These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A sign of hope

First post
Author
Valkin Mordirc
#21 - 2015-01-25 05:58:55 UTC
WOOO! Go Anti-Gankers!


I honestly don't care for you all but GG on getting content done.


Oh and saying that they only save 5% or 10% of all ganks is a fail isn't really fair. Ganking is done by a far larger community then what they have. So it's not fair for some to say, "MEH! You didn't stop ALL THE GANKS CODE. WINS AGAIN" Even though they will. XD


I say good job on stopping the ganks you have and good job on getting more content in EVE. =D
#DeleteTheWeak
Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2015-01-25 07:30:42 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


*Edit* - I'd also point out the absurdity of you complaining about poor quality posting when your response to every post you dislike is to threaten permanent wardeccs against the poster (how have I been so lucky as to avoid that fate?). Maybe it's time to look in the mirror before you complain about poor posting. There must be better ways to resolve forum disputes than to try and force people out of the game, no?


That is true.

But you will only notice it is when people post utter garbage. Most of my replies are their to correct or help people.

Now back on topic.

This is the guys celebrating the ganks that they managed to stop.

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk

Dar'Nalaa
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2015-01-25 10:00:10 UTC
Sonne7 wrote:
Anyone one notice who's missing from all this...........
That tells a story in it's self




Sonne7 is right , thats because its not a Code. win and it upset them,

i bet the order went out to not reply to this,
wonder who has the job of picking up all the toys from around the cot

Dar'Nalaa


ps thxs Cannibal Kane for your words and all others for their input




Siegfried Cohenberg
Cohenberg's Ethical Hauling
Freighter Friends
#24 - 2015-01-25 10:30:02 UTC
you're probably the most eager AG member i've seen
Black Pedro
Mine.
#25 - 2015-01-25 12:36:22 UTC
Dar'Nalaa wrote:
Great victory at Uedama

...

Code please make an effort to keep the content going.........

Another victory for the Code in Uedama!

The Code always wins - generating high quality highsec content since 2012.

Don't worry, as long as carebears continue to disrespect highsec and treat her as a risk-free ISK-printing machine the New Order will be there to enforce the Code.

I am a glad you are engaging with the game and have found some purpose beyond watching your wallet balance get ever bigger while doing your utmost to avoid interactions with other players. Fighting the New Order brings people together and is good thing for the game.

You can't actually beat us by fighting, but you can have a good time while doing it.

Vive la résistance!
Dar'Nalaa
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2015-01-25 13:22:35 UTC
Siegfried Cohenberg wrote:
you're probably the most eager AG member i've seen



and you sir Bump like no other
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#27 - 2015-01-25 14:10:08 UTC
Just saying, no one, and I mean absolutely no one should feel good about themselves when Veers consistently praises your actions.

It should, in fact, trigger a thorough re-examination of your priorities.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#28 - 2015-01-25 14:47:01 UTC
MPaladin wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
If getting on a bunch of CONCORD killmails and "forcing" gankers to use battlecruisers constitutes a victory to you, then I must be the Hero of Frickin' Aufay.

Mind you, I wasn't actually trying to stop them. I was actually on comms with them chatting them up and having a good time while farming their bounties.

My point is that getting on a bunch of CONCORD killmails and seeing gankers move up to battlecruisers is not a victory, it's just another day in the life of a suicide ganker.

Also, keep in mind that, at least according to their quasi-religious code, their goal is to inspire capsuleers away from bot-aspirism. By encouraging your participation...you are actually helping them win.

The CODE always wins because it is a self-fulfilling manifesto.



Of course the gankers will adapt, and so will we. That is the nature of the universe, it is the "Adapt or Die" motto. But we are also showing other players that it is possible to fight back, using the right tactics.


But I have possibly have found my role in this game, I've been doing my own thing and keeping to myself the last few years, but things are changing and I have found the real reason I keep coming back to this game.


Welcome to eve MPaladin.

