These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Sojourn

Author
Daemun Khanid
Corbeau de sang
#61 - 2015-03-11 15:03:51 UTC
Ave, Ms. Jenneth,

It was only today that I stumbled across this string of communications. I certainly have a more thorough understanding of the reasons behind your recent visit. While I feel somewhat slighted by your lack of transparency during the meeting I am not convinced it was wholly intentional and in any case I retain my respect for your personal journey. Hopefully I was able to provide you with a useful glimpse into our society and an understanding that even in a social system as regimented as the Amarr, you may still find a great deal of diverse thought and opinions. Though finding your way into the True Faith may not be your intention, I do hope that while you have opened your heart to new thoughts and idea's that God may find his way in.

Go with Him and safe travels,
DoK

Daemun of Khanid

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#62 - 2015-03-11 15:49:10 UTC
Daemun Khanid wrote:
Ave, Ms. Jenneth,

It was only today that I stumbled across this string of communications. I certainly have a more thorough understanding of the reasons behind your recent visit. While I feel somewhat slighted by your lack of transparency during the meeting I am not convinced it was wholly intentional and in any case I retain my respect for your personal journey. Hopefully I was able to provide you with a useful glimpse into our society and an understanding that even in a social system as regimented as the Amarr, you may still find a great deal of diverse thought and opinions. Though finding your way into the True Faith may not be your intention, I do hope that while you have opened your heart to new thoughts and idea's that God may find his way in.

Go with Him and safe travels,
DoK


Looking back on my log of our meeting, sir, it ... seems that while I did outline my work, I did not fully explain the reasons for it.

Full transparency, in my case, sir, for those who did not know me before, means a long look into an abyss, for both of us. Each time I do so, I ... maybe understand the person I was a little better. My knowledge is her knowledge, mostly. My insights are hers. She's ... there, at the bottom, looking back at me.

Each time, I ... feel like I come away a little more like her.

Even if that were not so, it seems egotistical of me to burden others with my problems-- to focus on myself, when I should be learning others' ways.

I am sorry I was not more clear. A part of this process has been trying to learn what to say, how, and where, and I apologize for giving offense. Nothing I said was untrue. I didn't have very much time, I wanted to learn what I could, and the words, "I am an amnesiac pirate-philosopher who murdered her own grandfather" do not tend to steer the conversation towards ... well, learning about you.
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#63 - 2015-03-11 18:14:37 UTC
Questions of the soul always does seem the usual crisis in reaction to the anomie of the capsuleer-clone transhuman condition for the spiritually bound. I wonder what use is a metaphysical construct or identity abstraction when the reality will always remain that I am an infomorph entity with no need for a soul, data gestalt that I am.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#64 - 2015-03-11 18:26:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Questions of the soul always does seem the usual crisis in reaction to the anomie of the capsuleer-clone transhuman condition for the spiritually bound. I wonder what use is a metaphysical construct or identity abstraction when the reality will always remain that I am an infomorph entity with no need for a soul, data gestalt that I am.

Well ... so, there's the point that we do all die. Eventually something's going to happen to each of us to render us unrecoverable.

But ... there's another question in play: (1) whether souls exist at all, and (2) whether they're at all the way the Amarr seem to usually conceive of them. My musings on the subject presently assume (1) yes and (2) yes, mostly because I'm sort of entertaining the Amarrian worldview at the moment.

My own Achur sect teaches that there's nothing immortal about us except our place as part of the Totality. We'll one day lose this fiction we call "self," and therefore, for our own purposes, end.

But we're not all that real to begin with, so that's not so bad.
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#65 - 2015-03-11 23:14:06 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Questions of the soul always does seem the usual crisis in reaction to the anomie of the capsuleer-clone transhuman condition for the spiritually bound. I wonder what use is a metaphysical construct or identity abstraction when the reality will always remain that I am an infomorph entity with no need for a soul, data gestalt that I am.

Well ... so, there's the point that we do all die. Eventually something's going to happen to each of us to render us unrecoverable.

