These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Nude Patch? [NSFW]

Author
Xane the CEO
Verge Aeronautics
#1 - 2011-12-29 05:52:58 UTC
Tried to view a full body of a pilot. Got a view of a full body.

This picture is completely unedited - shortly after I took it, EvE crashed, so perhaps things were just loading slowly?
Mutie DaPig
Doomheim
#2 - 2011-12-29 05:54:03 UTC
Knocking one out before ze ccp loc
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#3 - 2011-12-29 06:01:52 UTC
Know I know what a CCP person sees when they are thinking lustfully.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Darth A30NZ
Deep Axion
Honorable Third Party
#4 - 2011-12-29 06:03:12 UTC
This is how I see all women through my monocle.

New Eden Spotlight full episode list. 

http://www.youtube.com/user/NewEdenSpotlight/videos

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2011-12-29 06:06:17 UTC
Either too much strain on the client to load full body view or it's another release of 'Mannequin' .
Croniac
Thunder Chickens
#6 - 2011-12-29 06:34:29 UTC
Did you pubies honestly expect it to be anatomically correct? Or maybe have a bush?

Its a mannequin to hang clothes on, not a blow up doll.

Lame post.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#7 - 2011-12-29 06:39:40 UTC
Croniac wrote:
Did you pubies honestly expect it to be anatomically correct? Or maybe have a bush?

Its a mannequin to hang clothes on, not a blow up doll.

Lame post.


I believe the correct term is "meat puppet".

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#8 - 2011-12-29 07:53:01 UTC
Croniac wrote:
Did you pubies honestly expect it to be anatomically correct? Or maybe have a bush?

Its a mannequin to hang clothes on, not a blow up doll.

Lame post.


Seems like you did. Nobody else brought it up.
Jimi Crackcorn
Directed Evolution Corp
#9 - 2011-12-29 07:57:52 UTC
Croniac wrote:
Did you pubies honestly expect it to be anatomically correct? Or maybe have a bush?

Its a mannequin to hang clothes on, not a blow up doll.

Lame post.



Uhh.. hallucinogenic drugs are bad... mmmmmk?
Landrae
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2011-12-29 08:21:02 UTC
Bleach andVomit
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2011-12-29 08:22:15 UTC
Cue condescending remark by Liang, detriment to the community.
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#12 - 2011-12-29 10:21:01 UTC
Two things -


1. This isn't SA: you don't write [NSFW] - you just don't create the thread at all...


BUT

2. How is an anatomically-devoid computer generated model not safe for work? RIddle me that. I guess if you live in a monastary I guess it could be considered unsafe for work Lol

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Opertone
State War Academy
Caldari State
#13 - 2011-12-29 10:23:39 UTC
i will pay 10 000 aurum for that

This post sums up why the 'best' work with DCM inc.

WARP DRIVE makes eve boring

really - add warping align time 300% on gun aggression and eve becomes great again

Valei Khurelem
#14 - 2011-12-29 10:23:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Valei Khurelem
lol 3D/2D artists have to draw full nudes so they can get the anatomy right, hell I'M doing that and I've only been at it for a year or so right now, you've got to otherwise the characters will look **** especially when you try doing them in full.

It might be just the computer or software struggling to render it all somehow, I doubt it's that big of a deal, that said, I'm sure there's someone, somewhere reading this thread who's part of some sort of stupid and irrational pressure group who's going to blow this out of proportion and claim CCP are selling nudity to young children.

Now I think about it there might have been a situation with Bethesda and that happening with their editing tool, I know there was at least a mod that a bunch of assholes made a huge deal out of, but that was just a mod.

"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP."   - CCP Ytterbium

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#15 - 2011-12-29 10:35:30 UTC
Do you think God created us, by starting with nudes, then went into more detail and personality?

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2011-12-29 11:42:24 UTC
It's sad that WoD Characters will have nipples, but ours don't.
Cpt Greagor
Liquid Relief
#17 - 2011-12-29 13:15:35 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
It's sad that WoD Characters will have nipples, but ours don't.


Why will they have nipples?

 - Today's Goals -  Log Into Forums - [X] Make More Useless Posts - [X] Log Into EVE - [  ]

David Grogan
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2011-12-29 13:18:41 UTC
Xane the CEO wrote:
Tried to view a full body of a pilot. Got a view of a full body.

This picture is completely unedited - shortly after I took it, EvE crashed, so perhaps things were just loading slowly?


shaved eh?

At least it aint link those rotten hairy japanese muffs

Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless you are from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs.

Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
#19 - 2011-12-29 13:23:30 UTC
Cpt Greagor wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
It's sad that WoD Characters will have nipples, but ours don't.


Why will they have nipples?


For breastfeeding, silly.Twisted
J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-12-29 13:29:55 UTC
I knew all that pod goo i swam in was bad for my body ... give me my nipples back Sad
This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.  Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless
12Next page