These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Concord is now inconsequential...

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#21 - 2015-01-26 08:51:05 UTC
dunno about ye but i wouldn't call the bannhammer inconsequential

Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

=]|[=
Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#22 - 2015-01-26 09:05:34 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Corey Lean wrote:
How can it be inconsequential when you lose your ship everytime. That guy loses like 8 ships to kill one.

Those my friend are some consequences.


Do you whine because it uses ammo to kill a ship, too?

Of course not. It's the cost of shooting things and you factor it in.

Just like the gank ship is a factored in cost. Think of it as a bigger piece of ammo. And just as inconsequential.

Mr Epeen Cool

What a ridiculous argument. 8 ships is 8 ships, whether it's one person losing all 8 or 8 people losing 1 each.
Whether or not this is a factored cost is irrelevant. The cost of ammo isn't inconsequential, it's just relatively small.
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#23 - 2015-01-26 09:08:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolai Serkanner
Figur Edd wrote:
link to reddit thread about avoiding the brunt of concords impact in highsec

Apperantly a Guy banned for using a technique that allowd him to ignore the full effect of Concorde punishment to gank in highsec has been unbanned and is currently continuing to use this technique to bank ppl with no defender possible "due to mechanics".

Ccp please do Something About this, otherwise if this gets widespread you might as Well remove freighters and bowheads from highsec.


post deleted ... drink coffee before posting ...
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#24 - 2015-01-26 10:03:00 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Corey Lean wrote:
How can it be inconsequential when you lose your ship everytime. That guy loses like 8 ships to kill one.

Those my friend are some consequences.


Do you whine because it uses ammo to kill a ship, too?

Of course not. It's the cost of shooting things and you factor it in.

Just like the gank ship is a factored in cost. Think of it as a bigger piece of ammo. And just as inconsequential.

Mr Epeen Cool

Surely the freighter or bowhead is just also a cost of hauling. Inconsequential loss.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#25 - 2015-01-26 10:04:51 UTC
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
... drink coffee before posting ...
I can confirm that this is very sound advice.

That said, thread locked.

The Rules:
11. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including support ticket responses and emails) received from any member of CCP staff.

16. Posting about bugs and exploits is prohibited.

Bugs and exploits should be reported through the proper channels. Bugs should be brought to the attention of CCP by filing a bug report for our Quality Assurance department. More information on filing bug reports can be found here. Discussions about unverified issues in game can cause unnecessary panic in the community. When there is an issue that the EVE Online community needs to be aware of, it will be communicated via an official statement from CCP after thorough investigation.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Previous page12