But ... there's another question in play: (1) whether souls exist at all, and (2) whether they're at all the way the Amarr seem to usually conceive of them. My musings on the subject presently assume (1) yes and (2) yes, mostly because I'm sort of entertaining the Amarrian worldview at the moment.

My own Achur sect teaches that there's nothing immortal about us except our place as part of the Totality. We'll one day lose this fiction we call "self," and therefore, for our own purposes, end.

But we're not all that real to begin with, so that's not so bad.


If there's one thing I learned during my time with SuVee it's that many Achuran sects do enjoy their flavours of solipism, yes. But my thoughts were not directed to you alone, Ms. Jenneth, rather a trend I noticed that has little to do with the soul but a wider condition. It matters little I suppose, all experiences differ as do the perspectives they engender, but I do feel my own have lead to certain irreconcilable differences with the memes and dreams of the old world.

Carry on, dear.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#66 - 2015-03-12 05:34:16 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
If there's one thing I learned during my time with SuVee it's that many Achuran sects do enjoy their flavours of solipism, yes. But my thoughts were not directed to you alone, Ms. Jenneth, rather a trend I noticed that has little to do with the soul but a wider condition. It matters little I suppose, all experiences differ as do the perspectives they engender, but I do feel my own have lead to certain irreconcilable differences with the memes and dreams of the old world.

Carry on, dear.

Ah ... respectfully, solipsism ... is the belief that the only reality we can be sure of is our own. Gwen Ikiryo's sect is just close enough to this that she might ... take offense at the term.

My own is ... sort of the opposite. We believe in the Totality of creation, but we believe that correctly perceiving it requires us to let go of Self. The Self is an illusion, a fib our minds tell us to aid our survival. It is our minds' original lie, and forms the base of the full labyrinth of more or less useful lies our minds spin for us.

We seek the extinction of Self in embracing the Totality.

Your own beliefs may differ greatly, but it would be strange if they varied far from all the many odd things humans have thought to themselves over the millennia.
KaRa DaVuT
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#67 - 2015-03-12 07:25:07 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:

Your own beliefs may differ greatly, but it would be strange if they varied far from all the many odd things humans have thought to themselves over the millennia.


That is a good one..

But I see you are no different than her... Still +1

Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. What God desires is in your heart and on your mind... And what you decide to do every day, makes you - not your race - a good man - or not.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#68 - 2015-03-12 08:03:28 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
If there's one thing I learned during my time with SuVee it's that many Achuran sects do enjoy their flavours of solipism, yes. But my thoughts were not directed to you alone, Ms. Jenneth, rather a trend I noticed that has little to do with the soul but a wider condition. It matters little I suppose, all experiences differ as do the perspectives they engender, but I do feel my own have lead to certain irreconcilable differences with the memes and dreams of the old world.

Carry on, dear.

Ah ... respectfully, solipsism ... is the belief that the only reality we can be sure of is our own. Gwen Ikiryo's sect is just close enough to this that she might ... take offense at the term.

My own is ... sort of the opposite. We believe in the Totality of creation, but we believe that correctly perceiving it requires us to let go of Self. The Self is an illusion, a fib our minds tell us to aid our survival. It is our minds' original lie, and forms the base of the full labyrinth of more or less useful lies our minds spin for us.

We seek the extinction of Self in embracing the Totality.

Your own beliefs may differ greatly, but it would be strange if they varied far from all the many odd things humans have thought to themselves over the millennia.


Yes, I would agree the concept of self is an illusion. Hence my aforementioned irreconcilable differences with the cultural memes of an old world - such as the concepts of a soul in its varied incarnations. I am able to recognize with clarity what is false and inapplicable to myself for I exist in a different condition divorced from the cultural conformity pressures and societal conditioning that reinforces a minds' labyrinth of lies.

It is not a matter of belief for me, Ms. Jenneth, but rather its absence.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

U'tah Arareb
Doomheim
#69 - 2015-03-12 14:37:00 UTC
For an illusion to work, something must exist to be fooled...
the argument that self is an illusion is therefore cyclical .
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#70 - 2015-03-12 15:36:33 UTC
Pilot Gesakaarin:

My faith and your lack of same share a premise: the search for clarity.

