These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Scylla] Ishtars

First post First post
Author
Caleb Seremshur
Commando Guri
Guristas Pirates
#321 - 2015-03-31 03:32:40 UTC
One problem I've always had in fighting ishtars is that they're hard to jam. For a vessel that has an even less skillful weapons system than missiles I think they could suffer having lower than normal sensor strength, shorter lock range and be a bit slower. Drone aggressive state also needs reviewing because right now that's another totally broken feature that makes drones the best weapon system in the game.
Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#322 - 2015-03-31 04:43:41 UTC
Shaklu wrote:
Aiyshimin wrote:
They aren't battleship class weapons. They are drones.

But they are. Heavy and Sentry drones are designed as anti-BS drones for use by ships like the Dominix. While you can use them on smaller ships, you can only use a very limited number.

Frigate Drone boat bandwidth is 25 - allowing 5 light drones (1 sentry/heavy)
See: Tristan, Dragoon, Algos

Cruiser/BC Drone boats have bandwidths of 50 - allowing 5 medium drones (2 sentry/heavy)
See: Vexor, Curse, Pilgrim, Harbinger, Prophecy, etc.

BS Drone boats have a bandwidth of 125 - allowing 5 sentry or heavy drones
See: Dominix, Armageddon

There are some minor exceptions, like the Prophecy having 75, and the Algos having 35.. but the most gross exception is the Ishtar which has 125, more than the Battlecruiser done ships, the same as a Battleship drone boat. Except it's not a BS and has a tiny sig radius and can MWD all over the place, Making it deal equal damage as a Dominix without having to worry about having a tank as it can fly away, and is much harder to hit in the first place because it's a cruiser.

Edit:
In the same way that weapons are restricted via powergrid requirements, so too are drones restricted via their bandwidth. You may be able to fit 1 or 2 battleship guns on a smaller ship, but that would be silly.. the same thing goes for drones. Bandwidth and drone bay capacity limit the number of drones you have available and the number you can actually use. Cruisers should only have a bandwidth designed for medium drones, though sentry drones could be used if you wanted to - in a very limited manner.


Vexor has 100mb bandwith, VNI 125, Prophecy 75, Myrmidon 100. Some BS have 75 only. Anti BS weapon doesn't mean it's a BS class fitted weapon.

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP

Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#323 - 2015-03-31 08:03:12 UTC
Soldarius wrote:
Aiyshimin wrote:
Shaklu wrote:
I just don't understand why a cruiser class has bonuses to battleship weapons. Heavy drones and sentries are battleship class weapons, and unless you are flying a t3 battlecruiser or battleship you shouldn't have bonuses to battleship weapons.

I'd even say being able to have 5 sentries/heavies up at a time is overkill. Removing bonuses and only allowing 3 or 4 sentries to be active via bandwidth makes the most sense to me.


They aren't battleship class weapons. They are drones.


425mm Railgun II: 400m signature resolution, optimal 57.6km, falloff 24km (81.6), tracking .01 rad/s.
Tachyon Beam Laser II: 400m signature resolution, optimal 52.8km, falloff 20km (72.8), tracking .014rad/s.
1400mm Howitzer Artillery II: 400m signature radius, optimal 48km, falloff 35km (83), tracking .009 rad/s.

Bouncer II: 400m signature resolution, optimal 36km, falloff 54km (90km), tracking .019 rad/s.

Definitely not a BS-class weapon.

edit: Also don't mind the best-in-class range and tracking.


Goode poast.

Another day.

Another day Ishtar not fixed. vOv
knobber Jobbler
State War Academy
Caldari State
#324 - 2015-03-31 09:00:04 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Lienzo wrote:
Why should a Gallente ship get a bonus to using Amarr drones?

Limit the Ishtar drone damage bonuses to thermal damage and call it a day.


Yes. This.

Or

Remove Sentries from the Ishtar completely.

CCP vOv


That wouldn't solve the overiding problem that Sentries are still by far the best fleet weapon in the game.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#325 - 2015-03-31 19:41:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
knobber Jobbler wrote:
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Lienzo wrote:
Why should a Gallente ship get a bonus to using Amarr drones?

Limit the Ishtar drone damage bonuses to thermal damage and call it a day.


Yes. This.

Or

Remove Sentries from the Ishtar completely.

CCP vOv


That wouldn't solve the overiding problem that Sentries are still by far the best fleet weapon in the game.


