These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

[CLRGY] Project - Amarr System Cleansing

Author
Kontrahage
Perkone
Caldari State
#21 - 2015-07-02 08:07:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Kontrahage
I doubt driving out scammers would lead to economical or cultural isolation.
Also the means suggested are just as legal and cannot be viewed as vigilante
law enforcement.
I am also sceptical wether this will have any success but if so I shall welcome it.
Amarr has to stand as an example to mankind of how things can and should be.
An approximation of HIS kingdom in our material world.

I would be interested in where the line is drawn. Maybe a cleric can enlighten me.
Would contract gambling be allowed as practised by Mesitosh Kashaga?
Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#22 - 2015-07-02 11:26:13 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Living righteously and in fear of God is what is vital to Amarr.

Amarr should be known as the capital of God, not a capital of greed. The scammers opposed by the OP are just a symptom of systemic corruption caused by the northern liberalism that we've allowed to sink into Amarr. The scamming is not going to be stopped by warning people in local, that's just trying stop a high pressure hose with your hand. You have to kill the source, and the source is the unregulated open market that the SCC has created.


I commend your dedication and your conviction.

I would suggest, however, that the "symptoms" you're discussing are less a product of "northern liberalism" and more a product of the human heart, which is given to greed, selfishness and deceit. That is, in point of fact, why the righteous discipline themselves so rigorously to resist the temptations of their own lusts and desires.

I have visited Amarr. It is not just "northerners" that are spamming contracts and attempting to deceive others with quick-grab schemes and dishonest ploys. It offers you and yours no gain to attempt to pass this off as unwanted influence from outsiders when it is your own people falling to temptation.

Perhaps, instead of starting a message about killing open trade and a free market, it would be more prudent to focus on efforts to help reinforce the spirit of discipline, resistance to temptation and purity of soul that is the hallmark of your people and their faith.

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#23 - 2015-07-02 18:19:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
You think the two are different when they're not, Antolliere. Northern culture promotes following individual human desires and wants above all else.

Again, the scammers are not the issue. They're a symptom. The issue is that the SCC is unregulated and unrestricted. The fact that you can freely buy drugs, weapons, and anything else you could want on the interstellar marketplace is the issue.

I am calling on reinforcing the spirit of discipline. Discipline requires enforcement. It requires policies and laws that deny people the freedom to act on their temptations. You'll never stop scamming, or any of the terrible transactions that go on daily, but with proper policies in place you can make it illegal and force them to go underground.

Counter-spamming isn't what's going to stop scammers. Refusing to buy criminal and sacrilegious goods isn't what's going to stop people from selling them. The laws that allow that allow people to do these things freely is what needs to be changed.
Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#24 - 2015-07-02 19:41:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Liam Antolliere
Samira Kernher wrote:
You think the two are different when they're not, Antolliere. Northern culture promotes following individual human desires and wants above all else.


I suppose a surface understanding of "northern culture" would look like this, sure. I'll concede that point. Though, I will state that there's quite a bit more to it than this, that's a topic for another thread.

Samira Kernher wrote:

Again, the scammers are not the issue. They're a symptom. The issue is that the SCC is unregulated and unrestricted. The fact that you can freely buy drugs, weapons, and anything else you could want on the interstellar marketplace is the issue.


Now you're discussing something else altogether. Here you're discussing market regulation to enforce product legality and availability, which does literally nothing for the scammers and spammers.

Also, it's a proven fact that regulating the public market is simply going to create and/or bolster the black market, which with the resources and wealth available to capsuleers would basically be like freely taking money away from businesses that wish to function legally and putting it in the hands of illegal business cartels and pirates on a silver platter. Not to mention the extra personnel and manpower hours that would now need to be delegated to policing and enforcing market regulation cluster-wide against the aforementioned resources and wealth of capsuleers. In short, a logistic nightmare that simply isn't feasible.

Samira Kernher wrote:

I am calling on reinforcing the spirit of discipline. Discipline requires enforcement. It requires policies and laws that deny people the freedom to act on their temptations.


Here's where we disagree. Taking away temptation is not discipline. It doesn't teach it, it doesn't strengthen it, it doesn't empower it. It does quite the opposite. When you take away temptation so an individual is never faced with it then when they inevitably face temptation, they're nigh powerless to resist it because they've no practice, no resistance built up, no discipline.

On the contrary, discipline is taught by letting an individual face temptation and helping them develop the strength, resolve and character necessary to resist it on their own power.

Samira Kernher wrote:
You'll never stop scamming, or any of the terrible transactions that go on daily, but with proper policies in place you can make it illegal and force them to go underground.


See above. This would do more harm than good in the interstellar market economy.

Samira Kernher wrote:
Counter-spamming isn't what's going to stop scammers. Refusing to buy criminal and sacrilegious goods isn't what's going to stop people from selling them. The laws that allow that allow people to do these things freely is what needs to be changed.


Changing the laws will not stop the scamming. It might stop the spamming but at great personnel cost and investment, cost and investment that is going to come out of the businesses and consumers purchasing on the legal, regulated market while those buying and selling on the newly bolstered black market will reap all of the reward and discipline is still not taught.

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#25 - 2015-07-02 19:57:08 UTC
Liam Antolliere wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:

Again, the scammers are not the issue. They're a symptom. The issue is that the SCC is unregulated and unrestricted. The fact that you can freely buy drugs, weapons, and anything else you could want on the interstellar marketplace is the issue.


Now you're discussing something else altogether. Here you're discussing market regulation to enforce product legality and availability, which does literally nothing for the scammers and spammers.


Because, if you had been reading my posts, you would see that I have consistently said that scammers are a very minor problem compared to all of the other issues the SCC has created. If we are going to try to fix Amarr then there are much, much bigger problems than a few loud-mouthed con artists exploiting people of low intelligence.

Quote:
Also, it's a proven fact that regulating the public market is simply going to create and/or bolster the black market, which with the resources and wealth available to capsuleers would basically be like freely taking money away from businesses that wish to function legally and putting it in the hands of illegal business cartels and pirates on a silver platter. Not to mention the extra personnel and manpower hours that would now need to be delegated to policing and enforcing market regulation cluster-wide against the aforementioned resources and wealth of capsuleers. In short, a logistic nightmare that simply isn't feasible.


If that business engages in practices that should be illegal then it deserves to have money taken away from it.

And get over yourself. The interstellar market place is dominated by capsuleer corporations who have far fewer restrictions imposed on them than any legitimate corporation. If capsuleer businesses are ruined then good. Maybe they'd then have to employ with respectable groups.

Quote:
On the contrary, discipline is taught by letting an individual face temptation and helping them develop the strength, resolve and character necessary to resist it on their own power.


People don't have that strength. See capsuleers for what happens when you let them face it without anything holding them back.
Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#26 - 2015-07-02 20:31:06 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Because, if you had been reading my posts, you would see that I have consistently said that scammers are a very minor problem compared to all of the other issues the SCC has created. If we are going to try to fix Amarr then there are much, much bigger problems than a few loud-mouthed con artists exploiting people of low intelligence.


Except that this thread is about the scammers and spammers and thus my responses to you were in that context. I have made no attempt to tell you how to fix the Empire, nor would I be arrogant enough to presume I could.

Samira Kernher wrote:
If that business engages in practices that should be illegal then it deserves to have money taken away from it.


I believe we're misunderstanding one another. I'm not suggesting that the dilemma is that legitimate businesses would lose money (most wouldn't, at least not this way. Money would be lost in the increased market costs due to regulation and oversight costs), I'm referring to the fact that regulating the market will more-than-likely increase the black market, particularly given the penchant for capsuleers to use their wealth and resources to acquire illicit goods.

Samira Kernher wrote:
And get over yourself. The interstellar market place is dominated by capsuleer corporations who have far fewer restrictions imposed on them than any legitimate corporation. If capsuleer businesses are ruined then good. Maybe they'd then have to employ with respectable groups.


Interesting...I'm discussing the situation and you're telling me to get over myself. This discussion isn't about me, I'd like to keep it that way if that's quite alright with you. I understand that capsuleer businesses have fewer regulations than baseliner businesses, largely due (again) to the amount of administrative oversight necessary to regulate business being conducted by individuals with the wealth and resources of capsuleers.

Further, I never said businesses would be "ruined," I said that the increase in costs for doing business directly hurts legitimate businesses.

Samira Kernher wrote:
People don't have that strength. See capsuleers for what happens when you let them face it without anything holding them back.


You're demonstrably wrong regarding the strength of people. I can look at several capsuleers who possess the strength to practice discipline, your own alliance contains many of them.

Your lack of faith and embitterment with the cluster around you doesn't make it reality, it makes it your perception. It still doesn't change the fact that discipline is taught, not enforced by omission.

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Archbishop Abraxas
Defensores Fidei
#27 - 2015-07-03 07:16:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Archbishop Abraxas
Samira Kernher wrote:
The SCC to intervene? No. I want SCC policies to be changed, through pressure from Amarr diplomats, so that it stops stomping over our cultural and religious law.

If that's not an option, then we should just withdraw from the SCC.


Kontrahage wrote:
I doubt driving out scammers would lead to economical or cultural isolation.
Also the means suggested are just as legal and cannot be viewed as vigilante
law enforcement.
I am also sceptical wether this will have any success but if so I shall welcome it.
Amarr has to stand as an example to mankind of how things can and should be.
An approximation of HIS kingdom in our material world.