Thus far, the only difference I see is perhaps our sense of where we stand. To Shuijing Achura, we are tiny parts of something wonderfully vast and vastly wonderful. We seek insight into that vastness, and our place in it.

Lacking (unlike many other sects) belief in literal gods and spirits, our faith is mostly found in the belief that we will live better, happier lives in this way.

Do you have no faith, even of this sort?

U'tah Arareb wrote:
For an illusion to work, something must exist to be fooled...
the argument that self is an illusion is therefore cyclical .


Your logic assumes that there is no alternative to the "self" being fooled, Ms. Arareb. That is only so if you assume that, however you look at that entity, what you will see is a "self."

What is being fooled is a sliver of Totality-- which, however, is in no way separate from the Totality, generally.

That is why "self" is an illusion: the "self" is something separate from the rest of the world. But we are not separate, distinct beings. We are inseparably part of a greater whole. That separateness is the illusion.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#71 - 2015-03-16 18:02:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Entry Six

Gods, what a day.

There's a lot to take in. I'll need to hold off on recording my thoughts on the Amarr proper until bits of data stop flitting around my head and start settling into a nice, coherent sheet of snow.

With boiled blood and charred offal all over it ...

... that last bit's not their fault, though.

I had a chance, yesterday, to observe a clone soldier action: an Amarrian Templar and his paladins versus a Blood Raider installation. It was supposed to be a very safe sort of thing, with me tucked away safe and secure on a war barge command deck.

I guess the Sani were expecting us, though, because the ground installation turned out to be an ambush and the barge came under attack in space, complete with boarding pods. We destroyed the attacking ships, but not before a wave of boarders got through. The commander ended up having to personally repel boarding parties.

Perhaps it was because it was only a couple hallways away, but, even over holo, watching what Templar weapons do to a person was....

Caught in a weaponized plasma channel, people ... "pop" doesn't quite cover it. Blood boils over; flesh bursts into vapor or chars and flops like the meat it is, then falls and bleeds, and the pooled blood boils, too; bone just ... burns.

It was just a mercy I couldn't smell it.

Only of course, the commander was just one man, and the last pod hit the hull right outside the bridge. I don't know where security was; trying to keep the bulk of the boarders bottled in with the commander on the lower level, I guess. Anyhow, the Raiders cut through the door before the Templar could finish mopping up down where he was, and I wound up hunkered down behind a control panel trying to figure out how to use an Amarrian sidearm.

(I wasn't quite sure whether it was them or me I was going to be using it on. In hindsight, that should have been obvious: that was the last hostile squad, and their fleet had been destroyed. There was no way they were going to be getting off that ship alive, with or without prisoners. I was in much more danger of getting shot than dying slowly on some Blooder apparatus, but that wasn't especially clear to me at the time. Heavily-armed Blood Raiders plus close proximity apparently equals kind of hard to think straight.)

The Templar commander spared me having to, though, because about the time I was hoping I'd figured out how to turn the safety off he just ripped right up through the deck plates and tore into them. (Note to self: never, ever get boarded by clone soldier infantry.)

I don't know whether he'd just run out of weapons or if it was out of consideration for his crew and me, but he didn't even use a gun. He just used his hands. He shredded his way right through them, ripped and smashed them into a ... sort of melange of meat, blood, offal, urine, and fecal matter.

That, I could smell.

Intellectually, I know I've personally done as much, and worse, even within my own short memory: naval blaster charges slamming through a frigate's weak shields and into the armor, providing my half of a matter/antimatter annihilation reaction that just blasted the ship apart. Before, what happened to the human bodies inside was an abstraction. If somebody's fluids burst boiling out of their body and then the whole mess got either vaporized or flash-seared onto the nearest wall, I never saw it.

Well, I guess now I know what I've been missing out on.