That would at least limit their proliferation, if fleets could tank against one damage type when facing said nanogaf Ishtars. Sentries on a cruiser hull - be gone!

To fix: I'd up the sentry m3 volume and increase battleships' drone bays to compensate - that way Ishtars won't be able to carry more than 2-3 sentries, while genuine sentry use could be delegated to battleships/carriers alone.

But what do we know. vOv

Cruisers Online.

P.S. Dominix fleets of the future/past - We'd have to see about that potential meta. Domi sentry damage could also be restricted to Tm.

First fix the Ishtar problem.
McChicken Combo HalfMayo
The Happy Meal
#326 - 2015-03-31 22:38:29 UTC  |  Edited by: McChicken Combo HalfMayo
Subcap drone boats shouldn't be a thing. Drone subcaps dominate many classes besides the HAC department. I'd prefer to see all drone bonuses removed from subcaps.

Drones were actually originally intended to be supplemental weaponry, not a primary weapon system. Rebalance the EWAR drones so the ships with large drones bandwidth / drone bays can use drones in a supplemental role.

There are all our dominion

Gate camps: "Its like the lowsec watercooler, just with explosions and boose" - Ralph King-Griffin

Ncc 1709
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Pandemic Horde
#327 - 2015-04-01 00:23:10 UTC
the nerf hasn't changed anything.

Go back to 1 and start again
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#328 - 2015-04-01 09:06:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Another day.

Another day in a nanu dron Ishtar.

P.S. I suspect the Chinese Eve server hasn't discovered the sentries' real potential yet, hence no fix. All the changes to TQ also apply there, and vice versa.

McChicken Combo HalfMayo wrote:
Subcap drone boats shouldn't be a thing. Drone subcaps dominate many classes besides the HAC department. I'd prefer to see all drone bonuses removed from subcaps.

Drones were actually originally intended to be supplemental weaponry, not a primary weapon system. Rebalance the EWAR drones so the ships with large drones bandwidth / drone bays can use drones in a supplemental role.


Also this.

But it's far too late to go back now - CCP have created a monster. Addition of DDAs showed how broken the system is - perfect tracking, omni damage and superior range with damage avoidance for the boat controlling them in the case of sentries.
Shaklu
State War Academy
Caldari State
#329 - 2015-04-01 12:12:38 UTC
McChicken Combo HalfMayo wrote:
Subcap drone boats shouldn't be a thing. Drone subcaps dominate many classes besides the HAC department. I'd prefer to see all drone bonuses removed from subcaps.

Drones were actually originally intended to be supplemental weaponry, not a primary weapon system. Rebalance the EWAR drones so the ships with large drones bandwidth / drone bays can use drones in a supplemental role.

I dunno, I remember when I first started playing Gallente were introduced as primarily using their drones to deal damage, and that's actually why I didn't pick them. I think drone boats are okay, as long as they stay within their classes. Frig/Dessy should use light, cruisers medium, battleships large. The only exceptions should be minor - perhaps a Battlecruiser that can use 4 heavies or something.. but in no universe should cruisers be using full battleship weapons. Especially with bonuses to them.

Heavy drones and Sentry drones are battleship weapons - Restrict the ability to use them from ALL ships besides Battleship and up.

Powergrid/CPU restricts gun size
Use Bandwidth/Drone bay to restrict drone types
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#330 - 2015-04-10 07:17:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
After wading through all the bullshit and gimmicky solutions in countless threads, the real cause of all the great suffering has been identified:

TerminalSamurai Sunji wrote:
One of the most blatant things that I see in respect to the Ishtar compared to the other HACs is the fact that the Ishtar has way too many bonuses.


This man is correct.

Gallente Cruiser bonuses (per skill level):

7.5% bonus to Heavy Drone max velocity and tracking speed
10% bonus to Light, Medium, and Heavy Drone hit points and damage, 5% bonus to Sentry Drone hit points and damage

Heavy Assault Cruisers bonuses (per skill level):

5000m bonus to Drone operation range
5% bonus to Sentry Drone optimal range*and*tracking speed

That's at least 6 bonuses.
_______________________________________________________________

A Zealot has 4, or even three if you disregard the Activation cost:

Amarr Cruiser bonuses (per skill level):

10% reduction in Medium Energy Turret activation cost
5% bonus to Medium Energy Turret rate of fire

