Test Server Feedback

Could be fixed by not letting it move you while you have any active timers?

A big time saver with womrhole testing and any other group testing would be /movetoplayer (playername). Then maybe target player gets a popup like accepting a convo, except for teleporting, so its not abused.

Either that or the /back which was already suggested. Its just such a pain to do anything with wormholes.

Thanks for the new sisi things though, it helps more than you know.

It would not be for ANY ship, module, or spawn. Just new stuff you wanted us to test. For example, if you introduced a new destroyer along with a new deploy-able, then /ship would give you a list with just one ship on it, the new destroyer. /module would give you a list with just that one new item.

I am not sure if giving us /ship would make life any easier for you than putting the ship in the seeded market. For us, it may make little difference as we still need to go to the market to fit the ship. But there are some odd use cases, for example:

I have a mission or a Wormhole in a particular solar system, one far away from a seeded market. I want to test the new ship with different fits against this mission.

Without /ship: I go to the market, get and fit a ship, go back, get it destroyed, repeat.

With /ship: I go to market, get a pile of fittings and a hauler. Take everything to the test system. Use /ship to get a test ship, fit it, get it destroyed, repeat.

It's faster and more convenient.

The other reason for a /ship, /module or /spawn is it tells us what you want tested. We just go to the list.

Edit: It just occurred to me that if you implemented /back, as suggested above, my use case above goes away. The player uses /moveme to get to a system with a market, buys what they want, then uses /back to return to the test site.

The day this feature is introduced on Tranquility by accident in a future expansion will be hilarious.
If this Murphy fella was right, it's only a matter of time

I like the moveme option for thera, but for people that wish to try w-space itself not only for their benefits but also to test out and do some BH stuff, would there be a way to add a J-sig to the moveme list? maybe a c4 with c6 c2 static or something along those lines. That way it allows players to go up to higher class or lower class wormholes for testing.

Clears all drones and anything that is not being controlled by a player (i.e. all deployables, undocked drones, in-flight missiles and bombs, corpses, wrecks, abandoned ships, etc except active ships). Anything that was brought to the grid and left behind by the players should be removed, except for dev-implemented stuffs. Fully restores all on-grid ships' HP and repairs all modules and drones in the cargo/drone bay and all fitted modules. Does not restore expended charges. All target locks will be broken, and all ongoing player-induced effects will end.


In certain places...
If this is executed in a complex, the entire thing is reset and player is moved back to the very first acceleration gate which is the entrance to the complex.

If this is executed in an anomaly, the entire thing is reset and player is moved back to the warp-in beacon. Cue initial spawn(s).

If this is used inside a mission space (are there missions in SiSi?), it will move player back to the warp-in point and reset the current mission.

If this is used in empty space, at gates, at celestial bodies or at station, the grid will be cleared as per normal. If there are POCOs, they should be restored to full HP.


In presence of other players...
If this is used while there is only the executing player himself, he can execute this command any time every X minutes. His ship will be restored but will not be moved and will continue heading in the direction he was heading.

If this is used while there are 2 or more players including the executing player on the grid, the majority needs to issue this command so as to actualize the command. If there are only 2 players, both must issue the command. If there are 3 or more, you need >50% vote. Players' ships will remain where they are, heading in whichever direction they were heading. Then a cool-down will prevent the command from being used again for X minutes.

If some players have left the scene before the command is actualized, system should re-count the number of votes against the new total number of players and execute accordingly. Say, if there are 10 players on-grid and 5 have issued the command, if one:
- Player that voted for the command warps out, the number becomes 4/9, and now they still need 1 more vote to get the command executed.
- Player that did not vote for the command warps out, the number becomes 5/9, the command executes automatically.

Same goes if more player warps in.

Might want to issue a text message to all on-grid players to notify them that a vote to reset the grid has been called for and how many more votes are needed. Players may not need to know who has or has not voted (dev's discretion?).

fitting a ship and testing a ship are not the same thing. if i want to see a paper fit i will use pyfa if i want to see an applied fit i use SiSi

/standing [entity] [amount] #Both positive and negative amounts.
/train [skill] [level]
/untrain [skill] [end level]

I know skills are touchy as its the reward for attending mass tests, but the ability to skill up to 5 to test new things would be awesome.

I've got Drack training Minmatar Tactical Destroyer on SiSi ready to test the Syv... the Siv.... the Svi.... the new Matari T3 Dessy. Wouldn't it be best if we could test it at level 5 straight away?

The /moveme command gives you limited options. What if something like /skillup did the same? The options only included what was being tested for the new release? For example when we all got max super capital skills to test low-sec doomsdays and supercap gate travel?

So I have, but this one is an easy train. How about a 8x skill or a 10x skill in the future? What if they mirror TQ next week, a day before they introduce the ship?

Hence I suggested they only do the skills for what they want testing. Its a balance. Mass tests versus proper testing of the new items.