These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Time to ban highsec ganking ?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Octavian Septimus
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2015-03-22 11:25:30 UTC
I keep hearing pilots complain about being ganked in "safe" space. Personally this has never happened to me but i am interested to hear other peoples opinions about this nefarious crime.

Should CCP ban non consenual pvp in Empire space ?

Is the system just fine as it is ?
Serene Repose
#2 - 2015-03-22 11:28:50 UTC
You're just wanting an avalanche threadnaught, right? You're not really asking this.

There must be a thousand threads on this very subject. Surely you've seen one, or two, or three....?

High sec ganking will never be banned. It doesn't matter what anyone thinks about it.

There. A response for you, bandwidth hog.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.
Valkin Mordirc
#3 - 2015-03-22 11:36:06 UTC
ISD landing in 3...2...1
#DeleteTheWeak
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#4 - 2015-03-22 11:36:52 UTC
If you were listening to CCP Rise yesterday during his eve new player experience

He CLEARLY said the highest group for retention is when a new player gets killed ILLEGALLY

They have an 85% more chance of becoming a long term subscriber


If anything, they may buff ganking
Yarda Black
The Black Redemption
#5 - 2015-03-22 11:37:03 UTC
INB4L !!!!
Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
#6 - 2015-03-22 11:37:49 UTC
Trollolololloolia
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2015-03-22 11:38:55 UTC
*pours petrol on the thread
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#8 - 2015-03-22 11:42:59 UTC
In before the ISD team gank the hell out of this thread.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#9 - 2015-03-22 11:58:21 UTC
Thread number 6417648354 about this subject.
NovaCat13
Ember Interstellar Inc.
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#10 - 2015-03-22 12:00:01 UTC
INB4L

Just say NO to Dailies
S'Way
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2015-03-22 12:02:50 UTC
Oh this thread again....

Octavian Septimus wrote:

Should CCP ban non consenual pvp in Empire space ?

No

Octavian Septimus wrote:

Is the system just fine as it is ?

Yes

Octavian Septimus wrote:
"safe" space.

This doesn't exist, CONCORD provides consequences for actions, not safety.

And in before the lock.
ST0NER SMURF
Vrix Nation
#12 - 2015-03-22 12:08:55 UTC
Kenneth Feld wrote:
If you were listening to CCP Rise yesterday during his eve new player experience

He CLEARLY said the highest group for retention is when a new player gets killed ILLEGALLY

They have an 85% more chance of becoming a long term subscriber


If anything, they may buff ganking


ccp rise ftw ;o the anti gankchat was freaking funny ;o

now they yust need to add a fir ship x 100 options and we can gank even more :) wel more while beeing lazy Twisted

__________________________________________________________________ 

♫ When your pod gets blown to bits ♪♫ And you lose your implant fits ♪\☻/ Don't worry ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ Be Happy \☻/
Gimme Sake
State War Academy
Caldari State
#13 - 2015-03-22 12:11:38 UTC
I think ganking is a direct result of players becoming bored in the space where action should take place. CCP is probably on the right track making that space more dynamic and more rewarding.

"Never not blob!" ~ Plato
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#14 - 2015-03-22 12:18:45 UTC
Wow, you guys were all over this one.

Anyway, closed for redundancy!

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department