The Templar was apologetic, after. I don't really think he has anything to be sorry for. I came here to see, with unclouded eyes, the truth and way of things. If I find exactly what I was looking for, I've no reason to complain.
Aldrith Shutaq
Atash e Sarum Vanguard
#72 - 2015-03-16 22:42:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Aldrith Shutaq
On behalf of PIE I apologize for any danger you may have been placed in. Clearly the warbarge could have done with a capsuleer escort. I suggest that you plan your security options with us more thoroughly in the future. If I had known about this trip I would have personally ensured your safety.

That is, of course, if the Templar you accompanied was indeed one of our Classiarii.

We should discuss these events more in private, however.

Aldrith Ter'neth Shutaq Newelle

Fleet Captain of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore of the 24th Imperial Crusade

Lord Consort of Lady Mitara Newelle, Champion of House Sarum and Holder of Damnidios Para'nashu

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#73 - 2015-03-17 05:15:20 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Entry Five

Another personal note:

"Soulless."

What a concept.

I understand the basic theory: we died, in practical terms, the very first time we were ever cloned. Mostly at the start of our careers. Our souls passed on. What's left is ... just an echo, I guess.

In some sense, that's a comforting idea. Aria Jenneth wasn't ... an awful person when she died the first time, probably. Certainly, she'd never killed anyone, much less a family member. Maybe her (my) soul is long gone, moved on to some heaven or Naraka ... or passed on to another life.

It's not the most bizarre idea. I'd give that prize to the idea that the soul moves on with each and every clone's death. The idea that there's a sort of tenement house in Naraka for all the former Aria Jenneths seems frankly absurd.

But if cloned capsuleers are essentially hollow ghosts, what of me? Am I, therefore, a husk, some sad ... puppet? ... marionette? ... mannequin? ... who can no longer even remember a time when I had a soul?

It's ... ridiculous. Awful. Another idea out of a storybook.

There's no way I could ever believe such a thing.

I have solved the question about soul rather plainly: it is just a running instance of a consciousness. Thus if you can think about yourself, that you are you, that would mean that you indeed have a soul.
When your clone dies, you get new clone with same consciousness, but different instance of it, thus, with different soul.

What I am not sure about are spirits - and for me a spirit is a soul not attached to the body. I do believe in their existence, but, as any belief, I can't prove their existence or not. It is just a tradition and a world view that I have adapted and believe in.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#74 - 2015-03-17 05:28:12 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
- Why would the soul leave when the mind does not ?

- If someone dies without cloning, the soul goes to Heaven (or elsewhere). What if a brain scan has been kept somewhere and that person is revived at some point later ?

- If so, is continuous cloning keeping the soul, while discontinuous cloning is not ?

- Interesting corollary : could the soul be copied and duplicated in the cloning process ?


I do not find this way of reasoning very satisfying. All of those are half answers at best, and full of flaws and inconsistencies. It does, however, simply hint at an evidence : current scriptural interpretation of the soul has become obsolete and should be updated (something the TC and scholars might be doing right now).

I could easily give answers on these questions with interpretation of the word 'soul' that I have given above.
I am not sure you will accept it, but, trust me, most of arguments arise just because people believe differently in the concepts and can't come in agreement about definition. First to answer these questions, you have to answer the most important one: what is the soul?

Lyn Farel wrote:

I suppose that some parts of the Scriptures are yet to come to terms with quantum physics... Taken like it, the issue disappears by itself.

The science answers to questions that we can study with scientific method, that we can positively prove or refute by applying experiment and obtaining verifiable and repeatable results.
The religion answers to questions that science is unable to give answers, it is what you can only accept, something that you believe in, something outside of visible scope, trans-scientific, by moving horizons of human perception leading by our desires to understand the world, to feel what is above and beyond our reach.

Trying to mix religion and science, to demand a science to follow religious laws, or to demand a religion to follow scientific laws, is a crime and disrespect towards both religion and science.