Heavy Assault Cruisers bonuses (per skill level):

10% bonus to Medium Energy Turret optimal range
5% bonus to Medium Energy Turret damage
________________________________________________________________

Muninn also four:

Minmatar Cruiser bonuses (per skill level):

5% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret rate of fire
5% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret damage

Heavy Assault Cruisers bonuses (per skill level):

10% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret optimal range
7.5% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret tracking speed

* * *

The same drone/sentry Optimal range and Tracking double bonus is also present on the Dominix --- In a situation where sentries/drones are a fully functioning primary weapons system that is unacceptable. WTB Apocalypse with Tracking+Optimal and a 10% Damage bonus.

Remove the Optimal range part of the double bonus, and maybe combine Sentry 5% Tracking with Heavy Tracking 7.5% into one.

If they ever want to reach those ranges again, they'll have to sacrifice their tank buffer - just like everyone else.

Thanks for listening to reason.

Roll
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#331 - 2015-04-10 07:38:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:

The same drone/sentry Optimal range and Tracking double bonus is also present on the Dominix --- In a situation where sentries/drones are a fully functioning primary weapons system that is unacceptable. WTB Apocalypse with Tracking+Optimal and a 10% Damage bonus.

Remove the Optimal range part of the double bonus, and maybe combine Sentry 5% Tracking with Heavy Tracking 7.5% into one.

The Dominix' primary weapon are the drones. And the Dominix is a pure drone boat, nothing else. If you remove the Tracking/Optimal, you have a bad Armageddon.

The number of bonuses you see is incorrect as well. You have either 4 (5 with the range) for heavy drone or you have 4 (5 with the range) for sentries or you have 2 (3 with range) for the light and medium drones. I don't see any discrepancy with other HACs as the bonuses do not affect all weapon sizes at the same time but only 1 size exclusively.

The tracking bonuses for sentries on the Ishtar were decoupled from the mobile drone bonuses in order to reduce the effectiveness of the Sentrishtar. You do not want to have that back. Roll
On the Dominix, however, all the bonuses as they are make sense as sentries are a BS weapon. Or so I've been told time and time again. Roll

Your "reason", as you call it, really is of questionable nature. Roll

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#332 - 2015-04-10 07:43:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Rivr Luzade wrote:

On the Dominix, however, all the bonuses as they are make sense as sentries are a BS weapon. Or so I've been told time and time again. Roll


One more time:

Apocalypse:

Amarr Battleship bonuses (per skill level):

7.5% bonus to Large Energy Turret optimal range
7.5% bonus to Large Energy Turret tracking speed

Dominix:

Gallente Battleship bonuses (per skill level):

10% bonus to Drone hitpoints and damage
7.5% bonus to Drone optimal range and tracking speed

Tempest:

Minmatar Battleship bonuses (per skill level):

5% bonus to Large Projectile Turret rate of fire
5% bonus to Large Projectile Turret damage

Is the Dominix a brawling ship? A fleet ship? All of the above? Best spaceship?

I'd love to get a 10% damage per level bonus on the Apocalypse. Oh, and make it so that all of the bonuses apply to Small, Medium and Large energy turrets. Roll

Ishtars Online Roll

Rivr Luzade wrote:

The number of bonuses you see is incorrect as well.


Let's see,

7.5% bonus to Heavy Drone max velocity and tracking speed - That's two
10% bonus to Light, Medium, and Heavy Drone hit points and damage, 5% bonus to Sentry Drone hit points and damage - That's number 3.

Heavy Assault Cruisers bonuses (per skill level):

5000m bonus to Drone operation range - Four
5% bonus to Sentry Drone optimal range *and* tracking speed - Five & Six

Alright, we can count the Trackings as one. So 5 (five) in total. Roll

Don't forget that this CRUISER hull can instantly switch between Tachyon Beam Laser / 425mm range & damage, and Neutron Blaster Cannons whenever it feels like it. Albeit only two times, if abandoning sentries is required. Smile

On the topic of all drone sizes getting damage bonuses: Would I fly a Zealot with bonused Small Beams? Possibly. Smile
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#333 - 2015-04-10 07:53:33 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Is the Dominix a brawling ship? A fleet ship? All of the above? Best spaceship?

