These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

(Triage-)Carrier buff

Author
Goose99
#21 - 2011-12-24 15:37:48 UTC
Saramiir wrote:
Some triage carrier balance would be nice. And Thanny is ass.

Either remove the drone damage bonus and add armor resist bonus(ohnoes archon copy!) or boost the drone damage bonus.



No, thanny dmg bonus don't matter pvp, and we don't care about pve. Gimp archon to be in line with other carriers.Cool
Murtific
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#22 - 2011-12-24 18:59:25 UTC
Nidhoggur is able to fit prior to genelotion plants:

shield tank shield triage with great effectiveness and comparable resists and tank to the archon. 2 shield transfers with lvl 5 minny carrier are like 88% or something of the 3rd rep of a carrier that can fit 3 reps.

armor tank armor triage nidhoggur tanks pretty crappy.


shield tank armor triage allows for all fittings

armor tank shield triage allows for all fittings


shield tank requires faction mods, but enables an average same ammount of resists as an archon.



There's nothing wrong with the nid as far as i can see. Along with the increased PG and capacitor ammount, this carrier if fitted properly and without scrubs piloting it. (near max skill) can perform along well with an archon in battle. Carriers can refit in triage. This allows for a shield tanked nid to refit armor tank moduels to allow for reps outside of triage. The biggest fail is that the nidhoggur should not enter triage again unless shields are at full. That's the pretty crap part..

good luck guys... carriers are serious business =]

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#23 - 2011-12-24 23:55:52 UTC
Only carrier that needs a change is the chimera.
it's meant to be the archon shield equivalent but it seems to run on 1980s MAC computers and hence has EPIC CPU issues.

thanny/nid are both ****** because they have crap cap and tank.
doesnt matter what you do to the fittings, this isnt going to change.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Saramiir
Norsk Lakseoppdrett
#24 - 2011-12-25 12:50:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Saramiir
Goose99 wrote:
Saramiir wrote:
Some triage carrier balance would be nice. And Thanny is ass.

Either remove the drone damage bonus and add armor resist bonus(ohnoes archon copy!) or boost the drone damage bonus.



No, thanny dmg bonus don't matter pvp, and we don't care about pve. Gimp archon to be in line with other carriers.Cool



If the damage bonus made it atleast worth using out of triage on par with other carriers it'd be ok.

Would still suck in triage though.

And mach > thanny for pve anyway
Valea Silpha
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2011-12-25 14:22:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Valea Silpha
Personally, I can't really think of a way to truly balance triage carriers.

That said, I do agree that shield set-ups are WAY too hard to fit and way too hard to keep capped. Relays shouldn't effect cap modules (there's plenty of stuff that doesn't) or flux coils should be better. Or, make a capital only low slot cap mod. Basically, do SOMETHING.

Other than that, which in essence would just be the tip of the ice burg it is a tough problem. To me it seems that capital remote modules are balanced so that the archon is fine and everyone else is screwed. If the other guys can't fit 3 reps they will never be useful as combat ships. Even if they are useable, you will still always be better served with all archons.

IMHO, CCP should be looking to completely rework all the fittings for all the carriers, and potentially ALL capital mods on all ships. The end result should be that all the ships can fit armor shield AND cap mods, forgetting the racial crap. What works on logistics ships does not work on carriers, they need cap transfers, and they need to be able to be used in whatever fleet comes to hand. After all of this we'd have:

Archon - High local armor tank.
Chimmy - High local shield tank.
Niddy - Highest shield rep output.
Thanny - Highest armor rep output.

And do whatever we need to do with the fittings and bonuses to make that happen, and preserving the ability for all of them to be refit to either tank type. Archons would still probably be the most useful triage carrier, because they would survive the best in triage, but at least when someone else brings something else, people aren't just giggling.

If they don't want to do that (and shame on them if they dont), they should add half-size capital remote modules. Half the fit, half the rep and cap amount. That would give carrier the chance to fit great but not amazing fits, but at least be able to physically fill all their high slots.
Murtific
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#26 - 2011-12-25 15:03:03 UTC
Valea Silpha wrote:
Personally, I can't really think of a way to truly balance triage carriers.

That said, I do agree that shield set-ups are WAY too hard to fit and way too hard to keep capped. Relays shouldn't effect cap modules (there's plenty of stuff that doesn't) or flux coils should be better. Or, make a capital only low slot cap mod. Basically, do SOMETHING.

Other than that, which in essence would just be the tip of the ice burg it is a tough problem. To me it seems that capital remote modules are balanced so that the archon is fine and everyone else is screwed. If the other guys can't fit 3 reps they will never be useful as combat ships. Even if they are useable, you will still always be better served with all archons.

