These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Awoxing is no more

First post
Author
Aredontis
Doomheim
#321 - 2015-01-16 19:51:09 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
You're surprised that I don't have an issue with one of arguably only two changes that benefit the ganking/nonconsensual pvp community, which float in a veritable sea of changes that don't?


but those changes that increased mining ships EHP and made it harder for you to gank caused you to join a group of others to accomplish the gank, instead of doing it yourself in a smartbombing catalyst. I thought forcing others to work together was a good thing?

/sarc

My point was, everyone "has a problem" with things that negatively affect their play style and "doesn't have a problem" with things that don't affect it or make it easier/better.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#322 - 2015-01-16 19:53:29 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Aredontis wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
This is what the majority wants, and we must cater to the majority.


We are off topic here, and the included quote is waaay out of context, but...

If the "majority (aka thousands and thousands of people)" are willing to pay CCP to have an area where they don't feel grief from other players, and that money makes it possible for CCP to keep devs employed and servers running/upgraded - what is your problem with it?

I see you had no problem with CCP allowing -10s to buy sec status, something they said would never happen when I started the game. (I'm just guessing that you had no problem with it Twisted, I do recall that -10 was supposed to be the big drawback to ganking and having to PVE your way back to sec was the "punishment" )


There is the standard "hey, they have money" fallacy.

So, somehow, DESTORYING the idea that is EVE Online to gain subscription money from people too weak minded to play real EVE benefits the EVE community because CCP will have more money to keep EVE (that isn't EVE) any more going....

EVE is one world, indivisible, with space-liberty and and injustice for all.


The "it destroy the idea of EVE" fallacy is just as bad. No matter how you look at it, it's a service/product they sell expecting to make a buck out of it. The end goal for the owner is always $$$. No matter what the devs say and even what they belive, if the owners say they want the game to generate more subs, then generating more subs it will be.

Who know what the owner actually want?
Solops Crendraven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#323 - 2015-01-16 19:53:55 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
I dont Know about you Guys heres a PvP Zombie MMO game in Alpha (H1Z1) that just came out in Jan 2015 and it has over 40k viewers on twitch while Eve Struggles with just to get 100 a day and its been out for 10 years I think we have serious core issues than Awoxing http://www.twitch.tv/directory/game/H1Z1


It's the new kid in town which just got released for early access. It means nothing in the grand scheme of things unless it stays that way for a long time.

That is true however Eve should be up there with Counterstrike and LOL and Wow Top Of the List not on the Bottom It Deserves more Views especially for a 10 year game. It Tells you alot about a community.

Moving To Las Vegas Watch Me Play Poker! enter link description here

Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#324 - 2015-01-16 19:55:37 UTC
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Eve should be up there with Counterstrike and LOL and Wow


The day this happens is the day all of my accounts are ended. No j/k.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#325 - 2015-01-16 19:56:08 UTC
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
I dont Know about you Guys heres a PvP Zombie MMO game in Alpha (H1Z1) that just came out in Jan 2015 and it has over 40k viewers on twitch while Eve Struggles with just to get 100 a day and its been out for 10 years I think we have serious core issues than Awoxing http://www.twitch.tv/directory/game/H1Z1


It's the new kid in town which just got released for early access. It means nothing in the grand scheme of things unless it stays that way for a long time.

That is true however Eve should be up there with Counterstrike and LOL and Wow Top Of the List not on the Bottom It Deserves more Views especially for a 10 year game. It Tells you alot about a community.


No it should not if you look at the size of it's playerbase. CS, LOL and WoW are all heaps and bound ahead on those metrics.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#326 - 2015-01-16 19:57:39 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Eve should be up there with Counterstrike and LOL and Wow


The day this happens is the day all of my accounts are ended. No j/k.


