These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Assault Frigates Will Blot Out the Sun...

First post
Author
Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#1 - 2011-12-23 18:40:42 UTC
This deserves a spot in Ships and Modules:

Chaos Server AF

Please deposit all Dramiels and Daredevils into the trash receptacle upon exiting the vehicle..... Twisted
Alara IonStorm
#2 - 2011-12-23 18:58:34 UTC
For Realsies...?
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#3 - 2011-12-23 19:01:43 UTC
I would have preferred an AB speed bonus rather than an MWD sig bonus - it's not like we don't already have MWD sig bonused T2 frigs in the game...
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Shukuzen Kiraa
Wildlands Tactical Response Unit
Great Wildlands Conservation Society
#4 - 2011-12-23 19:06:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Shukuzen Kiraa
Those changes look pretty great. Finally an extra mid slot on the Retribution! &Like mentioned above, would have liked an AB bonus instead of MWD personally, but I'm happy with the changes either way.
Lunkwill Khashour
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2011-12-23 19:07:23 UTC
I agree that the MWD bonus is a little disappointing. All AF's gain an extra slot but none of them gain grid increases and only some a CPU increase. I don't know how hard some of the AF's are to fit atm but it'll become more difficult.
Alara IonStorm
#6 - 2011-12-23 19:15:52 UTC
Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#7 - 2011-12-23 19:26:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Zarnak Wulf
New Wolf:

High -
200mm II x 4
Small Unstable Power Fluctuator
Mid -
Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler
Low -
Gyro II
TE II
Adaptive Nano II or Reactive II
F85 Peripheral Damage System
200mm Rolled Tungsten Plate
Rigs -
Projectile Collision
Projectile Burst

300 DPS with 12km of falloff or 235 DPS with 17.6km of falloff. I don't know how much more EHP I would get but it would definitely be more then the 5.82k I currently get on my all-or-nothing gank Wolf. Alternatively, I could swap out the nuet and plate for a nos and SAR II. Lots of options. The Wolf will no longer be completely helpless to drones.

The Enyo with an extra mid and 10% dmg/lvl rather then 5% also becomes -finally - a nice alternative to the Wolf.

A 4-4-4 Jaguar is a super Rifter. Artillery Jag is also an option with the tracking bonus. I have a fit that gets a 1k alpha. That's two thirds of a thrasher's while being faster and smaller with more EHP.

Edit: Even Liang will have to respect the Enyo if this goes through. P
Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#8 - 2011-12-23 19:44:12 UTC
Zarnak Wulf wrote:
New Wolf:

High -
200mm II x 4
Small Unstable Power Fluctuator
Mid -
Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler
Low -
Gyro II
TE II
Adaptive Nano II or Reactive II
F85 Peripheral Damage System
200mm Rolled Tungsten Plate
Rigs -
Projectile Collision
Projectile Burst

300 DPS with 12km of falloff or 235 DPS with 17.6km of falloff. I don't know how much more EHP I would get but it would definitely be more then the 5.82k I currently get on my all-or-nothing gank Wolf. Alternatively, I could swap out the nuet and plate for a nos and SAR II. Lots of options. The Wolf will no longer be completely helpless to drones.

The Enyo with an extra mid and 10% dmg/lvl rather then 5% also becomes -finally - a nice alternative to the Wolf.

A 4-4-4 Jaguar is a super Rifter. Artillery Jag is also an option with the tracking bonus. I have a fit that gets a 1k alpha. That's two thirds of a thrasher's while being faster and smaller with more EHP.

Edit: Even Liang will have to respect the Enyo if this goes through. P


Heh, did you see what they did to the Harpy? >:-)

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Diomidis
Pod Liberation Authority
#9 - 2011-12-23 19:46:46 UTC
AB speed bonuses, should have been insane in order to push those slow hulls fast enough in order to catch up with other ships. Combined with insane resists, cap and EHP (aided by the added slots) would break them against anything bigger than them. HMLs would be hugely nerfed, HAMs would be laughable and medium guns wouldn't track @@.

MWD IS NEEDED to hunt down prey, and its not a "null-sec" thing etc. Unless you think pvp is "come and get me".
The sig bonus allows them to be tackling from range when needed, or move in for scram/web without getting 2-volleyed. Still needs skill and it doesn't "break" them under scram range.

