These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

High Sec Candidate

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
yarasta Armer
Puffheads almost anonymous
#121 - 2015-03-05 15:03:19 UTC
ok, you pretty much had my vote at "Elite on the spectrum 48", the joys of being captain Jameson.
Lorelei Ierendi
We Care A Lot
#122 - 2015-03-05 18:31:27 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Lorelei, I am interested in hearing your views on something like this.


Thanks for asking!

I think I said somewhere that LowSec actually probably needs an Ore-Type that is unique, and pretty much essential for producing some stuff. I think that would be the best and easiest way to get miners out there in the first place.

Once there is a reason to mine in low, then one could look at balancing ships around that. Unfortunately as the system is, I think other changes probably would not motivate many High Sec players to move over there.

http://hisec-carebear.blogspot.de/
Lorelei Ierendi
We Care A Lot
#123 - 2015-03-05 18:32:31 UTC
yarasta Armer wrote:
ok, you pretty much had my vote at "Elite on the spectrum 48", the joys of being captain Jameson.


Trying to dock through the back of a space station, cos of the state-of-the-art line graphics. Good times!

http://hisec-carebear.blogspot.de/
Jenshae Chiroptera
#124 - 2015-03-06 15:02:08 UTC
Lorelei Ierendi wrote:
... LowSec actually probably needs an Ore-Type that is unique, and pretty much essential for producing some stuff. ....
That could be a good carrot but it would make Null and Worm Holes even less self suffient. Additionally, aren't there too many rods keeping people out of Null? Not enough tools to adapt in there?

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Lorelei Ierendi
We Care A Lot
#125 - 2015-03-07 10:55:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Lorelei Ierendi
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Lorelei Ierendi wrote:
... LowSec actually probably needs an Ore-Type that is unique, and pretty much essential for producing some stuff. ....
That could be a good carrot but it would make Null and Worm Holes even less self suffient. Additionally, aren't there too many rods keeping people out of Null? Not enough tools to adapt in there?


I think one of the big draws of null is the BIG alliances, BIG battles et cetera.
I think anything that entices people out of High Sec could be a good thing... and that is where the unique ORE should come in.

Maybe "self sufficiency" should involve more than one sec status... low, high and null?

http://hisec-carebear.blogspot.de/
Jenshae Chiroptera
#126 - 2015-03-07 20:08:03 UTC
Lorelei Ierendi wrote:
Maybe "self sufficiency" should involve more than one sec status... low, high and null?
I can get behind this.
Desireable but non-essential things in different and all sectors of space.
(So Null might have desireable thing #1 but Low would have #2, bit like how WHs have the T3 stuff. You don't need T3s to fight wars but you need almost all minerals to make all ships.)
Essential ship building and POS fuelling in all sectors of space.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Lorelei Ierendi
We Care A Lot
#127 - 2015-03-10 22:25:01 UTC
So finally the CSM voting is over...

I managed to attract the attention of Gevlon Goblin, and the official voting list of the Anti-Ganker community (see the bio of Sarah Flynt).

Some of the commentators thought I was a troll... even gave me A+++ marks as a troll...
but I am no troll.

The CSM is something that needs to be taken seriously, and if I don't get elected, then you can bet I will be back.
High Sec is also something that need to be taken seriously... even when the focus of the next year appears to be SOV changes!

I am looking forward to seeing the results of the elections... and reading the analyses of those results!
Here's hoping for a better High Sec!

http://hisec-carebear.blogspot.de/
Lorelei Ierendi
We Care A Lot
#128 - 2015-03-11 01:45:35 UTC
So on the eve of the end of the voting for the CSMX election... I found myself in the Anti Ganking channel.
Here is the chat (at the end... there is a pastebin link... if someone wants to read it all!

I tried to hide the names of everyone... apologies if I missed anyone!

.......
......
......

[ 2015.03.10 23:54:15 ] Antiganke12> Good luck with the CSM vote, Lorelei
[ 2015.03.10 23:54:25 ] Lorelei Ierendi > Antiganke11 getting banned forever. that is like a permaban! that is almost as much win as Erotica1.
[ 2015.03.10 23:54:35 ] Antiganke11 > that's not a troll.
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:11 ] Antiganke7 > everyone famous in the game falls into one of two categories . . . either they've earned respect like Chribba and EveUni . . .
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:13 ] Antiganke11 > If they see a ban as recognition of their worthiness, then that's their problem. As long as they aren't put in the tournament agai nto waste more time of ccp,

