These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

This is what eve si coming to: This is what CODE is: Pathetic.

First post First post
Author
Vek Hareka
Fist Bumps All Around
#201 - 2015-06-03 08:20:23 UTC
I wish this kind of thread would stop.

Even if some people are RPerrorists-slash-Dicks about it, Ganking is legit, Awoxing is legit, Spying is legit, Heisting is legit.

In that precise case, considering the tale of what happened, what the mole did was in fact downright commendable: exploiting and/ or oblivious CEOs need to DIE.

Here comes a time, ganker,

When blingfits cease to sparkle,

When hermophite looses its luster,

When the station hangar becomes a prison

And all that is left is a capsuleer's love for his fedo.

Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#202 - 2015-06-03 08:45:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Tora Bushido
You might want to add that Jayne called war decs, and I quote "The cancer of Eve" in that Interview. Wasn't the first time I heard him say that.

http://csmwatch.com/

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#203 - 2015-06-03 09:56:21 UTC
Tora Bushido wrote:
You might want to add that Jayne called war decs, and I quote "The cancer of Eve" in that Interview. Wasn't the first time I heard him say that.

http://csmwatch.com/

Check your evemail.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#204 - 2015-06-03 10:17:43 UTC
stil the best was erotica making that other guy freakout on teamspeak... for me its the alltime classic... this does not come close
Jenshae Chiroptera
#205 - 2015-06-03 11:20:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:
... I would surmise this opinion is a bit of sour grapes on your part. ...
Try seperate gankers / awoxers / war declarations from CSM for a minute and re-read my post.

I believe they are a vocal minority that are insignicant in actual EVE game play.

Since the CSM election you've been pretty negative about the CSM concept and have always been negative about CODE, so I'm lost trying to figure out which you are referring to:

CSM is insignificant
CODE is insignificant

Could be either that you are saying.


Roll

Before the election results:

http://i.imgur.com/trkZVUL.png

I believed it was a bad idea three years ago

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=70255

Before Mittens outted himself as the scum that he is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbYNLmtAMAw

I ran for CSM largely because I looked at so many of the candidates and thought, "Better me than any of them whispering in CCP's ears." Not because I am a particularly good idea but I think that I would do less harm. Blink

virm pasuul wrote:
token trade alt wrote:
So like, what does CODE actually do other than collect 10m isk per miner and gank anyway. I don't see how this changes hisec, and it's not really emergent gameplay since paying to be in an area is something that's been in MMOs since they started.

I mean, if you really need an elaborate reason to gank or bump people, sure, go for it. Didn't think anyone needed a reason beyond 'lulz' for fitting a catalyst and popping some hulks. But I digress, maybe griefing is also boring in hisec.
It's a bit more subtle than that. Whilst each part can be examined and assessed in isolation with a critical eye the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. I believe this is quite deliberate and part of the genius of James 315. Think of it like the parts of an AK47.
Each part is simple to manufacture, cheap, requires no specialization, can easily be copied or replaced. There is nothing special about any one part. Yet due to the design the parts fit together to make a virtually indestructible weapon that ...
... is a cult.
Had them coming and trying to tell me about their New Order and such, how they are good for EVE and all the other justifications they can come up with for shooting weak targets.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Josette Dugas
Industrial United Holdings
#206 - 2015-06-03 12:29:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Josette Dugas
Aww come on now, the CODE are just a wacky bunch of, devil-may-care, fun loving eggers. What I don't get is why they are so keen to get a "good fight" out of you. Let's be honest, they have their thing, they RP the hell out of it, and they make HiSec more interesting, but taking out a mining barge is nothing at all like a "fight" so it can hardly be considered good, bad or otherwise. Big smile

Having said that I would think that if miners spent as much time organizing for their mutual protection (or outright push-back against the CODE) rather than writing furious screeds on the forums then they might get to experience the sweet deliciousness that is CODE tears (all new and lemony fresh!). I mean 1f tears are your thing.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#207 - 2015-06-03 12:52:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Josette Dugas wrote:
Aww come on now, the CODE it just a wacky, devil-may-care, bunch of fun loving eggers. What I don't get is why they are so keen to get a "good fight" out of you. Let's be honest, they have their thing, they RP the hell out of it, and they make HiSec more interesting, but taking out a mining barge is nothing at all like a "fight" so it can hardly be considered good, bad or otherwise. Big smile


It is a fight, a fight the miner lost the second he undocked without support, without a plan to survive, and without relevant game mechanics knowledge.