The whole package will be way more formidable tho, and probably those ships will be used more than ppl use them now, but plz...just like with ceptors or pre-nerf Dramiels etc, their niche will be limited in large gangs, and most pilots grow tired of small gang / solo pvp because it involves lots of losses that their pride cannot afford.

Will they chew through faction ships and ceptors? Ofc...so do Destroyers now. I do see them flying around, but again it's solo pvp those are after. Hardly a popular thing.

It's a good start for reviving the T2 line of ships.
I hope HACs will be in line for similar boosts that might take them out of the shadow of BCs.

"War does not determine who is right - only who is left." -- Bertrand Russell

Diomidis
Pod Liberation Authority
#10 - 2011-12-23 19:47:20 UTC
AB speed bonuses, should have been insane in order to push those slow hulls fast enough in order to catch up with other ships. Combined with insane resists, cap and EHP (aided by the added slots) would break them against anything bigger than them. HMLs would be hugely nerfed, HAMs would be laughable and medium guns wouldn't track @@.

MWD IS NEEDED to hunt down prey, and its not a "null-sec" thing etc. Unless you think pvp is "come and get me".
The sig bonus allows them to be tackling from range when needed, or move in for scram/web without getting 2-volleyed. Still needs skill and it doesn't "break" them under scram range.

The whole package will be way more formidable tho, and probably those ships will be used more than ppl use them now, but plz...just like with ceptors or pre-nerf Dramiels etc, their niche will be limited in large gangs, and most pilots grow tired of small gang / solo pvp because it involves lots of losses that their pride cannot afford.

Will they chew through faction ships and ceptors? Ofc...so do Destroyers now. I do see them flying around, but again it's solo pvp those are after. Hardly a popular thing.

It's a good start for reviving the T2 line of ships.
I hope HACs will be in line for similar boosts that might take them out of the shadow of BCs.

"War does not determine who is right - only who is left." -- Bertrand Russell

Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#11 - 2011-12-23 19:52:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Zarnak Wulf
Liang Nuren wrote:

Heh, did you see what they did to the Harpy? >:-)

-Liang


Very scary. CPU will be tight but.... Blarpy will WTFBBQ stuff. And a rail harpy should now completely obsolete the cormorant.

Edit: Like how you do the Voldemort thing upon mention of your name.... Shocked
Cambarus
The Baros Syndicate
#12 - 2011-12-23 19:54:54 UTC
Liang Nuren wrote:


Heh, did you see what they did to the Harpy? >:-)

-Liang

Did you see what they did to the HAWK?
Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#13 - 2011-12-23 19:56:02 UTC
Cambarus wrote:
Liang Nuren wrote:


Heh, did you see what they did to the Harpy? >:-)

-Liang

Did you see what they did to the HAWK?


Yeah I was talking to Korgtronix on Twitter a couple of days ago about a 5 mid Hawk. Unless they give it some more fittings than they're suggesting its gonna be of limited utility though. :(

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Diomidis
Pod Liberation Authority
#14 - 2011-12-23 20:06:26 UTC
"Insiders" report it will be better than it is now. Will do more DPS than the Vengeance (some 25-30%) if sticking to kinetic, but the vengeance will also be a tough opponent with better dmg selection.

Think the Caldari ASs will get some CPU fitting increase, but I don't think you will be able to do dual prop, top guns (think the Hawk will be a 3-2 now, requiring guns) cap boosters etc without going the micro aux and/or PG rig way. Yet "better than current" setups with more DPS too boot and relatively straight-forward fitting with T2 modules and 1-2 meta 4s.

Remember, the Devs want to give some utility to these ships (some of the most underutilized T2 hulls - jokingly in TS convs, there was a claim that more Titans are downed than EAFs in EVE-O), not break them into the uber i-win ships.

"War does not determine who is right - only who is left." -- Bertrand Russell

VR Highfive
Hayabusa Logistics.
#15 - 2011-12-23 20:10:44 UTC  |  Edited by: VR Highfive
I am excited about the utility slot and the extra CPU for the Vengeance (my fav AF atm). Then I might finally be able to fit a nos without sacrificing 25% of my DPS. Not sure how the ROF nerf will work out though but I think I can live with -5% DPS.

