These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

You made game 50% less fun by removing the all purpose skins

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
HeXxploiT
Doomheim
#21 - 2015-05-04 18:32:40 UTC
I don't think I've ever seen so many threads on one topic. CCP has opened up Pandoras box. Excited to see what the future holds for skins and how CCP shapes them to make us content with our purchases.
Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#22 - 2015-05-04 18:43:19 UTC
You made my forum reading 100% less fun by posting this.

I want my money back.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.
KanashiiKami
#23 - 2015-05-04 18:45:07 UTC  |  Edited by: KanashiiKami
what really bothers me is that the modelling function for avatar is so advance and has so many hues of colors ... but the ship customization seems to be somewhere in the Triassic period ...

i would rather the avatar customization be reduced, but part of the engine be brought over to ships. so now ship hangars have modules which player can possibly build/buy to customize their ships instead of plainly buying something with aurum, etc.

so an aurum bought add-on would then need to be put into a special hangar module then the player can re-tool/ re-color/ re-mod the ship ...

ccp should also look into the possibility that POS based hangar can do MORE special mods than NPC stations

and player build outposts can do even more customizations than POS'

that would then make more sense about player build/built stuff

yes? no? like ? do-not-like?

eve is after all ... a player built world ... no ?

WUT ???
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#24 - 2015-05-04 18:52:28 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
I got to totally dunk on some bads in a solid gold fleet phoon.

I am willing to pay an exorbitant amount of money to make that an everyday thing.


+1
Otso Bakarti
Doomheim
#25 - 2015-05-04 19:36:43 UTC
If you think eye-candy is "fun" you really need to get out of the house more, that is unless you're in danger
of being perma-stuck staring at a blinking light.

There just isn't anything that can be said!
Viggo Konstanin
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#26 - 2015-05-04 20:15:25 UTC
Came for the hyperbole, stayed for the sht-posting.
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#27 - 2015-05-04 20:17:26 UTC
I can only hope they will bring that ability back in one for or another. Bugs being bugs I can see why they were removed, also for QA and stuff. But hopefully CCP has seen how much we want stuff like this. Have a little faith people.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
Tappits
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#28 - 2015-05-04 20:42:46 UTC
This game was all ready at -50% fun so with this does it mean its just at 0% fun again? or -75%
Entity
X-Factor Industries
Synthetic Existence
#29 - 2015-05-04 20:59:38 UTC
Tappits wrote:
This game was all ready at -50% fun so with this does it mean its just at 0% fun again? or -75%


Effects in EVE usually stack multiplicatively

╦......║...╔╗.║.║.╔╗.╦║.╔╗╔╦╗╔╗

║.╔╗╔╗╔╣.╔╗╠..╠ ╠╗╠╝.║╠ ╠╝║║║╚╗

╩═╚╝║.╚╝.╚╝║..╚╝║║╚╝.╩╚╝╚╝║.║╚╝

Got Item?
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#30 - 2015-05-04 22:19:34 UTC
Game 50% less fun because CCP fixed a bug. Right....eh...sure....

Thread locked.

The Rules:
3. Ranting is prohibited.

A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counter productive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Previous page12