These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why don't more women play Eve Online?

First post
Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#321 - 2015-02-10 05:12:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Celestia Via wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Again, let me be clear - you don't get to turn this around by attacking me and pretending I'm doing things I'm not to avoid the point, the point being that opinions are irrelevant until demonstrated otherwise. Hence why you don't get mine, regardless of how many tantrums you throw demanding it, regardless of how many times you accuse me of doing things I haven't done. I still get to criticise bad claims, and no, I don't have to provide my own claim alongside said criticism. All I have to do is ask you, why should I accept your claim as anything other than irrelevant opinion? And let me be clear, if you can't handle criticism, you don't get to dismiss said criticism by applying the term 'judgement' to it as if it's a bad thing. Criticism is how we stop bad ideas from taking fruition and damaging society. Criticism of a bad idea does not require an alternative idea to take its place.

If you'd been paying attention though, you would have noticed I gave my opinion a long time ago. But as per usual, and as I've already stated, you have no interest in my opinion, you're just desperate to divert attention from my criticism of yours.


so, im damaging society eh? and youre here to save it, from my terrible opinions. And, wait, im confused, you straightforward refused to give an opinion, but now claim you already did, but i cant see it anywhere. All this buried among a rant on how i attacked you. I-attacked-you?

i think its time to call out what youre doing for what it really is:

TROLLING

and also call me out for what i really am, a succer to your pointless waste of forum space. I gave my opinion, which is what forums are for. You probably had a fun time bashing it without any real counterproposal, only vague theoretical backtalk.

glad we had this chat, not. See you never.


I'm not trolling, you're misrepresenting my words. I never accused you of damaging society, I accused you of dodging criticism, which you are confirming with your incessant strawman arguments. Yes, you gave your opinion, and it was criticised, whereby you did everything you could, and still continue, to divert attention away from that criticism instead of actually addressing it.

And yes, when you accuse me of things I haven't done, aggression I haven't displayed, you are attacking me. You are making false accusations of me based solely on an interpretation of my words that you've created in order to divert attention away from the criticism I've given your opinions, criticism that you still refuse to address in any way at all, from anyone that's criticised you.

Which is exactly the behaviour I expected of you the moment I started reading your bad ideas, flawed arguments, ironic accusations that come across as more like projection, and just generally childish tantrum throwing. The hallmarks of the fringe feminist who wants the whole world to hear her, but doesn't wanna listen.

Which is why you aren't really interested in my opinion, you're just reaching for something to criticise me for to, you guessed it, dodge your own criticism. Well, dodging said criticism doesn't address it, which means the criticism remains, mine and everyone else's.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kiryen O'Bannon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#322 - 2015-02-10 05:13:43 UTC
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:

As a note, if you're brand new to this/a game, have no established friends in it, it's easier to move onto something else than try and stick around when faced with certain types of behaviour.

You know, you can go to the thread regarding AWOXing and learn rapidly that in general those types of behaviors are not directed at newbies because they have nothing worth the effort of AWOXing them for.


I'm not talking about people shooting you in a PvP oriented game.


Then what are you talking about?

Eternal Father, King of birth, /Who didst create the heaven and earth, /And bid the planets and the sun/ Their own appointed orbits run; /O hear us when we seek thy grace /For those who soar through outer space.

Iyokus Patrouette
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#323 - 2015-02-10 05:26:51 UTC
You're all wrong. but no one is to blame. See the problem is the original question that has been asked 'Why don't more women play eve online'

The correct question to be asked is actually 'why don't more PEOPLE play eve online' We already know that women do in fact play this awesome game.

So the original question while perhaps the intentions being well meaning is in fact the answer to the question, feeling the need to ask this in the first place is part of the problem.

At the end of the day if my wormhole opens into you, whether you are a male, female, cat, dog or transformer I am going to try and kill you. . and maybe have some laughs and smack talk after the fact.

Stop asking why more women don't play, and simply ask why don't more people play.

---- Advocate for the initiation of purple coloured wormholes----

Celestia Via
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#324 - 2015-02-10 05:28:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Celestia Via
Remiel Pollard wrote:

I'm not trolling, you're misrepresenting my words. I never accused you of damaging society, I accused you of dodging criticism, which you are confirming with your incessant strawman arguments. Yes, you gave your opinion, and it was criticised, whereby you did everything you could, and still continue, to divert attention away from that criticism instead of actually addressing it.

And yes, when you accuse me of things I haven't done, aggression I haven't displayed, you are attacking me. You are making false accusations of me based solely on an interpretation of my words that you've created in order to divert attention away from the criticism I've given your opinions, criticism that you still refuse to address in any way at all, from anyone that's criticised you.