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#29 - 2015-01-25 15:45:56 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Just saying, no one, and I mean absolutely no one should feel good about themselves when Veers consistently praises your actions.

It should, in fact, trigger a thorough re-examination of your priorities.


Roll

If you had bothered to, you know, actually read what I wrote, then you would realize that I oppose the AG fleets. The mechanics make them non-viable, and all they do is frustrate the FC's, like Gorila, and lead to them either quitting AG, quitting the game, or joining the bad guys. Notice that I have never participated in such endeavors.

My approach is to simply avoid risky occupations like hauling, and stick to the relatively risk free incursion and mission running. That is why Veers keeps on winning,and code keeps on losing.
Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2015-01-25 16:49:19 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Just saying, no one, and I mean absolutely no one should feel good about themselves when Veers consistently praises your actions.

It should, in fact, trigger a thorough re-examination of your priorities.


Roll

If you had bothered to, you know, actually read what I wrote, then you would realize that I oppose the AG fleets. The mechanics make them non-viable, and all they do is frustrate the FC's, like Gorila, and lead to them either quitting AG, quitting the game, or joining the bad guys. Notice that I have never participated in such endeavors.

My approach is to simply avoid risky occupations like hauling, and stick to the relatively risk free incursion and mission running. That is why Veers keeps on winning,and code keeps on losing.


How has code "Lost" to you? Thats kinda like saying "Black legion has never killed me before, therefore they lost, and I won."
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#31 - 2015-01-25 18:31:54 UTC
Solonius Rex wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Just saying, no one, and I mean absolutely no one should feel good about themselves when Veers consistently praises your actions.

It should, in fact, trigger a thorough re-examination of your priorities.


Roll

If you had bothered to, you know, actually read what I wrote, then you would realize that I oppose the AG fleets. The mechanics make them non-viable, and all they do is frustrate the FC's, like Gorila, and lead to them either quitting AG, quitting the game, or joining the bad guys. Notice that I have never participated in such endeavors.

My approach is to simply avoid risky occupations like hauling, and stick to the relatively risk free incursion and mission running. That is why Veers keeps on winning,and code keeps on losing.


How has code "Lost" to you? Thats kinda like saying "Black legion has never killed me before, therefore they lost, and I won."


An excellent question, sir. Code declared a campaign against highsec incursion runners, to force them to either buy permits and follow the trollific code, or to leave highsec entirely. Incursion runners refused to play ball, and dared code to do their worst. 4 months later, and after a countless number of incompetently performed failed gank attempts, code has given up and decided to go pick on pathetic miners and haulers. That is a huge victory for me specifically, and for highsec incursion runners more generally. Standing up to the biggest grief group in highsec and forcing them to concede unconditional defeat is a pretty huge win for the good guys.
Futt Isimazu
State War Academy
Caldari State
#32 - 2015-01-25 18:36:01 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Solonius Rex wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Just saying, no one, and I mean absolutely no one should feel good about themselves when Veers consistently praises your actions.

It should, in fact, trigger a thorough re-examination of your priorities.


Roll

If you had bothered to, you know, actually read what I wrote, then you would realize that I oppose the AG fleets. The mechanics make them non-viable, and all they do is frustrate the FC's, like Gorila, and lead to them either quitting AG, quitting the game, or joining the bad guys. Notice that I have never participated in such endeavors.

My approach is to simply avoid risky occupations like hauling, and stick to the relatively risk free incursion and mission running. That is why Veers keeps on winning,and code keeps on losing.


How has code "Lost" to you? Thats kinda like saying "Black legion has never killed me before, therefore they lost, and I won."


An excellent question, sir. Code declared a campaign against highsec incursion runners, to force them to either buy permits and follow the trollific code, or to leave highsec entirely. Incursion runners refused to play ball, and dared code to do their worst. 4 months later, and after a countless number of incompetently performed failed gank attempts, code has given up and decided to go pick on pathetic miners and haulers. That is a huge victory for me specifically, and for highsec incursion runners more generally. Standing up to the biggest grief group in highsec and forcing them to concede unconditional defeat is a pretty huge win for the good guys.