Are you some kind of indie rock fans but for video games where you think something only deserve your money if it's "underground" or not largely popular?
Bklyn 1
MUSE Buy-n-Large
#327 - 2015-01-16 19:57:39 UTC
As a leader in a group that recruits and accepts new players (this is an alt, don't get all excited), the precautations we take are rather extensive, to the point of being ridiculous. There are numerous layers of protection and security. A very specific recruiting method is used. There are various checks, including api checks, which I hate to have to do, but sadly are a necessity. There are different rules, roles, firewalls, investigations, interviews, promotion requirements, etc. It would probably be easier to get a real life job as a law enforcement officer. This is a game. When things are such that you need to do this, there's a flaw in the mechanics of the game.

This amount of 'red tape' needed is just silly for a game. Did I mention this is a game? Yet it is required due to game mechanics. Accepting new players is really a thankless job. There's no real benefit to us. They don't have the skills , experience or isk to do a whole hell of a lot, but we love this game and want to bring in and help the new guys. For that, we are denigrated at every turn. We are hated for allegedly being carebears. So called pvp'ers seek out our noobs because they are easy pickins', though oddly they dock up when the experienced guys come along.


Will this change help? Maybe it will, but in my experience, awoxers shooting members has never been a big problem in the first place. So if it gets new guys into player corps at the expense of a few guys who did this, I think that's ok. Don't worry 'emergent' players, there will still be theft, betrayal and coups. Heck, maybe you could even try out other aspects of Eve, maybe you will enjoy scamming, mining or pvp.

Honestly, I don't think the change will make much difference for me since I doubt we will relax our layers upon layers upon layers of security, but it sure is a step in the right direction and I'm all for it.


Also, it kind of never made any sense that a corp member could shoot another corp member in high sec, yet could not shoot, for example, someone they set to red but haven't wardecced. I can't shoot the people I hate withougha wardec, yet I can shoot the people that are supposedly my closest allies? It's just something that was dumb and illogical but became a tradition of sorts.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#328 - 2015-01-16 19:58:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Tim Timpson wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
*cry* *weep* *weep* CCP should go bust to appease me because I'm obviously the most important player. *sob*
Great. Anything more to add?


So CCP is going bust? When did this happen?

The standard prediction by the 'carebearist' crowd is that "If EVE doesn't do something to cater to people unfit for EVE NOW it's going to go bankrupt". It's the same line of thinking as "X game is going to kill EVE, CCP better change EVE to match my personal tastes NOW".

EVE should go bust to appease me, EVE should stay EVE, rather than continue down the road of muddy nothingness other MMOs are and have been. Part of what makes EVE special is that it (used to at least) treat it's players like ADULTs.

But little by little, the "hold my hand because I have 15 bux" crowd is winning. Now we have "Safeties" and pop ups warning us of low sec and pop up warning us about contracts and pop ups warning us to wear clean underwear in case of accidents and switchs that disallow a friendly fire mechanic that has existed since day one and that people (like me) some how miraculously managed to survive without hand holding....

I mean it's crazy, do human beings suck THIS MUCH that we can't have one video game on the market that requires some thought and maturity?
Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#329 - 2015-01-16 19:59:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Ma'Baker McCandless
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Eve should be up there with Counterstrike and LOL and Wow


The day this happens is the day all of my accounts are ended. No j/k.


Are you some kind of indie rock fans but for video games where you think something only deserve your money if it's "underground" or not largely popular?


No, I just think those games suck **** and I hate the people who think they are the opitome of the video game art.

But no you are right, only things that appeal to the masses should be allowed to exist.

Tell you what, Ill leave it up to you to decide what I should like and where I should spend my money, k?
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#330 - 2015-01-16 19:59:41 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:

But if you did some research you would find over 40 corps (yes, I do have a list and try to keep it up to date) who are good and very new player friendly.
40 corps across the whole game? And that's a list you've made? What was the criteria for being a "good" corp in your eyes? I fully believe that *you* believe these corps are good, but that doesn't make them not terrible.
[/quote]

A good new player friendly corp has stuff that will assist a new player in the way they need it:

* Proper guidance by older players.
* Assistance in the profession that the new player want
* But most of all, a good attitude among the corp players that keep people interested in the game. The latter, is a matter of trust.


Could you please list me where the first rule of high-sec corp is to brand everybody an Awoxer by default....

Ooh wait, there isn't any.

The only person who apparantly uses that rule is you in your 2 man alt corp.