Which is exactly the behaviour I expected of you the moment I started reading your bad ideas, flawed arguments, ironic accusations that come across as more like projection, and just generally childish tantrum throwing. The hallmarks of the fringe feminist who wants the whole world to hear her, but doesn't wanna listen.

Which is why you aren't really interested in my opinion, you're just reaching for something to criticise me for to, you guessed it, dodge your own criticism. Well, dodging said criticism doesn't address it, which means the criticism remains, mine and everyone else's.


listen man, i dont know how they do it in your village, but where im from, discussion is the exchange of ideas, not the constant bashing of others opinions by you, followed by a pause to reflect on how right you are.
you accuse me of childish tantrum throwing - just because i asked for your opinion?
at which you responded with several semi-angry walltexts about lawers and other perposterous things? and Im childish, right, right.

and after all that, its not even clear what you criticize me about, was it the word play on the "go do something else" phrase, i dont even know, so many words and you didnt even manage to make that clear. I like to be straightforward in my communications, all i got from you was a vague but firm disagreement in anything i posted.

i dont know what you think you are doing here, but its certainly not conversation, its cryptic criticism about fine points and wordplay, seems to me just for the sake of argument.

i feel i have been trolled into this, i wanted no part in it and I can assure you, you are not going to manage dragging me into this kind of thing again. I make alot of mistakes, but only once.

i also hope all my posts to you will be deleted, they deserve to be and i regret making them. they where irelevant to all and any subjects, an excersice in futility. I apologize to the moderators for letting myself get dragged into this.

"We marched for days and nights, under sun, in the rain. Our minds and bodies ached for rest, but in our hearts there was nothing but the fight."

Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#325 - 2015-02-10 05:40:59 UTC
Oh no someone disagreed with me on the internet, I'd better start playing the victim.
Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#326 - 2015-02-10 05:42:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaely Tanniss
Women play Eve...trust me..and some play it quite well. Though there is no doubt Eve is a varitable sausage fest...but we are here. Still though, the pecentage of women players in eve remains a low 5-10% tops. Some women like gaming...some don't. I, for one, love eve and wouldn't trade it for anything. As for the way men behave....there are always "those one's"..but for the most part, They have all been adult and civil. Besides, I can troll just as well as they can if need be. The thing is, Eve requires the good old HTFU philosophy. I know quite a few women in game and a lot of times they are as tough, if not tougher than some of the men. ...women being less inclined to PvP? I wouldn't say that at all...every single one I know is a PvPer...not one is a miner or carebear. Twisted

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#327 - 2015-02-10 05:48:32 UTC
Celestia Via wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

I'm not trolling, you're misrepresenting my words. I never accused you of damaging society, I accused you of dodging criticism, which you are confirming with your incessant strawman arguments. Yes, you gave your opinion, and it was criticised, whereby you did everything you could, and still continue, to divert attention away from that criticism instead of actually addressing it.

And yes, when you accuse me of things I haven't done, aggression I haven't displayed, you are attacking me. You are making false accusations of me based solely on an interpretation of my words that you've created in order to divert attention away from the criticism I've given your opinions, criticism that you still refuse to address in any way at all, from anyone that's criticised you.

Which is exactly the behaviour I expected of you the moment I started reading your bad ideas, flawed arguments, ironic accusations that come across as more like projection, and just generally childish tantrum throwing. The hallmarks of the fringe feminist who wants the whole world to hear her, but doesn't wanna listen.

Which is why you aren't really interested in my opinion, you're just reaching for something to criticise me for to, you guessed it, dodge your own criticism. Well, dodging said criticism doesn't address it, which means the criticism remains, mine and everyone else's.


listen man, i dont know how they do it in your village, but where im from, discussion is the exchange of ideas,


Which includes the criticism of ideas, which you're still dodging I see. GG.

*drops mic*

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Celestia Via
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#328 - 2015-02-10 05:50:42 UTC
Primary This Rifter wrote:
Oh no someone disagreed with me on the internet, I'd better start playing the victim.


when someone disagrees with you, you at least deserve to know why. please read all our posts and tell me what you make of it.
you decide if i have been trolled or not. i have disagreed with alot of people, even in this thread. See if i was civil or not, hearing each other out and at worst agreeing to disagree. After all, i never said im a victim, i deserve it for engaging in pointless backtalk with no hint of actual argument.

"We marched for days and nights, under sun, in the rain. Our minds and bodies ached for rest, but in our hearts there was nothing but the fight."

