These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM X - What are you voting for?

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Jenshae Chiroptera
#321 - 2015-03-20 13:03:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:
You're surprised that groups vote for their own members,... ?
No. I said they would from the outset. Tribilism behaviour.
Zuma was up on violent sexual assault charges, arms dealing and collaboration before he was elected. He simply became president due to being a Zulu, they are 60% of the population and their closely related tribe the Xhosa vote for the Zulu representative if they do not have one themselves.

I still advocate that CCP inform their player base better of what CSM is. There was a brief thing on the launcher with the shuttles and then it was gone. The average players used up much of my time explaining that there is a CSM and what it is.

Once again, most of the CSM represent a minority. Good going CCP. Roll

Link back to closing statement.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Kiryen O'Bannon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#322 - 2015-03-23 04:34:38 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:
You're surprised that groups vote for their own members,... ?
No. I said they would from the outset. Tribilism behaviour.
Zuma was up on violent sexual assault charges, arms dealing and collaboration before he was elected. He simply became president due to being a Zulu, they are 60% of the population and their closely related tribe the Xhosa vote for the Zulu representative if they do not have one themselves.

I still advocate that CCP inform their player base better of what CSM is. There was a brief thing on the launcher with the shuttles and then it was gone. The average players used up much of my time explaining that there is a CSM and what it is.

Once again, most of the CSM represent a minority. Good going CCP. Roll

Link back to closing statement.

Leaving aside the question-begging in that comparison, EVE is a sandbox video game where the whole point is to advance yourself and your space tribe and do battle with others in various fashions. Tribalism is really not a problem in this context.

Eternal Father, King of birth, /Who didst create the heaven and earth, /And bid the planets and the sun/ Their own appointed orbits run; /O hear us when we seek thy grace /For those who soar through outer space.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#323 - 2015-03-27 00:43:08 UTC
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:
Leaving aside the question-begging in that comparison, EVE is a sandbox video game where the whole point is to advance yourself and your space tribe and do battle with others in various fashions. Tribalism is really not a problem in this context.
Never mind, elections are over and it is all irrelevant to me.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
TribblexXx
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#324 - 2015-05-26 13:29:19 UTC
I can tell you what those are AFK camper well. Take the ISK from the game .. because PVE under such circumstances is almost impossible without being hotdroped.

The cloackie modules need a timer where the ciycle stop all 20 minutes or something like that. Reactivation would then be connected to a 3-6 minute delay. An art Fatiguid system for cloaks.

I can not understanding this ******* up trip .... CCP would have to know that through such actions as the "AFK cloaki hotdroping" players in Eve are expelled, the then rather play something else than penetration online 24/7

If I'm thinking about it, I could spin.
That was one of the reasons why I stopped playing with Eve for a long time.
More new things in Eve came about and less were the old problems have been fixed.


Better make new skins for stupid 800mio ISK or better stupit New player mechanics ..... like this .... "sakasm"

Whats about walking on station ... Thats it all?

I cant understand this madhads in CCP .....
They make what the big ones in eve hold to not leave the game ... so it is only in interessting of one or two big parts in Eve. "None Balance"

If the big ones crying about a new system Implemented in eve Which is good for new players and much saver for all the rest ... they would cry like kids about "getting anymore good and easy kills" or
"why we can anymore cloaki hotdrop anybody" and why why why bla bli blu....


I know I'm a little digressed but with the cloakies is really frustrating. One should note that in this case with it is Eve is a game and a game should make possible unceremoniously fun.

This one is permanently penetrated by AFK cloakis can not be fun.


I've been playing the game since 2004 and has to be seen, the game is always more and more crappy.

I hope CCP and Co wakeup before They lost the rest of Eve players.
Where I start playing eve It was daily more then 60.000k ppl in this game
now we are reduced to lesser than 27.000k ....... speak for themselves.

15,000 k alliance Big One
10,000 k Alliance
5000 K Alliance

Thats mad and I have something to laugh about.

So everyone can see 20k of unprooved measure can controll everything.
Its like wather in the Ocean ... one wave and all comes with it.


Thank you for reading this.

And sorry for the one or two bad words:D
Jenshae Chiroptera
#325 - 2015-05-26 18:09:07 UTC
Null Sec has always been a pretty low % of the total population and it is about to crash down.
So, AFK hot droppers won't matter much.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#326 - 2015-05-26 19:08:16 UTC
Ah yes, the good old "I didn't get what I want so the CSM is simultaneously totally ineffective and yet incredibly corrupt and powerful, and totally unrepresentative because the only reason any of them get elected is because tens of thousands of players vote for them" spiel.

Contemptible, yet at least minimally original, when Ankhesentapemkah used it to con naive people into voting for her in 2010; contemptible but tediously overplayed and easily refuted in 2015.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Jenshae Chiroptera
#327 - 2015-05-26 20:56:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Malcanis wrote:
Ah yes, the good old[i] ....
Do try remember that I started this thread saying that I would like the whole CSM removed.
... and I tried to get an abstain option and no-confidence vote put in four years ago because I knew that Mittens would be useless.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#328 - 2015-08-06 05:15:14 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Whether ideas are good or bad they can still generate new game concepts:

- SOV alternative
- Blobs and system performance.
So on and so forth. .
Oh, look at that.
All the way back in March, almost as soon as the Dev blog came out, I was looking for alternatives and compromises to fix an obviously terrible SOV system.

Wands have fixed times.
Can't improve your ship to finish a node faster or to repair it faster.
It provides a "griefer's paradise" (I believe I started using that phrase along with "whack-a-mole SOV" first.

I suggested before, that the developers maybe take a month or two, to play EVE more, code less and really think about things before pulling the trigger and dumbing down SOV.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.