These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Terrible standings idea

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#1 - 2015-06-05 16:54:27 UTC
I know being in a high sec war and going thru highly populated system, like jita, amarr, dodixie, can be a pain trying to find war targets, to hunt or hide from. So I was thinking, What if there was a seperate tab that we could filter it, to only show those with terrible standings, bad standings, at war with etc, filter out blues, neutrals ann show only the ones you want to see.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#2 - 2015-06-05 17:06:30 UTC
I would rather a feature be added that you had to search for your topic b4 you could post one


this is bad and you would know that if you bothered to read the other posts on the topic where people explained why it is bad


the main one being there is nothing wrong with using populated systems to hid in local and that this idea would make local to strong

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#3 - 2015-06-05 17:08:30 UTC
choose not to show blues and greens and such? the option already exist as I choose not to show who im in fleet with or corp members or anyone else, all I see are neuts or who im at war with, low security standings etc.

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith
Leto Aramaus
Frog Team Four
Of Essence
#4 - 2015-06-05 17:09:53 UTC
Or just remove local altogether?

The UI update we deserve
Lugh Crow-Slave
#5 - 2015-06-05 17:12:33 UTC
Agondray wrote:
choose not to show blues and greens and such? the option already exist as I choose not to show who im in fleet with or corp members or anyone else, all I see are neuts or who im at war with, low security standings etc.


he is talking about local not the overview

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#6 - 2015-06-05 17:31:45 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
I would rather a feature be added that you had to search for your topic b4 you could post one


this is bad and you would know that if you bothered to read the other posts on the topic where people explained why it is bad


the main one being there is nothing wrong with using populated systems to hid in local and that this idea would make local to strong

Just as I would love a feature to keep all the nay sayers out, not going to spend hours seaching old threads for any possible similar posts. If you like it or not, can post something costructive on why you feel its good or bad. Not be a jerk / idiot about it.

But I am sure is way more people, predators and prey alike that would love this feature if it existed.
Iain Cariaba
#7 - 2015-06-05 17:57:16 UTC
Sarrgon wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
I would rather a feature be added that you had to search for your topic b4 you could post one


this is bad and you would know that if you bothered to read the other posts on the topic where people explained why it is bad


the main one being there is nothing wrong with using populated systems to hid in local and that this idea would make local to strong

Just as I would love a feature to keep all the nay sayers out, not going to spend hours seaching old threads for any possible similar posts. If you like it or not, can post something costructive on why you feel its good or bad. Not be a jerk / idiot about it.

But I am sure is way more people, predators and prey alike that would love this feature if it existed.

1. When you post a bad idea, specially when it's a bad idea that has been beaten into a mushy pulp already, expect people to point it out.
2. If you want no one to tell you you're wrong, keep to "I'm-a-twit"ter where you can delete stuff you don't like.
3. All the constructive posts have already been made, which you would know if you'd looked for it. How many times are we expected to rehash the same reasons why the same ideas are bad? There is a reason for rule 17.
4. If you read the existing threads on this bad idea, the general consensus is that it's a bad idea, both by predator and prey alike.
Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#8 - 2015-06-05 18:16:42 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Sarrgon wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
I would rather a feature be added that you had to search for your topic b4 you could post one


this is bad and you would know that if you bothered to read the other posts on the topic where people explained why it is bad


the main one being there is nothing wrong with using populated systems to hid in local and that this idea would make local to strong

Just as I would love a feature to keep all the nay sayers out, not going to spend hours seaching old threads for any possible similar posts. If you like it or not, can post something costructive on why you feel its good or bad. Not be a jerk / idiot about it.

But I am sure is way more people, predators and prey alike that would love this feature if it existed.

1. When you post a bad idea, specially when it's a bad idea that has been beaten into a mushy pulp already, expect people to point it out.
2. If you want no one to tell you you're wrong, keep to "I'm-a-twit"ter where you can delete stuff you don't like.
3. All the constructive posts have already been made, which you would know if you'd looked for it. How many times are we expected to rehash the same reasons why the same ideas are bad? There is a reason for rule 17.
4. If you read the existing threads on this bad idea, the general consensus is that it's a bad idea, both by predator and prey alike.



1. May be a bad idea to you, is good to others.
2. I have no problem with people telling me they think I am wrong, as long as it is done in a contructive manner, trolls prey on these boards just waiting to be idiots.
3. Well if you know where all these posts are, post a link to them so others like me can see what others have posted and said, probably be quicker then PMSIng ranting in posts.
4. Not sure who you talked to or who posted but everyone I talked to loved this idea, just troll idiots post the most in these forums while others like me are trying to get something done and have a meaningful debate.
5. Try WoW, heard they like trolls there.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#9 - 2015-06-05 18:18:40 UTC
Sarrgon wrote:

Just as I would love a feature to keep all the nay sayers out, not going to spend hours seaching old threads for any possible similar posts. If you like it or not, can post something costructive on why you feel its good or bad. Not be a jerk / idiot about it.

But I am sure is way more people, predators and prey alike that would love this feature if it existed.


Seriously, this exact idea has been posted multiple times. And calling people 'nay sayers' for not wanting to repeat the same arguments for the 20th time is why the only jerk/idiot here is you. As a courtesy to other forum users, use the search function..

You might also be disappointed by the amount of people that would prefer local be a chat channel only rather than such a powerful intel tool.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
Sarrgon
Avalonians United
#10 - 2015-06-05 18:32:33 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Sarrgon wrote:

Just as I would love a feature to keep all the nay sayers out, not going to spend hours seaching old threads for any possible similar posts. If you like it or not, can post something costructive on why you feel its good or bad. Not be a jerk / idiot about it.

But I am sure is way more people, predators and prey alike that would love this feature if it existed.


Seriously, this exact idea has been posted multiple times. And calling people 'nay sayers' for not wanting to repeat the same arguments for the 20th time is why the only jerk/idiot here is you. As a courtesy to other forum users, use the search function..

You might also be disappointed by the amount of people that would prefer local be a chat channel only rather than such a powerful intel tool.




Is quicker to post a link to said thread then write a long post ranting about another post, give reasons or a link, don't rant is what I am saying, what you are doing does nothing, so hence a nay sayer troll
Iain Cariaba
#11 - 2015-06-05 18:34:58 UTC
Just realized the title for this thread is perfect. It is, indeed, a terrible idea regarding standings.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#12 - 2015-06-05 18:37:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#13 - 2015-06-05 18:39:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
Sarrgon wrote:

Is quicker to post a link to said thread then write a long post ranting about another post, give reasons or a link, don't rant is what I am saying, what you are doing does nothing, so hence a nay sayer troll


I take my 'thanks for doing my work for me' in multiples of billions in isk.

dont be surprised if people start treating you like an arse, when youre acting like an arse.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2015-06-05 18:56:40 UTC
Sarrgon wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Sarrgon wrote:

Just as I would love a feature to keep all the nay sayers out, not going to spend hours seaching old threads for any possible similar posts. If you like it or not, can post something costructive on why you feel its good or bad. Not be a jerk / idiot about it.

But I am sure is way more people, predators and prey alike that would love this feature if it existed.


Seriously, this exact idea has been posted multiple times. And calling people 'nay sayers' for not wanting to repeat the same arguments for the 20th time is why the only jerk/idiot here is you. As a courtesy to other forum users, use the search function..

You might also be disappointed by the amount of people that would prefer local be a chat channel only rather than such a powerful intel tool.




Is quicker to post a link to said thread then write a long post ranting about another post, give reasons or a link, don't rant is what I am saying, what you are doing does nothing, so hence a nay sayer troll


It's quicker if you search before posting your trash since nobody else have to post about the fact it's a bad idea and then debate why it is.

Use the search function.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#15 - 2015-06-05 19:05:03 UTC
Quote:

Forum rules

17. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.

As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.


Closed.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department