I fly pirate battleships for missions (Mach, Rattlesnake, Nightmare) and Incursions (Mach and Vindicator). I know when I pull up my fitting screen to fit for a mission that there is a price/cost threshold that if i cross it I'm risking a 'gank for profit'. I know that when I am doing missions and the mission takes me out of system, that whatever I do I want to not be afk when I jump through a gate, and i know i want to make damn sure my hardeners and DC are on as soon as possible after I initiate warp in the new system, because that gate (and the station undock) is my biggest point of vulnerability.

I know that when I'm in an incursion I want to shoot PAST my anchor and anchor on him on his side that is AWAY from the warp in point (so that there is at least one potential gank target, the anchor guy, between me and the warp in point, like the old joke says, I don't have to outrun the bear, i just have to outrun YOU lol).

So forth and so on. Every second I'm in game and in high sec, I'm "fighting" against the ganker (and scammer and awoxxer) types, with my mind and preventive action. This is why my total loss list against high sec gankers after playing this game since June 21, 2007 (8 years in a couple weeks) are 2 empty shuttles and 1 empty pod.

It's the inability of some to understand that "gameplay" in eve starts at the login screen that creates the conditions where groups like Code can even exist in the 1st place.

Quote:

Having said that I would think that if miners spent as much time organizing for their mutual protection (or outright push-back against the CODE) rather then writing furious screeds on the forums then they might get to experience the sweet deliciousness that is CODE tears (all new and lemony fresh!). I mean 1f tears are your thing.


It's simply not in their nature. Anyone who would choose the EVE version mining as a leisure activity are probably not the types to seek out and cooperate with others except in extreme circumstances. They are mentally a lot like the old wild west prospector that goes out into the wildness alone to seek his fortune. Old Wild west prospectors likewise had a super high mortality rate lol.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#208 - 2015-06-03 13:25:26 UTC
Josette Dugas wrote:
Aww come on now, the CODE it just a wacky, devil-may-care, bunch of fun loving eggers. What I don't get is why they are so keen to get a "good fight" out of you. Let's be honest, they have their thing, they RP the hell out of it, and ...
James 315 was guided by a GM who said that if he made a roleplaying reason they can't ban him for harrassment when bumping miners.
So, they aren't a real roleplaying group, it is a construct, a parody and if they start believe the rubbish then they are really sinking.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#209 - 2015-06-03 14:01:15 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
So, rather than be satisfied with CCP deciding to functionally ban proper awoxing, you're on here to complain that people are allowed to join your corp with any ill intent at all, and trying to get them banned.

This is the kind of thing you can only post on an NPC alt.

Remember the 'dont awox me brah!' switch? Well, just wait for the cry-us release where CCP introduces some great new additional features!

- CEO's can turn off all external communications, to prevent spies from using eve mail to inform those outside of corp about intel
- CEO's can tag all assets in corp hangars with a virus, that will cause the asset to explode (and ship with it) at the press of a button -- no more theft!
- CEO's can turn on a new dont-gank-me-brah! switch, which uses whimsical new sleeper technology to prevent CODE members from opening fire on a members ship in hisec!

Surely we can all look forward to more great content-creation features like these to come, with the input of all our illustrious guardians-of-the-sandbox CSM'S!

HAIL BOB..er...BARNEY!

F


Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#210 - 2015-06-03 15:10:22 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
So, rather than be satisfied with CCP deciding to functionally ban proper awoxing, you're on here to complain that people are allowed to join your corp with any ill intent at all, and trying to get them banned.

This is the kind of thing you can only post on an NPC alt.

Remember the 'dont awox me brah!' switch? Well, just wait for the cry-us release where CCP introduces some great new additional features!

- CEO's can turn off all external communications, to prevent spies from using eve mail to inform those outside of corp about intel
- CEO's can tag all assets in corp hangars with a virus, that will cause the asset to explode (and ship with it) at the press of a button -- no more theft!
- CEO's can turn on a new dont-gank-me-brah! switch, which uses whimsical new sleeper technology to prevent CODE members from opening fire on a members ship in hisec!

