These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Neutralizer Mechanics against Smaller Ships
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Korg Tronix
Mole Station Nursery
#61 - 2011-12-21 19:49:58 UTC
Kitsu Shadow wrote:


Guy, u really need to leave this thread. Half this post is about u telling me how i should post. If your going to post constructive criticism that's fine; if your going to come here and insult me or other posters then go somewhere else. It's not necessary nor is it appreciated.


Constructive Criticism wrote:

I'll outline how battleship or other tackle against something heavy works for you:


Frigate has 300 cap (arbitrary amount).
Frigate activates AB, -14 cap. It now has 286 cap. (cycle time=15 seconds)
Frigate activates scram, -5 cap. It now has 281 cap. (cycle time=5 seconds)
Frigate activates web, -6 cap. It now has 275 cap. (cycle time=5 seconds)
Battleship activates a 500W neut on it. -500 cap. Frigate now has 0 cap. (cycle time=24 seconds)
Frigate activates a Knave nos. Steals 8.8 cap. It now has 8.8 cap. (cycle time=3 seconds)
Frigate pilot intelligently turns off the web and AB temporarily, so he has cap to keep the scram running.
In the 18 seconds left before the next 500W cycle, the frig pilot steals 8.8*18/3= 52 cap (without even considering the natural cap regen), more than enough to get his mods going before the next neut.
Rinse and repeat, if even necessary. If your gang isn't there in 30-ish seconds, you need to have a serious talk with them.

Evil: If I were creating the world I wouldn't mess about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers, eight o'clock, Day One! [zaps one of his minions accidentally, minion screams]
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#62 - 2011-12-21 19:53:31 UTC
Kitsu Shadow wrote:

Guy, u really need to leave this thread. Half this post is about u telling me how i should post. If your going to post constructive criticism that's fine; if your going to come here and insult me or other posters then go somewhere else. It's not necessary nor is it appreciated.


Actually only the part about texting shorthand is telling you how to post.

The rest is telling you that you are an idiot for asking for a nerf of neuts instead of learning from your mistakes and fitting countermeasures, in addition to having the entitled feeling that your AFs should be able to easily kill Battlecruisers that require more ISK and training to fly. You're as bad as the miners whining about their Hulks instapopping when they don't bother to fit any form of tank.

Wait no, at least some of those miners can spell out words.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
Duchess Starbuckington
Doomheim
#63 - 2011-12-22 02:10:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Duchess Starbuckington
I did post constructive criticism. You ignored it all, just like you ignored every other bit that disagrees with you over this entire thread.
That is why you're an idiot.

In fact, please read Petrus Blackshell's post at least 3 times before you respond here, because he put it a lot better than I did.

And by the way:
Quote:

Guy, you really need to leave this thread. Half this post is about you telling me how I should post. If you're going to post constructive criticism that's fine; if you're going to come here and insult me or other posters then go somewhere else. It's not necessary nor is it appreciated.