I can understand, that respecting science can be hard, it requires a certain mindset and a lot of work, dedication, certain type of education that would basically take whole your life. Science is a temple for a chosen ones, who will work there and do their thing, studying the universe which is within their reach. I can't ask you to respect science, unless you want to work in this field.

But I would like to ask you to respect religion, as it was made for people, and billions of them live every hour of their life according to it. Disrespect to religion means disrespect to all these peoples. And even if we are capsuleers and a bit different from them now (but what is this difference? just implants on our spine, allowing to plug probes into us to connect with a capsule...), it doesn't give us moral superiority over all these people, basically, we are the same.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Utari Onzo
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#75 - 2015-03-17 06:38:49 UTC
For a change, I strongly agree with Miss Kim's sentiments. She's hit the nail on the proverbial head in regards to science and the divine.

"Face the enemy as a solid wall For faith is your armor And through it, the enemy will find no breach Wrap your arms around the enemy For faith is your fire And with it, burn away his evil"

Jennifer Starfall
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#76 - 2015-03-17 14:39:28 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Trying to mix religion and science, to demand a science to follow religious laws, or to demand a religion to follow scientific laws, is a crime and disrespect towards both religion and science.

I can understand, that respecting science can be hard, it requires a certain mindset and a lot of work, dedication, certain type of education that would basically take whole your life. Science is a temple for a chosen ones, who will work there and do their thing, studying the universe which is within their reach. I can't ask you to respect science, unless you want to work in this field.


Science and religion are not mutually exclusive of one another. The Amarr Faith does not find the two at odds with each other at all. In fact, from what I've seen and experienced, the Amarr see scientific principles as a manifestation of God's will. The Amarr Faith does not reject a universe of scientific principles, but merely acknowledges the presence of God as the creator of it. They see a study of the universe as an attempt to better understand God through understanding His creations.

Diana Kim wrote:
But I would like to ask you to respect religion, as it was made for people, and billions of them live every hour of their life according to it. Disrespect to religion means disrespect to all these peoples. And even if we are capsuleers and a bit different from them now (but what is this difference? just implants on our spine, allowing to plug probes into us to connect with a capsule...), it doesn't give us moral superiority over all these people, basically, we are the same.


We are different. While we start out the same as baseline humans, by undergoing the transformation that makes us capsuleers and by our subsequent experiences, we are different. We do not fear death. While we are not truly immortal, we are, compared to baseline humanity, effectively immortal. We do not fear our own deaths. We do not see our lives as finite. Given the will to do so, we are capable casting our gaze upon stars that baseline humans will never see the light of during the brief spark of their lifetimes. We are capable of seeing patterns in the universe that appear as chaos to baseline humans because they cannot experience enough of it.

But no, this does not make us morally superior to them. No more than children raised in better times than their parents. For yes, capsuleers are the children of baseline humanity. Unruly, spoiled children who have grown such that their parents struggle to discipline them. A man wiser than me has said this better.

In the end when we find we can no longer cheat death or grow tired of the game, God will judge us, just as he judges baseline humanity.

I pray He will find me worthy.

Jennifer Starfall

Fifth Seyllin Conference

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#77 - 2015-03-17 17:42:58 UTC
Jennifer Starfall wrote:


We are different. While we start out the same as baseline humans, by undergoing the transformation that makes us capsuleers and by our subsequent experiences, we are different. We do not fear death. While we are not truly immortal, we are, compared to baseline humanity, effectively immortal. We do not fear our own deaths. We do not see our lives as finite. Given the will to do so, we are capable casting our gaze upon stars that baseline humans will never see the light of during the brief spark of their lifetimes. We are capable of seeing patterns in the universe that appear as chaos to baseline humans because they cannot experience enough of it.


The problem with this is that whilst I am TECHNICALLY everything you quote, I am in actuality enjoying no more than a two year difference between my chronological and biological age. I know as much more about the human condition than a man in his mid-twenties knows than a man in his early twenties.