'Code always wins'

lolnope
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#33 - 2015-01-25 23:27:33 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Solonius Rex wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Just saying, no one, and I mean absolutely no one should feel good about themselves when Veers consistently praises your actions.

It should, in fact, trigger a thorough re-examination of your priorities.


Roll

If you had bothered to, you know, actually read what I wrote, then you would realize that I oppose the AG fleets. The mechanics make them non-viable, and all they do is frustrate the FC's, like Gorila, and lead to them either quitting AG, quitting the game, or joining the bad guys. Notice that I have never participated in such endeavors.

My approach is to simply avoid risky occupations like hauling, and stick to the relatively risk free incursion and mission running. That is why Veers keeps on winning,and code keeps on losing.


How has code "Lost" to you? Thats kinda like saying "Black legion has never killed me before, therefore they lost, and I won."


An excellent question, sir. Code declared a campaign against highsec incursion runners, to force them to either buy permits and follow the trollific code, or to leave highsec entirely. Incursion runners refused to play ball, and dared code to do their worst. 4 months later, and after a countless number of incompetently performed failed gank attempts, code has given up and decided to go pick on pathetic miners and haulers. That is a huge victory for me specifically, and for highsec incursion runners more generally. Standing up to the biggest grief group in highsec and forcing them to concede unconditional defeat is a pretty huge win for the good guys.


First off, its not your win, because you didn't do anything beside whine on forums.

Secondly, the good guys are the gankers. Trillions of liquid isk flooding the wallets of highsec incursion runners fucks up the economy for everyone.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#34 - 2015-01-26 00:32:49 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:


First off, its not your win, because you didn't do anything beside whine on forums.

Secondly, the good guys are the gankers. Trillions of liquid isk flooding the wallets of highsec incursion runners fucks up the economy for everyone.


LOL...your code talking points are no good here sir....I was the face of the enemy for them, and I won big by continuing to demonstrate my elite PvP skills and expose code as the griefers they are.

And no, deciding to illegally kill people to combat inflation in a deflationary environment does not make you a hero...it just makes you a delusional villain. And do watch the language, please.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2015-01-26 00:42:56 UTC  |  Edited by: BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Cannibal Kane wrote:


To be fair though...

They do stop ganks. Yes they maybe stop 5% (dare I say10%) of the ganks but they are at least having fun doing it. It might seem an impossible mission but who cares?They are enjoying it. It creates content for both sides and I am all for that.

I might not be the most liked person in AG, but that is not going to stop me from respecting those in AG that at least make an effort instead of talking about it.

So... . Who are you to deny that fact and their small victories? Just as much as you think of them as less than an ant. I could say exactly the same about you.

Remember, stay classy.

I'd say its about 10% of the time where they cause a run at a freighter to fail. What that doesn't take into account though is that code usually just waits 15 minutes and hits the same freighter again killing it. I'd say its only 2% of the time or so where they actually stop a gank.

Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Oh and saying that they only save 5% or 10% of all ganks is a fail isn't really fair. Ganking is done by a far larger community then what they have. So it's not fair for some to say, "MEH! You didn't stop ALL THE GANKS CODE. WINS AGAIN" Even though they will. XD

I say good job on stopping the ganks you have and good job on getting more content in EVE. =D

I don't think you quite understand the statement "Code Always Wins". Even those two freighters that were "saved" is the code winning. Agreed on content though, and congrats to them on helping the code win!

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#36 - 2015-01-26 01:03:07 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:


First off, its not your win, because you didn't do anything beside whine on forums.

Secondly, the good guys are the gankers. Trillions of liquid isk flooding the wallets of highsec incursion runners fucks up the economy for everyone.


LOL...your code talking points are no good here sir....I was the face of the enemy for them, and I won big by continuing to demonstrate my elite PvP skills and expose code as the griefers they are.