IMHO, CCP should be looking to completely rework all the fittings for all the carriers, and potentially ALL capital mods on all ships. The end result should be that all the ships can fit armor shield AND cap mods, forgetting the racial crap. What works on logistics ships does not work on carriers, they need cap transfers, and they need to be able to be used in whatever fleet comes to hand. After all of this we'd have:

Archon - High local armor tank.
Chimmy - High local shield tank.
Niddy - Highest shield rep output.
Thanny - Highest armor rep output.

And do whatever we need to do with the fittings and bonuses to make that happen, and preserving the ability for all of them to be refit to either tank type. Archons would still probably be the most useful triage carrier, because they would survive the best in triage, but at least when someone else brings something else, people aren't just giggling.

If they don't want to do that (and shame on them if they dont), they should add half-size capital remote modules. Half the fit, half the rep and cap amount. That would give carrier the chance to fit great but not amazing fits, but at least be able to physically fill all their high slots.


i'm so glad you aren't a dev....

but anyway, I think the carriers are fine how they are. Except the CPU on the chimera, could use a small boost.
King Rothgar
Deadly Solutions
#27 - 2011-12-25 15:03:19 UTC
I like the nidhoggur as is, thank you very much. Out of all the triage carriers, it is the best of them. I say that with all seriousness and guess what, I have amarr carrier 5 too. So it's not like I'm in the dark here. The nidhoggur was buffed with crucible appropriately. Before it was a little gimped but even then it wasn't nearly as bad as many claimed. The archon is of course fine too. I'm also inclined to say the thanny is fine. It's certainly the worst of the triage carriers but it is the best ratting/missioning carrier. I really don't see a problem with that. The chimera desperately needed more CPU prior to crucible, I honestly don't know if they made any changes to it. Other than said CPU shortage, it's actually just fine.

In short, stop trying to convert the other 3 carriers into archons. Variety is good, I trained multiple carriers for a reason.

[u]Fireworks and snowballs are great, but what I really want is a corpse launcher.[/u]

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
#28 - 2011-12-25 23:04:40 UTC
Murtific wrote:
but anyway, I think the carriers are fine how they are. Except the CPU on the chimera, could use a small boost.


This tbh. /thread
Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#29 - 2011-12-25 23:14:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Liang Nuren
King Rothgar wrote:
I like the nidhoggur as is, thank you very much. Out of all the triage carriers, it is the best of them. I say that with all seriousness and guess what, I have amarr carrier 5 too. So it's not like I'm in the dark here. The nidhoggur was buffed with crucible appropriately. Before it was a little gimped but even then it wasn't nearly as bad as many claimed. The archon is of course fine too. I'm also inclined to say the thanny is fine. It's certainly the worst of the triage carriers but it is the best ratting/missioning carrier. I really don't see a problem with that. The chimera desperately needed more CPU prior to crucible, I honestly don't know if they made any changes to it. Other than said CPU shortage, it's actually just fine.

In short, stop trying to convert the other 3 carriers into archons. Variety is good, I trained multiple carriers for a reason.


I wish the grid boost had been a bit bigger, but overall I'm much more satisfied with my Nidhoggurs. Besides, the Nidhoggur is damn sexy. :)

-Liang

Ed: Also, supporting a big CPU increase for the Chimera. :)

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Julia Connor
P R O M E T H E U S
From Anoikis
#30 - 2011-12-26 00:15:54 UTC
Chimera needs moar cap and cpu to be on par with the archon. It would be nice to also do something about deadspace invuls so shield capitals and supercapitals can compete with their armor counterparts.
Jendra Neutral
Doomheim
#31 - 2011-12-26 00:59:29 UTC
Good to see people making a fuss about the chim. It's been four long years since I made the idiot mistake of training for one and not a day has gone by when I didn't kick myself for it.
Murtific
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#32 - 2011-12-26 05:01:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Murtific
Jendra Neutral wrote:
Good to see people making a fuss about the chim. It's been four long years since I made the idiot mistake of training for one and not a day has gone by when I didn't kick myself for it.



dedicated training and fitting requirements are needed to make the chimera a reliable and good triage carrier, 20k dps tank good resists, crap scan res, decent capacitor sustainment during triage operations, it is the stealth bomber of the triage operational requirements. The capacitor transfer range is pretty important in my opinion, but isn't overshadowed by the nidhoggur's repair incentives. I have minmatar carrier 5 and am still looking deeper at uses for the chimera in triage operations. Justification of the energy transfer range will allow you to let a skirmish fleet run around more on the battle field which allows for range dictation. Running around requires capacitor and if anything, sustainment of capacitor while mwd'd can be critical during a fight. There are many advantages of such tactics, techniques, and procedures utilized in triage operations.