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#329 - 2015-02-10 05:53:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Celestia Via wrote:
Primary This Rifter wrote:
Oh no someone disagreed with me on the internet, I'd better start playing the victim.


when someone disagrees with you, you at least deserve to know why. please read all our posts and tell me what you make of it.
you decide if i have been trolled or not. i have disagreed with alot of people, even in this thread. See if i was civil or not, hearing each other out and at worst agreeing to disagree. After all, i never said im a victim, i deserve it for engaging in pointless backtalk with no hint of actual argument.


I explained why. Repeatedly. With a lot of patience and restraint. All I can do is explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. That's on you, and it begins with paying attention. Your wilful ignorance of the argument doesn't mean there wasn't one.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Iyokus Patrouette
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#330 - 2015-02-10 05:59:55 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Celestia Via wrote:
Primary This Rifter wrote:
Oh no someone disagreed with me on the internet, I'd better start playing the victim.


when someone disagrees with you, you at least deserve to know why. please read all our posts and tell me what you make of it.
you decide if i have been trolled or not. i have disagreed with alot of people, even in this thread. See if i was civil or not, hearing each other out and at worst agreeing to disagree. After all, i never said im a victim, i deserve it for engaging in pointless backtalk with no hint of actual argument.


I explained why. Repeatedly. With a lot of patience and restraint. All I can do is explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. That's on you, and it begins with paying attention. Your wilful ignorance of the argument doesn't mean there wasn't one.


you dropped your mic. . . i didn't see you pick it back up. jus sayin'

---- Advocate for the initiation of purple coloured wormholes----

Celestia Via
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#331 - 2015-02-10 06:11:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Celestia Via
Remiel Pollard wrote:

I explained why. Repeatedly. With a lot of patience and restraint. All I can do is explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. That's on you, and it begins with paying attention. Your wilful ignorance of the argument doesn't mean there wasn't one.


what i made of it, was you arguing on wording of phrases and semantics, nothing in particular.
Seems like I was just interested on why women dont play EvE, while you where interested in criticizing someones posts. Happened to be me. You where also trying to bait people long before i did, butting in conversations with remarks like :
"When all you have is subjective opinion on the visuals and gameplay of EVE Online, your agreement, or lack thereof, is irrelevant."

which actually means nothing since we can all see how your favorite word is "(ir)relevant", however you consistenly fail to even mention who or what the relevance applies to. Is it irrelevant to you? to us? to the subject?

I see it now as a cheap trick, a hook for suckers like me to bite. And i did bite, on a similar phrase if i recall, one with the same vague use of "relevance". After that it was easy for you, backtalking with eloquence and ranting on how armies of lawyers chased you and that you woudnt be my friend, when all i asked was the basis of all conversation : a damned opinion on the subject. (note: any claims at this point that you have given one are a lie, your initial post in this thread only tells us that women might not be interested in EVE, nothing about why)

also, your portraying me as a "fringe feminist" further displays your failure to even read any of my earlier posts, in which i seperate myself from the whole feminist idea and disagree completely with the actual feminists, thus supporting my claim that all your interest in myself was only void argument.

so, yes, j'accuse mr. Pollard, of empty rhetorics and deliberately wasting my time.

"We marched for days and nights, under sun, in the rain. Our minds and bodies ached for rest, but in our hearts there was nothing but the fight."

Corey Lean
No Vacancies
No Vacancies.
#332 - 2015-02-10 06:38:12 UTC
Hi boys Cool
Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#333 - 2015-02-10 07:59:15 UTC
Corey Lean wrote:
Hi boys Cool

Hi.
Kenneth Endashi
Kor-Azor Slave Holdings
#334 - 2015-02-10 08:54:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Kenneth Endashi
Iyokus Patrouette wrote:
You're all wrong. but no one is to blame. See the problem is the original question that has been asked 'Why don't more women play eve online'

The correct question to be asked is actually 'why don't more PEOPLE play eve online' We already know that women do in fact play this awesome game.

So the original question while perhaps the intentions being well meaning is in fact the answer to the question, feeling the need to ask this in the first place is part of the problem.

At the end of the day if my wormhole opens into you, whether you are a male, female, cat, dog or transformer I am going to try and kill you. . and maybe have some laughs and smack talk after the fact.

Stop asking why more women don't play, and simply ask why don't more people play.


Iyokus Patrouette, thanks for commenting. I recognize and appreciate your sentiments toward player equality. I think your attitude toward indiscriminate murder is on par with all reasonable expectations of capsuleers throughout New Eden. In fact, I applaud your tenacity and I would hope discrimination in the literal sense is in fact a thing of the past, at least in those areas where we can help it.

