These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[AEGIS] The Hecate

First post First post
Author
Terra Chrall
Doomheim
#101 - 2015-06-22 19:19:57 UTC
Brother Mercury wrote:
I love when we get new ships.

I don't love when the new ships we get completely nullify any usefulness of 3 classes of ships, however. Particularly after CCP has just done a great job on the tiercide re-balance.

Can anyone please explain to me what the point of flying a t1 frigate, assault frigate, or t1 cruiser is now, when we have these four amazing tactical destroyers?

I'm not being completely facetious -- I'd really like to be shown an example where one would choose a t1 frigate, t1 cruiser, or an assault frigate over one of these tactical destroyers. "Because the player is a newbie" doesn't count.

T1 ships are entry level ships, low SP, low cost. Do you use T1 tank and weapons or T2? Why would you use T1 tank or weapons if you can use T2? That is the same with ship progression. Once you have the skills and money to fly a better ship you will do so. The times you will revert back to something less will be solely based on your preference. Usually as a suicide ship you want to save some ISK by using T1 over T2/T3.

As far as Assault Frigates go, they need some love and a balance pass now that T3D are out. And CCP has, IIRC, stated they intend to take a look at AFs in the near future.
Stitch Kaneland
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#102 - 2015-06-22 19:42:36 UTC
I enjoy when new t3d come out. Means im going to get a lot easy kills from ppl without a clue flying around Twisted.

T3D die very quickly when webbed/neuted. And missiles absolutely punish them, provided you have to intelligence to fit for application. I killed quite a few prenerf 10mn confessors with my drake. Then i sat in a RHML phoon and decimated every t3d that was dumb enough to engage.

Yea cruisers can kill em too. I just like flying ships everyone says is bad, and getting lots of fun fights.

As for AF, they need some work to remain competitive. Jag needs a bit of work, either 4th turret + grid or turn it into a t2 breacher and make it a mini claymore. Svipul does EVERYthing a jag can, but better in everyway.
XSANATOS
Doomheim
#103 - 2015-06-22 19:58:03 UTC
Let see, full hull fitting with rigs and dmgc in defense mode will be complete OP but again good design!
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#104 - 2015-06-22 20:49:27 UTC
Stitch Kaneland wrote:
I enjoy when new t3d come out. Means im going to get a lot easy kills from ppl without a clue flying around Twisted.

T3D die very quickly when webbed/neuted. And missiles absolutely punish them, provided you have to intelligence to fit for application. I killed quite a few prenerf 10mn confessors with my drake. Then i sat in a RHML phoon and decimated every t3d that was dumb enough to engage.

Yea cruisers can kill em too. I just like flying ships everyone says is bad, and getting lots of fun fights.

As for AF, they need some work to remain competitive. Jag needs a bit of work, either 4th turret + grid or turn it into a t2 breacher and make it a mini claymore. Svipul does EVERYthing a jag can, but better in everyway.


Stich, dear, all assault frigate are in dire need on an overhaul but I guess they have to wait till later this year.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Ares Desideratus
UNSAFE SPACE
#105 - 2015-06-22 21:41:05 UTC
Terra Chrall wrote:
Brother Mercury wrote:
I love when we get new ships.

I don't love when the new ships we get completely nullify any usefulness of 3 classes of ships, however. Particularly after CCP has just done a great job on the tiercide re-balance.

Can anyone please explain to me what the point of flying a t1 frigate, assault frigate, or t1 cruiser is now, when we have these four amazing tactical destroyers?

I'm not being completely facetious -- I'd really like to be shown an example where one would choose a t1 frigate, t1 cruiser, or an assault frigate over one of these tactical destroyers. "Because the player is a newbie" doesn't count.

T1 ships are entry level ships, low SP, low cost. Do you use T1 tank and weapons or T2? Why would you use T1 tank or weapons if you can use T2? That is the same with ship progression. Once you have the skills and money to fly a better ship you will do so. The times you will revert back to something less will be solely based on your preference. Usually as a suicide ship you want to save some ISK by using T1 over T2/T3.

As far as Assault Frigates go, they need some love and a balance pass now that T3D are out. And CCP has, IIRC, stated they intend to take a look at AFs in the near future.

I don't think anyone is going to dispute the obvious ship progression argument. At least not reasonably.

However, T3 destroyers overshadow nearly everything else that uses small weapon systems. Only some of the Interceptors are worth flying, while others are gimped in horrible ways (Crusader, Claw), and overall they have no meaningful DPS, especially if you want to use them at long range.

The biggest problem is with Assault Ships. The only advantage an Assault Ship has over a T3 destroyer is the signature radius bonus while using MWDs. Besides that, T3s have every conceivable advantage over Assault Ships, even speed! This should not be the case.

There are exceptions, for instance the Retribution has a 7.5% tracking bonus while the Confessor does not, but in the grand scheme of things this bonus makes very little difference when a Confessor is faster, has easily twice the DPS, and can hit out to far greater ranges.

At a minimum, I think Assault Ships should generally be faster than T3 destroyers.
Rinolt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#106 - 2015-06-22 22:19:42 UTC
Looks nice.

Btw: How about seeding the corresponding skill on the market on the test server?
Xavier Azabu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#107 - 2015-06-22 23:09:12 UTC
Ares Desideratus wrote:
Terra Chrall wrote:
Brother Mercury wrote:
I love when we get new ships.

I don't love when the new ships we get completely nullify any usefulness of 3 classes of ships, however. Particularly after CCP has just done a great job on the tiercide re-balance.

Can anyone please explain to me what the point of flying a t1 frigate, assault frigate, or t1 cruiser is now, when we have these four amazing tactical destroyers?

I'm not being completely facetious -- I'd really like to be shown an example where one would choose a t1 frigate, t1 cruiser, or an assault frigate over one of these tactical destroyers. "Because the player is a newbie" doesn't count.

T1 ships are entry level ships, low SP, low cost. Do you use T1 tank and weapons or T2? Why would you use T1 tank or weapons if you can use T2? That is the same with ship progression. Once you have the skills and money to fly a better ship you will do so. The times you will revert back to something less will be solely based on your preference. Usually as a suicide ship you want to save some ISK by using T1 over T2/T3.

As far as Assault Frigates go, they need some love and a balance pass now that T3D are out. And CCP has, IIRC, stated they intend to take a look at AFs in the near future.

I don't think anyone is going to dispute the obvious ship progression argument. At least not reasonably.

However, T3 destroyers overshadow nearly everything else that uses small weapon systems. Only some of the Interceptors are worth flying, while others are gimped in horrible ways (Crusader, Claw), and overall they have no meaningful DPS, especially if you want to use them at long range.

The biggest problem is with Assault Ships. The only advantage an Assault Ship has over a T3 destroyer is the signature radius bonus while using MWDs. Besides that, T3s have every conceivable advantage over Assault Ships, even speed! This should not be the case.

There are exceptions, for instance the Retribution has a 7.5% tracking bonus while the Confessor does not, but in the grand scheme of things this bonus makes very little difference when a Confessor is faster, has easily twice the DPS, and can hit out to far greater ranges.

At a minimum, I think Assault Ships should generally be faster than T3 destroyers.


Claw and other Interceptors are very useful. They can catch things fast, travel anywhere safely, blap and run, and make for quick roams to hit PVE targets etc., I don't think that interceptors are meant to tank and/or brawl, aside from maybe the Taranis.

As far as the Assault Frigates go, the Harpy, Hawk (in brawler situations), Enyo (brawler), and Vengeance are alright. The Punisher, Wolf, Jaguar, Retri, and Ishkur are overshadowed by other ships in my opinion - especially the new T3s destroyers.

But back to the Hecate. That signature bloom means that they will take heavy damage from most competent cruiser comps. But depending on player skill and warpins the Hecate will be hell for some of the other T3 dessies. As far as it looks now I am liking solo brawling fits and a Harpy-esque 125mm rail fit. Maybe a little high power (due to the sheer versatility) but I'm sure that if the cost can be kept high enough people will still have reason to use cheaper ships.
Vibiana
Frontier Trading Company
#108 - 2015-06-23 00:36:05 UTC
Xavier Azabu wrote:

Maybe a little high power (due to the sheer versatility) but I'm sure that if the cost can be kept high enough people will still have reason to use cheaper ships.


Nope, they won't.

The thing is just OP. Too much damage for the size.
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#109 - 2015-06-23 00:39:18 UTC
Well, we won't be using Enyos in our C4 wolf-rayet ratting. That's like, 1650 DPS in C4 W-R, and basically perma-run MWD to get from rat to rat extra fast.

YOLOSWAGCASHDOLLAZ

Certainly invalidates the majority of other options, especially in C13's. Woe betide anyone who gets dropped on by these in any wormhole, with nice 0m warp-ins.
Daniela Doran
Doomheim
#110 - 2015-06-23 01:44:34 UTC
elitatwo wrote:
Stitch Kaneland wrote:
I enjoy when new t3d come out. Means im going to get a lot easy kills from ppl without a clue flying around Twisted.

T3D die very quickly when webbed/neuted. And missiles absolutely punish them, provided you have to intelligence to fit for application. I killed quite a few prenerf 10mn confessors with my drake. Then i sat in a RHML phoon and decimated every t3d that was dumb enough to engage.

Yea cruisers can kill em too. I just like flying ships everyone says is bad, and getting lots of fun fights.

As for AF, they need some work to remain competitive. Jag needs a bit of work, either 4th turret + grid or turn it into a t2 breacher and make it a mini claymore. Svipul does EVERYthing a jag can, but better in everyway.


Stich, dear, all assault frigate are in dire need on an overhaul but I guess they have to wait till later this year.


I don't see how, seeing as they were really great until Jan. 2015.
Ares Desideratus
UNSAFE SPACE
#111 - 2015-06-23 02:50:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Ares Desideratus
Xavier Azabu wrote:


Claw and other Interceptors are very useful. They can catch things fast, travel anywhere safely, blap and run, and make for quick roams to hit PVE targets etc., I don't think that interceptors are meant to tank and/or brawl, aside from maybe the Taranis.

Interceptors are actually supposed to be designed for combat, so it's sad that the Crusader and Claw, which both should be elite combat inteceptors, are relegated to the role of shuttle.

If you spend any decent amount of time trying to find a use for the Claw / Crusader, you will know that they are garbage cans.
Xavier Azabu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#112 - 2015-06-23 03:01:18 UTC
Ares Desideratus wrote:
Xavier Azabu wrote:


Claw and other Interceptors are very useful. They can catch things fast, travel anywhere safely, blap and run, and make for quick roams to hit PVE targets etc., I don't think that interceptors are meant to tank and/or brawl, aside from maybe the Taranis.

Interceptors are actually supposed to be designed for combat, so it's sad that the Crusader and Claw, which both should be elite combat inteceptors, are relegated to the role of shuttle.

If you spend any decent amount of time trying to find a use for the Claw / Crusader, you will know that they are garbage cans.


I really don't think that most ceptors are designed to challenge much more than other frigs or to tackle what's escaping.

As for the combat ceptors that you mention, the Crusader is in a bad place combat wise yes, but it has great niche uses.
Taranis is fine. Raptor is not good except for weird uses (maxtank tackle etc.,). Claw is pretty good with arty. Last fall and winter I saw a lot of arty claws.

T3 dessies were partially created to nerf the hordes of ceptors that nobody could catch. They also cost many times more and cannot sig tank as efficiently as ceptors. I personally like the T3s in the current meta. An OP fit t3 Dessie costs as much as some of the cheaper faction cruisers so, so what if they are useful.
Ares Desideratus
UNSAFE SPACE
#113 - 2015-06-23 03:24:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Ares Desideratus
Xavier Azabu wrote:

I really don't think that most ceptors are designed to challenge much more than other frigs or to tackle what's escaping.

As for the combat ceptors that you mention, the Crusader is in a bad place combat wise yes, but it has great niche uses.
Taranis is fine. Raptor is not good except for weird uses (maxtank tackle etc.,). Claw is pretty good with arty. Last fall and winter I saw a lot of arty claws.

T3 dessies were partially created to nerf the hordes of ceptors that nobody could catch. They also cost many times more and cannot sig tank as efficiently as ceptors. I personally like the T3s in the current meta. An OP fit t3 Dessie costs as much as some of the cheaper faction cruisers so, so what if they are useful.

I love the T3 destroyers just as much as anyone else. I do not want to see them nerfed again. I love the Confessor the way it is.

However, if you think about this rationally, it is impossible to look at the current frigate lineup, and conclude that any of the Assault Ships are in a good place. As soon as the Hecate is out, there will no longer be any reason to purchase an Assault Ship, aside from silly reasons like aesthetics, which from a gameplay perspective is really irrelevant here.

With that in mind, it should be impossible for anyone to ignore the hideous problem with the Crusader and the Claw. They used to be okay, once upon a time. But they have never actually been good, and in the current game they are simply mediocre. Arty Claws are terrible, like, absolute crap. The only reason someone should use one of those, is as a tackle Interceptor, but at that point, you are using the wrong ship for the job, and should just get a Stiletto.
Xavier Azabu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#114 - 2015-06-23 05:32:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Xavier Azabu
Ares Desideratus wrote:
Xavier Azabu wrote:

I really don't think that most ceptors are designed to challenge much more than other frigs or to tackle what's escaping.

As for the combat ceptors that you mention, the Crusader is in a bad place combat wise yes, but it has great niche uses.
Taranis is fine. Raptor is not good except for weird uses (maxtank tackle etc.,). Claw is pretty good with arty. Last fall and winter I saw a lot of arty claws.

T3 dessies were partially created to nerf the hordes of ceptors that nobody could catch. They also cost many times more and cannot sig tank as efficiently as ceptors. I personally like the T3s in the current meta. An OP fit t3 Dessie costs as much as some of the cheaper faction cruisers so, so what if they are useful.


I love the T3 destroyers just as much as anyone else. I do not want to see them nerfed again. I love the Confessor the way it is.

However, if you think about this rationally, it is impossible to look at the current frigate lineup, and conclude that any of the Assault Ships are in a good place. As soon as the Hecate is out, there will no longer be any reason to purchase an Assault Ship, aside from silly reasons like aesthetics, which from a gameplay perspective is really irrelevant here.

With that in mind, it should be impossible for anyone to ignore the hideous problem with the Crusader and the Claw. They used to be okay, once upon a time. But they have never actually been good, and in the current game they are simply mediocre. Arty claws...


You have never run into arty claws run by say PL... Less alpha than Svipuls, sure. But less than ten of them has the alpha of a Talos. They nearly instantaneously align. With a combat prober these are pretty good. Look also at the sheer speed of travel within a system or constellation. They are much more mobile than a T3 Dessie.

Stiletto, Mal, Ares, and the nerfed Crow still fulfill their role. Due to T3s though they are not as safe to fly as they once were, and I applaud that.

AFs are cheaper than T3s and as I said in a previous post all but 3 of them are in a bleh place. I still don't know if they should be able to take on a T3 Dessie. It's kind of like suggesting that a Sabre should be able to take on a Tengu. (Although I have done it before and so have others in my guild with Thrashers lol)

The difference is of course cost. They were supposed to make Svipuls more expensive but the price has dropped again.

Hopefully they'll put it back.
Decripid Sano
Doomheim
#115 - 2015-06-23 08:06:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Decripid Sano
Trinkets friend wrote:
Well, we won't be using Enyos in our C4 wolf-rayet ratting. That's like, 1650 DPS in C4 W-R, and basically perma-run MWD to get from rat to rat extra fast.

YOLOSWAGCASHDOLLAZ

Certainly invalidates the majority of other options, especially in C13's. Woe betide anyone who gets dropped on by these in any wormhole, with nice 0m warp-ins.


Such ashame to see a veteran 2007 char going around ganking peoples in T3D's. If that's not trolling I don't know what is. Get yourself a SC or Titan.......... and stay in it.
Arla Sarain
#116 - 2015-06-23 09:50:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Arla Sarain
Terra Chrall wrote:
Do you use T1 tank and weapons or T2

I frequently use T1 modules, especially after the tiercide balance. In fact a lot of people do. Maybe even will use T1 guns after they go through those. Some fits already have T1 LMLs as a requirement.

Sup?
Adriana Shi
Deadspace Corp.
#117 - 2015-06-23 09:50:58 UTC
Vibiana wrote:
Xavier Azabu wrote:

Maybe a little high power (due to the sheer versatility) but I'm sure that if the cost can be kept high enough people will still have reason to use cheaper ships.


Nope, they won't.

The thing is just OP. Too much damage for the size.


This right here.
it looks great other then its redoncules dps.
its going to end up being another Catalyst used for ganking, At least with this you can have a tank.
but seriously tho i think this is going to be the next suicide ganking specialty ship really this will replace the Tornado in Jita ganking i think for half the cost look at the other T3D's prices already far more cost effective.

On another note i think Suicide ganking needs to be looked at but thats not the point here.
holdmybeer
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#118 - 2015-06-23 11:05:08 UTC  |  Edited by: holdmybeer
Adriana Shi wrote:
Vibiana wrote:
Xavier Azabu wrote:

Maybe a little high power (due to the sheer versatility) but I'm sure that if the cost can be kept high enough people will still have reason to use cheaper ships.


Nope, they won't.

The thing is just OP. Too much damage for the size.


This right here.
it looks great other then its redoncules dps.
its going to end up being another Catalyst used for ganking, At least with this you can have a tank.
but seriously tho i think this is going to be the next suicide ganking specialty ship really this will replace the Tornado in Jita ganking i think for half the cost look at the other T3D's prices already far more cost effective.

On another note i think Suicide ganking needs to be looked at but thats not the point here.


I don't think anyone can take you seriously after this post, Adriana.


Good looking ship though, outside and inside. I don't know if I should fly a svipul or this after it is available.
412nv Yaken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#119 - 2015-06-23 12:08:27 UTC
cant wait to drop a fleet of these onto some freighters for the lulz

A True Champion of High Security Space

Estella Osoka
Cranky Bitches Who PMS
#120 - 2015-06-23 15:34:46 UTC
Is this open for testing on SISI?