Not ever carrier can fit in perfect with every tactic. The archon is great for slow moving armor fleets, yet the nidhoggur and the chimera will be the lead for the skirmish shield fleet. A pilot that knows every aspect (cap recharge, total ammount of cap, amount of cycles all transfers can run simultaneously, scan res on commonly used alliance/corp standardized ship fittings [lock times], and so on. There are so many variables that a good triage pilot will know. He who flies his ship better and knows the performance limitations will conduct themselves accordingly than any other pilot in combat.


My 2 cents.. All the carriers are fine, I believe the chimera could use 30 cpu more and it will be good for shield fleets without the use of flux coils or cap power relays......

-M
Jendra Neutral
Doomheim
#33 - 2011-12-26 05:11:20 UTC
Murtific wrote:

My 2 cents.. All the carriers are fine, I believe the chimera could use 30 cpu more and it will be good for shield fleets without the use of flux coils or cap power relays......

-M


Your post does not support this statement. Furthermore, i'd love to seethe chim fits your using for comparison.
Murtific
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#34 - 2011-12-26 16:05:10 UTC
Jendra Neutral wrote:
Murtific wrote:

My 2 cents.. All the carriers are fine, I believe the chimera could use 30 cpu more and it will be good for shield fleets without the use of flux coils or cap power relays......

-M


Your post does not support this statement. Furthermore, i'd love to seethe chim fits your using for comparison.




That information is classified dear friend. If you want to get the ship to perform on a basic level, you have to spend some isk. Unlike the Archon which you can just slap t2 mods to and go, the chimera requires modules that reduce CPU. Go back to EFT and try again m8ter.
Jack Dant
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
#35 - 2011-12-26 16:43:13 UTC
Murtific wrote:
That information is classified dear friend. If you want to get the ship to perform on a basic level, you have to spend some isk. Unlike the Archon which you can just slap t2 mods to and go, the chimera requires modules that reduce CPU. Go back to EFT and try again m8ter.

Does this "classified fit" involve 4 istabs for a tank?

Anyway, saying the chimera is fine because you can fit it fine with 100m worth of faction mods is silly. You can spend the same on the archon, and actually make it better instead of just fitting.

What happens in lowsec, stays in lowsec, lowering the barrier to entry to lowsec PVP: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=476644&#post476644

Jendra Neutral
Doomheim
#36 - 2011-12-26 17:43:55 UTC
Jack Dant wrote:
Murtific wrote:
That information is classified dear friend. If you want to get the ship to perform on a basic level, you have to spend some isk. Unlike the Archon which you can just slap t2 mods to and go, the chimera requires modules that reduce CPU. Go back to EFT and try again m8ter.

Does this "classified fit" involve 4 istabs for a tank?

Anyway, saying the chimera is fine because you can fit it fine with 100m worth of faction mods is silly. You can spend the same on the archon, and actually make it better instead of just fitting.


I assumed he was trolling.

I really hope he was trolling.
Murtific
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#37 - 2011-12-27 04:34:33 UTC
istabs ftw. They are pretty awesome for quickly getting to a pos to refit a super, dont fly tired and ensure completion of your pre combat checks m8s.. This concludes my safety brief for the holiday season. Pirate

Archon still reigns supreme in my opinion. I too have amarr carrier 5 and agree that it's performance is unprecedented amongst the other platforms loaded on the remaining types of carriers that can produce triage standards. A lot is possible with the chimera, but It does need a CPU buff.


I think CCP should give it more CPU to be inline with the Archon without having to fit a lot of faction and expensive/unique implants. I think we can all agree upon that.
Soon Shin
Scarlet Weather Rhapsody
#38 - 2011-12-27 07:41:41 UTC
The Chimera even with pimp and faction does not have enough CPU to fit a Tech 2 Triage Module, no matter how hard you try, the only way is to use a cpu implant, The chimera desperately needs CPU.
Danny John-Peter
The Congregation
RAPID HEAVY ROPERS
#39 - 2011-12-27 18:32:03 UTC
Tbh I think the Nid should be the best Triage carrier, it is the reppy one after all.

Proposal -

New Nid Bonus as follows

"While in Triage shield and armour resists increase by X%"

This would effectively make the Nid a highly effective triage platform while retaining its lackluster ability to tank out of Triage, which is in turn balanced by the repping bonus.

And as for Thanatoses not having a resist bonus, there care-bear carriers anyways.
Halle Karnassus
Doomheim
#40 - 2011-12-27 23:48:58 UTC
Danny John-Peter wrote:
And as for Thanatoses not having a resist bonus, there care-bear carriers anyways.


And the niddy is a repping POS carrier anyway.

Buff my chimera!
Previous page123Next page