These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Candidates, check your evemail inbox for your Vote Match login details

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Dierdra Vaal
Interstellar Stargate Syndicate
#1 - 2015-02-17 23:35:55 UTC
Hey candidates!

I've just sent you your Vote Match login details. Vote Match is a website that matches voters to candidates who share their opinions and views on Eve Online and it is used by thousands of voters every election to help make their choice.

The website will go public on February 24th. While you can fill out your profile after that time, you risk losing out on votes. As such I urge you to complete your profile sooner rather than later. Also make sure not to forget the questionnaire. See the big blue button at the top of the page after loggin in.

Good luck to everyone in this election, and don't hesitate to contact me if you have questions or problems.

Veto #205

Director Emeritus at EVE University

CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman

Evesterdam organiser and CSM Vote Match founder

Co-Author of the Galactic Party Planning Guide
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#2 - 2015-02-17 23:39:55 UTC
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, more to write! Blink

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
June Ting
Nobody in Local
Deepwater Hooligans
#3 - 2015-02-18 01:38:17 UTC
> I have regular experience running a POS
No
Yes, I have lived in a POS
Yes, I have managed a POS

The latter two seem orthogonal. I could conceivably answer yes to both of them, but one is not a superset of the other or vice versa. Is it too late to revise this question?

I fight for the freedom of my people.
Dierdra Vaal
Interstellar Stargate Syndicate
#4 - 2015-02-18 16:08:16 UTC
June Ting wrote:
> I have regular experience running a POS
No
Yes, I have lived in a POS
Yes, I have managed a POS

The latter two seem orthogonal. I could conceivably answer yes to both of them, but one is not a superset of the other or vice versa. Is it too late to revise this question?


Good point but unfortunately yes it is too late. Pick whichever one you feel applies most to you, and feel free to add an explanatory comment with your answer.

Veto #205

Director Emeritus at EVE University

CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman

Evesterdam organiser and CSM Vote Match founder

Co-Author of the Galactic Party Planning Guide
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#5 - 2015-02-18 16:28:45 UTC
Is there a way to remove a person from being applicable under one of the vote match sections? There is one specifically I (and others) has concerns about. I doubt he has a chance in hell of winning, but the guy doesn't do what he is alleging he is doing. I'm more curious of the stance of candidates falsifying both their experience and their voting block (such as highsec candidate who says they have 100% experience in lowsec, when they don't. And I mean absolutely has zero experience outside of avoiding the systems in total).

Just curious really.

Yaay!!!!
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#6 - 2015-02-18 17:16:49 UTC
Phoenix Jones wrote:
Is there a way to remove a person from being applicable under one of the vote match sections? There is one specifically I (and others) has concerns about. I doubt he has a chance in hell of winning, but the guy doesn't do what he is alleging he is doing. I'm more curious of the stance of candidates falsifying both their experience and their voting block (such as highsec candidate who says they have 100% experience in lowsec, when they don't. And I mean absolutely has zero experience outside of avoiding the systems in total).

Just curious really.

Phoenix is referring to Bane Cortex, who is clearly not a wormhole candidate and running on that platform. Wormholers are advised to not vote for him, and to ignore any lol-able posting that may result from his campaign.

That said, Corbexx is the wormholer everyone should vote for... and that's about all I can disclose from my "WH Super PAC" advisory board at this time. :P

Thanks Dierdra for doing this each year! You're great.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
Dierdra Vaal
Interstellar Stargate Syndicate
#7 - 2015-02-18 22:34:00 UTC
Phoenix Jones wrote:
Is there a way to remove a person from being applicable under one of the vote match sections? There is one specifically I (and others) has concerns about. I doubt he has a chance in hell of winning, but the guy doesn't do what he is alleging he is doing. I'm more curious of the stance of candidates falsifying both their experience and their voting block (such as highsec candidate who says they have 100% experience in lowsec, when they don't. And I mean absolutely has zero experience outside of avoiding the systems in total).

Just curious really.



Not really, ultimately I can't police (or verify) if what the candidates fill in is actually sincere or correct. You can hide the candidate from your own match results if you like however.

Veto #205

Director Emeritus at EVE University

CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman

Evesterdam organiser and CSM Vote Match founder

Co-Author of the Galactic Party Planning Guide