These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Awoxing is no more

First post
Author
Tim Timpson
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#681 - 2015-01-18 13:56:45 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Tim...citation please that is done for that reason...

Still waiting on proof that is the reason.

P.s. new players are already safe from grieving by the new player protection rules.

Also, I have recruited MANY new players over the course of years. None of them were Awoxers nor have been awoxed.

It is the corps security that makes that happen. It is quite easy to spot an awoxer.
CCP just added this for the corps who suck at doing their own security.
CCP stated that newbie recruitment is their reason for this change. I tend to believe that they know what their stats on players leaving mean. Not toe mention that in this very thread several CEOs have admitted to purposely not recruiting noobs for this very reason.

And OK, if an awoxer is easy to spot, enlighten us with what the difference between an awoxer on an new account and a newb on a new account is. There is no difference between the two. You've evidenced over and over and over again that you don't know how basic EVE mechanics work, and yet we're supposed to accept your tears about this change over CCPs own claims to the contrary?
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#682 - 2015-01-18 13:58:31 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Tim Timpson wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:
I've been mulling this over and it seems like tying this feature to a small tax would be a good idea. Corps lack tools to tune their level of risk so a small tax to CONCORD for the protection would be exactly this - a way to balance safety (risk) vs. profit (reward).
That would go against the reason for this change. This change is to encourage people to recruit noobs by making it safe to do so. Adding a punishment for turning this option on will just leave most people leaving it off and not recruiting noobs.


They're recruiting new players anyway.

That's how any awoxing happens in the first place.
The corps that recruit newbies now are terrible corps, which is why they get awoxed. A competent CEO will want to vet their recruits which you can't do to a newbie.


Generally vetting a true new player is easy.

And in general the awoxing new players are alts and those are very easy to spot if you know what you are doing.

Just cause you suck at doing something correctly doesnt mean something is wrong.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Tim Timpson
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#683 - 2015-01-18 13:59:03 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Tim.

Im still waiting on your proof people awox new players.

Almosy all awox that happens is against loot pinatas flown by older people.
I've never claimed they do, so please learn to read. As I've stated, the problem is that people with loot piñatas don't recruit new players because they are indistinguishable from awoxers. This is also what CCP claim. If you want to dispute it, dispute it with CCP. I'll believe them until you can categorically prove otherwise.
Tim Timpson
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#684 - 2015-01-18 14:01:01 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Generally vetting a true new player is easy.

And in general the awoxing new players are alts and those are very easy to spot if you know what you are doing.

Just cause you suck at doing something correctly doesnt mean something is wrong.
Just stop. Go play EVE, learn the mechanics, learn how corp security works and come back and make serious comments.

All you're doing is having an emotional response to the change and saying literally anything you can to dispute it regardless of how ludicrous it is. You cannot tell the difference between a new player and a new character on a new account controlled by an awoxer.
Tim Timpson
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#685 - 2015-01-18 14:05:29 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
sure you can.
also this is why people have training corps etc.
Sure, you can segregate your newbies, which is hardly a good experience for legitimate newbies, and is still something most corps won't do.

Dave Stark wrote:
if people don't want to put the effort in to screen applicants, awoxing is exactly what they deserve.

tip: if the new guy's only ship is a gnosis... it's probably an awoxer.
You can't screen a newbie and tell he's not an awoxer. sure you can get rid of the most obvious awoxers, but the only way to not recruit them at all is to not recruit newbies - which most corps do. At the end of the day, CCP have identified this as a reason that newbies don't get recruited. I don't really care if you think there's behavioural ways people could instead work with newbies, because it's not happening. Decent corps are more often than not excluding newbies, which is bad for the game. If a tiny change to corp aggression will help encourage competent corps recruit newbies more freely I'm all for it. Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#686 - 2015-01-18 14:08:45 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:
J'Poll wrote:
Tim...citation please that is done for that reason...

Still waiting on proof that is the reason.

P.s. new players are already safe from grieving by the new player protection rules.

Also, I have recruited MANY new players over the course of years. None of them were Awoxers nor have been awoxed.

