These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Abolition and Faith

Author
Jili Tonari
Doomheim
#41 - 2015-05-21 20:55:59 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Saede Riordan wrote:
Why do you believe what you believe?


Because a universe without is empty.



It isn't. Not really.

How much do you know about the religion of your people, your tribe?

Do not fear emptying the glass of your soul, it can be refilled with pure water.

“Where must we go, we who wander this wasteland, in search of our better selves.”

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#42 - 2015-05-21 21:01:22 UTC
Saede Riordan wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:
Saede Riordan wrote:
Why do you believe what you believe?


Because a universe without is empty.


And why do you believe that?


Because life needs purpose. It needs something bigger than ourselves. It is not enough to simply exist; there has to be a reason to exist.

Liam Antolliere wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:
Yes. Consider this, gallente: The idea of something being secular, of something being apart from religion, is only a very very recent concept in Amarr culture, spawned only from contact with cultures like yours.


You state this like it's a bad thing.

The fact that there are Amarr coming to the realization that a distinction does or should exist is a good thing.

Perhaps the realization that having your faith governed by a political system which then benefits from that faith will lead to critical, earnest challenges to the established system from within the Empire and even if nothing changes and the Empire continues as it always has; the fact that the challenge happened is a very good thing.

At least, in my (admittedly) not-so-humble opinion.


It is a bad thing. It is not possible to rule justly without God. Mankind is sinful and blind without God's guidance.

The system needs less changes, not more. Your culture is poison.
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#43 - 2015-05-21 21:06:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Jili Tonari wrote:
How much do you know about the religion of your people, your tribe?

Do not fear emptying the glass of your soul, it can be refilled with pure water.


I lived in the Republic after my emancipation, I went through the voluval ritual. I know enough about it.
Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#44 - 2015-05-21 21:09:09 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:


It is a bad thing. It is not possible to rule justly without God. Mankind is sinful and blind without God's guidance.

The system needs less changes, not more. Your culture is poison.


I suppose my next question would be, why does the recognition that some things are secular and others religious stand in opposition to just governance under God's guidance?

Why can't such a realization lead instead to a greater understanding of God's nature, character and will? Why can't the distinction serve to keep separate the wills and desires of man from the will and desire of God?

Why is it inherently bad?

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Matar Ronin
#45 - 2015-05-21 21:20:41 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Saede Riordan wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:
Saede Riordan wrote:
Why do you believe what you believe?


Because a universe without is empty.



It is a bad thing. It is not possible to rule justly without God. Mankind is sinful and blind without God's guidance.

The system needs less changes, not more. Your culture is poison.
You are a troubled lost soul dear child, there is no just rule amongst the Slavery Cultists.

You have eyes but refuse to see, the Slavery Cultists are the most sinful example of humanity in the Cluster and they are the loudest to proclaim their ways are righteous, they are not.

The Amarr are not evil by nature, they are human like everyone else in the cluster, they are however the fruit of a foul and evil system that is the antithesis of every good thing religion could possibly stand for.

They say they follow divine scriptures but rewrite them to fit the needs of the ruling class whenever required. Even the titular head of the Slavery Cult Empire did not adhere to the rules that applied to taking that most foul throne.

I pray God will cure your self induced blindness and forgive the sins you commit in the name of the evil Slavery Cult. One day you will see yourself and what you have done and the horror and shame of it will haunt your every reanimation for a long long time to come capsuleer.

‘Vain flame burns fast/and its lick is light/Modest flame lasts long/and burns to the bone.’

" We lost a war we chose not to fight." Without a doubt this is the best way to lose any war and the worst excuse to explain the beating afterwards.

Saede Riordan
Alexylva Paradox
#46 - 2015-05-21 21:57:38 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Saede Riordan wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:
Saede Riordan wrote:
Why do you believe what you believe?


Because a universe without is empty.


And why do you believe that?


Because life needs purpose. It needs something bigger than ourselves. It is not enough to simply exist; there has to be a reason to exist.


Why does there need to be a reason?
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#47 - 2015-05-21 23:19:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Liam Antolliere wrote:
I suppose my next question would be, why does the recognition that some things are secular and others religious stand in opposition to just governance under God's guidance?

Why can't such a realization lead instead to a greater understanding of God's nature, character and will? Why can't the distinction serve to keep separate the wills and desires of man from the will and desire of God?

Why is it inherently bad?


Because there is no separation. It is one universe. We are all God's creations. We exist to serve Him and His will should guide every aspect of our lives. To have any kind of distinction is to put God aside, to say that you will only follow Him at times you choose instead of at all times.

The wills and desires of man are immaterial. We are flawed and sinful and can't be trusted with governing ourselves.