participants and viewers :P
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:15 ] Lorelei Ierendi > Antiganke11 trolls are ugly monsters that regenerate their hp unless you use fire or acid.... so that sounds like a troll to me
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:28 ] Antiganke7 > or they're shameless self-promoters
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:33 ] Antiganke13 > Lorelei Ierendi I think you are listening to them too much... them saying that they win doesn't mean it's true
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:35 ] Lorelei Ierendi > same thing
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:42 ] Antiganke11 > oh, code is certainly the altter Antiganke7
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:50 ] Antiganke11 > *latter, can't type tonight
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:56 ] Antiganke7 > Antiganke11 couldn't agree more
[ 2015.03.10 23:55:58 ] Lorelei Ierendi > Antiganke13 why must it be that they think they win.
[ 2015.03.10 23:56:39 ] Antiganke5 > Lorelei Ierendi they don't. they're trolling
[ 2015.03.10 23:56:45 ] Antiganke13 > DIdn't you say they got the ultimate troll win?
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:05 ] Antiganke11 > code. relies entirely on propaganda
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:06 ] Lorelei Ierendi > Antiganke5 they dont just say it. they think it
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:14 ] Antiganke11 > they'll make anything a win because they did it.
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:45 ] Antiganke5 > Lorelei Ierendi the line member maybe. not their leadership though
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:48 ] Antiganke7 > Antiganke11 and if it's really a loss, they'll blame AG
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:48 ] Lorelei Ierendi > well it has been fun talking tonight! it is now 1am and I have to work tomorrow... o7
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:59 ] Antiganke11 > either way though... that doesn't really matter. Players are free to think however they do.
[ 2015.03.10 23:58:06 ] Lorelei Ierendi > I'll be back.....
[ 2015.03.10 23:58:08 ] Antiganke7 > Lorelei Ierendi o7
[ 2015.03.10 23:58:21 ] Antiganke11 > as long as it doesn't create a toxic environment, something i'm afraid eve is turning too much towards
[ 2015.03.10 23:58:22 ] Antiganke5 > Lorelei Ierendi thanks for joining :)
[ 2015.03.10 23:58:25 ] Antiganke9> o7


The whole chat:


http://pastebin.com/yTHi5zhD

http://hisec-carebear.blogspot.de/
Jenshae Chiroptera
#129 - 2015-03-11 04:44:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Lorelei Ierendi wrote:
[ 2015.03.10 23:57:05 ] Antiganke11 > code. relies entirely on propaganda
The high sec trade hub campers and gankers are the kids that hang around corners beating up little newbies for their lunch money.

Sending you a hilarious battle report from when I started talking about how gankers are really carebears, CODE sent a contingent to my home system, caught one procurer because he was stuck on the invisible part of an asteroid. Then they had a 97% ISK loss when they were wiped out. Lol

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Lorelei Ierendi
We Care A Lot
#130 - 2015-03-19 21:04:15 UTC
So congratulations to all who got in! I am looking forward to seeing a more detailed breakdown of voting!

And a big thank you goes out to all those who supported me.

And, of course, I shall be back in the running next year!

http://hisec-carebear.blogspot.de/
Jenshae Chiroptera
#131 - 2015-03-20 02:26:14 UTC
Lorelei Ierendi wrote:
I shall be back in the running next year!
Good luck.
Try get a large alliance behind you. It is the short cut to a seat.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#132 - 2015-04-01 13:59:20 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Quote:
Round beginning - 18 candidates remain
Elimination: "Thoric Frosthammer" with 1045.000000 votes

Quote:
Round beginning - 13 candidates remain
Elimination: "Lorelei Ierendi" with 1375.000000 votes


QuestionQuestionQuestion

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Lorelei Ierendi
We Care A Lot
#133 - 2015-04-02 21:27:39 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Quote:
Round beginning - 18 candidates remain
Elimination: "Thoric Frosthammer" with 1045.000000 votes

Quote:
Round beginning - 13 candidates remain
Elimination: "Lorelei Ierendi" with 1375.000000 votes


QuestionQuestionQuestion


The second run was the STV thing to find the 2 candidates with the most votes... the ones with the permanent seats.

http://hisec-carebear.blogspot.de/
Jenshae Chiroptera
#134 - 2015-04-07 02:25:29 UTC
Quote:
Round beginning - 15 candidates remain
1332 "Lorelei Ierendi"
1057 "Thoric Frosthammer"
Still a weird system to jump so far.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Xenuria
#135 - 2015-04-07 16:43:28 UTC
What made you choose the name Lorelei?
Any particular history you have with that name?

CSM 12 Candidate