EVE General Discussion

Wormholes should be at the forefront of potential Wealth acquisition precisely because there is a lot of investment and risk involved, and precisely because it is a relatively new industry - T3 prices have room to fall, still.

I'll update this post with ISK Faucet and sinks metrics later on - also do consider that Wormhole activity for the most part is not an ISK Faucet, as it is similar to mining, which is resource acquisition, and incidentally needs to be matched to the ISK inflows minus sinks.

http://i.imgur.com/wybDyAB.png

The "Commodities" is presumably Overseer Effects and WH blue loot.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2hsqEvPGWQ

One could argue that you could have 50,000 bots getting Bounty ISK from CONCORD, and the same number mining, and then it all balances out.

Who would want to play in a game like that? Perhaps these guys - EVE China Server(Serenity) 49-U6U Battle For PIBC View

That server is licenced to a Chinese sub-contractor Tiancity per Chinese law, and I have no idea how much say CCP has in the way that it is managed with all the ensuing mechanics.

That was more Supercaps and Titans destroyed than in TQ BR-5RB - http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/65959/1/3_-_Ships_Lost_Comparison.png

http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/the-49-u6u-slaughterhouse

That's how they roll. With 8k PCU players.

Single tower in a C5/6 wormhole with a static C6: 1b +/- depending on type and modules
Assuming that, like 99% of wormhole residents of higher-class WHs make their own fuel.
1x Archon: 1.9b, +/- rigs and whatnot
1x Moros: 3.5b, +/- tank or faction mag stabs
1x Loki: 500m, no Slaves, can tank C6s.
1x OGB: 300m not counting warfare implant.
1x capital sitter toon, low skills: depending on how far you're escalating, anywhere from 1.5b to 5b +/-.

Tada, you have a C5/6 escalation fleet.

The best part is that you can train the actual site-running toons to also be efficient PI alts and sell excess PI material for profit.
Assuming you don't attempt to move 3000x Nanoribbons in a Heron to Jita, you can make quite a lot of money with minimal work compared to incursions or anom running.

OK, let's try a simple exercise.
In your own words, please define "botting" in the context of MMOs.

That's an insanely limited view which kind of misses the point about what is wrong with botting. In addition nothing in this thread - not one single rule or discussion - has affected botting.

I'm not sure what "windowception" is, but yeah, looks great, better than that screenshot.

https://element-43.com/market/29668/

Steady as a rock.

But I understand you may have no interest in anything Eve-related, apart from receiving big hourly ticks.



I won't wish for your computer to explode catastrophically, but I do hope that the EULA clauses 6A-2 & 3 will be enforced in full this coming Summer, as they gain a major player buffer from the coming expansions, in order to do so.

I humbly wish you all the best in your future Eve career(s).

Don't be so hard on yourself for not comprehending.

ISBoxer dashboards fall under, 6A-2 "You may not use your own or third-party software to modify [...] how the Game is played."

and

6A-3 "You may not rewrite or modify the user interface or otherwise manipulate data in any way to acquire items, currency, objects, character attributes or beneficial actions not actually acquired or achieved in the Game."

Stay sharp, bot boi.

I think his point is proving that he has no idea what's going on. I think it's pretty clear though that what he is mad at is multiboxers in general, manual or not.

Except what we have is 1 person playing with 19 of his friend AND 1 person playing with 20 accounts. These two concepts can work together. EVE will never stop being a multiboxing heavy game. Ever. you've made it clear that it's multiboxing itself, not the use of tools, that you dislike. Tough.

???? It's obviously did, hence the people still playing the game. ISBoxers had nearly no effect on the game then, all they did were make some people sad pandas when they though someone was making more isk than them. The truth is they were making a very small amount of isk for a very large time and effort investment. Their existence didn't really affect the number of other players playing, just the number of overly entitled players whining about something they misunderstood. Those people whining failed to realise a simple truth - they were jealous because they were terrible at EVE. There's countless ways to earn far more than a multiboxer, and countless methods to crush a multiboxer, but they can't do those, so instead they thought "they must all use ISBoxer, let's get rid of that". Now that's gone, and there's still whining about all the multiboxers!

Multiboxers still exist on a massive scale throughout the whole of EVE. CCP are still running the power of two campaign to drag in more and more alts. That's never going to change.