I was surprised to see the MWD bonus, my first thought that ccp might see the AF as the tier-3 BC killer class. This bonus would allow AF to close fast from range without taking to much damage from the large turrets and while they will have enough DPS to take the tier 3 BC down.

Learning solo PvP, one explosion at a time.

Dibblerette
Solitude-Industries
#16 - 2011-12-23 20:13:37 UTC
Liang Nuren wrote:
Cambarus wrote:
Liang Nuren wrote:


Heh, did you see what they did to the Harpy? >:-)

-Liang

Did you see what they did to the HAWK?


Yeah I was talking to Korgtronix on Twitter a couple of days ago about a 5 mid Hawk. Unless they give it some more fittings than they're suggesting its gonna be of limited utility though. :(

-Liang

My first thought was YAAAAAY T2 hookbill. Then I considered doing some insane dual small shield boost fit. Then I went and had a lie down.
Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#17 - 2011-12-23 20:16:55 UTC
Dibblerette wrote:
Liang Nuren wrote:
Cambarus wrote:
Liang Nuren wrote:


Heh, did you see what they did to the Harpy? >:-)

-Liang

Did you see what they did to the HAWK?


Yeah I was talking to Korgtronix on Twitter a couple of days ago about a 5 mid Hawk. Unless they give it some more fittings than they're suggesting its gonna be of limited utility though. :(

-Liang

My first thought was YAAAAAY T2 hookbill. Then I considered doing some insane dual small shield boost fit. Then I went and had a lie down.


SSB is a joke - you want to go MSE or MSB in almost all circumstances. :)

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

m0cking bird
Doomheim
#18 - 2011-12-23 20:21:29 UTC  |  Edited by: m0cking bird
Based on that garbage. Seems like CCP plans on screwing over interceptors completely. Nice! Not that I use them much over assault frigates any-more, but whatever. Other than the role bonus the rest of it seems interesting. I'm glad they're thinking along the way I view things. Focus on weapon system damage, with the exception of the Vengeance and Hawk. Those 2 should focus more on damage mitigation or more effective hit-points.

Assault ships should mirror Heavy assault cruisers and battle-cruiser dynamics. They should have the defence of a cruiser, with T2 resist and higher velocity. While being able to have the damage output of a battle-cruiser.

I would like those same dynamics, but with Assault frigates and Destroyers. More damage in-line with the current damage output of destroyers, while maintaining the effective hit-points of a T1 frigate with T2 resist.

Also, I would like to be able to use long range turrets and missiles on certain assault frigates. Kinda like the Muninn, Zealot and Cerberus. I'm finding it hard to put those set-ups together.

Also, based on those changes. Certain frigates seem very overpowered: Ishkur, Jaguar, Wolf, Harpy, Vengeance.


-proxyyyy
Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#19 - 2011-12-23 20:28:54 UTC
Interceptors go twice as fast as AF and are much more agile. I'm not worried about them being obsoleted by any AF buff. But T1 Frigates will be relegated even more to the dust bin. I'd also have to think really hard about getting a faction frigate.

For example - the Daredevil and the Enyo will both now have the equivalent of 6 turret slots. The Daredevil will go much faster. The Enyo will have much more EHP and cost 25% of the price. The enyo gets a normal web and a tracking bonus to the Daredevil's 90% web and no tracking bonus. Something to ponder.

In low sec as well a rifter had a chance against a wolf if it could get on top of it and under the guns. Tracking was an achilles heel. That's no longer the case.
m0cking bird
Doomheim
#20 - 2011-12-23 20:42:04 UTC  |  Edited by: m0cking bird
Listen or read rather. I look @ relative velocities of ships and effective combat ranges. So that includes overheated modules and were most ships engage.

Most interceptors are most effective under warp scrambler range. To suggest this will not effect them is r3tarded. Since, signature reduction does not help interceptors that much in the current environment. Most are squashed by multiple ships with tracking enhancers. That signature bonus is all they have to even remotely make them distinctive from assault ships. Interceptor velocity does not mean much if they have to go into scram range to apply damage or go into warp disruption range to point a Hurricane.

This is why I write most of you off. Amazing amount of r3tardation...

The signature radius bonus has been a joke for a very long time now and will continue to be. All frigates are squishy. Assault frigates are far superior to ever class of frigate close range.

To even argue otherwise is r3tarded.

I apologize for my rude statements. However I'll leave them as is.
123Next pageLast page