These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

The Svipul - Holy overpower, batman!

Author
The Protato
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1 - 2015-01-20 16:43:48 UTC  |  Edited by: The Protato
If anyone's read the new devblog, they can't help but have noticed there's a new and sexually vertical T3 destroyer in the works.

I have just one concern: its defence mode bonuses provide 33.3% resistance bonuses to both armour and shields, whilst also reducing the MWD sig radius penalty by 66.6%. Already being (according to the blog) the fastest of the T3 destroyers, does it not seem a little ridiculous to allow it to dualtank at MWD speeds whilst only being 33.3% "bigger" than normal? You decide.
Battle BV Master
Bacon Never Dies
#2 - 2015-01-20 17:15:08 UTC
The Protato wrote:
dualtank


And thats where I stopped reading, dual tank. Ewwww

Either way its no better than the Amarr one which has the signature reduction before MWD which means with Halo's its sig is 30... (Ya know less then an interceptor?!)

I don't see this one being OP or at least more OP than the Amarr one
Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2015-01-20 17:27:33 UTC
Dual tank bonus is like saying shitfitting dual tank any other ship actually works, lets forget that the 4 slots in the mid/low. So armor tanking would probably be short range autos with a scram/web/MWD + utility in the mid or shield tank would probably be ganking gyros + tracking enhancers for standard fits....unless you are crazy to fit for bait and dual fit a buffer in PVP that would make people lulz. Can't see shield being any useful for bait, sense you have to point something and when using armor its only adding a few hundred shield you have to knock down....Confessor has more natural shield hitpoints but more lows for a bigger natural tank anyway.

Can see a dual tank useful semi utility scout with that probe launcher though. Extra buffer, but nothing it can't scan out when not being shot out it can't run out with the micro MWD bonus before it warps out assuming it was a bubble Roll. But I don't see the new Svipul as being game breaking, its almost like the Rupture in fitting.
Doctor Knuckles
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2015-01-20 17:28:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Doctor Knuckles
well. dual tank breacher actually works quite well.


i would be curious to see if it would be possible slapping 1 or 2 MASB and a SAAR on this lol, 4 mids 4 lows is an excellent layout
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#5 - 2015-01-20 17:39:50 UTC
I don't think the dual armor and shield bonuses are intended to be used at the same time, but rather to play to Minmatar ships' natural flexibility in tanking.

I do predict some comedy dual-tank losses soon after release though....

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Zen Guerrilla
CTRL-Q
Ushra'Khan
#6 - 2015-01-20 17:56:25 UTC
Bronson Hughes wrote:
I don't think the dual armor and shield bonuses are intended to be used at the same time, but rather to play to Minmatar ships' natural flexibility in tanking.

I do predict some comedy dual-tank losses soon after release though....

Will you stop it with your reason and common sense?

The ship gives a bonus to both armor and shield tank. That means we HAVE to use both. At least. Hull rigs for triple tank!


With only 4 slots for an armor tank or 2 slots for a shield tank it really isn't tanky anyway. So in the end all you get is a glorified arty thrasher with too many midslots.

pew pew

Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2015-01-20 18:09:04 UTC
Dual tank could work much like the breacher does currently. Will have to see the fitting first
Stitch Kaneland
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#8 - 2015-01-20 18:26:07 UTC
Zen Guerrilla wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
I don't think the dual armor and shield bonuses are intended to be used at the same time, but rather to play to Minmatar ships' natural flexibility in tanking.

I do predict some comedy dual-tank losses soon after release though....

Will you stop it with your reason and common sense?

The ship gives a bonus to both armor and shield tank. That means we HAVE to use both. At least. Hull rigs for triple tank!


With only 4 slots for an armor tank or 2 slots for a shield tank it really isn't tanky anyway. So in the end all you get is a glorified arty thrasher with too many midslots.


You are underestimating matar t2 resists and speed/sig tanking. Plug the kinetic hole and youre golden for shield tanking. Vagabonds manage fine with 2 mid tank. This will prob be similar with a much smaller sig. As long as its got grid for arty, it should be pretty potent. Especially with buffed arty.

I would like to see falloff plus optimal bonus, so acs are viable to use in sniper mode as well.
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#9 - 2015-01-20 18:55:32 UTC
Stitch Kaneland wrote:
You are underestimating matar t2 resists and speed/sig tanking. Plug the kinetic hole and youre golden for shield tanking. Vagabonds manage fine with 2 mid tank. This will prob be similar with a much smaller sig. As long as its got grid for arty, it should be pretty potent. Especially with buffed arty.

This. Same applies to T2 Amarr Armor tanks: plug the Thermal hole and you have a solid tank with very few slots.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#10 - 2015-01-20 20:41:00 UTC
If you dual-tank this, you are a complete noob.

This thing has very nice shield resists, and a huge explosive armor resist hole.

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2015-01-20 21:47:08 UTC
Soldarius wrote:
If you dual-tank this, you are a complete noob.

This thing has very nice shield resists, and a huge explosive armor resist hole.



I don't think you really understand how dual tanking works.
Zauri Hanaya
Abrigolandia
#12 - 2015-01-20 22:51:32 UTC
This ship has:

Dps+Range+Shield bonus+Armor bonus+Reduction microwarp penalty IN THE SAME MODE.



THIS IS OP!



Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#13 - 2015-01-20 23:02:14 UTC
Pith C-type med SBs currently go for ~40mil. Add a point, a mwd and a cap booster, fit arties and an exp. probe launcher, and you really got something :D
McChicken Combo HalfMayo
The Happy Meal
#14 - 2015-01-21 00:06:23 UTC
Dual tanking is not a bad choice for ships running an ancillary shield booster. There are some things in EVE that hold true 9 out of 10 times but hold exceptions that most players ignore. The ancil repairer works to keep you alive long enough for your ancil booster to reload. This works with other ships besides the Breacher too.

Another example would be fitting tank and rep at the same time. Generally a big no-no, but in some situations the EHP gained from an ancil will outweigh the EHP gains you'd receive from a resist module instead.

There are all our dominion

Gate camps: "Its like the lowsec watercooler, just with explosions and boose" - Ralph King-Griffin

Caleidascope
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2015-01-21 00:43:55 UTC
When did ccp hire We Form Voltron?

Life is short and dinner time is chancy

Eat dessert first!

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#16 - 2015-01-21 02:44:43 UTC
Zen Guerrilla wrote:
too many midslots.

you can never have too many mid slots
Fireflyb1
Walden 2.0
#17 - 2015-01-21 04:31:27 UTC
Caleidascope
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2015-01-21 04:40:01 UTC

Matari call it Vigil: http://www.eveinfo.net/complexes/vigil_~1.jpg

Life is short and dinner time is chancy

Eat dessert first!

Catalytic morphisis
Deep Space Coalition
Fraternity.
#19 - 2015-01-21 08:32:02 UTC
Exciting, Can't wait to fly around with this thing in defense mode blapping people!

Actual Link free and scout free solo PvP'er

erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#20 - 2015-01-21 09:42:43 UTC
I always wondered, how Venture with 420 m3 cargohold would look like... Now I see and I actually do not like it :(
12Next page