Just cause someone touches a new player occasionally in a bad way, means every corp is that and every new player gets the same treatment.

I do fully agree, there are A LOT of **** high-sec corps...both new player friendly and non-new player friendly cause they are too paranoid.

If you play smart, you won't become a victim. Even if you are in a corp with others and if those others are completely new players.

So, a new player joins, how does he know where you are exactly...if you are in a mission, he has to probe you (he...Dscan...ooh probes) or you ahve to invite him there yourself.

If at the station, just redock...if you can't stand 2 sec of damage in yoru ship, you suck .



But apparantly everyobdy is an Awoxer...paranoid much...want to buy more tinfoil from me, I can make you a special offer....


p.s. the fun part, all those Awoxers, will just go to the other option, ganking...and you will whine just as hard all over again.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Aredontis
Doomheim
#331 - 2015-01-16 20:00:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Aredontis
Jenn aSide wrote:
There is the standard "hey, they have money" fallacy.

So, somehow, DESTORYING the idea that is EVE Online to gain subscription money from people too weak minded to play real EVE benefits the EVE community because CCP will have more money to keep EVE (that isn't EVE any more) going....

EVE is one world, indivisible, with space-liberty and and injustice for all.


Sorry Jenn, but the truth is that without the money of those/us "weak minded" players, no one has a game to play. If the subs from the "burn it all" crowd were enough to sustain Eve and CCP, then nothing would be changing, and yet it is.

No $$$$ No game, it's pretty simple. (and since Iceland's economy gets a big boost from this game, I'm sure even their government wants it making money)

When CCP changes my style (like they did with -10s buying sec), I have to get over it, and so will those who awox. The reason for the change is valid, without corps picking up the new players, they leave. With awoxing being a "thing", corps don't pick up the new players. That is CCP's analysis, and I can't fault them.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#332 - 2015-01-16 20:03:52 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Eve should be up there with Counterstrike and LOL and Wow


The day this happens is the day all of my accounts are ended. No j/k.


Are you some kind of indie rock fans but for video games where you think something only deserve your money if it's "underground" or not largely popular?


No, I just think those games suck **** and I hate the people who think they are the opitome of the video game art.

But no you are right, only things that appeal to the masses should be allowed to exist.

Tell you what, Ill leave it up to you to decide what I should like and where I should spend my money, k?


I didn't say less popular/indie stuff didn't deserve to exist, I asked why you would unsub if the twitch level of popularity reached those of more "mainstream" games.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#333 - 2015-01-16 20:07:19 UTC
Bklyn 1 wrote:
As a leader in a group that recruits and accepts new players (this is an alt, don't get all excited), the precautations we take are rather extensive, to the point of being ridiculous. There are numerous layers of protection and security. A very specific recruiting method is used. There are various checks, including api checks, which I hate to have to do, but sadly are a necessity. There are different rules, roles, firewalls, investigations, interviews, promotion requirements, etc. It would probably be easier to get a real life job as a law enforcement officer. This is a game. When things are such that you need to do this, there's a flaw in the mechanics of the game.


You just described the things that make EVE a great and different game.
.

Apparently, many of you think EVE would be better if it were easier to just join up and go stab things. I don't.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#334 - 2015-01-16 20:07:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Destiny Corrupted
Aredontis wrote:
Sorry Jenn, but the truth is that without the money of those/us "weak minded" players, no one has a game to play. If the subs from the "burn it all" crowd were enough to sustain Eve and CCP, then nothing would be changing, and yet it is.

Uh, no. The carebear crowd still has a massive list of games to choose from if EVE fails, because the majority of the games on the market offer the feature set they require. Meanwhile, the pvp-centric bandits and pirates have to choose between EVE "dying" because all the carebears are going to "leave," and the game becoming a typical MMO that doesn't offer anything of value for them to begin with.

We want to take our chances with the former.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#335 - 2015-01-16 20:07:54 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:


I didn't say less popular/indie stuff didn't deserve to exist, I asked why you would unsub if the twitch level of popularity reached those of more "mainstream" games.


