These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

WA--- -- --- SI---- -- -O-----

Author
Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#21 - 2015-02-26 17:49:18 UTC
What do we think about the title of the message? Could provide appropriate context for interpreting the rest of it.

"WA-RN- SITE ONE"

Or perhaps:

"WA-TCH- SITE ONE"

Ypsilas Suonen
Doomheim
#22 - 2015-02-26 18:05:14 UTC
Obil Que wrote:
...and have witnesed [a form of] life that is both biological and biochemical in nature...

Suggest: biomechanical.
Jukko Riis
Doomheim
#23 - 2015-02-26 18:43:55 UTC
Ypsilas Suonen wrote:
Obil Que wrote:
...and have witnesed [a form of] life that is both biological and biochemical in nature...

Suggest: biomechanical.



Confirmed.


I'm doing a sweep of a sweep of Eram, but except for "Doctor Borkstar," I'm not finding anything.


Not yet.



Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2015-02-26 18:53:28 UTC
Jukko Riis wrote:
Ypsilas Suonen wrote:
Obil Que wrote:
...and have witnesed [a form of] life that is both biological and biochemical in nature...

Suggest: biomechanical.



Confirmed.


I'm doing a sweep of a sweep of Eram, but except for "Doctor Borkstar," I'm not finding anything.


Not yet.





Better keep scanning the Doctor....just in case
Rhavas
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#25 - 2015-02-26 19:11:43 UTC
Remember: Eram 5-2 was AJ's home before Site One was built.

Someone please test the acceleration gate.

Author of Interstellar Privateer Shattered Planets, Wormholes and Game Commentary

Obil Que
Star Explorers
Solis Tenebris
#26 - 2015-02-26 19:17:41 UTC
Rhavas wrote:
Remember: Eram 5-2 was AJ's home before Site One was built.

Someone please test the acceleration gate.


I have not visited Site One. If there is an acceleration gate, that might be the translation of this portion:

ac- -- - - ------ - - - ite One

Cap'n Schmitty
#27 - 2015-02-26 19:18:08 UTC
The gate still registers on my sensors as a Large Collidable Object called "Under Construction" and approaching it triggers a message that it's closed for public use.
Jaret Victorian
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#28 - 2015-02-26 19:29:43 UTC
Rhavas wrote:
Remember: Eram 5-2 was AJ's home before Site One was built.

Someone please test the acceleration gate.

It doesn't work.
Anslo
Scope Works
#29 - 2015-02-26 19:38:03 UTC
Huh. Guess that's why they wanted those Jovian bits.

Woops.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Naava Edios
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#30 - 2015-02-26 19:40:25 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Huh. Guess that's why they wanted those Jovian bits.

Woops.


Safe to say, Mistakes have been made...
Anslo
Scope Works
#31 - 2015-02-26 19:42:06 UTC
Naava Edios wrote:
Anslo wrote:
Huh. Guess that's why they wanted those Jovian bits.

Woops.


Safe to say, Mistakes have been made...

D'oh well.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Mark726
Project Compass Holdings
#32 - 2015-02-26 19:44:18 UTC
Is the collection bin where the Jovian Parts were deposited still in Site One?
Jaret Victorian
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#33 - 2015-02-26 19:48:05 UTC
Mark726 wrote:
Is the collection bin where the Jovian Parts were deposited still in Site One?

Yes, it is still there.
Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#34 - 2015-02-26 20:01:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Soldarius
I think biochemical should be biomechanical. That is how I read it at first (though I do not argue that it could be read that way), and would fit the Drifters and/or Sleepers better imo.

edit: Title: WATCH SITE ONE! seems legit. I have attempted a reconstruction of the corrupted message body. I hope this helps.

"Hilen Tukoss" wrote:
T(his mess)age is (being br)oadcast (on a)ll pos(sibl)e fr(equ)encies. (I managed) to sec(ure) a (n old/s)leeper ves(sel) for (escap)e no id(ea) my lo(cati)on, or the (others/Other). I have (no i)dea how long (it will take) to tra(nsmit/nsfer/nsit/in for/ns) it, I'(ve o)n(ly) o(nc)e (-- - - - - ) of the (complex)ity of th(is ship's turre)ts[,] e(ngine)e[]r(ing, )an(d design.)

To who(mever) rec(overs) th(i)s c(ommuni)c(atio)n, I (can only o(ffer a w(arn)ing to t(- - - -- -)e c(harac?)ter. Sle(eper) ac(tivi)ty (has) incre(as)e[d] exp(onen)tia(l/ly since I) was br(ou)ght he(r)e. I ha(ve) lost (- - - -)w these dr(one)s are op(eratin)g, and h(ave) witne(ssed a) for(m of l)ife th(at is) bo()th biol(ogi)cal and bi(me)ch(ani)cal in na(tur)e sin(c)e I wa()s br(ought) her()e. I (know nothing) of the int(enti)ons of (the/those peopl)e o(n)ce cal(led) sle(epe)rs, but I d(o) kn(ow) now t(ha)t wi(th)out a do(ub)t, the(y are) no lon(ger) s(lee)ping.

