These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Psianh Auvyander for CSM 10

Author
Demetri Slavic
Mind Games.
#21 - 2015-01-04 19:12:00 UTC
+1 Psianh will make a great addition to CSM.

EVE_NT London Organiser

https://www.facebook.com/EVELondonMeets

@EVELondonMeets

Next Meet: November 18th 2017

Psianh Auvyander
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2015-01-07 01:16:07 UTC
Dersen Lowery wrote:
You mention being ecstatic that corps and alliances are being worked on. What do you think of the recent push by Jayne Fillon, Mangala Solaris, Sugar Kyle and others to broaden player organizations beyond corps and alliances? NPSI standing fleets, incursions, and casual/new player organizations could all conceivably benefit, and in fact alliances could even be reworked as one of these other-than-corp organizations.

Also, as Adam Smith said, a corporation is just a union of companies[1]. What would you think of allowing more fine-grained organization below the corporation level? Or even, as someone (sorry, forget who) suggested, an LDAP/Active Directory style model?

[1] Not so much any more, but that's what they were when he put quill to paper.


I've been in pretty close contact with Jayne (we were almost alliance mates there for a bit!), Mangala, and Sugar over the last year and I think the world of all three of them and the work they've put into the game.

I love the idea of NPSI groups, they provide a very interesting gameplay approach to EVE that is unique to EVE, and that's great. The more tools CCP can provide to players to approach the game in their own way, the better. Obviously CCP will always be behind the curve to some degree, but that's understandable.

I'd definitely be in support of additional tools and organizational structures that NPSI communities are interested in having, though my personal feeling is that it's of the utmost importance to iron out the traditional organizational structures first before turning attention to NPSI organizations. They're niche and unique and require abnormal support from my understanding, and due diligence needs to be done to ensure that they retain that unique, niche aspect.

To your second point, I'd also be highly interested in more granular "corporations" that aren't as robust as full corporations with their own drawbacks and advantages. I'd approach this topic with my general mentality:

  • What gameplay element does it provide?
  • What are its advantages?
  • What are its natural disadvantages?
  • What disadvantages should be leveraged against it to keep the risk/reward scale balanced?


It's an interesting time to be having discussions of this nature too, as I imagine that the corporate and alliance rework is - if not close to completion - at least in its late design stages, after which the momentum and leverage gained there may be applied to new ideas such as this. Having CSM members who are aware and open to implementing engaging new mechanics like this is definitely going to be important in the near future.

My Blog

@wsethbrown

Psianh Auvyander
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2015-01-15 16:56:42 UTC
I've updated my second post with a link to Marc Scaurus' low sec questionnaire, also found here.

My Blog

@wsethbrown

Lanctharus Onzo
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#24 - 2015-01-17 09:19:34 UTC
Cap Stable Interview:
http://capstable.net/2015/01/17/psianh-auvyander/

Executive Editor, CSM Watch || Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast || Twitter: @Lanctharus

Psianh Auvyander
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2015-02-19 00:09:38 UTC
I've updated my thread with Scaurus' analysis of my CSM campaign.

My Blog

@wsethbrown

Psianh Auvyander
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2015-02-20 21:21:12 UTC
My CSM votematch information can be found here!

My Blog

@wsethbrown

Bellak Hark
New Eden Media Organization
#27 - 2015-02-23 01:38:28 UTC
Psianh Auvyander
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2015-02-23 04:36:26 UTC
Bellak Hark wrote:


This is great, thanks a lot for your contribution!

My Blog

@wsethbrown

Proclus Diadochu
Slipstream Horizons
#29 - 2015-02-25 13:11:27 UTC
The following is an excerpt of my endorsements for CSMX:

Quote:
Psianh and Manny are the two mercenary representatives needed for CSMX. When CCP takes a look at SOV mechanics, Wardec mechanics, piracy, and the various "secs" throughout the game, it is important that the CSM has experienced players speaking to those areas. Psianh has been training mercs for a long time and understands the needs of the players and the areas that need work/help. Manny has been FC'ing and leading within Pandemic Legion, the largest mercenary group in Eve Online, for ages and has been involved in the largest fights in computer gaming history. Manny is also the second of the SOV Trifecta and both of these players should serve on CSMX!

The rest of the article/list is found here. Best of luck, Psianh!

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Previous page12