Saede Riordan wrote:
Why does there need to be a reason?


I cannot answer your questions in any way that you will find satisfactory. You've already said that the beliefs I hold are ones that you can't understand.

Simply, I want my existence to mean something.

Matar Ronin wrote:
They say they follow divine scriptures but rewrite them to fit the needs of the ruling class whenever required.


The people who edit them are empowered by God to do so.
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#48 - 2015-05-21 23:22:58 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:

Matar Ronin wrote:
They say they follow divine scriptures but rewrite them to fit the needs of the ruling class whenever required.


The people who edit them are empowered by God to do so.


I'm not even sure what to say to this.
Matar Ronin
#49 - 2015-05-21 23:24:06 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:


Matar Ronin wrote:
They say they follow divine scriptures but rewrite them to fit the needs of the ruling class whenever required.


The people who edit them are empowered by God to do so.
The people who edit them are liars and frauds.

‘Vain flame burns fast/and its lick is light/Modest flame lasts long/and burns to the bone.’

" We lost a war we chose not to fight." Without a doubt this is the best way to lose any war and the worst excuse to explain the beating afterwards.

Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#50 - 2015-05-21 23:30:14 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:

Because there is no separation. It is one universe. We are all God's creations. We exist to serve Him and His will should guide every aspect of our lives. To have any kind of distinction is to put God aside, to say that you will only follow Him at times you choose instead of at all times.

The wills and desires of man are immaterial. We are flawed and sinful and can't be trusted with governing ourselves.


Samira Kernher wrote:
The people who edit them are empowered by God to do so.



Herein lies the problem, lieutenant.

"The wills and desires of man are immaterial." Precisely, but how do you distinguish what is the will of man from the will of God when you cannot even see the distinction between them? You claim there is no separation, then you claim the wills of man and the will of God are one and the same in the Amarr Empire, which history has proven false more than once already.

The distinction is there. It must be there to avoid corruption, to honestly discern between the will of God and the will of man made to appear to be the will of God.

Your last statement is a striking example of the latter.

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#51 - 2015-05-21 23:44:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
I have nothing else to say here. Those higher than me are purer in blood and spirit and are blessed by God with the wisdom and authority to carry out His will. It's not my place, and certainly not yours, to dispute their leadership.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#52 - 2015-05-21 23:45:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
No, the problem here is that you can't have a discussion with someone about their religion and prove that it's wrong through the use of logic.

Nobody's faith will stand up to that test, Winds, Spirits or Goddesses. You're being idiots.

Maker! Do you actually think you can catch the Amarr in some sort of dogmatic trap and they'll willingly pull their entire Empire to pieces out of gratitude?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#53 - 2015-05-22 00:01:46 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
I have nothing else to say here. Those higher than me are purer in blood and spirit and are blessed by God with the wisdom and authority to carry out His will. It's not my place, and certainly not yours, to dispute their leadership.


I understand and I apologize for putting your back against the proverbial wall in my pursuit of discussion. It was inconsiderate of me.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
No, the problem here is that you can't have a discussion with someone about their religion and prove that it's wrong through the use of logic.

Nobody's faith will stand up to that test, Winds, Spirits or Goddesses. You're being idiots.

Maker! Do you actually think you can catch the Amarr in some sort of dogmatic trap and they'll willingly pull their entire Empire to pieces out of gratitude?


You misunderstand me, Monsieur Tuulinen, though it is not hard to see why.

My intention isn't to undermine the Empire or to destroy Lieutenant Kernher's faith or even to put the Empire into a "dogmatic trap."

On the contrary, I have a deep-seated respect and even admiration for the unyielding faith demonstrated by Lieutenant Kernher and those like her. I admire the selflessness displayed in willingly becoming a servant to the will of another being and denying oneself.

I am not attempting to prove a religion wrong or prove a faith wrong. Rather, I would prefer that faith be tested, challenged and tried. A faith that is never questioned and never challenged doesn't grow, it doesn't nourish the soul. It's like stale bread.

A faith that is questioned and challenged to the point that the faithful must search for answers outside of themselves; when viewing a faith from an outsider's perspective or changing the angle of the looking glass drives the faithful to a better understanding of their faith because they've challenged it...that is a very good thing and that is all I was trying to do here.

I mean no offense to anyone involved and I am not striving to destroy anyone's faith, quite the opposite.

It is meant in respect, though perhaps I should have pursued the conversation in private rather than seemingly dogpile the lieutenant.

I will withdraw.



"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Matar Ronin
#54 - 2015-05-22 00:06:40 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
No, the problem here is that you can't have a discussion with someone about their religion and prove that it's wrong through the use of logic.

