These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
Allowed Input Broadcasting
Doomheim
#3201 - 2015-01-27 09:27:20 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
With the new rules on input broadcasting in place, I wanted to clarify what is and isn't acceptable use of the broadcasting feature. In the process of doing so I seem to have run into a world of contradictions with the EVE staff I've corresponded with.

First let's look at CCP Falcon's official post from the top of this forum
Falcon wrote:

"Examples of allowed Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing are actions taken that do not have an impact on the EVE universe and are carried out for convenience"

"If you are uncertain about your Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing use-case, please get in contact with us, as we would prefer to work with members of the community to come to an amicable resolution. We will also follow up this statement with further clarifications if needed, based on questions and concerns from the community."

Falcon clearly states there are allowed forms of input broadcasting and that CCP prefers we contact them for clarification on the matter.

To clarify what is and is not allowed, I sent in a petition with a list of commands in question. That list is as follows

- Opening cargohold
- Opening orehold
- Opening/closing "people/places" window
- Creating a bookmark
- Deleting a bookmark from "people/places" window
- Activating survey scanners
- Managing inventory in station (ex clicking "ship hangar")
- Managing fittings in station (ex fitting module from hangar)
- Clicking "join fleet" when invited

I will now paraphrase the responses I received and will also not include the GM names. This is in order to respect the rules on communications of GM correspondence.

*Snip* Please refrain from posting GM correspondence. ISD Ezwal.

There needs to be some real clarity on this, between the GMs and in communication with the users.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#3202 - 2015-01-27 10:05:59 UTC
I have removed a rule breaking post.

The Rules:
12. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.

The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a support ticket under the Community & Forums Category.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

ashley Eoner
#3203 - 2015-01-27 10:16:54 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
I'm not surprised as this has been a problem with CCP for as long as I can remember. There is a definite consistency problem with enforcement and interpretation of the rules.

Compounding the issue is CCP's desire to not paint themselves into a corner.


EDIT : Rule of unintended consequences and all..
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#3204 - 2015-01-27 10:25:57 UTC
CCP have create a clear grey area to discourage people from going into a certain direction. If this isn't a hint, I don't know what is.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3205 - 2015-01-27 10:46:15 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
CCP have create a clear grey area to discourage people from going into a certain direction. If this isn't a hint, I don't know what is.
Of course they don't. that's always been the most ridiculous argument. Creating a grey area simply means more people will do things they are not supposed to and get banned purely because they don't know what they are and are not supposed to do.

Nobody has an issue with following the rules CCP sets, but they have to put actual rules. As it currently stands, players who don't even use multiboxing tools have now been banned and STILL there's no clear answer on what is and isn't allowed. It's no wonder CCP is running a failing business with methods like these and quite frankly I hope mainstream gaming media picks up on it, as it seems the only way to get CCP to actually act is through negative press.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#3206 - 2015-01-27 10:58:55 UTC
Is it true that there were bans for people that multibox and did not even use a ISboxer or any other related software?
It is very common that people use 3-4 accounts in fleets (e.g. Dread, Triage, Super, Covert-ops)
There are some claims on a popular gaming website that are really disturbing.
Can somebody verify or falsify those claims?

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

Serene Repose
#3207 - 2015-01-27 11:21:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Serene Repose
Every time you create something, there's this tiny percentage of people who think their life's crusade is to circumvent it. Sometimes this is harmless. Sometimes it's just in bad taste. Other times, it's to juke a system for personal gain. I think it's generous to create a freeware software to enhance games, if done with permission. However, I (and the entire gaming community that doesn't cheat - which is a decided majority) do not agree with third party applications giving people decided advantages in the actual game play.

I've watched videos of people "farming" in WoW using bots. They're presented as though the one doing it is being oh, so clever and smarter than everyone else. Personally, I don't think it's either. I think it's rather infantile and demonstrates a colossal approach to immaturity. It's always struck me - if they don't want to play the game - DON'T. This simple logic seems beyond these people so they can be called neither clever, nor smart. Only intelligent people can be stupid, so that doesn't count. (If an unintelligent person is doing something unintelligent, it's "normal" behavior.)

I don't see this as meat for a crusade with this boxer, third-party application. I do see this handful of people trying to force the issue on the forum here as a significant annoyance, however. Were they attempting similar behavior in a bar, for instance, some of my Harley driving friends might wish to discuss it in the parking lot and there'd be a lot of shouting for MOMMY going on from some precinct, or another.

However, the simple fact is due to the nature of the forum, and internet, these people can continue to post their infantile BS and force our ISDs to inspect and lock their posts ad nauseum. This onslaught will never get public opinion on their side. They'll never inject a doubt which turns the playerbase against CCP, and in the end, all they'll do is anger people like ME.

TYVM. Have a nice day. Big smile

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#3208 - 2015-01-27 11:28:56 UTC
ashley Eoner wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
ashley Eoner wrote:
Anyone that has played WoW knows that world pvp is very active.


Very actively botted, you mean. Bots comprise 40% or higher of their instanced PvP groups. And they do nothing about it either.
I'd love to see a bot do WORLD pvp... Notice I said WORLD pvp not instance pvp or bg pvp or arena pvp... WORLD pvp...



Yeah, they're in the Ashran world PvP zone too. Tons of them. The worst part is the ones that auto interrupt you, so they're actually better fighters than most human players.

Automation must never be tolerated. Even one step in that direction is one step too many.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Flash Startraveler
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#3209 - 2015-01-27 11:53:33 UTC
Serene Repose wrote:
Every time you create something, there's this tiny percentage of people who think their life's crusade is to circumvent it. Sometimes this is harmless. Sometimes it's just in bad taste. Other times, it's to juke a system for personal gain. I think it's generous to create a freeware software to enhance games, if done with permission. However, I (and the entire gaming community that doesn't cheat - which is a decided majority) do not agree with third party applications giving people decided advantages in the actual game play......
And so on


Have you even read what the last problem was that people had? It's not about the ones you called cheaters, its about those who don't cheat and are not using anything but a keyboard, a mouse and possibly more than one monitor but nothing else, no program etc. Right now we want to know where we are in this "grey area" as soon as we use more than one client at one time.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3210 - 2015-01-27 12:02:54 UTC
Eugene Kerner wrote:
Is it true that there were bans for people that multibox and did not even use a ISboxer or any other related software?
It is very common that people use 3-4 accounts in fleets (e.g. Dread, Triage, Super, Covert-ops)
There are some claims on a popular gaming website that are really disturbing.
Can somebody verify or falsify those claims?
As far as such things can be told, at lest some of those claims are accurate. It's pretty much impossible to proved clear evidence though which is why it's so problematic. Even if CCP were to respond to people's tickets it's not really possible to prove you weren't using tools without CCP coming to your house for a live demo. At this point the safe choice is to deactivate most of your accounts and only use 1 at a time, so multiboxing in general is under serious threat.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#3211 - 2015-01-27 12:21:29 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Eugene Kerner wrote:
Is it true that there were bans for people that multibox and did not even use a ISboxer or any other related software?
It is very common that people use 3-4 accounts in fleets (e.g. Dread, Triage, Super, Covert-ops)
There are some claims on a popular gaming website that are really disturbing.
Can somebody verify or falsify those claims?
As far as such things can be told, at lest some of those claims are accurate. It's pretty much impossible to proved clear evidence though which is why it's so problematic. Even if CCP were to respond to people's tickets it's not really possible to prove you weren't using tools without CCP coming to your house for a live demo. At this point the safe choice is to deactivate most of your accounts and only use 1 at a time, so multiboxing in general is under serious threat.

That makes the game practically unplayable.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3212 - 2015-01-27 12:21:38 UTC
Serene Repose wrote:
I've watched videos of people "farming" in WoW using bots. They're presented as though the one doing it is being oh, so clever and smarter than everyone else. Personally, I don't think it's either. I think it's rather infantile and demonstrates a colossal approach to immaturity. It's always struck me - if they don't want to play the game - DON'T. This simple logic seems beyond these people so they can be called neither clever, nor smart. Only intelligent people can be stupid, so that doesn't count. (If an unintelligent person is doing something unintelligent, it's "normal" behavior.)
They do want to play the game, in the way they play it. Honestly, I don't care how you want to play a game. It's irrelevant to me. The problem I have with people like you is that you playing the game your way isn't good enough, you want everyone to play your way or not be allowed to play at all. How about you just mind your own business?

Serene Repose wrote:
Were they attempting similar behavior in a bar, for instance, some of my Harley driving friends might wish to discuss it in the parking lot and there'd be a lot of shouting for MOMMY going on from some precinct, or another.
So you complain about immaturity, then suggest that people stating their case on a game forum would be beaten up by your biker mate in a bar. Now that right there is hilarious.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3213 - 2015-01-27 12:30:32 UTC
Eugene Kerner wrote:
That makes the game practically unplayable.
Not really. I've trained up new traders on 2 of my alt accounts, I'm scrapping faction warfare, 50% of my T1 production, all of my T3 production and consolidating everything down to just 3 accounts and am working on reducing that to just 2. I'm currently already booked up for fanfest again this year, but once fanfest is over I'll be taking a serious look at whether or not EVE is really entertaining me enough to be worth sticking about. CCP seem to be almost completely incapable of communicating with their players, the community is growing more toxic by the day and the new releases leave much to be desired.

I've been enjoying Elite:Dangerous, and as it stands, their teams seems much more able to respond the their community in the right way. The fact that there's no subscription costs is a massive plus too.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#3214 - 2015-01-27 12:44:11 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Eugene Kerner wrote:
That makes the game practically unplayable.
Not really. I've trained up new traders on 2 of my alt accounts, I'm scrapping faction warfare, 50% of my T1 production, all of my T3 production and consolidating everything down to just 3 accounts and am working on reducing that to just 2. I'm currently already booked up for fanfest again this year, but once fanfest is over I'll be taking a serious look at whether or not EVE is really entertaining me enough to be worth sticking about. CCP seem to be almost completely incapable of communicating with their players, the community is growing more toxic by the day and the new releases leave much to be desired.

I've been enjoying Elite:Dangerous, and as it stands, their teams seems much more able to respond the their community in the right way. The fact that there's no subscription costs is a massive plus too.


There has to be a better solution than leaving. Everyone I know in this game does multibox. If people I know start to get bans for no reason I will have to re-evaluate though.
I am not plexing my accounts as I do not have time for grinding but whats the use of multiple (payed!) accounts if you can not run them simultaniously? (I am not talking of using software to multibox, but simply running multiple accounts over 1 IP at the same time)
Some official feedback seems to be overdue.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#3215 - 2015-01-27 13:58:36 UTC
Allowed Input Broadcasting wrote:
To clarify what is and is not allowed, I sent in a petition with a list of commands in question. That list is as follows

- Opening cargohold
- Opening orehold
- Opening/closing "people/places" window
- Creating a bookmark
- Deleting a bookmark from "people/places" window
- Activating survey scanners
- Managing inventory in station (ex clicking "ship hangar")
- Managing fittings in station (ex fitting module from hangar)
- Clicking "join fleet" when invited


Are any of those:

  1. Adjusting window size
  2. Logging in to the game


If the answer is "no", then those actions are not allowed to be broadcast. You know this. Why do you waste GM time with these petitions?
Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#3216 - 2015-01-27 14:37:03 UTC
Eugene Kerner wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Eugene Kerner wrote:
That makes the game practically unplayable.
Not really. I've trained up new traders on 2 of my alt accounts, I'm scrapping faction warfare, 50% of my T1 production, all of my T3 production and consolidating everything down to just 3 accounts and am working on reducing that to just 2. I'm currently already booked up for fanfest again this year, but once fanfest is over I'll be taking a serious look at whether or not EVE is really entertaining me enough to be worth sticking about. CCP seem to be almost completely incapable of communicating with their players, the community is growing more toxic by the day and the new releases leave much to be desired.

I've been enjoying Elite:Dangerous, and as it stands, their teams seems much more able to respond the their community in the right way. The fact that there's no subscription costs is a massive plus too.


There has to be a better solution than leaving. Everyone I know in this game does multibox. If people I know start to get bans for no reason I will have to re-evaluate though.
I am not plexing my accounts as I do not have time for grinding but whats the use of multiple (payed!) accounts if you can not run them simultaniously? (I am not talking of using software to multibox, but simply running multiple accounts over 1 IP at the same time)
Some official feedback seems to be overdue.



and have most of the people you know been banned?
Flash Startraveler
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#3217 - 2015-01-27 15:14:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Flash Startraveler
i'm just gonna quote myself (again)

Me wrote:
Have you even read what the last problem was that people had? It's not about the ones you called cheaters, its about those who don't cheat and are not using anything but a keyboard, a mouse and possibly more than one monitor but nothing else, no program etc. Right now we want to know where we are in this "grey area" as soon as we use more than one client at one time.


Free your mind from the fact that everyone in here that is against the bans is using ISBoxer... Lots of people multibox in eve. Rumor has it, that some of these innocent people have been banned and as far as my knowledge goes, there are lots if people MULTIBOXING WITHOUT THE USE OF ANY KIND OF PROGRAM BUT ONLY USING THEIR HANDS (i hope this is clear now) which now are threatened of being banned just for commanding more than one client at one time.
We ask meaningful, well thought through questions and as far as we are allowed to talk about stuff without getting censored we try to bring in evidence.

And then theres people like you just throwing in constructive stuff like
"ALL MULTIBOXERS ARE BAD"
and
"IF YOU ARE USING A PROGRAM YOU SHOULD BE BANNED"

Feel free to read what this is all about on the last pages and then comment again

Mara Rinn wrote:
The entire point of the ban was to remove the mechanical advantage.

which didn't work out
Mara Rinn wrote:

As far as your speculation of CCP not being able to track if someone is input multiplexing or just multi boxing, there are some very easy metrics that CCP is in a unique position to capture. Anyone who has read up on botting studies in the past will have a good idea of the types of strategies that CCP can employ without engaging in Blizzard-style monitoring of the end-user's computer.

The techniques required will also be capable of a very low false positive rate.

Which is exactly what we don't know, so we can't tell how far you can safely multibox at the moment WITHOUT THE USE OF ANY KIND OF PROGRAM, without getting banned, so we ask
Quote:
meaningful questions
Kaphrah
Thats my BOI
#3218 - 2015-01-27 17:19:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaphrah
There are a lot of reasons CCP should finally give out some information what is fine and what is forbidden, just using this little story here:

Flying Incursions as usual, our fleet won a contest, people in local start raging about ISBoxer and sh*t, and told me they gonna report me. At this moment, I had a great and big questionmark above my head wtf those guys were thinking, so I posted them plop this one, to show how I play. Guess what, they were happy I posted "evidence" for my multiboxing crime and included it in their petition. (what the actual f***...)

I don't wanna log on some day and find my accounts banned (they usually fly 3-4 logis), just because some tard reported me for input broadcasting/ISBoxing whatever I never even did. Yes, I am able to use those really fast, if you're fast enough, they run even synced cause the server tick is so long.
(For the special snowflakes in this thread: No, there is no software, just 4 normal clients on 2 screens, Inb4 forumwarrior-hightech-CSImiami-pictureanalysis)

Oh btw I used ISBoxer on my laptop cause the screen was too small to use eve in windowed mode, so I needed it for a small videoFX window and a bit of window management, so I asked in a ticket if it was ok. Got told to ask in this thread here, still no answer.
ashley Eoner
#3219 - 2015-01-27 23:22:21 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
Lucas Kell wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
CCP have create a clear grey area to discourage people from going into a certain direction. If this isn't a hint, I don't know what is.
Of course they don't. that's always been the most ridiculous argument. Creating a grey area simply means more people will do things they are not supposed to and get banned purely because they don't know what they are and are not supposed to do.

Nobody has an issue with following the rules CCP sets, but they have to put actual rules. As it currently stands, players who don't even use multiboxing tools have now been banned and STILL there's no clear answer on what is and isn't allowed. It's no wonder CCP is running a failing business with methods like these and quite frankly I hope mainstream gaming media picks up on it, as it seems the only way to get CCP to actually act is through negative press.

Yeah when the grey area includes how fast you're allowed to hit hotkeys......


Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


Yeah, they're in the Ashran world PvP zone too. Tons of them. The worst part is the ones that auto interrupt you, so they're actually better fighters than most human players.

Automation must never be tolerated. Even one step in that direction is one step too many.

That's not what I'm talking about but I will admit that is technically world pvp. It's clear you're trying to be as silly about this as possible because I know you're not too dense to realize I'm talking about PVP out in the regular world including the questing and leveling areas. Not those singular regions that are designed for competition.

No one in this thread is asking for a step towards automation and you know that.


EDIT : I multibox with multiple computer/monitors. So I'm now having to make a conscious effort to slow down my gameplay lest I get banned for hitting f1 on two keyboards too quickly...


EDIT 2 : So what happens when that one node goes flaky again or a DDOS hits and people's commands are arriving in groups to the server? Will that mean a mass ban? Or only those that have been petitioned would be banned?


EDIT 3 :

Nolak Ataru wrote:
In games like WoW, there's very little you can do in terms of disruption of logistics, mining, etc. In EVE, players have the ability to shut down someone else's income for a theoretically indefinite period of time. You can't destroy someone's ship like you can in EVE.
You can't ECM like you can in EVE.
You can't sensor damp like you can in EVE.
You can't neut/nos like you can in EVE.
You can't out-maneuver someone like you can in EVE.
You can't meta-game someone like you can in EVE.

Trying to compare a game as PVP-friendly and varied as EVE to the My Little Pony of World of Warcraft is silly.

You've clearly never camped a person in WoW. I've completely destroyed the ability of gold farmers to do their job. I've also completely camped non farmers who were griefing lowbies. I've never been banned in WoW despite actively greifing certain people on my server. I also know of a couple people who make a wow living scamming guilds.

You can interrupt or stop for a time damage casting melee and magic
You can remove all buffs
You can control the movements of the enemy.
You can lock down an enemy in one spot
You can out maneuver people like eve (mounts etc)
You can meta game like eve. I've seen guild banks scammed and more
You can do WoW's equivalent of nuet/nos by removing their mana/rage/whatever.


You really don't seem to know how WoW plays. You can't lock down someone's income in eve unless they let you. Meanwhile WoW has a severely limited number of gold making areas so you can't just move on like you could in eve. Granted you could run instances but your income rate will drop dramatically. At least in eve you can still make good income after moving.

If my account was still active I could log in right now and gank newbies all day long. Well until some higher levels decide to show up.

What's even funny is wow is more hardcore then eve in that you're not even safe in a city (where as in eve in the city aka docked you're perfectly safe).
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3220 - 2015-01-27 23:27:57 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Mike Azariah wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
I do not know if I am impressed or depressed that this thread is still going.

I guess everybody has a right to fight their corner.


I figure another couple of months before people learn the new borders or are removed

m
Would really help if CCP simply let people know what the borders are rather that forcing people to share GM correspondence behind the scenes, since even if someone is banned he's not allowed to tell others to warn them of where the line was. That's what the dumbest part of all of this is. People would be happy to abide by the rules IF CCP ACTUALLY TOLD PEOPLE WHAT WAS AND WASN'T ALLOWED.

Hey, wait, you're a CSM member. You're supposed to facilitate communication between CCP and it's players. Do your job, otherwise what's the point in having you?


See? You and I disagree on a basic thing, there. People are not willing to abide by the rules, they will begrudgingly strip the rules to the thinnest of edges and then try to lawyer an extra advantage out of them if at all possible.

Or maybe I know meaner people than you do.

So CCP is faced with the dilemma of black and white 'this is the line' or a grey area where they can evaluate things on a case by case basis. You say they did the latter but I think they have been fairly forthcoming in saying 'you multi-broadcast? you gone'. 'you publish private communication with GMs? You gone.' Not too, grey an area, in my opinion.

Doing my job? I am. I am here talking to you and listening. I am following the occasional isboxer thread when it is linked to me.

But.

CSM (contrary to some folks conspiracy theories) has little to do with bannings. We do not oversee that. We discuss the results (after) or the reasons(before) with CCP but we are not the security oversight committee. But I wade through threads like this because I do think it is one of my tasks. To know what the issues are and to be able to discuss them with CCP and with you.

If you want my opinion? Here it is.

If you get banned your name and accused crime is published Name and shame
If the ban is overturned you get an apology. . . and the egg is on CCP's face.
This would bypass all the secrecy and let people know that this is a place where rules are enforced.

I do NOT CARE that they were not enforced before, they ARE NOW. Do not drag up ancient history. Argue your point from todays rules, not yesterdays.

m


Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)