Surely we can all look forward to more great content-creation features like these to come, with the input of all our illustrious guardians-of-the-sandbox CSM'S!

HAIL BOB..er...BARNEY!

F




ilu feyd

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#211 - 2015-06-03 15:40:20 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
So, rather than be satisfied with CCP deciding to functionally ban proper awoxing, you're on here to complain that people are allowed to join your corp with any ill intent at all, and trying to get them banned.

This is the kind of thing you can only post on an NPC alt.

Remember the 'dont awox me brah!' switch? Well, just wait for the cry-us release where CCP introduces some great new additional features!

- CEO's can turn off all external communications, to prevent spies from using eve mail to inform those outside of corp about intel
- CEO's can tag all assets in corp hangars with a virus, that will cause the asset to explode (and ship with it) at the press of a button -- no more theft!
- CEO's can turn on a new dont-gank-me-brah! switch, which uses whimsical new sleeper technology to prevent CODE members from opening fire on a members ship in hisec!

Surely we can all look forward to more great content-creation features like these to come, with the input of all our illustrious guardians-of-the-sandbox CSM'S!

HAIL BOB..er...BARNEY!

F


As I've been saying, the real problem is a deep seated and learned form of risk aversion that says "we must be safe from all harm, even video game harm".

Risk-Aversion isn't an issue, it's a symptom. It's just what the western world is coming to. And apparently, not just the West lol.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#212 - 2015-06-03 19:08:02 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Josette Dugas wrote:
Aww come on now, the CODE it just a wacky, devil-may-care, bunch of fun loving eggers. What I don't get is why they are so keen to get a "good fight" out of you. Let's be honest, they have their thing, they RP the hell out of it, and ...
James 315 was guided by a GM who said that if he made a roleplaying reason they can't ban him for harrassment when bumping miners.
So, they aren't a real roleplaying group, it is a construct, a parody and if they start believe the rubbish then they are really sinking.

Actually the GM said profit motive. The roleplay is separate.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#213 - 2015-06-03 19:09:36 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
So, rather than be satisfied with CCP deciding to functionally ban proper awoxing, you're on here to complain that people are allowed to join your corp with any ill intent at all, and trying to get them banned.

This is the kind of thing you can only post on an NPC alt.

Remember the 'dont awox me brah!' switch? Well, just wait for the cry-us release where CCP introduces some great new additional features!

- CEO's can turn off all external communications, to prevent spies from using eve mail to inform those outside of corp about intel
- CEO's can tag all assets in corp hangars with a virus, that will cause the asset to explode (and ship with it) at the press of a button -- no more theft!
- CEO's can turn on a new dont-gank-me-brah! switch, which uses whimsical new sleeper technology to prevent CODE members from opening fire on a members ship in hisec!

Surely we can all look forward to more great content-creation features like these to come, with the input of all our illustrious guardians-of-the-sandbox CSM'S!

HAIL BOB..er...BARNEY!

F



I think the virus will actually return the ship to the CEO's personal hangar instead of destroying it.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Josette Dugas
Industrial United Holdings
#214 - 2015-06-03 19:31:39 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
[quote=Josette Dugas]Aww come on now, the CODE it just a wacky, devil-may-care, bunch of fun loving eggers. What I don't get is why they are so keen to get a "good fight" out of you. Let's be honest, they have their thing, they RP the hell out of it, and they make HiSec more interesting, but taking out a mining barge is nothing at all like a "fight" so it can hardly be considered good, bad or otherwise.