Because the fundemental core of the game would have to be so utterly changed as to make it not a game Id want to play, and therefore pay for?
Solops Crendraven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#336 - 2015-01-16 20:09:35 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
I dont Know about you Guys heres a PvP Zombie MMO game in Alpha (H1Z1) that just came out in Jan 2015 and it has over 40k viewers on twitch while Eve Struggles with just to get 100 a day and its been out for 10 years I think we have serious core issues than Awoxing http://www.twitch.tv/directory/game/H1Z1


It's the new kid in town which just got released for early access. It means nothing in the grand scheme of things unless it stays that way for a long time.

That is true however Eve should be up there with Counterstrike and LOL and Wow Top Of the List not on the Bottom It Deserves more Views especially for a 10 year game. It Tells you alot about a community.


No it should not if you look at the size of it's playerbase. CS, LOL and WoW are all heaps and bound ahead on those metrics.

Exactly my point Eve online should have at least 7.8 million subs by now.Dont get me wrong I enjoy playing Eve and will continue so as long asthe playerbase dosnt shrink to 500 people.I just wish that it was big as WOW and LOL at least for the griefers that would mean Hell of alot more AwoxesLol

Moving To Las Vegas Watch Me Play Poker! enter link description here

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#337 - 2015-01-16 20:10:29 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Aredontis wrote:
Sorry Jenn, but the truth is that without the money of those/us "weak minded" players, no one has a game to play. If the subs from the "burn it all" crowd were enough to sustain Eve and CCP, then nothing would be changing, and yet it is.

Uh, no. The carebear crowd still has a massive list of games to choose from if EVE fails, because the majority of the games on the market offer the feature set they require. Meanwhile, the pvp-centric bandits and pirates have to choose between EVE "dying" because all the carebears are going to "leave," and the game becoming a typical MMO that doesn't offer anything of value for them to begin with.

We want to take our chances with the former.


Democracy! Except in the game market, you buy your right to vote so it's more like: Capitalism!!!
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#338 - 2015-01-16 20:11:33 UTC
Aredontis wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
There is the standard "hey, they have money" fallacy.

So, somehow, DESTORYING the idea that is EVE Online to gain subscription money from people too weak minded to play real EVE benefits the EVE community because CCP will have more money to keep EVE (that isn't EVE any more) going....

EVE is one world, indivisible, with space-liberty and and injustice for all.


Sorry Jenn, but the truth is that without the money of those/us "weak minded" players, no one has a game to play. If the subs from the "burn it all" crowd were enough to sustain Eve and CCP, then nothing would be changing, and yet it is.

No $$$$ No game, it's pretty simple. (and since Iceland's economy gets a big boost from this game, I'm sure even their government wants it making money)

When CCP changes my style (like they did with -10s buying sec), I have to get over it, and so will those who awox. The reason for the change is valid, without corps picking up the new players, they leave. With awoxing being a "thing", corps don't pick up the new players. That is CCP's analysis, and I can't fault them.


I can fault them, because they haven't seemed to learn the lessons of the past. EVE survives despite most people disliking it. Something like 9 million people tried it and didn't sub. And yet here we still are.

That's because EVE Online is an exclusive type game, it chases away the weak and stupid (most of them anyways) leaving a better breed of gamer.

Without realizing it, people like you would turn EVE online into the kind of crap you find on ANY Xbox live voice server on a Thursday night. No thanks, had enough of that playing WoW, don't want it here. EVE is plenty viable enough with the unwashed masses of ignorant gamer floating around out there.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#339 - 2015-01-16 20:12:17 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:


I didn't say less popular/indie stuff didn't deserve to exist, I asked why you would unsub if the twitch level of popularity reached those of more "mainstream" games.


Because the fundemental core of the game would have to be so utterly changed as to make it not a game Id want to play, and therefore pay for?


That way I will entirely agree with you. Your wallet is your vote in MMOs.
Aredontis
Doomheim
#340 - 2015-01-16 20:12:33 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
We want to take our chances with the former.


Unfortunately for you, CCP isn't willing to take that chance. I can't say I blame them, this is their RL job and economy.