These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Dear CSM Wormhole Rep

Author
Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
WiNGSPAN Delivery Network
#21 - 2015-03-26 14:32:37 UTC
Trinkets, first of all I'd like to thank you for helping me fit my Proteus a couple weeks ago. You will be proud to know that while I haven't killed a single thing with it yet, I did manage to almost lose it to gate guns. Luckily it was PLEX tanked and I got out in structure.

As far as my approach, yes I'd like to take polls and surveys. WINGSPAN corp already has bi monthly corp surveys to assess direction and morale, as well as gauge other KPIs among our agents.

Now, I can see from your posts you are operating on a few false assumptions about me. The first is that "Chance cares about being competent at PVP." I enjoy EVE because it's a sandbox where nobody defines success other than yourself. When I want to feel good at games, I play titles that were made with clear goals and score/objectives, and optimize strategy to meet those goals. When I want to play space ego wars, I play Eve.

The second presumption is "Chance knows how to tell if his structures are being attacked." Can't say I've figured that one out yet!

You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT

Ilaister
Binary Aesthetics
#22 - 2015-03-26 15:25:00 UTC
Trinket - much love but you realise nobody in Wspace has pointed out how worthless bombers are here for a reason?

Edit blog pls :)

Keskora Yaari
POS Party
Ember Sands
#23 - 2015-03-26 15:31:35 UTC
Haha Trinket that POCO switch is so deliciously trolly.
Ab'del Abu
Atlantis Ascendant
#24 - 2015-03-26 16:11:06 UTC
Trinkets friend wrote:
Look, Chance is on the CSM. The CSM has to provide input to CCP on structures.

This is Chance's corp's first experience owning a POCO.
methinks he will need to brush up on structures pretty quick.


Isk sent to cover loss of poor mammoth.
slam34
Transtar Services
#25 - 2015-03-26 16:42:15 UTC
I just recently discovered the Wingspan Delivery Services video collection. Entertaining.

I'm sure Chance will do his best to contribute to the CSM now that he is there.

I expect that the new mechanics and new structures will develop a life of their own and the reasons they need changing, especially in regards to wormhole use, will be lost in the gathering momentum of the shiney new things as they are developed. As deadlines loom and programming compromises are made, we will most likely have a baffling new array of things that do not work right and cannot be easily changed. And we will grumblingly adapt and make do with what we have, to do what we want them to do instead of what they were designed to do.

And you know what? I'm OK with that. That's always been the best part of EvE.

High sec: That's the tutorial. Null Sec is the actual game. Wormholes? Even CCP isn't sure.

Viggo Konstanin
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#26 - 2015-03-26 17:09:57 UTC
On the bright side, we have now in Chance a WH CSM that will advocate hard for the revision of POCO ownership mechanics.
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#27 - 2015-03-27 14:31:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Trinkets friend
If the innumerable POCo attacks he's getting this week don;t prompt a change to POCO tranfer mechanics, then Marmites will be the ones who Q.Q the most and get it done.

Just sayin', I am working on Annoyikis, a wormhole bastion in a C2 with E545/R474 null-C6 statics (which no one in their right mind wants, ergo no one will ever actually seriously siege) where the POCOs are owned by, viz. Marmites, Wingspan, Pursuit of Happiness, Deadly Fingertips, etc etc. and where wormhole representatives who are annoyed by said wardec station camping griefers come to congreagate and, using alts in omens with Standard M crystals which nev er burn out, ping said POCOs ever couple of hours until said owners of the POCos get jack of receiving notifications and come onto the forums and Q.Q about it.

Annoyikis. it's wormholes for douches.
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#28 - 2015-03-27 17:11:44 UTC
how has nobody made the "we have a chance Chance will do something about structures"?

come on people

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
WiNGSPAN Delivery Network
#29 - 2015-03-27 18:34:10 UTC
Well what I'm hearing is you guys don't want docking, and only want mooring if it solves similar problems that POS shields solve. It certainly sounds like a reasonable request.