(And coming up, here is why I quoted your response. I don't mean to call you out. You've been helpful and you commented most recently:) But I am concerned that for whatever reason, you are intentionally misinterpreting my question to make your own point that you don't feel like a gender discrepancy in Eve Online is a problem - and you are certainly entitled to that opinion - but to dismiss this entire thread as if my question is the problem would, itself, be a symptom of the problem you're referring to, if such a problem were to really exist (which I hear you saying it doesn't, and I respect your opinion and I recognize the spirit in which you said it and I don't think you're wrong).

Once more, just to reiterate:

I do not, as many of you have suggested, "mean anything" by the question. And again, to reiterate, I am looking specifically for research-based, or at least science-oriented - whether it be social science, cognitive science, computer science - answers. Without some basis in observable facts, we can't really have this discussion as the 15 pages of dialog, much of which was deleted by the ISD, has extensively proven.

And again, once more, I am looking for answers to the question of why is it that - within the population of people playing Eve Online, small, rich and rewarding as it is - don't more women choose to play Eve Online?

In this type of conversation, the kind of answers I'm looking for would be something short and to the point without too much personal anecdotes, which don't qualify as evidence, however interesting and informative to your life they might have been. Here's something I was thinking about, just as an example and maybe we can talk about it:

I am looking at a 2008 study I saw recently in the Duke Law Journal published by Phillip Stoup, entitled The Development and Failure of Social Norms in Second Life in which Stoup argues that in many virtual worlds such as Second Life, what he calls "positive social norms" break down without intense regulation in the form of community moderation. I think it goes without saying that such regulations would not be in the spirit of Eve's hands-off approach by CCP, and a sentiment echoed throughout this forum (and a sentiment I agree with wholeheartedly) is that any attempt at community regulation on CCP's part would be grossly inappropriate. But while I think that's not a solution, I also believe that because of Eve Online's noteworthy complexity, the reasons for fewer women gamers would have to be much more complex than that. Perhaps even societal?

That's the kind of discussion I am trying to have - something based on research and evidence - and if anyone wants to have that talk, that's why I started this thread. The extreme, politically charged rhetoric being used here has no place in the sensitive and important discussion I tried to facilitate.

In this type of conversation, we feed each other constructively, riffing on mutual curiosities rather than shutting down the discussion before it can even get started.
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#335 - 2015-02-10 09:04:01 UTC
lack of interest?

the fact it's the internet?

preference of cute things over encouragement of certain types of ill behaviour?

I don't know.
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#336 - 2015-02-10 09:06:17 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
What's the problem, EVE is already full of bitches

I'm quoting that Cool
Leannor
State War Academy
Caldari State
#337 - 2015-02-10 09:15:42 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lupe Meza wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lupe Meza wrote:
CCP does its part to kill that stuff when it can in game, but since so much of EVE requires you to use out of game resources the landscape is like a minefield full of n-bombs, sammich jokes and interaction with socially maladjusted dudes who learned all they needed to know about women from pornhub.


I know a guy (like me, he was black) who quit playing because of the casual use of the a fore mentioned "n-bomb" on commms. I think he was being silly. The truth is that he didn't have to mentality to be in this kind of internet based community. His reaction to that happening was to rant on comms, play the victim, "educate people" about the hurtfulness of that word and finally quit. My reaction is to give as good as i get to the...Saltine-Americans on comms, tell them to kiss the black off my largest body part (which i leave to their imagination) and let that be that.

EVE Online (like the internet in general, especially on 3rd party comms) is a biker bar/men's locker room (with a spaceship shaped backdrop, in EVE's case lol). Understanding that going in ,and asking one's self "am i cut out for this", is crucial to enjoying and enduring it.

And yes, this is why I harp on being the right kind of person for EVE and why I resist the notion that "EVE should be for everyone". EVE is for the tough minded who give zero #$%^s about your feelings.



Well frankly, that is YOUR Eve Online. To state that is what the game should be is reductive and non-constructive.

I was part of a corp for months when some more "rural" contingents let their feelings be known about a certain ethnic group I happened to be a part of, unbeknownst to them because I don't conform to societal stereotypes and it is difficult to pick up on comms with me. I didn't seek to educate anyone, I politely dropped comms and corp and found a corp that I have been in to this day with more like minded people, tolerant, and frankly better people. EVE doesn't have to degenerate into some cesspool unless that is what you personally seek, in which case you gravitate towards those people and enjoy playing in your greasetrap, but that wills till only be one group in a sea of many.


Good for you, still, running away from people isn't what I do. Not everyone has to be the same, but if you find people speaking their mind (ignorant though it may be) hard to take, the problem isn't them, it's you.

