EVE Information Portal

This seems appropriate - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOYJhax5ssI

It's equally funny/hypocritical to hear about "dirty so and so leaked logs " when that complaint is lobbed from the "Home of Digi". Never afraid to leak things, even including things with personal info.

Something, something cleaning your own house first something something

...ah the hypocrisy, SMH

And yet not a single grateful word on Dolan and Xhagen, and their legacy - on top of which everything was built.

A bit sad.

The show must go on.

Hey corebloodbrothers, what first-hand experience do you have with ISBoxer? Have you talked to any ISBoxers, smacktalk and crying in local nonwithstanding? Did you even attempt to integrate anti-bomber ships into your fleet doctrines, including defensive DIC/HICs?

e: And Falcon, you're one to talk about acting like an adult after refusing to discuss this with the ISBoxer community before Jan1.

mr. falcon if someone were to post the past csm scandals it would only get blotted out cause you know you don't want the bad stuff out there. so to speak honestly about it would get completely censored.. both you and I and everyone knows it. your response was proper but also has a sting of guilt associated with it.

im for a complete new CSM where they're not used as test mice or puppets and look to provide better for all of the game not just certain parts (cough cough null sec).. which seems to be the entirety of it lately only about null sec and the rest is blah..

I hope ccp can do a great job in retaining new players and expand and make the game balance and fair for all.. oops I said a bad word fair.. fair play is good right?? then rid the game of its issues and move onward into the future!

good day to you falcon spread your wings or cloak up and dodge the trolls mate o7

shout out to Corebexx

The work you, the other wormhole reps and CCP did this year have made wormhole space a better place.

The buffs to income in low class wormholes has had great benefits for activity in those wormhole classes.

For me I now have more targets to shoot at. For PVE people there is now more income and a reason to live in low class holes.

The Addition of faction Relic and Data sites to Wormhole space has seen many new players coming into wormhole space in their herons and asteros. Before new players generally avoided wormholes.

anyway.. good job

Nobody negotiated with the macro miner "community" when they were banned
Nobody negotiated with RMT "community" when they were banned
Nobody negotiated with ISBotter "community" when replication was banned

If it's bad for the game, it is and you happened to be part of the problem, when ban was the solution. Deal with it.

Easily one of the best posts in this thread so far
CCP and the CSM do a fantastic job under alot of pressure, and for that I respect them. Keep up the good work guys o/

Macros are and have always been a gray area, but I assume you mean the more complicated macros that no longer require human interaction. Those are and have always been against the EULA under the botting clause, and the accelerated gameplay clause.
RMT is and has always been in violation of the EULA under the RMT clause and the clause regarding CCP's control over the game.
Your pitiful attempt at wordplay aside, ISBoxer was not in violation of the EULA, 6A3, the macro clause, or the control clause, and that fact had been repeatedly reinforced by CCP and GM responses to the troll threads on the forums. Lax worked with CCP in order to remove as much chance and possibility of turning ISBoxer into a botting program. Now corebloodbrother comes along and makes claims that broadcasting was somehow in violation of the EULA, or that ISBoxer was some instant-win button with no counters, or that (and this is my favorite) it's somehow the sole cause of problems in the game. I want to know what qualifications and experience he has with the product in question, much as an average Joe would want to know how much experience the dude he'll be electing to Congress, or the presidency.

Not even negotiation in the pure sense, but ISBoxers were willing to come to the table and discuss actual changes to the gameplay that would have a greater effect on their ability to box than the broadcast ban, which was recently laughed at by a video posted by Shadowandlight where he demonstrated a way to control a theoretically unlimited number of bombers that fell within the new EULA. And we're not even talking about how the boxing community was treated by CCP before the ban with reimbursements of ganked ships being handed out like condoms in a brothel, and then with CCP's refusal to talk to any ISBoxer seriously until after Jan1, even when they pointed out a dozen or more ways to attack ISBoxers with changes to gameplay mechanics (let alone fleet doctrines, EWAR, or ganks) that would have had a greater effect on ISBoxers.

Oh nice, then i'll wait for the actual efforts to get more people caring/involved/voting.