It is the corps security that makes that happen. It is quite easy to spot an awoxer.
CCP just added this for the corps who suck at doing their own security.
CCP stated that newbie recruitment is their reason for this change. I tend to believe that they know what their stats on players leaving mean. Not toe mention that in this very thread several CEOs have admitted to purposely not recruiting noobs for this very reason.

And OK, if an awoxer is easy to spot, enlighten us with what the difference between an awoxer on an new account and a newb on a new account is. There is no difference between the two. You've evidenced over and over and over again that you don't know how basic EVE mechanics work, and yet we're supposed to accept your tears about this change over CCPs own claims to the contrary?


Citation... where did you read that...show me the official CCP source of said change.


And it is very easy to spot a genuine new player from an alt of a veteran player by just interacting with them before you let them join. Not to mention that an awox alt will 99% of the time fail any half decent API check cause he will need some form of asset / ISK to fund the awox.

Or take the safe approach of a trainee corp in your alliance. They can join in on the stuff while there without the hazard for the main corp. Most Awoxers are not patient enough to go through thw trainee corp when there are plenty of stupid and easier targets.

Or let them fly on good standings with you for a while before you officially recruit them. Again, an awoxer will not even try as there are plenty of stupid corps that let him in too easily.

You are the one nit knowing the mechanics obciously.

There are already loads of ways to protect you from Awoxers.
You keep bouncing from "Waah all new players are awoxers" to "Waah everybody wants to awox new players". Both which are false, the first as explained above is easily avoided by good and clever recruitment the latter just doesnt make sense. Why would I Awox a new player when I can awox Johnny No-clue in his pimped Navy Raven as easily if I wanted.

Sure, there will be people that target new players in their Awoxing, but the majority of the awoxers target bigger ships for bigger gains and a much better killboard.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#687 - 2015-01-18 14:10:16 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:
J'Poll wrote:
Tim.

Im still waiting on your proof people awox new players.

Almosy all awox that happens is against loot pinatas flown by older people.
I've never claimed they do, so please learn to read. As I've stated, the problem is that people with loot piñatas don't recruit new players because they are indistinguishable from awoxers. This is also what CCP claim. If you want to dispute it, dispute it with CCP. I'll believe them until you can categorically prove otherwise.


Get on comms with your recruit and it is actually quite easy to spot a new player from someone who made an alt. By just spotting irregularity in knowledge of game mechanics etc.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#688 - 2015-01-18 14:12:47 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:
J'Poll wrote:
Generally vetting a true new player is easy.

And in general the awoxing new players are alts and those are very easy to spot if you know what you are doing.

Just cause you suck at doing something correctly doesnt mean something is wrong.
Just stop. Go play EVE, learn the mechanics, learn how corp security works and come back and make serious comments.

All you're doing is having an emotional response to the change and saying literally anything you can to dispute it regardless of how ludicrous it is. You cannot tell the difference between a new player and a new character on a new account controlled by an awoxer.


Look who says that.

Come back when yoh have been recruiting for 3.5 years aswel as being the lead recruiter and security guy for an alliance.

And never ever saw anything that you claim happen.
I've rwcruited and saw plenty of new players been recruited, none of which were awoxers. Sure, we had to turn down a bunch of alts that tried, but those were easily spotted.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#689 - 2015-01-18 14:14:46 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Tim Timpson wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
sure you can.
also this is why people have training corps etc.
Sure, you can segregate your newbies, which is hardly a good experience for legitimate newbies, and is still something most corps won't do.

Dave Stark wrote:
if people don't want to put the effort in to screen applicants, awoxing is exactly what they deserve.

tip: if the new guy's only ship is a gnosis... it's probably an awoxer.
You can't screen a newbie and tell he's not an awoxer. sure you can get rid of the most obvious awoxers, but the only way to not recruit them at all is to not recruit newbies - which most corps do. At the end of the day, CCP have identified this as a reason that newbies don't get recruited. I don't really care if you think there's behavioural ways people could instead work with newbies, because it's not happening. Decent corps are more often than not excluding newbies, which is bad for the game. If a tiny change to corp aggression will help encourage competent corps recruit newbies more freely I'm all for it. Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in.



Haha.

A trainee corp in an alliance can join about everything you do anyway if you set everything up to be on alliance level.

The only thing that is excluded there are POS services, but then again you should not let a new recruit have access to POS stuff.

And againthe claim that CCP stated that for the reason, without ANY form of proof of that claim. It will become believable the moment you link a verified post by a CCP employee. Until then, it is just yet another whiny try to make up a reason for the change from the carebears.

Ive seen better proof supplied by the anti-change people on how it is already possible etc then all you carebear whiners together.

P.s. I do hope you love to live under wardecs as that will just be the next logical action what people will do....they will dec the corps they were going to awox.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#690 - 2015-01-18 14:15:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Destiny Corrupted
Tim Timpson wrote:
CCP stated that newbie recruitment is their reason for this change. I tend to believe that they know what their stats on players leaving mean. Not toe mention that in this very thread several CEOs have admitted to purposely not recruiting noobs for this very reason.

And OK, if an awoxer is easy to spot, enlighten us with what the difference between an awoxer on an new account and a newb on a new account is. There is no difference between the two. You've evidenced over and over and over again that you don't know how basic EVE mechanics work, and yet we're supposed to accept your tears about this change over CCPs own claims to the contrary?

Look at their skills, and look at their assets. Odds are that if a "newbie" is making a beeline for destroyers, you're in for some trouble.

Tim Timpson wrote:
I've never claimed they do, so please learn to read. As I've stated, the problem is that people with loot piñatas don't recruit new players because they are indistinguishable from awoxers. This is also what CCP claim. If you want to dispute it, dispute it with CCP. I'll believe them until you can categorically prove otherwise.

Here's a novel idea: having new players join loot pinata corporations is a bad idea. Being in the damn NPC corporations is a touch better than being taught to fit flux coils on your Drake, and to be afraid of your own shadow, by some megalomaniac who treats his corporation members like his own personal property.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#691 - 2015-01-18 14:20:08 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Tim Timpson wrote:
CCP stated that newbie recruitment is their reason for this change. I tend to believe that they know what their stats on players leaving mean. Not toe mention that in this very thread several CEOs have admitted to purposely not recruiting noobs for this very reason.

And OK, if an awoxer is easy to spot, enlighten us with what the difference between an awoxer on an new account and a newb on a new account is. There is no difference between the two. You've evidenced over and over and over again that you don't know how basic EVE mechanics work, and yet we're supposed to accept your tears about this change over CCPs own claims to the contrary?

Look at their skills, and look at their assets. Odds are that if a "newbie" is making a beeline for destroyers, you're in for some trouble.


Or if you have a new player with a too high wallet size.

Or one with obvious gank-ships in hangars.

Or ones that are very destine on fleeting with people all the time. Without apparant reason why. Hell, as fleet boss you can specifically see what someone is flying. So you can already see what he is going to bring (heh, Baby Joe joined our mining fleet in a catalyst, this sounds legit).

Or ones that are up front show too much knowledge about game mechanics.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Sol Jing Ko
Doomheim
#692 - 2015-01-18 14:23:58 UTC
What is this thread about? :/
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#693 - 2015-01-18 14:41:02 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Mara Pahrdi wrote:
newbies got an enormous buff income wise during the last years, miners especially, looking at the venture. Trit was at 1,5-2 isk/unit 4 years ago and a hulk was a 240m investment that could easily be lost to just three cats.


the price of minerals has **** all to do with the venture.

Sorry, if that's what you read. That's not what I wanted to say.

Remove standings and insurance.

Tim Timpson
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#694 - 2015-01-18 14:41:33 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Citation... where did you read that...show me the official CCP source of said change.

The original mention of this came from Summer CSM minutes - Page 77 which explains in part why they are doing it. Following that there were numerous discussions about it which CCP posted in, but you'll have to search around for those.

J'Poll wrote:
And it is very easy to spot a genuine new player from an alt of a veteran player by just interacting with them before you let them join. Not to mention that an awox alt will 99% of the time fail any half decent API check cause he will need some form of asset / ISK to fund the awox.
Oh I see, so you're saying an awoxer can;t pretend to be a newbie (which is obviously wrong) and that getting isk to your awoxer alt is an issue (which is again wrong - it's called jettisoning PLEX in space and pretending you bought PLEX), and that awoxers need funding - which is again wrong since a half decent awoxer can deal enormous damage with just the stuff they get from tutorial missions.

J'Poll wrote:
Or take the safe approach of a trainee corp in your alliance. They can join in on the stuff while there without the hazard for the main corp. Most Awoxers are not patient enough to go through thw trainee corp when there are plenty of stupid and easier targets.
This is segregating newbies, which is hardly newbie friendly and it's certainly not a surefire way of getting rid of awoxers.

J'Poll wrote:
Or let them fly on good standings with you for a while before you officially recruit them. Again, an awoxer will not even try as there are plenty of stupid corps that let him in too easily.
So refuse to recruit them and say "I'll set you blue, and later I might recruit you". I won't even begin to explain why that idea is terrible.

On top of all of this you miss one thing - you're talking about behavioural changes - You can't force people to do this, so the fact is that most corps just don;t recruit noobs, since it's safer and easier to simply put in minimum SP limits.

J'Poll wrote:
You keep bouncing from "Waah all new players are awoxers" to "Waah everybody wants to awox new players". Both which are false, the first as explained above is easily avoided by good and clever recruitment the latter just doesnt make sense. Why would I Awox a new player when I can awox Johnny No-clue in his pimped Navy Raven as easily if I wanted.

Sure, there will be people that target new players in their Awoxing, but the majority of the awoxers target bigger ships for bigger gains and a much better killboard.
I'm not bouncing between anything, I can only assume you're either reading someone else's posts and attributing them to me or you can't read basic English very well. So stop putting this strawman back up. I've stated clearly that this is not my opinion. It has nothing to do with people wanting to awox newbies in their rookie ships, it's about the refusal to recruit newbies into decent corps. The fact that this is what you keep returning to is just further proof you don't understand the change.

Effectively you're crying your eyes out because a handful of awoxers won't have easy mode awoxing any more. Well tough luck. CCP have already had this discussion with us, they've looked at the stats and made the decision. The change is coming, so get over it. If you can't get over it, quit.
Tim Timpson
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#695 - 2015-01-18 14:43:42 UTC
Sol Jing Ko wrote:
What is this thread about? :/
Basically CCP have decided to remove easy mode awoxing (in corp aggression) because it makes people resistant to recruiting newbies. Some people are freaking out and crying to no end about how EVE is basically WoW, and the usual nonsense that comes whenever CCP makes a change to help newbies.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#696 - 2015-01-18 14:48:09 UTC
All of this talk about how CEOs don't recruit noobs because of awoxing completely ignores the fact that CEOs don't recruit noobs at much higher rates because they can be future war spies. Doesn't even begin to compare.

Maybe you feel safe talking about hypotheticals, but I actually infiltrate these corporations by the dozen and get hired to protect them sometimes, so I have more than enough practical experience with regard to the matter. I think I heard awoxing being mentioned half a dozen times at most by these people in the last five or six years, but every single one of them make war spying an almost-daily piece of conversation.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Sol Jing Ko
Doomheim
#697 - 2015-01-18 14:48:50 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:
Sol Jing Ko wrote:
What is this thread about? :/
Basically CCP have decided to remove easy mode awoxing (in corp aggression) because it makes people resistant to recruiting newbies. Some people are freaking out and crying to no end about how EVE is basically WoW, and the usual nonsense that comes whenever CCP makes a change to help newbies.
I don't understand you at all can you say that in english without using all these slang words and acronyms?? :/ I'm new here and this is all rather confusing to me. :(
Dave stark
#698 - 2015-01-18 14:50:19 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:
Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in.


amount of effort put in is irrelevant if the feature is no longer there.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#699 - 2015-01-18 14:51:23 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Tim Timpson wrote:
Awoxers will just have to put a bit of effort in.


amount of effort put in is irrelevant if the feature is no longer there.

Careful, you know they'll get you on that technicality.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Arec Bardwin
#700 - 2015-01-18 14:52:28 UTC
Could this change be in violation of Malcani's Law?