player can deploy is two. Now lets do some theoretical math here, you have ten people on grid, they now all deploy two mines, that 20 mines that the server has to keep track of... Now lets grow that to 100 people, and they all deploy mines, that 200 new objects the SERVER has to keep track of....

Lets go a step further. lets say there are 1000 people in system, and they all deploy 2 mines.... That now two thousand more objects the server has to keep track of, ontop of other players and objects already in the server... Do you not see how fast this can get out of hand?

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. Confucius

"A man who talks to people who aren't real is crazy. A man who talks to people who aren't real and writes down what they say is an author."

FireFrenzy
Cynosural Samurai
#9 - 2015-07-02 12:46:51 UTC
sorry i was attempting to give OP a bit of credit seems he seemed to grasp his idea was terrible and i figured he might have a new interesting notion
Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#10 - 2015-07-02 14:15:24 UTC
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Basic idea is that this would be a counter to cloaked ships from being able to sneak up on you and catch you off guard (active player)

You lost any support I might have given you right there.
Cloaked ships ARE A THING in this game and that is the way it should be.
Cloaked ships serve a purpose and it would be very bad if everyone could simply fit this module thus rendering cloaking obsolete.
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#11 - 2015-07-02 14:19:09 UTC
Posting in a stealth nerf cloaks thread.

That said, other than being abusable in some kinds of camps and a great anti-tackle/ drone system if done even slightly wrong, OP looks reasonablish.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#12 - 2015-07-02 14:20:36 UTC
Madd Adda wrote:
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
We have a thread to keep awful 'nerf cloaks' ideas in you know.



Yes. There is a thread for AFK cloaking. When looking at that, thread I didn't feel my idea fit in - due to it requiring active play.


Quote:
Basic idea is that this would be a counter to cloaked ships from being able to sneak up on you and catch you off guard (active player)


cloaked is cloaked whether afk or not.

besides i'm sure there is a thread on mines somewhere


Last mines thread got locked IIRC, and is weeks old. Thus this thread should be kosher on that front.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#13 - 2015-07-02 14:29:12 UTC
Self-replicating-cloaky-mines muahahahahaha..

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#14 - 2015-07-02 20:54:40 UTC
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
We have a thread to keep awful 'nerf cloaks' ideas in you know.



Yes. There is a thread for AFK cloaking. When looking at that, thread I didn't feel my idea fit in - due to it requiring active play.



Your idea would also see much, much more use in gatecamps than in fighting hotdroppers.

A point has longer range than your mines if they have the 5k range you're talking about.

If they have the 50k range you mention, you might as well take the entire concept of a bombing run out behind the shed and give it both barrels.



In the scenario you mention, IE a guy ratting in local after a neut shows up and not actually doing anything useful to protect himself, the ratter deserves everything they get. Why should someone who doesn't see the point in taking active steps to avoid a hotdrop gain what you're essentially describing as a 'no more drops ever!!11' button?
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2015-07-02 21:55:43 UTC
elitatwo wrote:
Self-replicating-cloaky-mines muahahahahaha..

Only around wormholes though.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Alexis Nightwish
#16 - 2015-07-02 23:57:58 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
elitatwo wrote:
Self-replicating-cloaky-mines muahahahahaha..

Only around wormholes though.

igetthatreference.gif

CCP approaches problems in one of two ways: nudge or cludge

EVE Online's "I win!" Button

Fixing bombs, not the bombers

Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#17 - 2015-07-03 09:32:02 UTC
Perhaps "mines" was the wrong term

I was envisioning something more like chaaf (can't spell)
In real life we normally use it to mess up missiles and other things from being able to get a lock on planes or whatever.
Most Sci-fi movies and TV use it for those times you have things that go about cloaked up and it is how the "good guys" know where the bad guy is.

My example was pretty bad - at 5k Mac range it would force a cloaked ship back into view at 7.5km. And there are good points to the "why were you not already safe?, topic.

We all know that in its current state -cloaks are probably the most OP mod in the game. Yeah you could use a Smart bomb to give yourself some breathing room. But even that fails - if this "tinfoil sprayer" worked it would ether decloak and/or make lock time terrible for the both players.
The whole thought still resides in finding some kind of point defense system to help active players have just one more option then - warp and hide - when a big bad wolf comes to blow them up. And yes putting anything in space in grid will cause more server load - so steps would have to be made to counter that - plus they could just be in active around the players ship until they are "charged" via disrupting a cloak. And thus, a smarter hot dropper would realize this and avoid decloaking due to the chaaf.

I think that might clear up so of the concern.


"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs

Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#18 - 2015-07-03 18:04:29 UTC
It'd still be useless for avoiding hotdrops though, since you're still letting the guy get well inside of point range before decloaking him.

Which means that it'd be much more use for catching cloaky guys trying to get out of bubble camps. And gatecamps don't really need a buff like that.
Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#19 - 2015-07-04 09:43:41 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
It'd still be useless for avoiding hotdrops though, since you're still letting the guy get well inside of point range before decloaking him.

Which means that it'd be much more use for catching cloaky guys trying to get out of bubble camps. And gatecamps don't really need a buff like that.



You make a great point about gate camps.
I also didn't want to make it OP so hot droppers couldn't catch their pray.
I was just thinking that if I had something like this > I could use it and instead of the guy being 2.5km away I would have maybe a little more reaction time. Specially if it messed up his targeting time.

"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs

Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#20 - 2015-07-04 09:51:42 UTC
On the gate camp side - a restriction on use near a gate could be put in place. As in most things - it is the balance of the feature and I know that I generally only see things from one side (as I don't cloak or hot drop)

"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs