These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

capitals into highsec
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#61 - 2015-06-19 10:44:22 UTC
Vek Hareka wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
Grinder2210 wrote:
+ 3 for caps in Highsec Smile

After all we need some way to kill drifters besides useing a POS tower right Blink


too bad I did not read your post before I just shot one of those drifters not knowing what they are and got volleykilled :D


You mean https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=430503 ?

Is this why you push for caps in HS ?

... Because Drifters shoot caps too, you know ?


na that happend after I read about the caps in highsec, there is no need to push for it, the devs have already mentioned that it is on the agenda and they want to do it... I was just asking if somebody knows the timeline for that, to assure I finished training for the ships as soon as it is live

still battling the drifter with some caps in highsec would certainly be more fun then getting popped with just one strike

Harry Forever vs. Goonswarm
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#62 - 2015-06-19 10:47:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
Barrogh Habalu wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see

I fail to see how Hisec restrictions stop you from bringing heavy ships into Low / Null.

Wait, it's Harry forever. I mean, you're not overly serious, right?


you know the difference between caps and battleships right? why would highsec go there with battleships if you have the caps waiting for them... with the change now it will be an even fight and thats what nullsec wanted to prevent

Harry Forever vs. Goonswarm
Anddo
Doomheim
#63 - 2015-06-19 14:02:26 UTC
La Rynx wrote:


Bear
Nice Joke!

But is is easier to organize a bag of cats than a reasonable amount of hisec dwellers.
Lol

stoicfaux wrote:
Arkady Romanov wrote:
Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before.

But has he paid his CODE permit? If not, then CODE is a joke.


CODE IS a joke...

Bear


No, they are just carebears who can't PvP, so they do what they do instead. Worse than mining, really.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#64 - 2015-06-19 14:09:01 UTC
Capitals in High Sec are alright by me so long as you can't fly one in high sec while being a member of an npc corp.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2015-06-19 14:09:24 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:
Barrogh Habalu wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see

I fail to see how Hisec restrictions stop you from bringing heavy ships into Low / Null.

Wait, it's Harry forever. I mean, you're not overly serious, right?


you know the difference between caps and battleships right? why would highsec go there with battleships if you have the caps waiting for them... with the change now it will be an even fight and thats what nullsec wanted to prevent


even if this did make sense it would still sound stupid Ugh

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#66 - 2015-06-19 14:12:30 UTC
Anddo wrote:
No, they are just carebears who can't PvP, so they do what they do instead. Worse than mining, really.

Y so mad? Was there an antimatter related accident?

Evil RatKid
Anddo
Doomheim
#67 - 2015-06-19 14:21:48 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

Y so mad? Was there an antimatter related accident?


No...I've never lost a ship to you bears. But then again, I look for people who can challenge me and fight back....you wouldn't understand. Keep up the good "PvP" you do, though.

AT14 showed your PvP skills. Going for a similar showing this year?
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#68 - 2015-06-19 14:39:27 UTC
I don't think you understand what pvp means.

And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat.
Anddo
Doomheim
#69 - 2015-06-19 14:41:22 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
I don't think you understand what pvp means.

And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat.


Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#70 - 2015-06-19 14:43:40 UTC
Anddo wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
I don't think you understand what pvp means.

And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat.


Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.


i agree and the only people who really challenge it and throw the whole "everything is pvp" tend to be the people who do nothing but shoot non-combat ships

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#71 - 2015-06-19 15:02:49 UTC
Anddo wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
I don't think you understand what pvp means.

And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat.


Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.

How is it our problem when they start a fight in a non-combat ship? We are just protecting our territorial claim.. I am not sure why you are so butthurt.

Evil RatKid
Anddo
Doomheim
#72 - 2015-06-19 15:19:11 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

How is it our problem when they start a fight in a non-combat ship? We are just protecting our territorial claim.. I am not sure why you are so butthurt.


Like your claim over AT14? Oh, wait....right. I remember now.

Pats Ima Wreckyou on the head and gives a gold star. You're cute.
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#73 - 2015-06-19 15:44:00 UTC
Anddo wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

How is it our problem when they start a fight in a non-combat ship? We are just protecting our territorial claim.. I am not sure why you are so butthurt.


Like your claim over AT14? Oh, wait....right. I remember now.

Pats Ima Wreckyou on the head and gives a gold star. You're cute.

Thanks, but i already have a gold medal from the last AT, it's even in my bio.

Evil RatKid
Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#74 - 2015-06-19 15:53:18 UTC
Until there are tangible structures that block capitals from high sec, I would be okay with them in high sec because I hate the arbitrary restrictions. 'Empire policy doesn't allow blah blah blah....' That and all those poor towers, stuck in space forever that need to be released from their torment.

The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal
Anddo
Doomheim
#75 - 2015-06-19 15:56:50 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

Thanks, but i already have a gold medal from the last AT, it's even in my bio.


Adorable. I got it

*wink

I loved the spin and backpedaling code did after that disaster.
Bellatrix Invicta
Doomheim
#76 - 2015-06-19 16:07:06 UTC
Anddo wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

Y so mad? Was there an antimatter related accident?


No...I've never lost a ship to you bears. But then again, I look for people who can challenge me and fight back....you wouldn't understand. Keep up the good "PvP" you do, though.

AT14 showed your PvP skills. Going for a similar showing this year?


Confirming that every Agent of the New Order routinely engages in honorable, 1v1 PvP.

If you think you've won, think again.

The CODE always wins.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#77 - 2015-06-19 16:36:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Anddo wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
I don't think you understand what pvp means.

And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat.


Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.

Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just being intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.

A player destroying the ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.

Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#78 - 2015-06-19 17:52:35 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:

A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.


This is where "carebears" fail and where real pve players (in the EVE sense) shine. The carebear thinks "I'm not bothering anyone, I should be left alone, so no one will bother me while i make isk".. The better player thinks "while rare, gankers do exist, I better not bling this ship too much, and i better have a plan to survive, as well as a back up continuity plan in case I do get popped I can jump right in to another ship and keep on truckin".

It's not a matter of intelligence or laziness IMO, but rather player "predisposition". If you are the type to make bad assumptions and not the type to think ahead in real life, you're not going to suddenly grow these attributes when playing a video game.
Anddo
Doomheim
#79 - 2015-06-19 18:02:27 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:

Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.

A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.

Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks.



That doesn't mean I have to respect it. I 100% support CODE being able to do what they do in game. It's a sandbox. They create great content. I love hunting them, and love treating them like the spineless people they are. It's all part of the meta.

I like the idea of trying to push New Eden to an honorable, no ganking type of world, and honestly I couldn't have fun doing that without people like CODE doing what they do. It's a "I love to hate them" kind of thing.
Bellatrix Invicta
Doomheim
#80 - 2015-06-19 18:05:08 UTC
Anddo wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:

Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.

A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.

Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks.



That doesn't mean I have to respect it. I 100% support CODE being able to do what they do in game. It's a sandbox. They create great content. I love hunting them, and love treating them like the spineless people they are. It's all part of the meta.

I like the idea of trying to push New Eden to an honorable, no ganking type of world, and honestly I couldn't have fun doing that without people like CODE doing what they do. It's a "I love to hate them" kind of thing.


"Spineless" - fearless, brave forum alt.

My cup of irony runneth over.

If you think you've won, think again.

The CODE always wins.