Most capsuleers have enjoyed that status less than a decade. How much wiser are we, really?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Jennifer Starfall
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#78 - 2015-03-17 19:04:46 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
The problem with this is that whilst I am TECHNICALLY everything you quote, I am in actuality enjoying no more than a two year difference between my chronological and biological age. I know as much more about the human condition than a man in his mid-twenties knows than a man in his early twenties.

Most capsuleers have enjoyed that status less than a decade. How much wiser are we, really?


No, you're essentially correct, Pieter. It's currently more a matter of potential, and the perspective doesn't guarantee wisdom.

Jennifer Starfall

Fifth Seyllin Conference

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#79 - 2015-03-17 20:41:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Diana Kim wrote:

I have solved the question about soul rather plainly: it is just a running instance of a consciousness. Thus if you can think about yourself, that you are you, that would mean that you indeed have a soul.
When your clone dies, you get new clone with same consciousness, but different instance of it, thus, with different soul.

What I am not sure about are spirits - and for me a spirit is a soul not attached to the body. I do believe in their existence, but, as any belief, I can't prove their existence or not. It is just a tradition and a world view that I have adapted and believe in.

[...]

I could easily give answers on these questions with interpretation of the word 'soul' that I have given above.
I am not sure you will accept it, but, trust me, most of arguments arise just because people believe differently in the concepts and can't come in agreement about definition. First to answer these questions, you have to answer the most important one: what is the soul?


I see your point, but for the Amarr the soul is a concept that is clearly separate from the consciousness and the mind, which are scientific and practical objects surrounded by countless definitions and concrete applications (with still their own dose of mysteries).

Unlike the quantifiable patterns of the mind, the point about the soul and Faith by extension, is that it has yet to be proven true, or false, or otherwise those would not be about belief, but small truths. The simple fact that stating as fact a Prime Mover or even a silly celestial fatherly figure (God, for example, who wears many faces depending on the believer), would be to state it as truth, or fact. True or false, it ceases by definition to be a belief proper. More importantly, it ceases to be about Faith.

Amarr soul is part of the Faith, and thus has to be part of the faithful belief. In that case, soul is something different than consciousness and mind. Argument from silence of religious zealot apologists or atheist crusaders is absurd by itself, since Faith is not about to be stated as fact, truth, or falseness.

More generally, Faith is not about tangible facts, or proofs. Faith is before all, a defined paradigm.

So, what is the scriptural soul ? It is a very nebulous concept, on which I am not very knowledgeable... The obvious fact about the soul is its incorporeality. Like most things related to Scripture beliefs, the literal meanings have to be transcended to find the true essence of the thought.



Diana Kim wrote:

The science answers to questions that we can study with scientific method, that we can positively prove or refute by applying experiment and obtaining verifiable and repeatable results.
The religion answers to questions that science is unable to give answers, it is what you can only accept, something that you believe in, something outside of visible scope, trans-scientific, by moving horizons of human perception leading by our desires to understand the world, to feel what is above and beyond our reach.

Trying to mix religion and science, to demand a science to follow religious laws, or to demand a religion to follow scientific laws, is a crime and disrespect towards both religion and science.

I can understand, that respecting science can be hard, it requires a certain mindset and a lot of work, dedication, certain type of education that would basically take whole your life. Science is a temple for a chosen ones, who will work there and do their thing, studying the universe which is within their reach. I can't ask you to respect science, unless you want to work in this field.

But I would like to ask you to respect religion, as it was made for people, and billions of them live every hour of their life according to it. Disrespect to religion means disrespect to all these peoples. And even if we are capsuleers and a bit different from them now (but what is this difference? just implants on our spine, allowing to plug probes into us to connect with a capsule...), it doesn't give us moral superiority over all these people, basically, we are the same.


Are you telling me to... respect religion ?

I think my message was maybe not clear enough, as a Faithful myself I can omit certain details that we often take for granted, and for that apologize.

To understand the Amarr Faith, we have to understand that everything in Amarr is about religion, science or otherwise. I would even argue further that science as a concept is redundant as it is part of the core of what makes scripture, Scripture.

