These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Codes place in the NULLocalypse
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#101 - 2015-04-20 04:30:18 UTC
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Buying shares is meaningless...it just shows that a few bored rich people support griefing. When it came to the true test of support - voting - your true support count was revealed.

Excuses there are many, but facts speak louder than rhetoric. Code ran hard, and lost harder.

As for my supporters, see the highsec PvErs elected....it's clear who truly speaks for the people.

And I have no need to shut you down, the csm elections did that perfectly, by exposing you as a griefer group with nary a sliver of true popular support. Keep on losing, you are so good at it.


Oh yeah by the way if you actually went to the link, you would see there is more then just a "few" supporters. There has to be hundreds of names there of people who bought shares. You lose again.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink


"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.
Danalee
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#102 - 2015-04-20 04:41:48 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.


Oh lord, that's what you keep saying, that's what you are running with after all your other bubbles got burst...

Let me say it again, just because I love it;

Code candidate had infinitely more votes than you. You fail and your tears are showing.
Tora (the big bad evil hisec baby seal slayer) had tripple that. You fail and the impotence of your latest rhetoric is so broken it's funny.
Goons... well yeah, you know where this one is going Cool You fail yet again but don't let that stop you, it's been a while since so many people had so many laughs about so much whinging.

To summarize, your sparrow is dead. Long live the sparrow!

D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#103 - 2015-04-20 10:21:37 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Buying shares is meaningless...it just shows that a few bored rich people support griefing. When it came to the true test of support - voting - your true support count was revealed.

Excuses there are many, but facts speak louder than rhetoric. Code ran hard, and lost harder.

As for my supporters, see the highsec PvErs elected....it's clear who truly speaks for the people.

And I have no need to shut you down, the csm elections did that perfectly, by exposing you as a griefer group with nary a sliver of true popular support. Keep on losing, you are so good at it.


Oh yeah by the way if you actually went to the link, you would see there is more then just a "few" supporters. There has to be hundreds of names there of people who bought shares. You lose again.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink


"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.

Wait a minute. "you would see there and more then just a "few" supporters."

Got to give you the second grammar mistake though. 1 outta 2 aint bad bud

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Danalee
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#104 - 2015-04-20 10:31:26 UTC
^^ From all the drivel you pick grammar? Lol
Also: , or the may be folks

Comma or the may be folks.
Indeed.
The lights are on but nobody is home.

D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#105 - 2015-04-20 10:35:05 UTC
I couldn't sit back and let a bad grammar correction go. I mean it's one thing to have bad grammar (like me). But its another to miss correct it. Think of the children

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#106 - 2015-04-20 11:07:33 UTC
Guys stop we are being mean and insensitive. I have solved Veers

Link

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#107 - 2015-04-20 11:48:50 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Buying shares is meaningless...it just shows that a few bored rich people support griefing. When it came to the true test of support - voting - your true support count was revealed.

Excuses there are many, but facts speak louder than rhetoric. Code ran hard, and lost harder.

As for my supporters, see the highsec PvErs elected....it's clear who truly speaks for the people.

And I have no need to shut you down, the csm elections did that perfectly, by exposing you as a griefer group with nary a sliver of true popular support. Keep on losing, you are so good at it.


Oh yeah by the way if you actually went to the link, you would see there is more then just a "few" supporters. There has to be hundreds of names there of people who bought shares. You lose again.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink


"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.

Glorious tears, now even with gramar correction. Veers has to actually undock to see how highsec is changing, i guess that will never happen.

Evil RatKid
Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#108 - 2015-04-20 11:59:11 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Guys stop we are being mean and insensitive. I have solved Veers

Link
Nice, was worth reading. Cool

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.
Amy Lemmont
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#109 - 2015-04-20 19:03:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Amy Lemmont
Veers Belvar wrote:
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Buying shares is meaningless...it just shows that a few bored rich people support griefing. When it came to the true test of support - voting - your true support count was revealed.

Excuses there are many, but facts speak louder than rhetoric. Code ran hard, and lost harder.

As for my supporters, see the highsec PvErs elected....it's clear who truly speaks for the people.

And I have no need to shut you down, the csm elections did that perfectly, by exposing you as a griefer group with nary a sliver of true popular support. Keep on losing, you are so good at it.


Oh yeah by the way if you actually went to the link, you would see there is more then just a "few" supporters. There has to be hundreds of names there of people who bought shares. You lose again.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink


"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.


You keep saying that, but GSF has how many candidates on the CSM? Who is our biggest supporters again? Who runs and/or participates in most of our freighter/orca ganking fleets? I'll give you a hint, it isn't high sec carebears, or anyone in your movement. You lose yet again.

Also, please provide proof of your accusations that anyone was scammed into buying shares, or that anything on our shareholders page being falsified or made up.

Once again, I await your next volley of tears Blink
Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#110 - 2015-04-20 21:15:42 UTC
Gerhard Stringfellow wrote:
I don't see how the changes to null will disrupt CODE at all.


Remember that the blocks act strategically in response to future game changes.

All of the sudden, when sov null just might be about more than supercapitals, we see KarmaFleet, Pandemic Horde, et al. being formed. The age of the weaponized newbie has dawned.

If the mineral and industry buffs are for real, and the blocks recruit miners en masse, you could see the hi sec miner populations being depleted. I mean you could say this is patently absurd, but now every newbie in a rifter -actually- matters and is actively sought out by the coalitions. The biggest threat to CODE. is not the latest hi sec braveheart movement, but game mechanic changes.

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#111 - 2015-04-21 03:00:24 UTC
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Buying shares is meaningless...it just shows that a few bored rich people support griefing. When it came to the true test of support - voting - your true support count was revealed.

Excuses there are many, but facts speak louder than rhetoric. Code ran hard, and lost harder.

