These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Alliance tournament and the rules to participate.

First post
Author
KleinerHai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2015-06-12 18:16:33 UTC
I have participated the last three years in the Ally tournament and within our corp we are actively working towards the tournament, organizing regular trainings and moving all members to participate for months.

Now I see a fundamental flaw in the random draw.

There are this year many alliances that want to participate and you picked out 48 randomly and obviously we are not one of them.

With an additional 12 alliances already rule int there are only 4 spots left and we need to bid on them knowing there are about 23 potential participants that want to join. Since we are unable to get together the plexes to bid on this only the most rich alliances will be able to join.

However there might be a lot of the 48 random alliances which might not necessarily be that keen to participate but are just happy to be part of it.

At the end the really motivated corporations might stay out due to the lack of spots.

It would have made way more sense to reduce the number of random draws.

If we loose the silent bid, my motivation for the game and the ally tournament will heavily be impacted as we cannot even switch corp to be still part of it.

I know this sounds like whining but what I definately lack is some balance between those who really want to participate and how some free slots might have been given to alliances which are not as motivated as we are. You might argue we just have to give a high bid on the silent bidding but we just cannot afford it. Sad

Regards,
Ilan Bashar
Fat Kitty Inc.
#2 - 2015-06-12 18:48:33 UTC
Well,

I cannot understand what makes you believe that there is such thing as a random draw.

They made sure to have all them former alliance buddies in the tournament and all the "big names" and thats it.
How likely is it to have like all three PL teams in the tournament (waffelshoardePL)?

CCP is very consequent in drawing conclusions from the past, where two teams from the same alliance fight each other.
They make it three teams, that will improve things, for sure! Roll

How ridiculous is that.



suicide
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#3 - 2015-06-12 20:48:37 UTC
The lack of arenas is the reason that all the teams that want to compete do not have a chance to compete.

A preliminary round could theoretically use a double-elimination format to get down to the correct number of teams (64) going into the tournament proper.
M Foucault
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2015-06-12 21:49:47 UTC
People complaining that a random draw randomly selected alliances that they don't like so it must be favouritism.

Good job, keep on posting.
Wil Aers
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2015-06-12 21:57:12 UTC
Ilan Bashar wrote:
Well,

I cannot understand what makes you believe that there is such thing as a random draw.

They made sure to have all them former alliance buddies in the tournament and all the "big names" and thats it.
How likely is it to have like all three PL teams in the tournament (waffelshoardePL)?

CCP is very consequent in drawing conclusions from the past, where two teams from the same alliance fight each other.
They make it three teams, that will improve things, for sure! Roll

How ridiculous is that.





you mad u goober? LOL
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#6 - 2015-06-12 23:15:57 UTC
Confirming we paid off CCP logiguy to pick waffles and horde

We used the proceeds we were paid to have Apothne and Elise be commentators again

Just be glad there is enough teams this year

Do you buy tin foil by the pound, roll or just per hat?
KleinerHai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2015-06-13 07:16:56 UTC
suicide wrote:
The lack of arenas is the reason that all the teams that want to compete do not have a chance to compete.

A preliminary round could theoretically use a double-elimination format to get down to the correct number of teams (64) going into the tournament proper.


cannot agree more.
Sivor Detmen
Arbitrary Spaceship Destruction
-affliction-
#8 - 2015-06-13 07:28:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Sivor Detmen
Kenneth Feld wrote:


Just be glad there is enough teams this year





More than enough teams this year it seems. It is a shame however to have so many teams left out. With the arenas in place a preliminary round would have been the solution even if organized by players.
Ilan Bashar
Fat Kitty Inc.
#9 - 2015-06-13 09:19:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Ilan Bashar
M Foucault wrote:
People complaining that a random draw randomly selected alliances that they don't like so it must be favouritism.
Good job, keep on posting.


Yes,
that is the word I am looking for. "Favourism". Thank you Mr. WehavefourteamsinAT.
I honestly do not think it is corruption, only favourism.

From a mathematical standpoint, It is just remotely probable that some alliances have never ever been "drawn" in the past years, whereas others have ALL their four teams in, in the same year.
Maybe my math is just wrong? Pls show your calculation!

Otherwise, the fact of having four teams in AT will lead to a lot of fake matches. Or shall I call it teams strategy?
A situation we have seen before and CCP promised to make sure it will not happen again.

*I would like to precise that I take PL as an example, I appreciate the fact that PL is in AT and will provide great entertainment and most likely also beat my favourite crew.


No. I say mathematicaly, it has such a low probability that it allows for conclusions to be drawn.
Plus the broken promise from CCP to make sure multiple teams from the same entity will not be allowed to manipulate AT again.
Plus the fact that CCP made sure to directly assign >90% of the slots.

It is ridiculous.
Bob Shaftoes
TURN LEFT
#10 - 2015-06-13 15:42:28 UTC
*sigh*

I hate to white knight CCP , but there is simply no conspiracy to the way the draw is handled. Hell you can even watch the youtube vid of them making the draw FFS.

Fact of the matter is that there is now a sound financial reason to join the alliance tournament , in the form of the valuable ship skins, that are now attainable by the newer and less experienced teams. This has led to an uptick in the amount of applications and unfortunately this means that some really motivated teams will not get to participate.
KleinerHai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2015-06-13 16:50:53 UTC  |  Edited by: KleinerHai
What I would really like is a statement from CCP.

Why was there no communication about which alliances have applied?
Why have only 4 spots been left over for the silent auction?
Why is the silent auction so short term?
Why do we not know who is bidding?
Why has the draw not be done publicly but just the result announced? Question was answered!
Why were some alliances allowed to have alt-alliances to join?

I do not doubt that the draw was done properly but the result definately does not feel correct!

You will miss some nice alliances and eventually you actually have 94% give away and the rest needs to bet like 20+ plexes to be in.

CCP do you thing this is fair?
Does this feel right?

Regards,
KleinerHai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2015-06-13 17:00:10 UTC  |  Edited by: KleinerHai
Bob Shaftoes wrote:
*sigh*

I hate to white knight CCP , but there is simply no conspiracy to the way the draw is handled. Hell you can even watch the youtube vid of them making the draw FFS.

Fact of the matter is that there is now a sound financial reason to join the alliance tournament , in the form of the valuable ship skins, that are now attainable by the newer and less experienced teams. This has led to an uptick in the amount of applications and unfortunately this means that some really motivated teams will not get to participate.


link the youtube- I am eager to see. Not that I do not trust it was drawn properly but I am just disappointed they decided to draw 48 spots!

Right, really motivated people who put in a lot of effort and will just quit the game cause the tournament is one of their main motivation to play this game!
Sivor Detmen
Arbitrary Spaceship Destruction
-affliction-
#13 - 2015-06-13 17:01:08 UTC
KleinerHai wrote:
What I would really like is a statement from CCP.

Why was there no communication about which alliances have applied?
Why have only 4 spots been left over for the silent auction?
Why is the silent auction so short term?
Why do we not know who is bidding?
Why has the draw not be done publicly but just the result announced?
Why were some alliances allowed to have alt-alliances to join?

I do not doubt that the draw was done properly but the result definately does not feel correct!

You will miss some nice alliances and eventually you actually have 94% give away and the rest needs to bet like 20+ plexes to be in.

CCP do you thing this is fair?
Does this feel right?

Regards,




The random draw was totally fair (check the vid). There was no wrongdoing or cherry picking of teams by CCP. The only real shame here is that lots of teams will be left out.
Ilan Bashar
Fat Kitty Inc.
#14 - 2015-06-13 17:12:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Ilan Bashar
Well,

The result is that in an event, called "Alliance Tournament" at least one entity can field several teams, resulting in leaving a lot other alliances teams outside.

So, how can this happen that a lot of alliances are left outside and others can field multiple teams?

IMO there are only two possible reasons:
1. CCP favours this situation
2. CCP has not the competence to assess the situation

I think no. 2 is not the case, as e.g. Fozzie, as an ex-PL member still knows the alliance landscape very well.

Are you in disagreement with me about the fact, that some entitys field several teams while other alliances are left outside?

Are you in disagreement with me that several teams of the same entity will lead to a lot of fake matches?
Lucas Quaan
Dark Enlightenment
New Eden Alliance 99013733
#15 - 2015-06-14 08:48:56 UTC
Bob Shaftoes wrote:
*sigh*

I hate to white knight CCP , but there is simply no conspiracy to the way the draw is handled. Hell you can even watch the youtube vid of them making the draw FFS.

Fact of the matter is that there is now a sound financial reason to join the alliance tournament , in the form of the valuable ship skins, that are now attainable by the newer and less experienced teams. This has led to an uptick in the amount of applications and unfortunately this means that some really motivated teams will not get to participate.

Well, you have two teams, so there's no way your opinion could be fair and balanced, right? ;)

I'm still trying to figure out who our fourth team could be, though. They might have some good setups we could use.
Jeslothar
VendoLife
End of Life
#16 - 2015-06-14 10:02:41 UTC
I take umbrage at the statement below. As a team who has participated in two tournaments and was lucky to get into this draw we are extraordinarily motivated even if we are not the most pro team around. I doubt that any team that has joined is not giving it a red hot go based on what I have seen at test open practice.

However there might be a lot of the 48 random alliances which might not necessarily be that keen to participate but are just happy to be part of it.

It's also unfair to call pandemic horde an alt corp of PL when they are in fact as starter corp. I for one would love to play against PH.

One the topic of missing out I can understand that it sucks and I too would be very down in you place. I agree random draw is probably not the best way to select teams.

It would also be nice if there was a drafting time post draw. Allowing team captains to post for pilots with specific skills from teams that never made it In and allow transfers through a petition or something. However that is only going to add to the complexity for the volunteers at ccp.

Another option is to just let all teams enter then do a random draw for the 48 spots and instead of doing silent auction run a set of elimination matches for the last 4 spots.

Jeslothar
VendoLife
End of Life
#17 - 2015-06-14 10:10:46 UTC
I take umbrage at the statement below. As a team who has participated in two tournaments and was lucky to get into this draw we are extraordinarily motivated even if we are not the most pro team around. I doubt that any team that has joined is not giving it a red hot go based on what I have seen at test open practice.

However there might be a lot of the 48 random alliances which might not necessarily be that keen to participate but are just happy to be part of it.

It's also unfair to call pandemic horde an alt corp of PL when they are in fact as starter corp. I for one would love to play against PH.

One the topic of missing out I can understand that it sucks and I too would be very down in you place. I agree random draw is probably not the best way to select teams.

It would also be nice if there was a drafting time post draw. Allowing team captains to post for pilots with specific skills from teams that never made it In and allow transfers through a petition or something. However that is only going to add to the complexity for the volunteers at ccp.

Another option is to just let all teams enter then do a random draw for the 48 spots and instead of doing silent auction run a set of elimination matches for the last 4 spots.

Auto Maat
Lousy T-Shirt Corp
#18 - 2015-06-14 13:31:54 UTC
As a team that has been left out I'm a bit disappointed about having only 4 spots for silent auction.

With this kind of setup of the tournament I feel like I have to do it like Pandemic Legion does:

Make alliances with alts to better my chances to get in.

Is the wish of the tournament to have like an all Pandemic Legion alt-parade?

Pandemic Legion is in
Waffles is in (an alliance controlled by pandemic legion)
Pademic Horde is in (an alliance controlled by pandemic legion)
Nihilists Social Club is in (an alliance of pandemic legion alts)

All the while, other entities have to enter different alliances as one "because they're controlled by 1 entity". Like Gorgon Empire/Spawn.

The current random draw just makes everyone and their grandmother apply.

So even as a team if you're serious about AT you have to have the luck of the draw, and you see team that do it for ***** and giggles getting places.

Extremely frustrating.

If you wanted a better tournament you would give the top 16 places and then do an open auction for all the other places.
Bei ArtJay
Side Kicks
Unspoken Alliance.
#19 - 2015-06-15 09:51:29 UTC
CCP Logibro is a good guy and i am damn sure the draw was legit so this conspiracy it pointless in my opinion.

The fact that some good teams won't get in this year is however is really sad for me, this method is clearly is not suited to enable the most competitive tournament possible anymore.

It's fantastic to see that 90 teams have put themselves forward, proving there are potentially thousands of players interested in eve e-sports now, hopefully CCP take this and run with it.
Nex Gaius
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2015-06-15 10:51:47 UTC
If you can't afford the plex bid for the silent auction, how are you going to be able to afford the tournament itself, as for you partaking in the last 3 AT's I'm guessing before the limit to 3% implants you where prob had terrible clones to fight, I remember spending close to 6bil per clone.

Also So many places with the random draw (BL #1) it gave people like you a better chance to get in, so cry all you like you didnt win the lotto, gratz on being a whiny *****.
123Next page