And no, deciding to illegally kill people to combat inflation in a deflationary environment does not make you a hero...it just makes you a delusional villain. And do watch the language, please.


I'm not part of Code.

And if the ****** filter doesn't pick up bad language its not my ******* fault.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#37 - 2015-01-26 01:10:45 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:


First off, its not your win, because you didn't do anything beside whine on forums.

Secondly, the good guys are the gankers. Trillions of liquid isk flooding the wallets of highsec incursion runners fucks up the economy for everyone.


LOL...your code talking points are no good here sir....I was the face of the enemy for them, and I won big by continuing to demonstrate my elite PvP skills and expose code as the griefers they are.

And no, deciding to illegally kill people to combat inflation in a deflationary environment does not make you a hero...it just makes you a delusional villain. And do watch the language, please.


I'm not part of Code.

And if the ****** filter doesn't pick up bad language its not my ******* fault.


You are expected to comply with forum rules regarding profanity regardless of the effectiveness of the filter. Per forum rule #8 -

Use of profanity is prohibited.

The use of profanity is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. This includes the partial masking of letters using numbers or alternate symbols, and any attempts at bypassing the profanity filter.
ujanga Cobon-Han
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2015-01-26 04:21:37 UTC  |  Edited by: ujanga Cobon-Han
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:


First off, its not your win, because you didn't do anything beside whine on forums.

Secondly, the good guys are the gankers. Trillions of liquid isk flooding the wallets of highsec incursion runners fucks up the economy for everyone.


LOL...your code talking points are no good here sir....I was the face of the enemy for them, and I won big by continuing to demonstrate my elite PvP skills and expose code as the griefers they are.

And no, deciding to illegally kill people to combat inflation in a deflationary environment does not make you a hero...it just makes you a delusional villain. And do watch the language, please.


I'm not part of Code.

And if the ****** filter doesn't pick up bad language its not my ******* fault.


You are expected to comply with forum rules regarding profanity regardless of the effectiveness of the filter. Per forum rule #8 -

Use of profanity is prohibited.

The use of profanity is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. This includes the partial masking of letters using numbers or alternate symbols, and any attempts at bypassing the profanity filter.




Dear Veers,

Since the center of the starmap in EVE is PVP heaven or a place where all PVP happens, why not suggest to make nul sec into high sec and high sec into nul sec, so all people from all around EVE can travel to the center of the map and do pvp, the travel time would be less for all people in New Eden.
It is easy to convert nul into high and high into nul since 80% of the PVE happens in nul and 80% of the PVP happens in high sec.
It should be easy done by CCP just change numbers and re-station concord.

I believe even CODE must like the idea, since the tears they have are because null changed into PVE heaven and they are angry to the people in high sec because that.
That is what james said in a blog; null sec changed into PVE heaven becouse miners, blame them!
Code want PvP, why just not bring pvp to code and change nul for high and high for nul.
Code does a good job in the effort to teach people how to fit their ships.
However, that doesnt solve the problem of EVE, which is bigger then the small sized high sec we have, where all players come to find something they cant find outside high sec, and where people live who found what they like to do in EVE.
Maybe they should try to blow life again in nul sec which is a gigantic PVE desert.
CCP created so much space of freedom around high sec, it are the big coalotions to blame it is dead zone, and only those coalitions can bring back life into EVE, instead all of you inc the coalition people living in high sec reflecting that what is wrong in EVE, is high sec.
Which is not true, it is all of those guy's that fucks up EVE as it once was a great game.
And everything that CCP does to balance the game to each his wish those guy's try to destoy it, because they sit there being old and bitter.

This is how adult people solve politics, it is like making a pie.

ujanga Cobon-Han,

pro diplomat and issue resolver.
holdmybeer
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#39 - 2015-01-26 05:38:02 UTC
CODE taking heavy losses

It feels good to be one of the best pvpers in eve.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#40 - 2015-01-26 06:02:39 UTC
Veers: backseat mod edition?

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss