These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Which KB do you use and why?

Author
Ovv Topik
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2015-03-06 12:24:13 UTC
I've always used eve-kill because of the concise easy to reference layout.

But it's glitchy, laggy, and likes to post all my losses while ignoring my kills (and I have submitted my API).

Which do you prefer?

And would you say any one is more suited to a solo PvPer for any reason?

"Nicknack, I'm in a shoe in space, on my computer, in my house, with a cup of coffee, in't that something." - Fly Safe PopPaddi. o7

Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#2 - 2015-03-06 13:54:39 UTC
Ovv Topik wrote:
I've always used eve-kill because of the concise easy to reference layout.

But it's glitchy, laggy, and likes to post all my losses while ignoring my kills (and I have submitted my API).

Which do you prefer?

And would you say any one is more suited to a solo PvPer for any reason?

yeah I noticed they aren't that great, found that out when I watched code kill a fleet of t1 logi ospreys followed by its freighter 15mins later, never did find those kills.

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith

Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2015-03-06 16:29:42 UTC
I use eve kill as well
Plato Forko
123 Fake Street
#4 - 2015-03-06 22:12:17 UTC
Ovv Topik wrote:
And would you say any one is more suited to a solo PvPer for any reason?


zKill is the best for solo. The EK layout hides too much data and you have to click something for each piece; colossal time waste, and doubly so when you forget a piece of data and have to re-trace your clickery to get it again.

F. That.

zKill loads up the main page with data, and since it's geared towards presenting recent activity it's all useful intel too. I'm never more than one click from knowing everything I want to know.
Valkin Mordirc
#5 - 2015-03-07 06:48:00 UTC
I use Zkill mainly, Even though Eve-Kills tends to give more information and such.

**** Battleclinc, used to use it a lot. Now it's a **** show with the new update they had.
#DeleteTheWeak
Yang Aurilen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#6 - 2015-03-07 07:55:26 UTC
zKill looks better on my eyes. That's it really. Eve-kill makes my eyes water.

Post with your NPC alt main and not your main main alt!

Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#7 - 2015-03-07 11:19:59 UTC
only really working KB has been Battleclinic
Belinda HwaFang
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#8 - 2015-03-08 08:19:44 UTC
zkillboard because it's easy to read, clear fonts, large enough typefaces, good contrasts and a general lack of blinking flashing stuff in my face.

The day i discovered zkillboard, I switched immediately. Such a pity it was down for quite some hours yesterday. We need to donate more hamsters to their cause.

--
Fang
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#9 - 2015-03-08 10:49:47 UTC
Battleclinic because their points system is better for solo and you can copy/paste a name directly into the url from local.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#10 - 2015-03-08 13:43:32 UTC
Battleclinic is currently dead. A new layout was released, the layout is terrible, admins going *HTFU, DWI*. There might be a resurgence at some point, but currently it's not usable.

Between eve-kill and zkill, eve-kill hands you lists of involved parties sorted by ships, corps, alliances. zKill does everything else.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#11 - 2015-03-08 17:54:03 UTC
I use zkill but I admit I really wish they would incorporate some battleclinc features like a reasonable points system simple easy icons that at a glance tell you something meaningful about the person (I.e. The low sec roamer tag on this character) and the recent associates list is a great idea too. I hope zkill gets some of those features or they actually make battleclinc have a reasonable interface and API grab at some point.