Wormholes

-The camera glitch (no ship/roll only) should be addressed immediately (not even summit worthy more of a glitch)
-Please continue to remind them that POS setups are in need of work.
-If they are still removing the IGB ensure that we will have other WH mapping tools
-Fix mobile siphon API info so that there isn't any, or so it doesn't show siphons regardless of config. Make mobile siphons more viable.
-Consider actually reworking WH sites, or adding new ones to attract solo players/allow difficulty to increase by waves/no spawns off-grid
-More viable frig-sized logi and boosting ships?

Those were the first ones off the top of my head. I will talk to my corp and come back with more.

Haven't played with CREST too much, but p sure it can be used for a mapper.

If they do remove IGB, you'd just have to alt-tab to put new WHs in.

Ability to save graphic settings and reload specific settings from the drop down list.

I'm still waiting on a purple themed wormhole nebula. . hop to. quick like a purple bunny!

For those of us that scan a lot, this is important. And it is an easy thing to fix - I think. We just need the normal "in-space" dropdown menu available in the map screen.

Also, pos permissions are critical. Currently, to reconfigure my pos, I need starbase-config roles from my corp. So either it's a huge security risk, or I can't really use my pos effectively.

1) An intuitive, modular POS system where you don't have to compromise as much on security/accessibility. I would also welcome something that isn't as 0/1 as the current POS Reinforce timer. Ex: Destructible modules that doesn't cripple the defender if lost, but gives some incentive to the attacker. Why? So that there is a less commiting response to blueballing than full-on invasion. "You can blueball us, but we'll raid your X, Y and Z."

2) Focus on reworking the Corp/Alliance structure to make it intuitive, flexible and powerful. Roles, bookmarks, etc all are archaic.

3) Shattered wormholes were interesting on paper, and they may still be, but apart from Ice and new ore sites they didn't offer much new. Lack of regular sites in your chain has never been the issue. For the Shattered wormholes to be coveted, they need to either have special sites with low-chance / high reward potential, like some item/ship BPC or something else I can't imagine now, but you get the idea.

4) The tech3 rebalance. This is going to be tricky, and no matter the change, someone will be angry. I hope tech3s will be useful for us after the rebalance because in terms of how we use them, there is a fairly short step down to Ishtars/Sacrileges and upwards to Command ships. That would make fights less interesting since the interesting part about Tech3 brawls are all the facets of ewar. Personally, I would not shed a single tear if nullfied subsystems were removed.

yay for axloth, and thanks

The names of corporate divisions is a property of the corporation object; individual anchorable objects don't have their own hangar names (they just re-use the corporation's). Doing what you ask is something that would need to be part of the overall POS re-work I suspect.

That said, I do wonder if we couldn't have separate sets of names for corporate hangars versus corporate wallets (without tearing the POS code apart in the process).

MDD

I'm concerned about the way how tiericide is delivered recently, leaving us with less fitting options and a general nerf of module stats (by removing superior meta4 modules). Imo this is the opposite of what I understand was intended when the project was presented at Fanfest 14.

Fixing the dumb thing where a chat window stops blinking if you hover over it. Clicking into a box no longer clears all blinking, but hovering does.