As for my supporters, see the highsec PvErs elected....it's clear who truly speaks for the people.

And I have no need to shut you down, the csm elections did that perfectly, by exposing you as a griefer group with nary a sliver of true popular support. Keep on losing, you are so good at it.


Oh yeah by the way if you actually went to the link, you would see there is more then just a "few" supporters. There has to be hundreds of names there of people who bought shares. You lose again.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink


"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.


You keep saying that, but GSF has how many candidates on the CSM? Who is our biggest supporters again? Who runs and/or participates in most of our freighter/orca ganking fleets? I'll give you a hint, it isn't high sec carebears, or anyone in your movement. You lose yet again.

Also, please provide proof of your accusations that anyone was scammed into buying shares, or that anything on our shareholders page being falsified or made up.

Once again, I await your next volley of tears Blink

Veers' movement is an alliance of him and a couple of NPC mission agents he is docked with in the same station.

Evil RatKid
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#112 - 2015-04-21 03:27:39 UTC
Amy Lemmont wrote:


You keep saying that, but GSF has how many candidates on the CSM? Who is our biggest supporters again? Who runs and/or participates in most of our freighter/orca ganking fleets? I'll give you a hint, it isn't high sec carebears, or anyone in your movement. You lose yet again.

Also, please provide proof of your accusations that anyone was scammed into buying shares, or that anything on our shareholders page being falsified or made up.

Once again, I await your next volley of tears Blink


It's either "is our biggest supporter" or "are our biggest supporters," not "is our biggest supporters."

That a tiny fraction of Goons are highsec griefers hardly means that GSF =/= Code. Code ran a candidate, in the form of our good friend Sabriz, and was mercilessly crushed. The chief Goon candidate, Sion Kumiwhatever, for all of his serious flaws, was instrumental in getting awoxxing removed from the game. Sure doesn't sound like a Code supporter to me.

As far as Code being scammers, I'm shocked that you demand proof - you must truly be naive. Try this one for starters. http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/08/roaches-in-sunlight-part-2.html

I await your next delusional post demonstrating your inability to grasp reality and laced with reference to nonexistent tears.
Amy Lemmont
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#113 - 2015-04-21 05:25:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Amy Lemmont
Veers Belvar wrote:
hardly means that GSF =/= Code.


Thanks for proving my point :P

Unless you meant to say "hardley means that GSF=Code", since we are playing grammar nazi :)

Veers Belvar wrote:
As far as Code being scammers, I'm shocked that you demand proof - you must truly be naive. Try this one for starters. http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/08/roaches-in-sunlight-part-2.html


That article shows to me that someone was not following the code and plotting against the New Order (A very serious offense), and got punished by getting his mining permit revoked along with losing his merc fee. Seems pretty clear-cut and legit to me. Once again you lose.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#114 - 2015-04-22 03:03:47 UTC
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
hardly means that GSF =/= Code.


Thanks for proving my point :P

Unless you meant to say "hardley means that GSF=Code", since we are playing grammar **** :)

Veers Belvar wrote:
As far as Code being scammers, I'm shocked that you demand proof - you must truly be naive. Try this one for starters. http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/08/roaches-in-sunlight-part-2.html


That article shows to me that someone was not following the code and plotting against the New Order (A very serious offense), and got punished by getting his mining permit revoked along with losing his merc fee. Seems pretty clear-cut and legit to me. Once again you lose.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink


If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#115 - 2015-04-22 03:06:21 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.

Congratulations on your first grammatically correct post while correcting somebodies grammar veers.

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#116 - 2015-04-22 03:07:33 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.

Congratulations on your first grammatically correct post while correcting somebodies grammar veers.


somebody's
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#117 - 2015-04-22 03:19:33 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.

Congratulations on your first grammatically correct post while correcting somebodies grammar veers.


somebody's

Actually no. I kind of set you up for that. Someone's is the correct way to say that Veers. I feel a little guilty for it but you did deserve it. Go back and learn your English better before imposing your faulty version.

got dat m8? CoolCool

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#118 - 2015-04-22 03:34:00 UTC
English 101 with music and video

Just for you veers cause I like ya so much

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#119 - 2015-04-22 03:44:47 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.

Congratulations on your first grammatically correct post while correcting somebodies grammar veers.


somebody's

Actually no. I kind of set you up for that. Someone's is the correct way to say that Veers. I feel a little guilty for it but you did deserve it. Go back and learn your English better before imposing your faulty version.

got dat m8? CoolCool


Somebody is fine...honestly I prefer you Marmite folks when you are trying and failing to wardecc me, or docking up when someone comes to fight you. This look stupid and make grammar errors role doesn't fit you well - I may need to personally take it up with Tora - he should have lots of free time after his CSM debacle.
Amy Lemmont
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#120 - 2015-04-22 23:26:30 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Amy Lemmont wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
hardly means that GSF =/= Code.


Thanks for proving my point :P

Unless you meant to say "hardley means that GSF=Code", since we are playing grammar **** :)

Veers Belvar wrote:
As far as Code being scammers, I'm shocked that you demand proof - you must truly be naive. Try this one for starters. http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/08/roaches-in-sunlight-part-2.html


That article shows to me that someone was not following the code and plotting against the New Order (A very serious offense), and got punished by getting his mining permit revoked along with losing his merc fee. Seems pretty clear-cut and legit to me. Once again you lose.

I patiently await your next volley of tears Blink


If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.


Hey Veers,

Would it ever hurt for you to admit you lost an argument? You are just making yourself look like a raging idiot right now.

Your emphasis is wrong as usual, and if you even bothered to read the article you would see someone being punished for breaking the code and not being scammed. You lose yet again!

I hope you have a fine code compliant evening, and I await your next volley of tears Blink