These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

The Fourth Seyllin Conference "SeyCon116"
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Milo Caman
Anshar Incorporated
#21 - 2014-12-02 18:56:04 UTC
Extremely glad to see this event making a reappearance. I will be attending.
Ragnar Severasse
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2014-12-02 19:19:30 UTC
A conference of the Sciences? I am no scientist but I will glad to come.
Jennifer Starfall
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#23 - 2015-02-12 21:06:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Jennifer Starfall
Thank you everyone for your patience and votes of support. A formal announcement of the dates and submission process has been published here:
[RPCIN][SYNE] The Fourth Seyllin Conference - Call for Submissions

If you have previously posted an intent to submit, please follow the submission procedure outlined in the post above.

Thank you.

Jennifer Starfall

Fifth Seyllin Conference
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#24 - 2015-02-12 21:38:44 UTC
Interesting. Though from records, it seems like the previous conferences were empire circlejerks. I don't hope for this one being much different.
Ollie Rundle
#25 - 2015-02-12 22:02:35 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Interesting. Though from records, it seems like the previous conferences were empire circlejerks. I don't hope for this one being much different.


One can only presume that you read superficially then, Ms. Polevhia and that your analysis is lacking as a result. It's an open invitation to attend - you are most welcome to attend and if you have research of any relevance to present feel free to submit it for consideration.

If you decide against either attending or presenting research I suppose we will just have to find a means to deal with our disappointment.
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#26 - 2015-02-12 22:10:36 UTC
I'll keep an eye on what is presented most likely. But I am not a researcher of the level of most of those who have attended in the past. Most of my experiments have been minor in scope. But if I make any discoveries that I think might be of some benefit to disseminate amid the general population I will apply for a spot at the soonest SeyCon.

I didn't mean to imply there isn't fascinating research and discoveries being shared. I just wonder about motives of past organizers and if there might be a trend.
Jennifer Starfall
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#27 - 2015-02-12 22:27:53 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:
I'll keep an eye on what is presented most likely. But I am not a researcher of the level of most of those who have attended in the past. Most of my experiments have been minor in scope. But if I make any discoveries that I think might be of some benefit to disseminate amid the general population I will apply for a spot at the soonest SeyCon.

I didn't mean to imply there isn't fascinating research and discoveries being shared. I just wonder about motives of past organizers and if there might be a trend.


Evi, I can certainly understand your concern. One of the reasons that Repracor stepped forward to become involved with the Conference was to ensure a venue free of political agendas. It is our intention to keep the Conference free of political agendas. I hope you have some faith in Repracor's firm neutral position.

Jennifer Starfall

Fifth Seyllin Conference
Quattras Peione
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#28 - 2015-02-13 01:17:26 UTC
The pilots of 4TUNA are quite interested in the furtherance of scientific pursuit. We will have a delegation, though we have nothing to present at this time.

Also, it should be pointed out that this would be "SeyCon117," not 116.

Dr. Quattras Alvar Peione

No, I'm not that kind of doctor.
Ollie Rundle
#29 - 2015-02-13 02:46:09 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:
I'll keep an eye on what is presented most likely. But I am not a researcher of the level of most of those who have attended in the past. Most of my experiments have been minor in scope. But if I make any discoveries that I think might be of some benefit to disseminate amid the general population I will apply for a spot at the soonest SeyCon.

I didn't mean to imply there isn't fascinating research and discoveries being shared. I just wonder about motives of past organizers and if there might be a trend.


A fair point, given the limited focus of the last conference and the restriction placed on delegate attendance which I was never in favour of. As far as I am aware though Seycon3 was the only time such a restriction had been in place and it is certainly not on the agenda this time around.

Again, despite any personal ideological differences that might exist between delegates, we've tried to shape this conference towards what SeyCon was originally intended for - a forum for open exchange of ideas and collaborative research. You will be most welcome to attend in that spirit either as an observer or active participant.
Previous page12