I would be interested in where the line is drawn. Maybe a cleric can enlighten me.
Would contract gambling be allowed as practised by Mesitosh Kashaga?

You are both very impressive faithfuls.

Testaments to God's glorious work in his children reclaimed.

Devoted. Intelligent. Uncompromising.

Continue steadfastly, Son and Daughter of the Most High God.
The Golden Serpent
A Drunken Squirrels' Conspiracy for Revenge
#28 - 2015-07-07 11:02:29 UTC  |  Edited by: The Golden Serpent
Yes I am with you I hate the scammers in Amarr. It might be better to recite prayers though. Most of the clergy I know don't have access to the ship channels and so God is poorly represented.

-:¦:-•:'":•.-:¦:-•* K H A N I D •-:¦:-•:''''*:•-:¦:-

Goldfinch
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2015-07-07 12:30:12 UTC

Liam Antolliere wrote:
I believe we're misunderstanding one another. I'm not suggesting that the dilemma is that legitimate businesses would lose money (most wouldn't, at least not this way. Money would be lost in the increased market costs due to regulation and oversight costs)


Slaves purchased from SCC markets become cheap, disposable labor. Unlike paid workers, illegal slaves rarely develop any advanced vocational skills, they have zero purchasing power, and thus worthless as consumers. Illegal slaves are also an inefficient source of labor, with high rates of disease (from neglect) and death (from abuse). This high turnover makes their availability on the SCC markets a self-perpetuating, volume profitable, illicit business.

Legitimate businesses would not lose the money invested in regulation. Regulation helps grow the number of consumers in the market, in the form of healthy and paid workers. Curbing cheap, illegal labor helps prevent businesses that employ them from flooding the market with grossly underpriced goods that hurt the legitimate business's bottom line.


Quote:
I'm referring to the fact that regulating the market will more-than-likely increase the black market, particularly given the penchant for capsuleers to use their wealth and resources to acquire illicit goods.


We feel the need to question the viewpoint that rules should not be enforced simply because people may break them.


Quote:
discipline is taught, not enforced by omission.


Discipline must be enforced.. and taught. The rod and whip are as much instruments of teaching, as they are of discipline.

\J/

veiled and bound

my origin story (on eve-backstage)

Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#30 - 2015-07-08 13:16:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Liam Antolliere
Goldfinch wrote:

Slaves purchased from SCC markets become cheap, disposable labor. Unlike paid workers, illegal slaves rarely develop any advanced vocational skills, they have zero purchasing power, and thus worthless as consumers. Illegal slaves are also an inefficient source of labor, with high rates of disease (from neglect) and death (from abuse). This high turnover makes their availability on the SCC markets a self-perpetuating, volume profitable, illicit business.


I agree completely, I am not arguing against their removal from the SCC markets, I even signed the petition asking for that exact thing.

Goldfinch wrote:
Legitimate businesses would not lose the money invested in regulation. Regulation helps grow the number of consumers in the market, in the form of healthy and paid workers. Curbing cheap, illegal labor helps prevent businesses that employ them from flooding the market with grossly underpriced goods that hurt the legitimate business's bottom line.


In the long run, yes. Again, I'm not stating that the regulations aren't needed or a good idea, I'm pointing out that there's more to the dilemma than simply swooping in with guns blazing and expecting swift change. It's a gradual process that's going to create initial difficulties for legitimate businesses and increase the activity of the black market. These aren't reasons not to pursue it, they're simply things that need to be considered when pursuing it.

Goldfinch wrote:
We feel the need to question the viewpoint that rules should not be enforced simply because people may break them.


That's not at all what I'm suggesting. I'm simply pointing out, again, that the extensive resourcefulness of capsuleers needs to be a variable that is considered when making changes to the SCC market regulations. it is pointless to put the regulations into place if nothing is also put into place to compensate for the counter activity done by those seeking to continue to flood the market with illicit goods.


Goldfinch wrote:
Discipline must be enforced.. and taught. The rod and whip are as much instruments of teaching, as they are of discipline.


On this we agree but the target of those instruments of teaching are those who transgress, not the object of their transgressions.

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Tony-Vagabond Carter
Chrysos Aigis
#31 - 2015-07-08 14:22:49 UTC
While I'm all for stopping the flood of fraudsters, which harm legitimate business. I have some concerns here especially with per-recorded transmissions, dubbed "macros" by CONCORD.

If such Macros are used to 'clear' a 'page' of Com display they are in violation.. or rather could be interpreted of being in violation of CONCORD and relevant authorities rules over use of the public coms/chat channel known as "local" .

Just my two milli-isk and an observation.

If I refuse to sell you a pie, for the sake of my beliefs or yours.. who really loses out here? Me. I will have lost a sale and possibly future sales, and you will just go to another pie-maker!

Previous page12