These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Fix for Ishtars online

Author
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2015-01-28 23:43:53 UTC
Pravius wrote:

i think thats the point isnt it..... its a cruiser hull that brings battleship dps to the field without all the drawbacks of being a battleship...

and btw if they implement these changes it still will be able to with orgre 2 but will be forced to fight and closer ranges and carry differnt types of drones than just flights of sentry drones

Nobody uses heavies, because they are trash.

If you were to remove sentries, still, nobody would use heavies in 99% of PvP, barring very rare brawling setups like Blasterthrons, Armageddons, or Rattlesnakes. Please note that none of these are cruiser hulls.

A small, fragile, kiting ship that can only use heavies or other non sentry drones is thus, also trash. Nobody would be forced to do anything with Ishtars, because just about everything would be better than them. I would pick a T1 fit hurricane over a t2 Ogre wielding Ishtar.

Heavies are just that bad.
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#22 - 2015-01-28 23:59:57 UTC
- replace the 10% drone damage and HP with 5% sentry and heavy drone damage
- reduce dronebay to 250

this would reduce the power of heavies and sentries in dps, survivability and replacement drones, and would force a 1-1 ratio of heavies and sentries.

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2015-01-29 00:08:43 UTC
Harvey James wrote:
and would force a 1-1 ratio of heavies and sentries.



Whut? sentries... 25 m3 space.. 25 mb bandwith. Heavies... the exact same.

*confused head scratch*
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#24 - 2015-01-29 00:11:17 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
and would force a 1-1 ratio of heavies and sentries.



Whut? sentries... 25 m3 space.. 25 mb bandwith. Heavies... the exact same.

*confused head scratch*



lol .. i.e a 250 bay and no bonuses for small/medium drones would force 125 for heavies and then you have 125 left for sentries

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Zimmer Jones
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2015-01-29 00:17:20 UTC
Harvey James wrote:
Anhenka wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
and would force a 1-1 ratio of heavies and sentries.



Whut? sentries... 25 m3 space.. 25 mb bandwith. Heavies... the exact same.

*confused head scratch*



lol .. i.e a 250 bay and no bonuses for small/medium drones would force 125 for heavies and then you have 125 left for sentries



You would have to drop the sentry bonus and give the heavies a lot more of a boost for people to use them. you drop sentries, and they start firing. drop heavies and they commute to the target.

Use the force without consent and the court wont acquit you even if you are a card carryin', robe wearin' Jedi.

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#26 - 2015-01-29 00:32:19 UTC
Zimmer Jones wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
Anhenka wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
and would force a 1-1 ratio of heavies and sentries.



Whut? sentries... 25 m3 space.. 25 mb bandwith. Heavies... the exact same.

*confused head scratch*



lol .. i.e a 250 bay and no bonuses for small/medium drones would force 125 for heavies and then you have 125 left for sentries



You would have to drop the sentry bonus and give the heavies a lot more of a boost for people to use them. you drop sentries, and they start firing. drop heavies and they commute to the target.


have you tried using geckos on a ishtar .. they are quite nasty

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2015-01-29 00:33:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Zimmer Jones wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
Anhenka wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
and would force a 1-1 ratio of heavies and sentries.



Whut? sentries... 25 m3 space.. 25 mb bandwith. Heavies... the exact same.

*confused head scratch*



lol .. i.e a 250 bay and no bonuses for small/medium drones would force 125 for heavies and then you have 125 left for sentries


You would have to drop the sentry bonus and give the heavies a lot more of a boost for people to use them. you drop sentries, and they start firing. drop heavies and they commute to the target.


And I think we all know how effective mediocre damage that can't hit small targets, can easily get killed by weapon fire, gets wiped out by a smartbomb or two on the target ship, you lose when you have to warp off, erased by an actual bombing wave, and takes several seconds minimum to travel between targets is. Especially when used in a kiting ship that is often not anywhere near the target, so that it can prevent ships from running away.

Completely useless unless it's against structures. About the only thing they can hit effectively are BC's that nobody uses, or solo BS's, because any BS fleet would just bring a firewall to cozy up next to the primary and disco.

My bad. Structures that are not POS's. They can't even do that much.
Zimmer Jones
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2015-01-29 00:34:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Zimmer Jones
Harvey James wrote:

have you tried using geckos on a ishtar .. they are quite nasty




Ah, but they're not just any heavy drone, and there is a limited supply, last I checked. If someone has BPC's, drop me a line I'd like some more.

Use the force without consent and the court wont acquit you even if you are a card carryin', robe wearin' Jedi.

M1k3y Koontz
House of Musashi
Stay Feral
#29 - 2015-01-29 00:59:54 UTC
Dustpuppy wrote:
Easy solution to counter a fleet of ishtars: use them, too. These are not titans, everyone can afford one. So do some training and join the rest.


Twisted


"The counter to X(n) is X(n+1)." So much for rock paper scissors.

Anhenka wrote:
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
So, when you've successfully nerfed Ishtars into oblivion, are you going to then beg for nerfs to whatever takes its place as the OP hull of choice? And when that hull goes the way of the drake, are you going to protest the next FOTM hull? When does it stop?

I would really like an honest answer to these questions from OP.


That would probably be the gila as the people who hate the ishtar seem to have an issue with drones in general :D


Impossible, Gila is so bad for most things you might as well take offense at the hurricane. Rattlesnake and Domi though will e the next choice of permawhine.


Rattler and Domi don't have the mobility of the Ishtar. Battleships are notoriously slow, and MJDs aren't a substitute.

I'd nerf the drone bay to 250m3. Force Ishtars to make the tough choices as to what to use.

How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.

Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2015-01-29 01:03:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
M1k3y Koontz wrote:

I'd nerf the drone bay to 250m3. Force Ishtars to make the tough choices as to what to use.


While that would certainly have an effect on the use of Ishtars in large scale nullsec combat, it would do fuckall to Ishtar roaming gangs, Ishtar gangs in lowsec, Ishtar gangs in WH's, Ishtar gangs camping gates, or stations..

I might not fly Ishtars in Huge fleets as often, but I doubt such a change would significant impact how much I use them for roaming, home defense, or gatecamping.

Not that I get to fly them much anyway since everyone is such a killmoger so that I get stuck flying Logi or Recon 80% of the time anyway.
Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#31 - 2015-01-29 02:46:18 UTC
Broken record here so I am just going to start a copy and paste into all the nerf Ishtar threads I can find.

-1

Again with the nerf Ishtar / sentry drone combination. Why is it that everyone misses the most logical first step in balancing this combination and jumps immediately to the nerfs instead?

Based on reading online the most common complaint with Ishtar / sentry combination is the ability to set them to aggressive mode which allows them to attack without the pilot needing a target lock or to set them to assist another ship in which case the Ishtar becomes nothing but a transport mechanism either of these allows them to drop and run away and hide.

While nerfs to damage, control range, bandwidth and various other ideas would solve the problme for the PvP crowd it would have an even larger and un-intended affect on the usefulness of the Ishtar for PvE. We don't care about PvE you say and my response is you should, this is a game that is played by many different types of players and we all have to share the same ships and equipment and the needs of ALL segments of the game need to be considered in any balance adjustment that is made.

As this applies to the Ishtar / sentry combination why start with the nerf bat big time when a simple change to drone use mechanics may solve the problem for the PvP crowd yet have minimal impact on the PvE crowd.
Just one such idea is to remove the aggressive mode and the ability to assign drones to assist another ship, so what does this do for the situation.
1. It requires the drones pilot to have a target lock to be able to shoot anything.
2. It prevents them from dropping drones and running away like a scared baby.
3. It makes drones ships just as susceptible to EWAR as most other ships.
4. It would have minimal affect on the use of this combination in the PvE segment of the game.

So I say give these simply fixes that have minimal impact on the PvE side of the game a try first. When they are tried and IF they do not solve the balance issues for the PvP crowd then we can start to look at other things that can / should be done.
Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication
#32 - 2015-01-29 03:20:52 UTC
Pravius wrote:
ishtars are a tad op... every 0.0 group uses them for obvious reasons......

limit sentry drones to battlecruiser and above...


seems like a good idea.


The issue is that they need a more effective counter than multiple ships including a BS to kill the sentries at range.

The best solution would be to allow Sensor Damping applied to the deploying ship to limit the optimal and falloff of the sentries. It would make it difficult to drop senties 100+ KMs that snipe with impunity even if the controlling ship was sensor damped.

Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space.

Support better localization for the Japanese Community.

Trailer Park Fun
Inner Shadow
#33 - 2015-01-29 03:42:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Trailer Park Fun
Just nerf the drone control range and all good, meaning got to be 'so close' to control sentries.
Zimmer Jones
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2015-01-29 03:53:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Zimmer Jones
Trailer Park Fun wrote:
Just nerf the drone control range and all good, meaning got to be 'so close' to control sentries.

^^^Just saying this is not me, I like my words coming from my own mouth

And to copy-pasted "don't take my shiny PVE boat away" PVE is what you do for isk to PVP. The reimbursements big alliances have circumvent that first bit. There are other shiny isk machines, you'll recover.

Use the force without consent and the court wont acquit you even if you are a card carryin', robe wearin' Jedi.

Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication
#35 - 2015-01-29 04:02:13 UTC
Trailer Park Fun wrote:
Just nerf the drone control range and all good, meaning got to be 'so close' to control sentries.


That is not necessary. If they provide a counter in the form of sensor dampening that would cut back on the range a drone can target out to, then it allows things to continue and 'aww so sorry' to anyone who neglects to think ahead if they know they are going to be dealing with drone boats of anykind. As it currently stands, ECM is effectively useless against sentries and just acts as a great way to draw their aggro. Fleets might be more balanced if Sensor dampening worked against the drones of the damped ship.

Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space.

Support better localization for the Japanese Community.

Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication
#36 - 2015-01-29 04:04:53 UTC
Zimmer Jones wrote:
Trailer Park Fun wrote:
Just nerf the drone control range and all good, meaning got to be 'so close' to control sentries.

^^^Just saying this is not me, I like my words coming from my own mouth

And to copy-pasted "don't take my shiny PVE boat away" PVE is what you do for isk to PVP. The reimbursements big alliances have circumvent that first bit. There are other shiny isk machines, you'll recover.


FYI: I don't like PvE in drone boats. I generally use a Golem or Rokh.

Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space.

Support better localization for the Japanese Community.

Sh00ter McGavin
Barr None
#37 - 2015-01-29 04:45:28 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Pravius wrote:
ishtars are a tad op... every 0.0 group uses them for obvious reasons......

limit sentry drones to battlecruiser and above...


seems like a good idea.

Any suggestions so that Ishtars, VNI's, and ordinary Vexors are not completely and totally **** afterwords?

Or are you one of the "gut them into uselessness and let CCP never sort them out." crowd?

-1 for a bare sketch of an idea, -1 for not searching to find the other 999 Ishtar threads, -1 for the "make them totally useless" suggestion.

And -10 for laziness.



I've never used a sentry on any of those ships once, and I've had an absolute blast in them, while killing things well above my weight. Sentries are a battleship weapon. They should not be allowed on anything smaller than a BC, and those three ships would be much better balanced without them.
Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2015-01-29 05:18:37 UTC
Ishtar HAC skill bonus:
Keep the 5k operation range/level
change the 5% sentry optimal and tracking bonus to 5 or 7.5% Heavy drone agility/level.

Ordinary Vexor is already pretty bad @** and doesn't need help.

VNI
+2 turret slots and a bit more PG/CPU to fit blasters or rails.


1 of alot of ways those two hulls could still be fun and versatile without sentries. Sentries should be a BS and capital ship only weapon.

The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#39 - 2015-01-29 06:10:44 UTC
The ship isn't the problem its the sentries.
Tabyll Altol
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#40 - 2015-01-29 06:15:36 UTC
Pravius wrote:
ishtars are a tad op... every 0.0 group uses them for obvious reasons......

limit sentry drones to battlecruiser and above...


seems like a good idea.


Not the are not, there are counters to ishtars. Go and find them.

-1