Nobody's faith will stand up to that test, Winds, Spirits or Goddesses. You're being idiots.

Maker! Do you actually think you can catch the Amarr in some sort of dogmatic trap and they'll willingly pull their entire Empire to pieces out of gratitude?
If faith fails the test of reality it is not faith it is imagination.

Pilot I have read your words many times here on IGS and believe you to be a reasonable man. I suspect no real God would demand that the thinking beings he or she granted intelligence to would have to abandon those God given faculties to be a true believer.

Faith is reinforced by fact, it does not run from it, It has been the faith of the Matari people in the one true God that has held them together despite being set upon by the hell's spawn slavery cultist who attacked our home worlds from the safety of orbit murdering untold numbers on planet after planet. Thru the travails of slavery our faith in God, the real one not the prop used by the Slavery Cultist kept us looking to the future beyond our pain and torment.

Those are facts, the false prop God could not supplant the deep faith the Matari held and still hold that one day we shall be freed of their awful Cult and the stench of the evil that is slavery will find no home anywhere amongst civilized humans. The fact is we are closer to that day than in many centuries, I am a man of faith and fact.

‘Vain flame burns fast/and its lick is light/Modest flame lasts long/and burns to the bone.’

" We lost a war we chose not to fight." Without a doubt this is the best way to lose any war and the worst excuse to explain the beating afterwards.

Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#55 - 2015-05-22 00:19:08 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Maker! Do you actually think you can catch the Amarr in some sort of dogmatic trap and they'll willingly pull their entire Empire to pieces out of gratitude?


Really I'd hoped this thread would be about slavery since that's the reason the conversation was taken here instead of the PPC thread. But for some reason they insisted on making it about their god.
Saede Riordan
Alexylva Paradox
#56 - 2015-05-22 00:32:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Saede Riordan
Samira Kernher wrote:
can't be trusted with governing ourselves.

Saede Riordan wrote:
Why does there need to be a reason?


I cannot answer your questions in any way that you will find satisfactory. You've already said that the beliefs I hold are ones that you can't understand.

Simply, I want my existence to mean something.



I do understand though Samira, I understand very well, and its sad really. I doubt there's anything I can do to help you. You don't want my help of course, if anything you want to help me, ironic, isn't it?

That's the thing Samira, I'm never satisfied with any answer, there's always another question to be asked. How can we learn anything, without asking questions?

So anyway, you want your existence to mean something, that's great, I totally here you there, I also want my life to mean something. But Samira, you say it exactly yourself, you want your existence to mean something. But what wanting something to be so does not make it so. If I want to fly, I can't just believe really hard that I'm capable of it, and jump off a cliff. I will promptly go splat if I do that. On the contrary, in order to fly, I have to understand how the universe works to a sufficient degree to build an aircraft. That's a much more effective method of achieving my goal (flight) then wanting really hard for it to be the case.

To step out of the metaphor then, you believe in God, because you want your life to mean something. If there's no God, your life is meaningless. But if that's the case, wouldn't you rather know that before you run into the existential splat at the bottom of the metaphorical cliff? The question of God vs. No God need not be unfalsifiable. You make it that way in order to shield your beliefs from scrutiny. You don't want to change your mind, and that's a damn shame really, I might as well be arguing with Diana Kim. But you're much closer to me genetically then Diana Kim is, so ingroup bias really makes me want to try to help you anyway. Maybe someday, years from now, some of this will start to sink in. I hope so. I know its incredibly hard to change your mind, its painful, and you have to be willing to give up cherished beliefs if the world doesn't turn out to be that way. It may make the universe seem a cruel and heartless place to live, full of random and meaningless violence. I understand why you would shy away from that for the comfortable fantasy of a protective deity, not having to hear the hard truths.

What do we really want from philosophy and religion? Palliatives? Therapy? Comfort? Do we want reassuring fables or an understanding of our actual circumstances? Dismay that the Universe does not conform to our preferences seems childish.

This is a difficult world to live in, compared to the much simpler lives our ancestors lived. Our time is burdened under the cumulative weight of successive debunkings of our conceits: We aren't special or unique, we live in an unremarkable galaxy amidst a multitude. We emerged from microbes and muck. We're related to our most hated of enemies. Our thoughts and feelings are not fully under our own control. There may be much smarter and very different beings elsewhere. Given so harsh a reality, of course we’re tempted to shut our eyes and pretend that we’re safe and snug at home, that the fall is only a bad dream, that the ground is not rushing towards us.

I know what that's like, but it doesn't make the impact any lessened, when you do finally hit the ground, and you will hit the ground someday, maybe you'll even survive the impact.

But you don't have to be afraid, because we're humans, and we're smart, and we do build aircraft. We don't need a god to assign us a meaning, we can create our own meanings. I know you're cynical, and think much ill of people, and capsuleers in particular. Its true, we are flawed and imperfect beings. We are riven by rivalries and hatreds, divided among race, religion, creed, and economic status, and it very much seems that this is all we can achieve, that we will never be free of these things, we are sinful creatures by nature. We can't do any better without help, and if there's no god to help, then its impossible.

But we've always defined ourselves by the ability to overcome the impossible. And we count these moments. These moments when we dare to aim higher, to break barriers, to reach for the stars, to make the unknown known. We count these moments as our proudest achievements. Maybe you can't see that, maybe you think this is the end of the road for us, and there's nothing left. But we are still pioneers, and we've barely begun. And our greatest accomplishments cannot be behind us, because our destiny lies above us.

The significance of our lives and our fragile civilisations are then determined only by our own wisdom and courage. We are the custodians of life’s meaning. We long for a Parent to care for us, to forgive us our errors, to save us from our childish mistakes. But knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better by far to embrace the hard truth than a reassuring fable.

If we crave some cosmic purpose, then let us find ourselves a worthy goal.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#57 - 2015-05-22 00:40:51 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Maker! Do you actually think you can catch the Amarr in some sort of dogmatic trap and they'll willingly pull their entire Empire to pieces out of gratitude?

Really I'd hoped this thread would be about slavery since that's the reason the conversation was taken here instead of the PPC thread. But for some reason they insisted on making it about their god.

Well ... that does genuinely seem to be what slavery is about, for many of them. If you snap a collar on someone and use it as a spiritual apprenticeship, you're doing God's work. If you do the same and just profit from it, you're not even doing your own.

That seems to be the logic, sort of.
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#58 - 2015-05-22 00:55:47 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Maker! Do you actually think you can catch the Amarr in some sort of dogmatic trap and they'll willingly pull their entire Empire to pieces out of gratitude?

Really I'd hoped this thread would be about slavery since that's the reason the conversation was taken here instead of the PPC thread. But for some reason they insisted on making it about their god.

Well ... that does genuinely seem to be what slavery is about, for many of them. If you snap a collar on someone and use it as a spiritual apprenticeship, you're doing God's work. If you do the same and just profit from it, you're not even doing your own.

That seems to be the logic, sort of.


And then we get back to the question I had before.

If the Amarr claim it is the mandate of their God, their Culture, but no one else truly accepts that they are right, why are they allowed to continue it? Why is the Empire given exception to this by CONCORD?
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#59 - 2015-05-22 01:13:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Evi Polevhia wrote:
And then we get back to the question I had before.

If the Amarr claim it is the mandate of their God, their Culture, but no one else truly accepts that they are right, why are they allowed to continue it? Why is the Empire given exception to this by CONCORD?

Because (1) they're a Yulai signatory and helped found CONCORD; (2) they have the backing of the Caldari in most disputes with the Matari or Gallente, so they're not out-voted; (3) they have lots and lots of lasers and trying to outlaw the practice by CONCORD fiat could spark a really proper war among the core powers?

Which, presumably, CONCORD would rather not see?
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#60 - 2015-05-22 01:54:16 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
(1) they're a Yulai signatory and helped found CONCORD


At best they are 1/4th, originally 1/5th, and the only of the 4-5 that practiced Slavery. Something banned and abhored in the rest of the signatories. Just because someone is a member of CONCORD doesn't mean they get a free pass. But yet they are allowed to continue. The Republic going to war wasn't even necessarily to stop slavery, it was to get their people back. For example if the Empire switch to 100% Khanid based slavery system and released all non Khanid, the Republic wouldn't lift a finger proving they are opposed not to the Slavery, but to the use of their people.

Aria Jenneth wrote:
(2) they have the backing of the Caldari in most disputes with the Matari or Gallente, so they're not out-voted;


The Caldari are against Slavery too, they're just not willing to break any of their precious trade agreements. But even still, no such vote has even taken place.

Aria Jenneth wrote:
(3) they have lots and lots of lasers and trying to outlaw the practice by CONCORD fiat could spark a really proper war among the core powers?

Which, presumably, CONCORD would rather not see?


In short, ending Amarrian slavery isn't worth starting a war over. I actually agree with that. Because trying to end a major part of a culture by the tip of the sword will generally result in that country fighting back. I wonder where we've seen that before.

So in short, the Empire gets to keep their slaves because of Caldari greed and cowardice. Because with the State backing the Empire out of love of ISK, it's too big of a potential war and too many people could die for something really only the Federation and Republic care that much about. Lovely.