I int - -- --- - ---- - - - -de - - - -- -gh-- - - -- - - -ible, but -- - - a- - - - to - -- -- - h - - --(unloc/unbloc)k the v(essel's) CISC tra(nspon)der b()e(acon), I -- - it -- - -- as- - -- - -gat-- --. Any unid(entif)ied sle(ep)er ves(sel without) th[i]s ar(riving at) S(it)e On(e must [not] )be at()t()a(ck)ed. I have (e)quip(men)t (for an) EVA, (and wi)ll () be cat(egorized as a) hic.

Pl(ease) se(cu)re () one () hos(tile) ac(celeration gate at S)ite One (in -- - - - -) wee()ks. I (am uncertain) of (my exact) ETA, (but a)ny sle(epe)r (-)th [v]essel ent(erin)g Sit(e) O(ne m)ust ([not]) be [d]estro(yed). Rep(ea)t, mu(st [not] B)E [D]EST(ROYE)D.

I -- --- --g- - -- -gh ----


Quick note. Any place with square brackets are something I had to add. I used this very sparingly and only in places is was absolutely obvious and required to replace data that was clearly lost or corrupted. Ex: the only word in my language that starts with "estro" is "estrogen" and its various forms. From context Dr Tukoss clearly was not discussing female sex hormones. So I made the obvious choice and added a "d". Added a comma for correct grammar. Added the possibility of the negative case when it was not clear. And removed an extra blank space at the end of the first paragraph.

Analysis: Dr Tukoss has escaped in a Sleeper ship of some kind and is making his way to Eram Site One. He should arrive in the next couple of weeks. We will be able to identify his ship. It may be classified as a Heavy Interdiction Cruiser (HIC). He should be outfitted for an EVA, (Extra-Vehicular Activity).

Also, The Sleeper has Awakened!

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

Ypsilas Suonen
Doomheim
#35 - 2015-02-26 20:29:33 UTC
Jukko Riis wrote:
I'm doing a sweep of a sweep of Eram, but except for "Doctor Borkstar," I'm not finding anything.

If, given the authenticity of the transmission:

Obil Que wrote:
Please - - - -- re -- one - - - hos -- -- - - - ac- -- - - ------ - - Site One -- - - - - weeks. I --- - - - of my ETA, any sleeper -r-th vessel entering Site One...

...indicates capability and intent to pilot a Sleeper vessel in the coming weeks, and if:

Obil Que wrote:
...unable to hack the vessels CISC transponder [because] --- -, I -- - it -- - -- as- ----gate.

...indicates that the CONCORD Identification Serial Code of any Sleeper vessel piloted by Hilen Tukoss will only designate said vessel with standard Sleeper nomenclature, then:

Obil Que wrote:
...Any unidentified sleeper vessels - th s arrive at Site One must [not?] be attacked. I have equipped it -- -- - - EVA, --- -- ll - - - - be catostrophic.

...suggests that both:

  • A) any Sleeper vessel that is fired upon while attempting to reach Site One is potentially piloted by Tukoss, and
  • B) any risk posed in allowing actual Sleepers to access Site One is deemed acceptable to Tukoss himself


Contingent upon the accurate decryption if the original transmission, the cascading interplay of variables, not the least of which is the authenticity of the transmission itself, lends itself to deep speculation. A fascinating exercise.
Jaret Victorian
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#36 - 2015-02-26 20:33:03 UTC
I should point out here that it was noted by members of Arek'Jaalan that C-Seekers no longer warp to S1. For 5 days now, approximately.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#37 - 2015-02-26 20:38:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Ypsilas Suonen wrote:

  • A) any Sleeper vessel that is fired upon while attempting to reach Site One is potentially piloted by Tukoss, and
  • B) any risk posed in allowing actual Sleepers to access Site One is deemed acceptable to Tukoss himself


Contingent upon the accurate decryption if the original transmission, the cascading interplay of variables, not the least of which is the authenticity of the transmission itself, lends itself to deep speculation. A fascinating exercise.


We're looking at a possibly tragic misunderstanding, either way.

If he's coming, maybe he'll have a month to paint, "It's me! Don't shoot!" on the hull in large-enough letters.

... assuming he's found a large cache of fullerene-friendly paint.
Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#38 - 2015-02-26 20:41:35 UTC
If history truly repeats itself and this goes anything like the first request we received from "Tukoss" then I see this ending in nothing but more misery.

Here's hoping for some sense in people this time.

-Eran
Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#39 - 2015-02-26 21:02:31 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:
If history truly repeats itself and this goes anything like the first request we received from "Tukoss" then I see this ending in nothing but more misery.

Here's hoping for some sense in people this time.

-Eran


That's another aspect at play here: How do we know this is the real Tukoss and not another imposter? How do we know any of these messages came from the "real" Tukoss?
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#40 - 2015-02-26 21:27:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Rinai Vero wrote:
That's another aspect at play here: How do we know this is the real Tukoss and not another imposter? How do we know any of these messages came from the "real" Tukoss?

We don't.

Even if we recover the physical man, we may never know whether it is the "real" Tukoss we have.

Then again, we might expect an impostor to be able to provide clearer directions. The question in that scenario would probably be not, "What is he trying to say?" but, "Should we listen?"