These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Mining Mechanics: Multi Ore, Multi Methods

First post
Author
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#221 - 2015-05-11 14:36:37 UTC
Null Infinity
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#222 - 2015-05-12 08:51:45 UTC
Jasmine Cheryu wrote:
+100 for all of OP's suggestions

...
TL;DR -- make a gank alt and kill botters Smile
Protip -- do not chase the same character(s) around all of new eden, as this can be classed as harressment and you may be subject to an EULA violation (I believe)


That will not solve the boredrome of the mining itself. OP suggestion will.

New mining menthods: interactive mining and comet mining

Null Infinity
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#223 - 2015-05-13 10:20:56 UTC
Bump.

New mining menthods: interactive mining and comet mining

Shai'd Hulud
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#224 - 2015-05-13 13:53:08 UTC
-1 for replacing a current system
But +1 to add new stuff.
I prefer that CCP focuses on adding new opportunities for mining and that it does not change what has been done so far.
Examples : add Comet mining or add the possibility to mine the rings of some planets (ring with ice or gas or minerals or both)
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#225 - 2015-05-14 08:32:24 UTC
Shai'd Hulud wrote:
-1 for replacing a current system
But +1 to add new stuff.
I prefer that CCP focuses on adding new opportunities for mining and that it does not change what has been done so far.
Examples : add Comet mining or add the possibility to mine the rings of some planets (ring with ice or gas or minerals or both)


Well, proposed strip mining method is pretty much what you have even now. The only thing, that would be replaced is amound of asteroids - from many to one. That is not really needed IMHO. But also not that crucial.

Mining rings is nice idea, but what about perfomance of the game? It can be very ressource demanding...
Null Infinity
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#226 - 2015-05-22 12:09:36 UTC
Bump!

New mining menthods: interactive mining and comet mining

Kiddoomer
The Red Sequence
#227 - 2015-05-24 13:25:26 UTC
Bump !

In the name of Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen : “Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.”

Raphendyr Nardieu
Avanto
Hole Control
#228 - 2015-06-01 14:21:36 UTC
I like the concept. Points for the ideas.

Thing that to consider is that if some process is based on facts (which deposit has more ore or where that is) then that would be automated/coded in the ship computer. Basic idea is that fact based stuff is automated, and thus player should be left to make choices against the dice roll.

Also some way to implement the risk/isk is nice. Of course low and null does it directly. Still maybe some asteroids could have npc "sleeping" on them and when you start mining one, the npc would wake up. Pretty boring idea but works as an example.

Asteroids or veins could also start getting critical and then you would need to think when to stop before it explodes.

tl;dr: instead of reading numbers and choosing the best, make queses which gain you profits or problems (maybe bring loot fairy here).
Primarch Apocalypse
Adeptus Imperium
#229 - 2015-06-02 12:11:54 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
Crazy ass well intended stuff


Let me put it this way . NO NO & NO

This change will only server your hateful little purpose and the ilks of you.

EVE is a nice game because it has verisimilitude combined with plausible facilitating in a way that few games do. The GTA series being one of the few managing to have such a balance.

So no , no & no you can take your immersion breaking changes & shove them. If you're bored feel free to rage quit and send me your isk + exotic dancers.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#230 - 2015-06-02 13:16:34 UTC
Primarch Apocalypse wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
Crazy ass well intended stuff


Let me put it this way . NO NO & NO

This change will only server your hateful little purpose and the ilks of you.

EVE is a nice game because it has verisimilitude combined with plausible facilitating in a way that few games do. The GTA series being one of the few managing to have such a balance.

So no , no & no you can take your immersion breaking changes & shove them. If you're bored feel free to rage quit and send me your isk + exotic dancers.

If quality of effort is not something you care about, I can understand why you would object.

For myself, why shouldn't I be able to get better results, by putting in more quality of effort?
(Said effort not being defined as duplicating the existing mechanic across multiple accounts, which would be quantity, not quality, of effort)
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#231 - 2015-06-03 15:33:17 UTC
Primarch Apocalypse wrote:
verisimilitude combined with plausible facilitating


Verbal Diarrhea detected.

Lets keep this discussion constructive, should we?