CSM Campaigns

So it's end of discussion because you can't responds as you know full well the changes you suggest would be minimal in impact on you despite your claims to the contrary. The last thing the CSM needs is someone like yourself looking out purely for their own interests above the needs of the game. If you aren't willing to look at things from other peoples views, and you're going to try to put down other CSMs by shitting up their threads, then why don't you just do the whole game a favour and withdraw your campaign.

And yes, you are a carebear, you just operate in a different way. You are easily as risk averse as any highsec miner, and you push for changes to further benefit yourself with no regard for how it affects others, so yeah, that's pretty much carebear.

I'm sure that attitude will get you very far.
Ok, Questions for the CSM candidate:
1. Why is it you want change which primarily benefit your playstyle at the detriment of others?

2. How do you explain that your campaign has vastly changed direction since you've started it. It seems that you pretty much just say what people want to hear rather than having a solid vision yourself, which is not really a good attitude for a CSM candidate.

3. How can a leader of a group which is as risk averse as any other highsec carebear and twice as self-serving claim to be for adding risk?

4. Do you believe CSM members can be dishonest? You suggest changes which will make it harder for small independent groups to declare war while minimally increasing the price for yourself. You are using that change as a "cost" so that people find it more acceptable to be in favour of your real idea which is the addition of dreadnaughts to highsec which would allow you to dominate structure combat in wars, undoubtedly going after as many research towers as you can.

Want more evil in Eve, Vote Bushido !

Noted. I am open for anything to keep the miners happy enough to don't go afk.

GO GO GO! El numero uno!
Can i vote with 2 hands? :D

Game for miners option

Good question, probably something evil, like 100% tax :).

Hi Tora, I am interested in your campaign, especially in your ideas for adjusting crime. I feel it is excellent that you slide both ways, seeing problems with an unbiased view, where most slide too far to one side or the other on such issues. There will never be too many clear-headed candidates.

I wish to apologize for passing up your campaign thread on my initial pass, and wish to get to know you better as a CSM candidate before voting opens up. I have a feeling I may wind up adding you to my growing list. I'm hoping you will also consider contributing to my highsec reform thread in Jita Park--there is a large turnout this year of good highsec reform candidates with great ideas across the board and I'm really hoping it means the start of something great. Highsec needs a lot of work and it's about time that work got under way. I've already spoken with a casual gamer (Mike Azariah), a staunch defender (Jenshae Chiroptera), and an attitude reformist (Sabriz Adoudel), so it'll be nice to add the CEO of Marmite to this list.

As to your ideas, I have no gripes or changes currently (just not in the mood) but I am very interested in such things as improving ability for prey to fight back, giving financial incentive to hunt people for their implants, and encouraging ATK gameplay.

Quoted for quality.

I can see it already!
R.I.P CAS in advance :P

@ Tora

I am curious what your opinions are on hyperdunk ganking?