It is a fight, a fight the miner lost the second he undocked without support, without a plan to survive, and without relevant game mechanics knowledge. Big smile


Sure it's a fight, but it's not good bad or otherwise. A good fight for me is, extending your wild west metaphor, two combatentes squaring off in a battle of skill and wits. Knocking off a miner is just knocking off a miner let's not pat ourselves on the back too hard here and put ourselves on some kind of pedestal for taking out someone who just plan doesn't know any better . I mean even if they get blown up time after time for the same things all your doing it beating up a on a dumb animal. If you want to elevate that to some kind of performance art ... your call, I don't judge. But getting in a twist because you don't get a "good fight" out of someone after you greased his barge is just lame.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#215 - 2015-06-03 19:45:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Josette Dugas wrote:


Sure it's a fight, but it's not good bad or otherwise. A good fight for me is, extending your wild west metaphor, two combatentes squaring off in a battle of skill and wits. Knocking off a miner is just knocking off a miner let's not pat ourselves on the back too hard here and put ourselves on some kind of pedestal for taking out someone who just plan doesn't know any better .


EVE is not an arena game. What you are doing here is exhibiting a misplaced sense of 'fairness' where it doesn't belong.

In every encounter between people in EVE, you have at least 2 people, sitting at a computer, playing a game that both of them know has un-consensual pvp. The fact that one of them ignores this reality (that pvp can happen anywhere) has zero to do with anything, he was still a guy or girl sitting in front of a computer who 'lost' an encounter with some other human being. At the end of the day, getting ganked is no different than losing a consensual 1v1 pvp fight, there is no such thing as the 'innocent miner minding his own business' because that player choose to play EVE rather than a protected themepark style game.

Quote:

I mean even if they get blown up time after time for the same things all your doing it beating up a on a dumb animal. If you want to elevate that to some kind of performance art ... your call, I don't judge. But getting in a twist because you don't get a "good fight" out of someone after you greased his barge is just lame.


Dumb animals don't play EVE, humans (the vast majority of which are adults) do. If you get blown up over and over in the same manner and get mad about it, it is true that this person should not be gaming. But that doesn't take away from the fact that in an encounter of 2 human beings, one won and one lost.

Where I'm from, a rational and mature adult congratulates the victor in a situation where they are beaten, it's called sportsmanship. If you don't want to have to do that (and I sure as hell don't) either don't compete (in this case, means don't log in) or do compete and play to win (in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you). I play to win, and have done so for 8 years.


TL;DR, i;ll restate: It's the inability of some to understand that "gameplay" in eve starts at the login screen that creates the conditions where groups like Code can even exist in the 1st place.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#216 - 2015-06-03 19:53:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Jenn aSide wrote:
in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you
Or do, those of us PvEr's who do "play to win" are quite happy to use those that don't as a meta tank of sorts.

They provide a valuable service by soaking up ammo and resources that may otherwise be aimed at us.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#217 - 2015-06-03 19:56:33 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you
Or do, those of us PvE's who do bother are quite happy to use those that don't as a meta tank of sorts.


New saying: if gankers are chasing us, I don't have to outrun the gankers i just have to out run YOU. Now where did i put those Ascendency implants??? Cool
Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#218 - 2015-06-03 20:02:00 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you
Or do, those of us PvE's who do bother are quite happy to use those that don't as a meta tank of sorts.


New saying: if gankers are chasing us, I don't have to outrun the gankers i just have to out run YOU. Now where did i put those Ascendency implants??? Cool


Yep. As long as I'm faster than the slowest person in the fleet... fleet tank, best tank!

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#219 - 2015-06-03 20:02:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Jenn aSide wrote:
New saying: if gankers are chasing us, I don't have to outrun the gankers i just have to out run YOU. Now where did i put those Ascendency implants??? Cool
Who needs to outrun when you can out-think?

The mission runner who falls for the old ninja salvager, the afk miners and, often overloaded, haulers etc aren't hard to out-think.

On a side note I was considering scanning other haulers while I do my rounds and feeding details of any juicy ones to some nefarious types I know, for shiggles.Pirate

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#220 - 2015-06-03 20:08:30 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
New saying: if gankers are chasing us, I don't have to outrun the gankers i just have to out run YOU. Now where did i put those Ascendency implants??? Cool
Who needs to outrun when you can out-think?

The mission runner who falls for the old ninja salvager, the afk miners and, often overloaded, haulers etc aren't hard to out-think.

On a side note I was considering scanning other haulers while I do my rounds and feeding details of any juicy ones to some nefarious types I know, for shiggles.Pirate


Out run? Out think? This is entirely too much effort on ones part. All one needs to do is 'out-whine' the other party in order to win.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?