I'd love to get a 10% damage per level bonus on the Apocalypse. Oh, and make it so that all of the bonuses apply to Small, Medium and Large energy turrets. Roll

Ishtars Online Roll

The Domi is many things, just like all drone boats. Until it runs out of drones. Besides, if you added 10% damage bonus to the Apoc, you'd get easily above 1k DPS. That sure is balanced. On the other hand, without the 10% damage bonus to drones on the Domi, you'd barely scratch 400 DPS with high DPS drones. That surely is balanced. Or remove the Optimal/Tracking bonus, then you have a Geddon without Neutralizer Bonus. Guess which ship is going to be less useful.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#334 - 2015-04-10 07:55:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Or remove the Optimal/Tracking bonus, then you have a Geddon without Neutralizer Bonus.


Don't try to steer away from the problem. I never said optimal and tracking needs removing. Only the Optimal part of the DOUBLE bonus. Blink

Or is Heavy drones tracking frigs not enough of an advantage? No? Roll

Carry on.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#335 - 2015-04-10 08:07:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Rivr Luzade wrote:

Besides, if you added 10% damage bonus to the Apoc, you'd get easily above 1k DPS. That sure is balanced. On the other hand, without the 10% damage bonus to drones on the Domi, you'd barely scratch 400 DPS with high DPS drones.


Currently, a 3x DDA Domi without any comps/omnilinks does 580 DPS with Wardens @ 103+42km, or 620 DPS & 61+54km with Bouncers.
In a Tachy Apoc to reach those ranges, I have to fit 2 Tracking comps, or use Standards, giving me 462 DPS @ 91+25km.

Balanced gaem, yo.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#336 - 2015-04-10 08:13:07 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:

Rivr Luzade wrote:

The number of bonuses you see is incorrect as well.


Let's see,

7.5% bonus to Heavy Drone max velocity and tracking speed - That's two
10% bonus to Light, Medium, and Heavy Drone hit points and damage, 5% bonus to Sentry Drone hit points and damage - That's number 3.

Heavy Assault Cruisers bonuses (per skill level):

5000m bonus to Drone operation range - Four
5% bonus to Sentry Drone optimal range *and* tracking speed - Five & Six

Alright, we can count the Trackings as one. So 5 (five) in total. Roll

Don't forget that this CRUISER hull can instantly switch between Tachyon Beam Laser / 425mm range & damage, and Neutron Blaster Cannons whenever it feels like it. Albeit only two times, if abandoning sentries is required. Smile

That is 6 bonuses that apply independently to different weapon sizes. There are 2 bonuses for small, 4 for mobile large and 4 for mobile stationary. Throwing them all into one pot is tailoring the data to favor your argument, not objectively looking at what the data actually does. You also cannot count the tracking bonuses as one as they do not apply to the same drones. Counting the range bonus is a bit of a stretch as stationary drones cannot follow you around and mobile drones need to travel.

In case you've forgotten, you can also not "instantly switch between" drones when you feel like it, there are cooldown timers and range limitations.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#337 - 2015-04-10 08:16:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Rivr Luzade wrote:

Throwing them all into one pot is tailoring the data to favor your argument, not objectively looking at what the data actually does.


Forget Ishtar for a second, look at the clear example of the Tracking + Optimal double bonus on the Domi along with the damage bonus to all drone types. Smile

You think that's fine, while all the other battleships get two effective bonuses? Smile

I hope CCP is thinking. Blink
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#338 - 2015-04-10 08:26:13 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Forget Ishtar for a second, look at the double Tracking + Optimal bonus on the Domi along with the damage bonus to all drone types. SmileBlink

This thread is about the Ishtar, not the Dominix. If you want to discuss the Domi, this is the thread for you. I have already voiced my opinion there and you are also active there.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#339 - 2015-04-10 08:27:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Zan Shiro
Ncc 1709 wrote:
the nerf hasn't changed anything.

Go back to 1 and start again



Not sure how it got off the whiteboard in a conference room discussion in the first place.


It wasn't the damage as the only issue. The flexibility in how you can apply it is another issue. Not sure how they don't see this.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#340 - 2015-04-10 08:29:56 UTC
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Forget Ishtar for a second, look at the double Tracking + Optimal bonus on the Domi along with the damage bonus to all drone types. SmileBlink


This thread is about the Ishtar, not the Dominix.


They are the Ying and Yang of the sentry problem. Smile

Going by history, seeing as no one wants a moderate solution, the nerf bat will decimate both of these ships in the end. Blink