Faith advances through science as well as social evolution. It is only logical that quantum physics to be part of scripture - and scripture treaties on quantum mechanisms are already legion. Thus why I think that the debate on the sanctity on flesh, continuity and discontinuity of consciousness and the transcendance of the self, solves by itself when leaving the conventional fields of thought to incorporate new ways of thinking.

The simple abandon of the standard timeline continuity, transcending space time continuum, sheds a totally new light on the concept of soul.

And thus a soul stops being born at birth, and migrating at death, to become a greater essence encompassing the individual and beyond without constraints of space and time.

The main issue with the current orthodox interpretations of the soul is that they base themselves on very old concepts that have eventually, as you have yourself noticed, mixed up with what science knows about the mind today. Either we accept that both are only one and the same, or either we transcend the definition of the soul to approach something else, for that the soul is still supposed to be immortal and timeless.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#80 - 2015-03-17 21:13:09 UTC
Jennifer Starfall wrote:

Science and religion are not mutually exclusive of one another. The Amarr Faith does not find the two at odds with each other at all. In fact, from what I've seen and experienced, the Amarr see scientific principles as a manifestation of God's will. The Amarr Faith does not reject a universe of scientific principles, but merely acknowledges the presence of God as the creator of it. They see a study of the universe as an attempt to better understand God through understanding His creations.

I agree with you, Ms. Starfall.
And this is what I have tried to say as well. You apply scientific principles to find scientific laws, which have a limited area of effect, but the reason of these laws to exist, and something outside of their area is explained by religion.
In more mundane form, they don't use the Scriptures to enhance and engineer new lasers, as well as they don't systematize results of each prayer to write down laws about which of prayer was more efficient to get the God's reply.

Jennifer Starfall wrote:

We are different. While we start out the same as baseline humans, by undergoing the transformation that makes us capsuleers and by our subsequent experiences, we are different. We do not fear death. While we are not truly immortal, we are, compared to baseline humanity, effectively immortal. We do not fear our own deaths.

When I was a baseline soldier, one of my instructor told us: "We are dead since we have enlisted." You don't have to be immortal to not fear the death. In the end, the death is the only certain thing in each life. And we can't change the fact that we will die. What we can affect, is how we will meet it: with dignity or not.

Jennifer Starfall wrote:

We do not see our lives as finite. Given the will to do so, we are capable casting our gaze upon stars that baseline humans will never see the light of during the brief spark of their lifetimes. We are capable of seeing patterns in the universe that appear as chaos to baseline humans because they cannot experience enough of it.

Yet the life expectancy of a capsuleer is way less than one of a baseliner. In other words, we die like flies. We are born with memories of our predecessors, we don't live through all our education, we just inherit it from previous clones, and are able to contribute to the society right from the moment of our birth.

We can accumulate memories, and a lot of memories of our previous lives. But, as Mr. Tuulinen has noted, we basically lack yet that amount of time of accumulated experience to be different. We still have same amount of life experience in form of memories like a regular baseliner, because the program became public only recently.

Jennifer Starfall wrote:

But no, this does not make us morally superior to them. No more than children raised in better times than their parents. For yes, capsuleers are the children of baseline humanity. Unruly, spoiled children who have grown such that their parents struggle to discipline them. A man wiser than me has said this better.

In the end when we find we can no longer cheat death or grow tired of the game, God will judge us, just as he judges baseline humanity.

I pray He will find me worthy.

I don't like myself how they let capsuleers out and CONCORD form of laws. The huge degree of gallenteanisms, freedoms and degradation hits capsuleer society rather hard. Whole alliances of demented pilots, killing peoples like they would play a game. Whole alliances of peoples, supporting criminal and antihuman regimes like Federation or Nation. General sentiments towards gallentean forms of freedom and liberalism. And even twisted forms of morals, again, which are way closer to what a gallentean would do, and which for Caldari mindset looks wild and irrational. Should the capsuleer program stayed under strict Caldari Navy supervision instead of CONCORD, we would have way more stable, reliable and human pilots, as we were taught in the Navy.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.