Quote:

That said, and not trying to be offensive, but maybe a black man who instead of supporting another black man offended by racist speech over comms, instead derides that person claiming he was playing the victim and mocks his attempts to "educate" the offenders should maybe take a long hard look at themselves before postulating anything about being "tough enough" for anything; let alone a videogame.


This is an example of what I can't stand in real life. Him and i belonging to the same ethnic group means squat, he doesn't deserve my "support" because of his ethnicity. People who deserve support are people who EARN support through their efforts and actions.
The simple fact was that he wasn't mentally suited to be a part of the group we were part of, and rather than look at himself and say "I made a mistake coming here even though I'd heard about it" (and he had, he told me he'd heard about how that group was on comms before joining), he went on a 'social justice' crusade in an attempt to change the hearts and minds of inconsequential internet nerds who like to drunkenly talk bull crap on teamspeak. TBH I disliked him way more than I dislike those drunk redneck internet nerds.





actual,y you're right. It's that very attitude that reinforces division, in a negative way.

Dunno how we deal with it, 'cos many people do it out of instinct.

"Lykouleon wrote:

STOP TOUCHING ICONIC SHIP PARTS"

Thorn en Distel
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#338 - 2015-02-10 09:20:14 UTC
Gwen Ikiryo wrote:
To elabroate on what I said a minute ago, most women I know don't want to play Eve because it's become a self-reinforcing bubble of stupid bravado and masculine crudeness. In most MMOs, a lot of immature habits - And argue that it's your right to do it as much as you want, because it ultimately is, but spouting constant sexual threats and sexually rooted slurs is immature in the eyes of society, like it or not - Have been slowly driven away because the population of women was big enough that people got enough negative feedback that they gave up.

But Eve has been so completely male dominated, and for so long, that instead a that a lot of men playing it have established it as a safe space for that sort of thing in their minds, and so will naturally get defensive when anyone tries to intrude on it. Look at how many people are shouting "If you don't like it, get out!" over and over. The people sick of it have left already, and the ones left don't want to change. It's a classic boys club.

Eve (in most cases) is the only MMO left where I get heckled instantly for describing myself as a feminist. It is the only MMO left where people make jokes or crappy comments when I speak in a voice chat server for the first time. It is the only MMO left where people throw out slurs like crazy and feel confident enough to tell me to shove it when I point out that they're acting like snickering boys at the back of a playground.

No amount of features that appeal to women demographically, like avatar gameplay or stuff to "build", will change that at this point.


Hum. Sorry to say, but I think your experience with MMO gaming may be a bit limited if you think all this is only still in existence in EVE. I see it in region chat in just about every game I currently play, and have experienced it in many voice chats. I mostly play PVP games, where it's more pronounced, but it's in PVE games too.
Thorn en Distel
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#339 - 2015-02-10 09:27:54 UTC
Iyokus Patrouette wrote:
You're all wrong. but no one is to blame. See the problem is the original question that has been asked 'Why don't more women play eve online'

The correct question to be asked is actually 'why don't more PEOPLE play eve online' We already know that women do in fact play this awesome game.

So the original question while perhaps the intentions being well meaning is in fact the answer to the question, feeling the need to ask this in the first place is part of the problem.

At the end of the day if my wormhole opens into you, whether you are a male, female, cat, dog or transformer I am going to try and kill you. . and maybe have some laughs and smack talk after the fact.

Stop asking why more women don't play, and simply ask why don't more people play.


I'm pretty sure (there was at least one dev post about it) that the statistics for this game say that the average number of women playing it is really, really low compared to other games. So sure, some women play EVE, but most of the female MMO players choose not to.

Like I already said, I know lots and lots of women gamers, many of them in hardcore PVP games, many of them guild leaders of PVP guilds. And they all avoid EVE like the plague. So I would dare state that apart from the things that generally appall the gaming population about EVE, there must be some other factors. My bets, based on both studies and personal experience, are on the factors I posted previously in this thread.
Celestia Via
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#340 - 2015-02-10 09:28:17 UTC
Quote:
...argues that in many virtual worlds such as Second Life, what he calls "positive social norms" break down without intense
regulation in the form of community moderation....


sounds very interesting. can you be abit more specific on what the "positive social norms" are, and what is meant by "intense regulation"?

I am asking, because if we are to take the online society to be an image of the real one, some measure of "the rule of law" needs to be implemented. and thats not necessarily a bad thing, its mandatory, like law in actual society. With that in mind, it would be great to know what the author means by "Intense regulation".

Intense, as in some compared to none, or as in heavy policing of all aspects and activities?



"We marched for days and nights, under sun, in the rain. Our minds and bodies ached for rest, but in our hearts there was nothing but the fight."