PS I do personally dislike the 48 hr mobile deport timer but not enough to fight against it unless there's a reason/support.

You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT

scorchlikeshiswhiskey
Totally Abstract
O X I D E
#30 - 2015-03-27 18:41:56 UTC
Chance Ravinne wrote:
Well what I'm hearing is you guys don't want docking, and only want mooring if it solves similar problems that POS shields solve. It certainly sounds like a reasonable request.

PS I do personally dislike the 48 hr mobile deport timer but not enough to fight against it unless there's a reason/support.

What we don't want, and those things are part of, is for WH space to become an extension/bastard clone of null. So if you're ever unsure how we would react, just ask yourself if a given suggestion would make WH space more like null and you will likely have your answer.

What is your opinion on the possibility that gates in Sov null will be able to influence WH spawn mechanics and/or behaviors? I don't think the actual effects being considered have been released, if they have I haven't been made aware, but I am not a fan of the "wormhole stabilizer" mechanic for the reason listed up there^^.
Keskora Yaari
POS Party
Ember Sands
#31 - 2015-03-27 21:25:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Keskora Yaari
scorchlikeshiswhiskey wrote:


What we don't want, and those things are part of, is for WH space to become an extension/bastard clone of null. So if you're ever unsure how we would react, just ask yourself if a given suggestion would make WH space more like null and you will likely have your answer.



I do agree with this. If i wanted the null mechanics and mentality I would go live in null. I want to see wormhole space continue to grow as a community with its own lifestyle in the game. My biggest worry with all of these announcements is that CCP will implement across-the-board changes to gameplay primarily targeted at null and those of us living in wormhole space will suffer as a consequence. That's also a lot of why I was upset to hear that corbexx was leaving for Goons. I just want to know that someone is looking out for us and that we won't be overlooked.
Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#32 - 2015-03-27 21:48:31 UTC
Is this the "Wingspan Killed Me" support thread?
Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
WiNGSPAN Delivery Network
#33 - 2015-03-27 22:13:38 UTC
scorchlikeshiswhiskey wrote:
Chance Ravinne wrote:
Well what I'm hearing is you guys don't want docking, and only want mooring if it solves similar problems that POS shields solve. It certainly sounds like a reasonable request.

PS I do personally dislike the 48 hr mobile deport timer but not enough to fight against it unless there's a reason/support.

What we don't want, and those things are part of, is for WH space to become an extension/bastard clone of null. So if you're ever unsure how we would react, just ask yourself if a given suggestion would make WH space more like null and you will likely have your answer.

What is your opinion on the possibility that gates in Sov null will be able to influence WH spawn mechanics and/or behaviors? I don't think the actual effects being considered have been released, if they have I haven't been made aware, but I am not a fan of the "wormhole stabilizer" mechanic for the reason listed up there^^.


It sounds like a pie in the sky idea to me since constructing or modifying gates has always been a very long term goal. That said id say it makes nulsec more like w space more than it would make w space more like nulsec assuming it would give nulsec "statics" in some way.

I'd need to see more details first.

You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT

Holznar'ar Eoner
Takamo
#34 - 2015-03-27 22:50:05 UTC
Please...I am more concerned with the effect from the perspective of wormholes not how it impacts null. Such change would alter static holes which should be the issue.
Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
WiNGSPAN Delivery Network
#35 - 2015-03-28 02:11:10 UTC
Holznar'ar Eoner wrote:
Please...I am more concerned with the effect from the perspective of wormholes not how it impacts null. Such change would alter static holes which should be the issue.


We don't actually know that at this point.

If the effect is tied to gates, they can't be generated in Anoikis (at least as far as we know). So they would be affecting nonstatic wh generation from k-space into (we don't know where). Could also be KS to KS locations.

You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT

Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#36 - 2015-03-28 14:31:59 UTC
Well, we know that Corbexx will be advocating easier access for the Goons to enter w-space with their blob and expand their rental empire.

Easier access resulting in more ships blowing up is a strong selling point for CCP as they can create more graphs showing an increase of pvp. CCP wins, Goons win.
Previous page12